Biomedical subjects

D R Boushey

Publications and source records attributed to D R Boushey.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1990

Anatomy and physiology of the cervical spine.

Although the lumbar spine was extensively studied from 1934 to the present, the cervical spine has received far less attention. Anatomic, physiological, biochemical, and biomechanical characteristics of the lumbar spine are often presumed to apply to the cervical spine. The differences are far too extensive to warrant such an assumed correlation. Beginning in 1955, the authors have collected 171 whole human spines and studied them anatomically, physiologically, and histologically. Reported in this article are clinically important anatomic characteristics of the nucleus pulposus, the uncinate process, nerve root exit sites, position of the motor (anterior) nerve root, relation of spinal cord volume to size and shape of the spinal canal, anatomy of the anterior and posterior spinal canal, menisci of the zygapophyseal joints, and the anatomy and clinical significance of the autonomic nervous system in the cervical spine.

Autonomic Nervous System↗

PubMed1983

The preparation of human cross sections.

Technical advances in the field of radiology, especially computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanning, have made gross anatomical cross-sections increasingly important in understanding the relationships of internal structures. Since 1940, the Anatomy Program at the University of Vermont has developed and used cross-sections of the entire human body in teaching predoctoral, postdoctoral, and allied health professionals. This paper describes in detail the process through which specimens are selected, embalmed, frozen, sectioned, and displayed. Kaiserling's Method is used for fixation and preservation of the specimens, which are then housed in appropriate display containers. Specimens prepared over forty years ago in the manner described in this paper are still in use.

Adult↗

PubMed1977

The painful shoulder.

The shoulder, a very common site of pain syndromes in medical practice, lends itself well to precise clinical analysis and identification of the pain-sensitive structure or structures. Once identified, rational and effective management can be applied, associated with predictably good prognosis. Early identification of the emerging specific syndrome is important in decreasing the duration of the clinical disorder and in achieving optimum return of shoulder function. Laboratory and X-ray studies are not commonly required in diagnosis and management. There are a confusing variety of names attached to the many shoulder pain syndromes; however, there are two most common categories. One is associated with severe pain but little or no limitation of shoulder movement (at least passive movement), in which the pain-sensitive structure is tendon or tendon sheath; the other is associated with both pain and limitation of active and passive motion, in which the pain-sensitive structures are capsule, bursa, and synovium as well as muscle and multiple tendons.

Arm↗