Improvement in renal function in hepatorenal syndrome with N-acetylcysteine.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Patch.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Variceal bleeding is a life-threatening complication of cirrhosis. Potential risk factors include clinical, endoscopic, and haemodynamic factors, but why bleeding occurs unpredictably in individual patients is not known. We postulate that bacterial infections in patients with variceal haemorrhage may be the critical factor that triggers bleeding. In patients with large varices and a high wall tension, the release of endotoxin into the systemic circulation during episodes of bacterial infection results in a further increase in portal pressure through the induction of endothelin and possibly vasoconstrictive cyclo-oxygenase products. The subsequent contraction of hepatic stellate cells causes a rise in intrahepatic vascular resistance. Furthermore, endotoxin-induced nitric oxide and prostacyclin, and prostacyclin induced by endothelin could inhibit platelet aggregation, which may result in a further deterioration of primary haemostasis at the level of varix. We propose that the combination of these two effects leads to the onset of variceal haemorrhage.
Bacterial infections are common complications in decompensated cirrhosis, but their relationship with hemostasis has not been studied. We prospectively assessed whether infection affects hemostasis in cirrhosis using routine hemostasis tests and thrombelastography (TEG), a global test of hemostatic function. Eighty-four cirrhotic patients (Child-Pugh B: 26; C: 58) without overt bleeding or blood-product transfusion were prospectively evaluated with routine hemostasis tests and TEG on admission and/or the first day with signs of infection and 5 days later. There were 30 patients with infection; 15 had infection on admission, and 15 developed infection in hospital. In the patients who developed infection in hospital, there was a significant deterioration in all routine hemostasis tests except platelet count (PLT) and in all TEG parameters, on the first day of infection compared with 7 +/- 3 days previously. The same parameters significantly improved from the first day of infection to day 5 and after (P <.02) only in the 22 patients whose infection resolved, while the r, k, and alpha TEG parameters significantly worsened in the 8 patients with persistent infection. In those who developed infection in hospital and were cured (n = 11), the 5-day parameters did not differ from their preinfection values. In conclusion, bacterial infections frequently impair hemostasis in decompensated cirrhotic patients. Successful treatment of infection usually restores hemostasis parameters to preinfection levels in 5 days. Thus, infection may have a role in the bleeding diathesis of cirrhosis.
Endoscopic treatment (ET) is frequently used to prevent variceal rebleeding but this still occurs in about 50% of patients. Recently, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been compared with ET in several trials. Using a meta-analysis, we evaluated randomized trials comparing TIPS to ET assessing prevention of rebleeding, survival, and the effects on resource use and the quality of patients' lives. Medical databases were searched between January 1988 and January 1999 as well as published citations and conference proceedings. Sensitivity analyses for type of publication, methodological quality score, mean duration of follow-up, type of ET, etiology, and severity of liver disease were performed. Eleven randomized trials involving 811 patients fulfilled the selection criteria. The median follow-up ranged from 10 to 32 months. Variceal rebleeding was significantly more frequent with ET (47%) compared with TIPS (19%) (odds ratio [OR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-5.2; P <.001), but there was no difference in mortality (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.71-1.34). Post-treatment encephalopathy occurred significantly less often after ET (19%) than after TIPS (34%) (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30-0.60; P <.001). In the studies showing resource use this was more extensive for TIPS. The sensitivity analyses did not alter the main conclusion, and sole comparison with endoscopic ligation did not alter these results. In conclusion, in patients with variceal bleeding, TIPS compared with ET reduces the rebleeding rate, but does not improve survival, and increases the incidence of encephalopathy in a period of 1 to 2.5 years. Thus, TIPS cannot be recommended as the first choice treatment for prevention of variceal rebleeding.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: In view of the changing nature of transjugular liver biopsy, we performed an audit of the safety, adequacy and clinical impact of such biopsies in our centre over a 2-year period from 1995 to 1997. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven transjugular biopsies were carried out in 145 patients, with prothrombin time >5 s over control and/or platelet count <50 x 10(9)/L and/or gross ascites. RESULTS: Major complications were two (1.3%) capsular perforations, which were easily plugged with coils without sequelae. Biopsy sample was adequate for histological diagnosis in 90%, inadequate in 6% and technically unsuccessful in 4% of cases. Mean biopsy size was 14.8+/-7.7 (1-51) mm. Adequacy did not differ between cases with and without cirrhosis. Transjugular biopsy had a clinical impact (specific diagnosis or influence on patient's management) in 50% of acute liver disease, 62% of chronic liver disease and 87% of transplant patients (P<0.001). In chronic liver disease, it had a significantly greater clinical impact in cases trying to establish the stage rather than diagnosis (84% vs. 35%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transjugular liver biopsy is a safe procedure for high-risk patients providing an adequate liver sample even in cirrhosis. It has a clinical impact in more than 80% of transplant patients and for staging chronic liver disease, but in only 50% (acute) or 35% (chronic) of liver disease when a diagnosis is sought.
The Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) has now become an accepted part of the therapeutic armory available to the practicing clinician. It may stop variceal bleeding when traditional endoscopic techniques have failed, and can be used as secondary prevention of variceal bleeding, as well as a treatment for intractable ascites and the Budd-Chiari syndrome. It has afforded new insights into the mechanisms of these disorders and significantly advanced our knowledge of disease pathophysiology. It has done all these things, and yet is a procedure that may be performed without interrupting the surgical field, should the patient require a transplant at a later date. In this article, the various indications for TIPS are reviewed with a critical eye. Advances in placement technique, refinement of indications, and results are all discussed. The authors present an up-to-date assessment of the clinical trials performed using this radiologic shunt, as well as their conclusions regarding the various clinical indications.
BACKGROUND: Height of portal pressure correlates with severity of alcoholic cirrhosis. Portal pressure indices are not however used routinely as predictors of survival. AIMS: To examine the clinical value of a single portal pressure measurement in predicting outcome in cirrhotic patients who have bled. METHODS: A series of 105 cirrhotic patients who consecutively underwent hepatic venous pressure measurement were investigated. The main cause of cirrhosis was alcoholic (64.8%) and prior to admission all patients had bled from varices. RESULTS: During the follow up period (median 566 days, range 10-2555), 33 patients died, and 54 developed variceal haemorrhage. Applying Cox regression analysis, hepatic venous pressure gradient, bilirubin, prothrombin time, ascites, and previous long term endoscopic treatment were the only statistically independent predictors of survival, irrespective of cirrhotic aetiology. The predictive value of the pressure gradient was much higher if the measurement was taken within the first or the second week from the bleeding and there was no association after 15 days. A hepatic venous pressure gradient of at least 16 mm Hg appeared to identify patients with a greatly increased risk of dying. CONCLUSIONS: Indirectly measured portal pressure is an independent predictor of survival in patients with both alcoholic and non-alcoholic cirrhosis. In patients with a previous variceal bleeding episode this predictive value seems to be better if the measurement is taken within the first two weeks from the bleeding episode. A greater use of this technique is recommended for the prognostic assessment and management of patients with chronic liver disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Bacterial infection is frequently diagnosed in cirrhotic patients with variceal hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of failure to control bleeding in cirrhotic patients during the first 5 days after the episode of variceal bleeding in relation to the diagnosis of bacterial infection and use of antibiotics. One hundred seventy-seven consecutive admissions for gastrointestinal bleeding in 151 patients were evaluated prospectively. From them, 163 admissions for variceal bleeding in 137 patients were included in the main analysis. Bleeding was managed in a standardized protocol using octreotide or terlipressin with sclerotherapy or band ligation for active bleeding at endoscopy. The end points were defined as in Baveno guidelines related to transfusion requirement or fresh hematemesis after 6 hours from time zero. The standardized screening protocol for bacterial infection consisted of chest radiograph and blood, urine, and ascitic fluid cultures. Active bleeding was reported at endoscopy in 86 admissions (53%). Failure to control bleeding occurred in 76 patient admissions (47%). Empirical antibiotic treatment was used in 113 admissions (69%), whereas in 81% of them (91 admissions, 56%) 102 bacterial infections were documented. Multivariate analysis showed that proven bacterial infection (P < .0001) or antibiotic use (P < .003) as well as active bleeding at endoscopy (P < .001) and Child-Pugh score (P < .02) were independent prognostic factors of failure to control bleeding. The results remained unchanged when all patient admissions with gastrointestinal bleeding of any source were included in the multivariate analysis. Bacterial infection is associated with failure to control variceal bleeding and needs to be evaluated in the planning and analysis of clinical trials.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The optimal emergency treatment for gastric fundal variceal bleeding is still unclear. In this study, the efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent/shunt (TIPS) in patients with uncontrolled gastric fundal vs. esophageal variceal bleeding was compared. METHODS: One hundred twelve consecutive patients with uncontrolled variceal bleeding required emergency TIPS, 84 with esophageal varices (EV group) unresponsive to endoscopic and vasoconstrictor therapy and 28 with gastric fundal varices (GV group) unresponsive to vasoconstrictor therapy. Clinical and biochemical data were retrieved, and the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Variceal bleeding was controlled in all patients after TIPS except for 1 in each group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of markers of disease severity, severity of bleeding, or portal hemodynamics. During a median follow-up period of 7 months, 20 in the EV group (24%) and 8 in the GV group (29%) developed clinical rebleeding. Most early rebleeding (within 7 days after TIPS) was related to esophageal ulceration secondary to previous sclerotherapy. Rates of mortality were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that emergency TIPS is equally effective in the immediate short-term control of gastric fundal variceal bleeding compared with esophageal variceal bleeding.
BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled variceal haemorrhage is the main indication for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. However, mortality is 50% for this high-risk group. We have evaluated clinical and laboratory variables prior to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in order to establish predictors of mortality, validated prospectively. METHOD: Over a 4-year period, 367 patients were admitted with variceal bleeding. In 54 patients endoscopic therapy for acute variceal bleeding failed and they had emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Failure of therapy was defined as continued bleeding after 2 endoscopy sessions (n=39) or vasoconstrictor-resistant bleeding from gastric/ectopic varices (n=15). Thirty-three variables were analysed from data available immediately prior to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients died within 6 weeks. In a multivariate analysis, 6 factors had independent prognostic value: moderate/severe ascites, requirement for ventilation, white cell blood count (WBC), platelet count (PLT), partial thromboplastin time with kaolin (PTTK) and creatinine. A prognostic index (PI) score was derived, in which presence of moderate/severe ascites, or need for ventilation, scored 1: PI=1.54 (Ascites)+1.27 (Ventilation)+1.38 Ln (WBC)+2.48 ln (PTTK)+1.55 Ln (Creat)-1.05 Ln (PLT). Using this equation, 42% (n=10) of deaths occurred in the fifth quintile (PI > or = 18.52), where the mortality was 100%. The score was prospectively validated in a further 31 patients, giving 100% positive predictive value. Eleven further patients died, including all seven with a PI >18.5. No survivors had a PI >18.3. CONCLUSION: Despite immediate control of bleeding by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, patients with uncontrolled variceal haemorrhage have a high mortality, particularly when associated with markers of advanced liver disease, sepsis and multi-organ failure. The use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is probably not justified in this subgroup. Our prognostic index can help identify such patients, and, if validated elsewhere, will help in deciding when to use transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The combination of non-selective beta-blockers and nitrates is an effective therapy for the prevention of rebleeding from oesophageal varices. However, a significant number of patients fail to respond and have further haemorrhage. It has been suggested that measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient response to long-term drug therapy may allow early selection of non-responders. We aimed to test this hypothesis in 63 patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding treated with propranolol+/-isosorbide mononitrate. METHODS: Hepatic venous pressure gradient was measured before and during treatment. Response was defined as a reduction of 20% or more in hepatic venous pressure gradient, or a fall in hepatic venous pressure gradient to 12 mmHg or less. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were evaluable: 28 responders and 16 non-responders. Hepatic venous pressure gradient fell significantly in the responder group (17.5+/-0.5 mmHg vs 12.2+/-0.5 mmHg; p<0.01) but not in the non-responders (18.0+/-1.0 vs 17.9+/-1.2 mmHg; p=n.s.). Overall, there was no difference in rebleeding rates between the two groups: responders 43%, non-responders 25%. However, rebleeding was uncommon in compliant patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, in whom the hepatic venous pressure gradient fell to less than 12 mmHg (9%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study a fall in hepatic venous pressure gradient of 20% was not a reliable predictor of clinical response. A threshold value of 12 mmHg was useful, but applied to relatively few patients.
BACKGROUND: Routine coagulation tests do not necessarily reflect haemostasis in vivo in cirrhotic patients, particularly those who have bleeding varices. Thrombelastography (TEG) can provide a global assessment of haemostatic function from initial clot formation to clot dissolution. AIM: To evaluate TEG changes in cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding and their association with early rebleeding. PATIENTS/METHODS: Twenty cirrhotic patients with active variceal bleeding had serial TEG and routine coagulation tests daily for seven days. The TEG variables before the day of rebleeding (n = 6) were compared with those of patients without rebleeding (n = 14). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the rebleeding and non-rebleeding groups were comparable apart from a higher incidence of uncontrolled infection on the day of rebleeding in the rebleeding group (p = 0.007). The patients in the rebleeding group were more hypocoagulable before the day of rebleeding as shown by longer r (42 v 24 mm, p < 0.001) and k (48 v 13 mm, p < 0.001) and smaller a (12 v 38 degrees, p < 0.001) compared with the mean of daily results of the non-rebleeding group. Routine coagulation tests, however, showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The results of serial TEG measurements suggest that hypocoagulability may be associated with early rebleeding in cirrhotic patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis survive variceal bleeding better than patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and have less bleeding at liver transplantation. Recently, patients with primary biliary cirrhosis have been found to have a higher incidence of thrombosis in the portal venous tree. We hypothesized that primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis patients may be hypercoagulable. METHODS: We used thrombelastography, which is a simple technique for evaluating whole blood clotting and fibrinolysis, to establish if hypercoagulability was present, defined by thrombelastography values greater than 2SD over controls: r<19 mm (this reflects plasma clotting factors), maximum amplitude (ma) >60 mm, and alpha angle >43 degrees (these reflect platelets and fibrinogen levels). We evaluated 47 primary biliary cirrhosis and 21 primary sclerosing cholangitis patients, 40 with non-cholestatic cirrhosis and 40 healthy subjects as control groups with thrombelastography, full blood count, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time and, fibrinogen concentrations. In those with hypercoagulability we evaluated protein S, C, anti-thrombin III levels and activated protein C phenotype. RESULTS: All three thrombelastography abnormalities present together defined hypercoagulability: these were found in 13 of 47 (28%) primary biliary cirrhosis and in nine of 21 (43%) primary sclerosing cholangitis patients independent of cirrhosis, and bilirubin concentration, but in only 2 of 40 (5%) patients with noncholestatic cirrhosis and in none of the healthy controls (p<0.03 and p<0.0002, respectively). There was no correlation between the fibrinogen concentration (which was normal in all patients) or platelet count and the thrombelastography parameters. Only six of the 22 hypercoagulable patients had lower than normal values of protein S, C or antithrombin III. Activated protein C phenotype was normal in all. CONCLUSIONS: This diffference between biliary and parenchymal liver disease may have clinical implications, which need to be defined.
Recent advances in the pharmacology of portal hypertension are reviewed, against the background of existing knowledge and current clinical research. The most recent trials are analysed, and conclusions made about the use of drugs in acute variceal haemorrhage, as well as directions for further clinical trials and research.