PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Pittrow

Publications and source records attributed to D Pittrow.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

[Metabolic syndrome and peripheral arterial occlusive disease as indicators for increased cardiovascular risk].

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The usefulness of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) or a low ankle brachial index (ABI), respectively, to identify patients with high risk for cardiovascular events has repeatedly been postulated. However, robust data on the prevalence and prognosis of such patients are missing in the primary care setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the prospective, non-interventional "German epidemiological trial on Ankle Brachial Index (getABI) at total of 6880 unselected patients > or = 65 years were observed by their General Practitioners over 3 years. Death and cardiovascular events were recorded. The definition of MetS was similar to the one of NCEP ATP III (National Cholesterol Education Program--Adult Treatment Panel III). ABI (ratio of the systolic blood pressures measured at the distal part of the calf and at the upper arm) was measured with Doppler sonography. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) was defined as ABI <0.9 or peripheral revascularization/amputation owing to PAD. Survival analyses were conducted with a Cox proportional hazard model. Hazard rate ratios (HRR, 95 % confidence intervals, CI) were multvariate adjusted. RESULTS: The observation time for the total cohort was more than 20,000 patient years (PY). Cardiovascular mortality in patients with MetS (n = 3040, 44 %) compared to patients without MetS (n = 3795; 55 %) was doubled (8.5 vs. 4.0 per 1,000 PY; HRR: 2.0; CI 1.3 - 2.9). Concomitant presence of MetS and PAD (n = 651; 9.5 %) increased the mortality risk compared to patients without both conditions (n = 3194; 46.4 %) drastically (21.1 vs. 3.0 per 1000 PY; HRR: 5.7; CI: 3.5 - 9.4). Similar significant risk increases also were noted for all-cause mortality or a combined endpoint of mortality and vascular morbidity. Further, in lower ABI categories cardiovascular event rates increased. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MetS carry a substantially increased risk of premature death, especially cardiovascular death, and therefore require intensive treatment of their risk factors. This holds especially true if concomitant PAD is present.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Unmet needs in the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia in the primary care setting in Germany.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: DETECT is a cross-sectional study of 55,518 unselected consecutive patients in 3188 representative primary care offices in Germany. In a random subset of 7519 patients, an extensive standardized laboratory program was undertaken. The study investigated the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, known risk factors (such as diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia and their co-morbid manifestation), as well as treatment patterns. The present analysis of the DETECT laboratory dataset focused on the prevalence and treatment of dyslipidemia in primary medical care in Germany. Coronary artery disease (CAD), risk categories and LDL-C target achievement rates were determined in the subset of 6815 patients according to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) ATP III Guidelines. RESULTS: Of all patients, 54.3% had dyslipidemia. Only 54.4% of the NCEP-classified dyslipidemic patients were diagnosed as 'dyslipidemic' by their physicians. Only 27% of all dyslipidemic patients (and 40.7% of the recognized dyslipidemic patients) were treated with lipid-lowering medications, and 11.1% of all dyslipidemic patients (41.4% of the patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs) achieved their LDL-C treatment goals. In conclusion, 80.3% of patients in the sample with dyslipidemia went undiagnosed, un-treated or under-treated.

Blood Chemical Analysis↗
PubMed2006

Endothelin in human autoimmune diseases with renal involvement.

Endothelin (ET)-1 is a potent renal vasoconstrictor with pro-inflammatory, profibrotic and mitogenic potential. Animal studies support a pathogenetic contribution of ET-1 and its cognate receptors in several renal manifestations of autoimmune disorders. However, data in humans are limited. The present minireview thus summarizes the observations available in humans. Similar to animal models, ET-1 is overexpressed in glomerular and tubulointerstitial lesions, which is reflected by an increased urinary excretion of ET-1. Since antagonizing the ET system has beneficial effects in experimental models, this approach may be translated to the human kidney, thus counteracting vasoconstriction, inflammation and extracellular matrix deposition during the course of human autoimmune disease.

Autoimmune Diseases↗
PubMed2006

Role of endothelin and endothelin receptor antagonists in renal disease.

Endothelin (ET)-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor peptide with pro-inflammatory, mitogenic, and pro-fibrotic properties that is closely involved in both normal renal physiology and pathology. ET-1 exerts a wide variety of biological effects, including constriction of cortical and medullary vessels, mesangial cell contraction, stimulation of extracellular matrix production, and inhibition of sodium and water reabsorption along the collecting duct, effects that are primarily mediated in an autocrine/paracrine manner. Increasing evidence indicates that the ET system is involved in an array of renal disorders. These comprise chronic proteinuric states associated with progressive glomerular and tubulointerstitial fibrosis, including diabetic and hypertensive nephropathy, glomerulonephritis and others. In addition, ET-1 is causally linked to renal disorders characterized by increased renal vascular resistance, including acute ischaemic renal failure, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, endotoxaemia, hepatorenal syndrome and others. Furthermore, derangement of the ET system may be involved in conditions associated with inappropriate sodium and water retention; for example, in congestive heart failure and hepatic cirrhosis. Both selective and non-selective ET receptor antagonist have been developed and tested in animal models with promising results. As key events in progressive renal injury like inflammation and fibrosis are mediated via both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, while constrictor effects are primarily transduced by ET(A) receptors, dual ET receptor blockade may be superior over selective ET(A) antagonism. Several compounds have been developed with remarkable effects in several models of acute and progressive renal injury. Thus, clinical studies are required to assess whether these results can be confirmed in humans, hopefully leading to novel and effective therapeutic options with few side effects.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed2005

[Prevalence and pharmacotherapy of diabetes mellitus in primary care].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: So far only incomplete epidemiological data on the management of diabetes mellitus have been available for the Federal Republic of Germany. It was the aim of this study to obtain such information from a representative cross-section of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 43549 consecutive, unselected patients (52.6% females; mean age 64.9 +/- 11.7 years) of general practitioners and internists in private practice were included in this study which was based on data provided by the general practitioners or internists during September 2001. They recorded prevalence of diabetes, hypertension and 22 other diseases, and the patients' current treatment. Also recorded were associations of other patient-related variables (age, gender, associated or resulting diseases, hypertension, micro- and macrovascular complications, obesity), with medical practitioner-related variables (medical training, use of guidelines, regional factors) and with the frequency of antidiabetic treatment (total and differentiated by class of drug). RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in this cohort was 15.6% (18.5% for males and 13.7% for females). 67.6% of the diabetics received antidiabetic medication. There was little difference, between the different age groups and between males and females, with regard to which of the various drugs were prescribed. Patients with macrovascular complications were more intensively treated with antidiabetics than those with exclusively microvascular ones. There was hardly any correlation between patterns of prescription and various practitioner characteristics (medical training, use of guidelines, regional factors). CONCLUSION: There was little differentiation in the prescription of antidiabetic medication by general practitioners/internists among an unselected patient cohort.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

[Cardiovascular high-risk constellations in primary care. DETECT Study 2003].

DETECT is a nationwide epidemiological cross-sectional and longitudinal study program in a random probability sample of 3,795 primary care settings (response rate: 60.2%). Based on a target day total assessment of n=55,518 consecutive patients (RR 93.5%) in these settings all patients underwent standardized diagnostic assessment, using self-reporting, clinical interview and laboratory measures. DETECT aims at describing the point prevalence and comorbidity of coronary heart disease (CHD), hyperlipidaemia, arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus and at identifying the behavioural, clinical, laboratory and psychological risk factors associated with these conditions. A random subset of patients (n=7,519) also completed an extensive standardized laboratory screening program and a 12-month follow-up investigation. Findings reveal a high prevalence of hypertension (36.3%), dyslipidaemia (29.1%), diabetes mellitus (14.6%) and CHD (12.4%) in primary care as well as their close association among each other. The study describes for the first time in greater detail the prevalence of specific disorders and the frequency of high-risk constellations in primary care and allows for the evaluation of various risk scores.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Current concepts for the prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and the annual incidence of VTE is 1 per 1000. The individual risk for venous thromboembolism may be substantially higher and is determined by expositional and dispositional factors. Unfractionated heparin and warfarin have been the mainstays for the prevention of VTE until the early 1980s. Bleeding complications and side effects limited the use of these agents and subsequently low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) were introduced into clinical practice. These are most commonly used for the prophylaxis and treatment of VTE today. In the last decade, the pace of development of further anticoagulants has accelerated with the introduction of new treatment regimens and new substances. In this context, novel drugs directed against clotting factor Xa (such as fondaparinux) and direct thrombin inhibitors (such as melagatran/ximelagatran) have been developed. Fondaparinux shows a favourable efficacy/safety profile and has been documented to be cost-effective compared to enoxaparin in the US and the UK.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2005

Cardiovascular risk factors in primary care: methods and baseline prevalence rates--the DETECT program.

OBJECTIVES: DETECT is an epidemiological study in primary care to examine (a) the prevalence rates and comorbidity of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and coronary heart disease (CHD), and associated conditions; (b) the frequency of behavioural and clinical risk factors for onset and progression; (c) the 12-month course and outcome; and (d) the met and unmet needs for these patients. METHODS: Three-stage, cross-sectional clinical-epidemiological study with a prospective-longitudinal component in a nationally representative sample of N = 3795 primary care settings [response rate (RR): 60.2%] and N = 55518 patients (RR: 95.5%). Patients completed a standardized assessment, including questionnaires for patients and the physician and diagnostic screening measures (i.e. blood pressure, heart rate, body mass index and waist circumference assessments). A subsample of patients (N = 7519) also completed a standardized laboratory screening program and was followed-up after 12 months. Data were weighted to adjust for non-response, regional distribution and attrition. RESULTS: (1) Doctors and patients sample can be regarded as representative for primary care settings in Germany. (2) The clinician-rated point prevalence of hypertension is highest (35.5%), followed by hyperlipidaemia (29.1%), diabetes (14.1%) and CHD (12.1%); prevalence rates of each disorder as well as their co-incidence rates increase markedly with age. (3) The vast majority (78%) of all patients revealed multiple (3+) behavioural and clinical risk factors. CONCLUSION: The findings of DETECT underline the considerable burden for primary care doctors in managing a highly morbid patient population, with predominantly complex risk factor constellations, in routine care. Our data provide, in unprecedented detail, a basis for calculating age-, gender- and risk-group-adjusted risk-factor profiles in routine care.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Patterns of antihypertensive drug utilization in primary care.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of hypertension, physicians' attitudes and practice patterns are receiving increased attention as contributors to poor blood pressure (BP) control. Thus, current use of antihypertensive drugs in primary care was analyzed and the association with selected physician and patient characteristics was assessed. METHODS: The Hypertension and Diabetes Risk Screening and Awareness (HYDRA) study is a cross-sectional point prevalence study of 45,125 primary care attendees recruited from a representative nationwide sample of 1912 primary care practices in Germany. Prescription frequencies of the various antihypertensive drugs in the individual patients were recorded by the physicians using standardized questionnaires. We assessed the association of patient variables [age, gender; co-morbidities such as diabetes, nephropathy or coronary heart disease (CHD)] and physician variables (general practitioner vs internist, guideline adherence, etc.) with drug treatment intensity and prescription patterns. RESULTS: Of all 43,549 patients for whom a physician diagnosis on hypertension or diabetes was available, 17,485 (40.1%) had hypertension. Of these hypertensive patients, 1647 (9.4%) received no treatment at all, 1191 (6.8%) received non-pharmacological measures only, and 14,647 (83.8%) were given one or more antihypertensive drugs. Drug treatment rates were lower in young patients (16-40 years: 57.4%). BP control was poor: 70.6% of all patients were not normalized, i.e., had BP >/=140/90 mmHg. Antihypertensive treatment was generally intensified with increasing age, or if complications or comorbidities were present. The use of the different drug classes was rather uniform across the various patient subgroups (e.g., by age and gender). Individualized treatment with regard to co-morbidities as recommended in guidelines was not the rule. Adherence to guidelines as self-reported by physicians as well as other physician characteristics (region, training etc.) did not result in more differentiated prescription pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the broad armamentarium of drug treatment options, physicians in primary care did not treat hypertension aggressively enough. Treatment was only intensified at a late stage, after complications had occurred. Treatment should be more differentiated in terms of coexisting morbidities such as diabetes, nephropathy, or CHD.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Recognition and management of overweight and obesity in primary care in Germany.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to the well-documented high prevalence of overweight and obesity in the general population, the prevalence, recognition rates and management by primary care physicians--as the core gatekeeper in the health care system--remains poorly studied. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To examine (1) the point prevalence of overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)) and obesity (BMI> or =30 kg/m(2)) in primary care patients, (2) prevalence patterns in patients with high-risk constellations (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, etc.), (3) doctors' recognition and interventions, as well as patients' use and perceived effectiveness of weight-loss interventions and (4) factors associated with non-treatment. METHODS: Cross-sectional point prevalence study of 45 125 unselected consecutive primary care attendees recruited from a representative nationwide sample of 1912 primary care practices. MEASURES: (1) standardized clinical appraisal of each patient by the physician (diagnostic status and recognition, severity, comorbidity, current and past interventions). (2) Patient self-report questionnaire: height and weight, illness history, past and current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, health attitudes and behaviors. RESULTS: (1) In all, 37.9% of all primary care attendees were overweight, 19.4% obese. (2) Rates for overweight and obesity were highest in patients with diabetes (43.6 and 36.7%) and hypertension (46.1 and 31.3%), followed by patients with cardiovascular disorders. Rates of overweight/obesity increased steadily by the number of comorbid conditions. (3) Doctors' recognition of overweight (20-30%) and obesity (50-65%) was low, patients' actual use of weight control interventions even lower (past 12 months: 8-11%, lifetime: 32-39%). Patient success rates were quite limited. (4) Co- and multimorbidity in particular as well as other patient and illness variables were identified as predictors for recognition, but prediction of patients' actual use of weight loss interventions was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care management of overweight and obesity is largely deficient, predominantly due to four interrelated factors: doctors' poor recognition of patients' weight status, doctors' inefficient efforts at intervention, patients' poor acceptance of such interventions and dissatisfaction with existing life-style modification strategies.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2004

Diabetes and cardiovascular risk evaluation and management in primary care: progress and unresolved issues - rationale for a nationwide primary care project in Germany.

This review highlights established and more recently recognized risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) relevant for patients seen in primary care, emphasizing the key role of diabetes mellitus type 2. Recent trends in risk factor research as well as current methods of risk stratification, and new systemic markers are discussed. Beyond the need for more forceful public health strategies to improve early recognition and intervention, the necessity of an integrated comprehensive investigation of the overall characteristics of cardiovascular disease, especially in primary care patients as a prerequisite for future concerted actions is pointed out. Based on this, a large-scale epidemiological investigation focusing on CHD and diabetes in the primary care sector is suggested.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2004

High prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and low treatment rates in elderly primary care patients with diabetes.

Representative data on peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in community-based office practice are scarce while at the same time of high interest. Thus, we aimed to determine the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), comorbidity of atherothrombotic manifestations, and treatment intensity among elderly diabetic patients in primary care. In this monitored cross-sectional study, 344 general practitioners throughout Germany determined the ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 6880 consecutive, unselected patients aged 65 years or older with bilateral Doppler ultrasound measurements. PAD was defined according to the recent American Heart Association guidelines (using the higher of the 2 systolic ankle pressures: ABI < 0.9) or peripheral revascularisation, or amputation because of PAD. Coronary events (CAD) and cerebrovascular events (CVD) were taken from the patient's history without additional diagnostic measures. Diabetes was defined according to the clinical diagnosis of the physician and/or HbA1c > or = 6.5 % and/or intake of oral antidiabetic medication and/or application of insulin. 1.743 patients were classified as diabetics: the median disease duration was 6 years (1st; 3rd quartile: 2; 11), median HbA1c 6.6 % (5.9; 7.3), mean age 72.5 +/- 5.4 years, and 51.4 % were females. Diabetics had in comparison with non-diabetics a higher prevalence of PAD defined as ABI < 0.9 (26.3 % vs. 15.3 %, univariate odds ratio 2.0 [95 % confidence interval: 1.7; 2.3]), intermittent claudication (5.1 % vs. 2.1 %, OR: 2.5 [1.9; 3.4]), known CAD (16.1 % vs. 10.6 %, OR: 1.6 [1.4; 1.9]), and known CVD (6.8 % vs. 4.8 %; OR: 1.4 [1.2; 1.8]). 57.4 % of the diabetics with previously known PAD (as only atherothrombotic manifestation) received antiplatelet therapy (vs. 75.1 % with CAD and/or CVD only). The ABI was suitable as screening measure in the primary care setting. In elderly diabetics in comparison to non-diabetics, the prevalence of PAD was very high. Despite the known benefits of antiplatelet therapy, PAD patients were less intensively treated than patients with CAD or CVD.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

The effect of irbesartan in reducing cardiovascular risk in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients: an observational study in 16,600 patients in primary care.

OBJECTIVES: As arterial hypertension substantially increases the risk of premature death, cardiovascular disease and renal insufficiency in patients with type 2 diabetes, effective and safe antihypertensive therapy is of importance. Therefore, the effect of irbesartan as monotherapy, or in fixed combination with hydrochlorothiazide, on blood pressure, metabolic parameters and microalbuminuria and the safety and tolerability of the drug were assessed. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Multicentric, prospective, open phase IV study over 3 months in 16,600 patients with the clinical diagnoses of hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Blood pressure was measured sphygmometrically and albuminuria was assessed with semi-quantitative urine dipsticks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure reduction, proportion of patients with microalbuminuria and cardiovascular risk calculated based on the SCORE score, each after a follow-up of 3 months compared to baseline. Number and nature of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The sample consisted of 51.3% men, mean age was 62.2+/-10.7 years, 53.9% of patients were overweight and 26.4% were obese. Mean SBP/DBP decrease after 3 months was 22.3/11.2 mmHg. The BP lowering effect was similar in the analyses of various subgroups (according to age group, sex, presence of micro- or macrovascular complications). Irbesartan treatment reduced the percentage of patients with microalbuminuria from 45.6% to 30.6% at 3 months (32.9% relative reduction). Metabolic parameters (lipids, blood glucose, HbA1c) and weight were improved significantly or showed trends for improvement, respectively. The mean 10-year cardiovascular risk as calculated with the SCORE score was decreased from a baseline value of 9.8% to 5.7% (-58% relative reduction). Tolerability was excellent: only 0.3% experienced an AE. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with irbesartan in patients with concomitant hypertension and type 2 diabetes led to large blood pressure reductions. In view of the renoprotective effect documented by the reduced rate of patients with albuminuria, and the improvement of further metabolic parameters, these changes translate into a reduction of cardiovascular risk.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

[IRMA-pRAcs: irbesartan in the treatment of microalbuminuria and proteinuria in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension-prospective observational study involving 38,016 patients in the general practice setting].

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In daily practice, nephropathy is diagnosed in a high percentage of type 2 diabetics, including those in whom blood pressure is well controlled. The aim of the present study was to reduce albuminuria in these patients by changing over antihypertensive treatment to the AT, blocker irbesartan. 9,838 general practitioners recruited a total of 38,016 type 2 diabetics aged at least 18 years to an open observational study: In the majority of cases, current antihyprertensive treatment was discontinued and patients given 300 mg (a small percentage received 150 mg or 75 mg) irbesartan, either as monotherapy or in combination with 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCT). The primary target outcome for efficacy was the 6-months normalization rate in patients with microalbuminuria or proteinuria; secondary target parameters included the change in protein excretion (grades: negative, 20 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg), normalisation of the systolic or diastolic blood pressure, and responder and blood pressure normalization rates. The target criterion for tolerability was the number of patients with adverse events (AE). RESULTS: 46% of the patients were controlled with 300 mg irbesartan alone, and 40% with irbesartan in combination with HCT. Albumin excretion normalized in 60.5% of the patients, improved by at least one grade in 81.9%, remained unchanged in 17.5%, and increased in 0.7% of the cases. The beneficial response was found to be independent ofthe type of prior antihypertensive treatment (including ACE-inhibitors) and was also seen in normotensive patients. Only 0.4 % of the patients reported AEs. CONCLUSION: In type 2 diabetics, treatment with 300 mg irbesartan administered alone or in combination with 12.5 mg HCT produced a pronounced nephroprotective effect.

Adolescent↗