PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D R Dvorak

Publications and source records attributed to D R Dvorak.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Selective abolition of OFF responses in kainic acid-lesioned chicken retina.

When ganglion cell responses were recorded from optic axons in the superficial layers of the chicken optic tectum, the responses recorded are predominantly ON-OFF transient, with some ON transient, and rare OFF transient responses. Several weeks after excitotoxic lesion of the retina with 40 nmol of kainic acid injected intravitreally, only ON transient responses could be recorded from the contralateral optic tectum. ON response latency and threshold were not affected. At low light intensities responses in the kainic acid-lesioned retinas showed a sustained component which was not detected in control retinas, but at high light intensities, the sustained component disappeared and the responses were extremely transient. The disappearance of the OFF responses seems to be due to elimination of the OFF component of the responses of cells which are normally ON-OFF transient, rather than the silencing of these cells, leaving only the normally ON transient cells. Morphological evidence suggests that approximately two thirds of the bipolar cells and most amacrine cells are destroyed by the kainic acid lesion (Ingham and Morgan, Neuroscience, 9 (1983) 165-181), and pharmacological logic (Morgan, Prog. Retinal Res., 2 (1983) 247-266) suggests that the missing bipolar cells should be OFF bipolar cells. These results therefore suggest that ON-OFF transient cells receive direct input from bipolar cells, which determines their basic response type. These results also suggest that amacrine cells have little if any role to play in the generation of the basic centre responses of these ON-OFF transient ganglion cells, and that while amacrine cells may have a role in the generation of transient responses in the inner plexiform layer, transient responses can be generated without the intervention of amacrine cells, particularly at high intensities.

Animals↗

Identification of kainic and quisqualic acid receptors on inner retinal cells of the salamander Ambystoma mexicanum.

The presence of kainic (KA) and quisqualic acid (QA) receptors on inner retinal neurones of the axolotl Ambystoma mexicanum has been studied using intracellular recording techniques. In the presence of CoCl2, which blocks neurotransmitter release, KA and QA depolarized the membrane. The minimum concentration of KA that induced a response was 1 microM and a maximum response was obtained with 10 microM (EC50: 3 microM). The operating range of QA was between 0.5 and 5 microM with an EC50 of 1 microM. These data show that inner retinal cells of the axolotl are sensitive to KA and QA. Cis-2,3-piperidine dicarboxylic acid (PDA, 3 mM) completely blocked responses to 5 microM KA, but not those induced by 2 microM QA. This suggests that the KA- and QA-sensitive receptors on inner retinal cells of the salamander are pharmacologically different and that PDA can be a valuable tool in distinguishing KA- and QA-sensitive receptors on these neurones.

Ambystoma↗

Push-pull effect of surround illumination on excitatory and inhibitory inputs to mudpuppy retinal ganglion cells.

1. Changes in membrane potential and conductance were measured in on-centre and off-centre ganglion cells during the responses to illumination of different portions of the receptive field. 2. In on-centre ganglion cells the sustained depolarizing response to steady illumination of the receptive field centre was associated with a net increase in conductance. In the presence of centre illumination, stimulation of the surround with an annulus of light caused a hyperpolarization and a net decrease in conductance, and the reversal potential of the light-evoked response was shifted in a negative direction. In the absence of centre illumination the same annular stimulus caused a hyperpolarization and a net increase in conductance. 3. In off-centre ganglion cells the sustained hyperpolarizing response to centre illumination was associated with a net increase in conductance. In the presence of centre illumination, stimulation of the surround with an annulus caused a depolarization and a net decrease in conductance, and the reversal potential of the light-evoked response was shifted in a positive direction. In the absence of centre illumination the same annulus caused a depolarization and a net increase in conductance. 4. The results indicate that illumination of the receptive field surround can affect both the excitatory and inhibitory sustained inputs to a given ganglion cell in a 'push-pull' manner, by decreasing the synaptic input that was increased by centre illumination and increasing the synaptic input of opposite sign. The relative effect of a given surround illumination on these two inputs, and hence the sign and magnitude of the net conductance change, varied with the amount of centre illumination.

Action Potentials↗

A physiologically active kainic acid-preferring receptor in chicken retina.

Neurotoxicity induced by intravitreal injections of kainic acid in the chicken retina was effectively antagonized by piperidine 2,3-dicarboxylic acid and to a lesser extent D-gamma-glutamylglycine. 2-Amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid and glutamic acid diethyl ester were much less effective antagonists. These effects probably result from interactions with a kainic acid-preferring receptor localized on the OFF-centre bipolar cells. Piperidine 2,3-dicarboxylic acid and D-gamma-glutamylglycine also blocked selectively the OFF-responses of ganglion cells while glutamic acid diethyl ester was without effect. 2-Amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid rapidly blocked ON and, much more slowly, OFF-responses. These results are consistent with a role for kainic acid-preferring receptors located on the OFF-centre bipolar cells in chicken retina in physiological transmission between photoreceptors and the OFF-centre bipolar cells.

2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate↗

Strychnine blocks transient but not sustained inhibition in mudpuppy retinal ganglion cells.

Transient and sustained inhibitory synaptic inputs to on-centre, off-centre, and on-off ganglion cells in the mudpuppy retina were studied using intracellular recording in the superfused eye-cup preparation. When chemical transmission was blocked with 4 mM-Co2+, application of either glycine or gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) caused a hyperpolarization and conductance increase in all ganglion cells. For both amino acids, the responses were dose dependent in the range 0.05-10 mM, with a half-maximal response at about 0.7 mM. Glycine and GABA sensitivities were very similar in all three types of ganglion cells. The response to applied glycine was selectively antagonized by 10(-5) M-strychnine and the response to applied GABA was selectively antagonized by 10(-5) M-picrotoxin. In all ganglion cells, 10(-5) M-strychnine eliminated the transient inhibitory events which occur at the onset and termination of a light stimulus. The block of transient inhibition was associated with a relative depolarization of membrane potential and decrease in conductance at these times. Strychnine had no effect on membrane potential or conductance in darkness or during sustained inhibitory responses to light. Picrotoxin (10(-5) M) did not block transient inhibitory events in any ganglion cells, but did affect other components of their responses. The results suggest that in all three classes of ganglion cells transient inhibition, but not sustained inhibition, may be mediated by glycine or a closely related substance.

Animals↗

Intravitreal kainic acid permanently eliminates off-pathways from chicken retina.

Kainic acid rapidly suppresses both ON- and OFF-visually evoked responses in the tectum after injection into the vitreous of chicken eyes. One week after injection the OFF-responses were still suppressed, while ON-responses were detected of similar magnitude but of simplified form to those of control eyes. It is suggested that kainic acid selectively destroys OFF- rather than ON-bipolar cells, while the simplification of the ON-responses is due to the destruction of amacrine cells.

Animals↗

Sustained and transient synaptic inputs to on-off ganglion cells in the mudpuppy retina.

Synaptic inputs to on-off ganglion cells in mudpuppy retina were studied by measuring current-voltage relations in darkness, during different phases of the response to light, and in the presence of 4 mM-Co2+. The addition of Co2+ to the bathing medium usually caused a hyperpolarization of the membrane potential in darkness and an increase in input resistance, indicating that on-off ganglion cells receive tonic excitatory synaptic input in darkness. Other results suggest that an additional synaptic input, with a reversal potential near the dark potential, may also be active in darkness. At the onset of a light stimulus in the receptive field centre all on-off ganglion cells responded with transient excitatory and inhibitory synaptic events, both of which were due to increases in conductance. Similar transient excitatory and inhibitory events occurred at the termination of the light stimulus. In about one-half of the on-off ganglion cells studied the synaptic activity during steady illumination was the same as in darkness. In the remaining cells steady illumination caused an increase in sustained inhibition.

Action Potentials↗

Sustained synaptic input to ganglion cells of mudpuppy retina.

1. Intracellular responses were recorded from on-centre and off-centre ganglion cells in isolated eyecups of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus.2. Current-voltage relations were measured in darkness, during illumination of the receptive field centre, and after chemically mediated synaptic inputs were blocked by 4 mM-cobalt chloride.3. In on-centre cells the membrane potential in darkness was -56+/-6 mV (mean+/-S.D.). Addition of Co(2+) resulted in an average depolarization of 10 mV and an average decrease in conductance of 2.1 nS. These results suggest that in darkness on-centre cells are tonically inhibited by synaptic input which increases conductance and has a reversal potential more negative than the dark membrane potential. In off-centre cells the membrane potential in darkness was -46+/-5 mV. Addition of Co(2+) caused an average hyperpolarization of 6 mV and an average decrease in conductance of 1.5 nS. These results suggest that in darkness off-centre cells receive a tonic excitatory input which increases conductance and has a reversal potential more positive than the dark membrane potential.4. In on-centre cells light causes a sustained depolarization. This response involves an increase in a tonic excitatory input which increases conductance and has a reversal potential more positive than the dark membrane potential.5. In off-centre cells, light causes a sustained hyperpolarization. This response involves an increase in a sustained inhibitory input which increases conductance and has a reversal potential more negative than the dark membrane potential.6. The depolarizing off-response of off-centre cells is associated with an increase in an excitatory input which increases conductance and has a reversal potential more positive than the dark membrane potential. This response may be due to a temporary increase in the excitatory input which is tonically active in darkness or may reflect an additional excitatory input.7. It is suggested that in both on- and off-centre ganglion cells the balance of sustained excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs determines the resting potential in darkness. Centre illumination alters the balance of these inputs, by increasing one and decreasing the other, to produce the characteristic sustained light responses.8. The possible presynaptic sources of the sustained excitatory and inhibitory inputs are discussed.

Animals↗