PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D R Gandara

Publications and source records attributed to D R Gandara.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Advanced bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: a phase II trial of paclitaxel by 96-hour infusion (SWOG 9714): a Southwest Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: There are no published prospective trials of chemotherapy for advanced bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), a subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer for which there is no current standard therapy. This phase II study assesses the efficacy and toxicity of 96-h paclitaxel in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced BAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or stage IV BAC were eligible. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 35 mg/m2/24 h continuously infused over 96 h (days 1-4) every 21 days for up to six courses. RESULTS: A total of 58 eligible patients were enrolled. The objective response rate was 14% (all partial responses, 9% confirmed); 40% of patients demonstrated stable disease. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 5 and 12 months, respectively. Grade 3 or greater toxicities included neutropenia/granulocytopenia (43%), febrile neutropenia (12%), infection (22%), and stomatitis/pharyngitis (10%); there were five treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: S9714 represents the first prospective multi-institutional cooperative group trial focusing on treatment outcomes in BAC. Studies targeting this population are feasible, and while first-line paclitaxel administered as a prolonged infusion is active in this setting, toxicities limits the utility of this regimen. S9714 serves as a historical control for BAC patients against which future therapeutic approaches can be compared.

Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar↗
PubMed2002

Quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a Southwest Oncology Group randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The main purpose of this paper is to present the results of a randomized trial comparing the effects of two chemotherapy regimens on the Quality of life (QOL) of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Trials in advanced stage disease represent an important treatment context for QOL assessment. A second purpose of this paper is to examine methods for handling the level of missing data commonly observed in the advanced stage disease context. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin plus vinorelbine or carboplatin plus paclitaxel. The QOL of 222 patients was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) prior to randomization; follow-up assessments occurred at 13 and 25 weeks. Three methods were used to analyze the QOL data: (1) cross-sectional analysis of four patient categories (improved, stable, missing, and declined) based on changes in the FACT-L score, (2) a mixed linear model, and (3) a pattern mixture model. The longitudinal analyses addressed two potential data biases. RESULTS: Questionnaire submission rates were 91% at baseline, 68% at 13 weeks, and 47% at 25 weeks. The cross-sectional and mixed linear model analyses did not show significant differences by treatment arm in patient-reported QOL. The pattern mixture model analysis, more appropriate given non-ignorable missing data, also found no statistically significant effect of treatment on patient QOL. CONCLUSION: We present a sensitivity analysis approach with multiple methods for analyzing treatment effects on patient QOL in the presence of substantial, non-ignorable missing data in an advanced stage disease clinical trial. We conclude that the two treatment arms did not differ statistically in their effects on patient QOL over a 25-week treatment period.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2001

Sequential combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: carboplatin and gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this Phase II study was to evaluate the concept of sequential chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) by the administration of carboplatin plus gemcitabine followed by of paclitaxel. METHODS: Patients with Stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC and a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) performance status (PS) of 0--2 were eligible. Therapy consisted of three cycles of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 5.5 mg/mL per minute) on Day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days followed by three cycles of paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) every 21 days. RESULTS: Of the 37 eligible patients, 81% had Stage IV disease, and 27% had a PS of 2; all were assessable for survival and toxicity; 32 patients were assessable for response. After treatment with carboplatin plus gemcitabine, there were no complete responses (CRs) and eight partial responses (PRs) (response rate [RR], 25%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 11--43%). The best overall response was two CRs and eight PRs (RR, 31%; 95% CI, 16--50%). The median survival time was 9.5 months, the 1-year survival rate was 36% (95% CI, 26--44%), the 2-year survival rate was 11% (95% CI, 3--25%), and the median time to disease progression was 4.9 months. The median survivals were 11.2 months for patients with a PS of 0--1 and 6.4 months for patients with a PS of 2. Noncumulative, reversible thrombocytopenia was the principal toxicity with carboplatin/gemcitabine therapy. Paclitaxel therapy was well tolerated, and moderate (Grade 3) neutropenia was the primary toxic effect. One cardiac death occurred, possibly related to paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to evaluate planned sequential chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. Carboplatin plus gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel was well tolerated and resulted in promising survival in this patient population. This pilot experience forms the basis for an ongoing SWOG trial. Cancer 2001;92:146-52. Published 2001 American Cancer Society.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non--small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial.

PURPOSE: This randomized trial was designed to determine whether paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) offered a survival advantage over vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VC) for patients with advanced non--small-cell lung cancer. Secondary objectives were to compare toxicity, tolerability, quality of life (QOL), and resource utilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred two patients received VC (vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2)/wk and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2)/d, day 1 every 28 days) and 206 patients received PC (paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) over 3 hours with carboplatin area under the curve of 6, day 1 every 21 days). Patients completed QOL questionnaires at baseline, 13 weeks, and 25 weeks. Resource utilization forms were completed at five time points through 24 months. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar between the groups. The objective response rate was 28% in the VC arm and 25% in the PC arm. Median survival was 8 months in both arms, with 1-year survival rates of 36% and 38%, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia (P =.002) and neutropenia (P =.008) occurred more frequently on the VC arm. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting were higher on the VC arm (P =.001, P =.007), and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was higher on the PC arm (P <.001). More patients on the VC arm discontinued therapy because of toxicity (P =.001). No difference in QOL was observed. Overall costs on the PC arm were higher than on the VC arm because of drug costs. CONCLUSION: PC is equally efficacious as VC for the treatment of advanced non--small-cell lung cancer. PC is less toxic and better tolerated but more expensive than VC. New treatment strategies should be pursued.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Randomized phase III intergroup trial of isotretinoin to prevent second primary tumors in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Promising data have suggested that retinoid chemoprevention may help to control second primary tumors (SPTs), recurrence, and mortality of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: We carried out a National Cancer Institute (NCI) Intergroup phase III trial (NCI #I91-0001) with 1166 patients with pathologic stage I NSCLC (6 weeks to 3 years from definitive resection and no prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy). Patients were randomly assigned to receive a placebo or the retinoid isotretinoin (30 mg/day) for 3 years in a double-blind fashion. Patients were stratified at randomization by tumor stage, histology, and smoking status. The primary endpoint (time to SPT) and the secondary endpoints (times to recurrence and death) were analyzed by log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 3.5 years, there were no statistically significant differences between the placebo and isotretinoin arms with respect to the time to SPTs, recurrences, or mortality. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of isotretinoin versus placebo was 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.78 to 1.49) for SPTs, 0.99 (95% CI = 0.76 to 1.29) for recurrence, and 1.07 (95% CI = 0.84 to 1.35) for mortality. Multivariate analyses showed that the rate of SPTs was not affected by any stratification factor. Rate of recurrence was affected by tumor stage (HR for T(2) versus T(1) = 1.77 [95% CI = 1.35 to 2.31]) and a treatment-by-smoking interaction (HR for treatment-by-current-versus-never-smoking status = 3.11 [95% CI = 1.00 to 9.71]). Mortality was affected by tumor stage (HR for T(2) versus T(1) = 1.39 [95% CI = 1.10 to 1.77]), histology (HR for squamous versus nonsquamous = 1.31 [95% CI = 1.03 to 1.68]), and a treatment-by-smoking interaction (HR for treatment-by-current-versus-never-smoking = 4.39 [95% CI = 1.11 to 17.29]). Mucocutaneous toxicity (P<.001) and noncompliance (40% versus 25% at 3 years) were higher in the isotretinoin arm than in the placebo arm. CONCLUSIONS: Isotretinoin treatment did not improve the overall rates of SPTs, recurrences, or mortality in stage I NSCLC. Secondary multivariate and subset analyses suggested that isotretinoin was harmful in current smokers and beneficial in never smokers.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment.

PURPOSE: Well-conducted cancer clinical trials are essential for improving patient outcomes. Unfortunately, only 3% of new cancer patients participate in clinical trials. Barriers to patient accrual in cancer clinical trials must be identified and overcome to increase patient participation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively tracked factors that potentially affected patient accrual into cancer clinical trials at the University of California Davis Cancer Center. Oncologists seeing new outpatients were asked to complete questionnaires regarding patient characteristics and the physician's decision-making on patient eligibility, protocol availability, and patient opinions on participation. Statistical analysis was performed to correlate these parameters with subsequent protocol accrual. RESULTS: There were 276 assessable patients. At the initial visits, physicians did not consider clinical trials in 38% (105/276) of patients principally because of a perception of protocol unavailability and poor performance status. Physicians considered 62% (171/276) of patients for participation in clinical trials. Of these, only 53% (91/171) had an appropriate protocol available for site and stage of disease. Seventy-six of 90 patients (84%) with available protocols met eligibility criteria for a particular study. Only 39 of 76 patients (51%) agreed to participate in cancer clinical trials, for an overall accrual rate of 14% (39/276). The remainder (37/76, 49%) declined trial participation despite meeting eligibility criteria. The most common reasons were a desire for other treatment (34%), distance from the cancer center (13%), patient refusal to disclose reason (11%), and insurance denial (8%). Patients with private insurance were less likely to enroll in clinical trials compared to those with government-funded insurance (OR, 0.34; P =.03; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.9). CONCLUSION: Barriers to cancer clinical trial accrual can be prospectively identified and addressed in the development and conduct of future studies, which may potentially lead to more robust clinical trials enrollment. Investigation of patient perceptions regarding the clinical trials process and the role of third party-payers is warranted.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Twenty-two years of phase III trials for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: sobering results.

PURPOSE: To determine the changes in clinical trials and outcomes of patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated on phase III randomized trials initiated in North America from 1973 to 1994. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Phase III trials for patients with advanced-stage NSCLC were identified through a search of the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program database from 1973 to 1994, contact with Cooperative Groups, and by literature search of MEDLINE. Patients with advanced NSCLC treated during a similar time interval were also examined in the SEER database. Trends were tested in the number of trials, in the number and sex of patients entered on the trials, and in survival over time. RESULTS: Thirty-three phase III trials were initiated between 1973 and 1994. Twenty-four trials (73%) were initiated within the first half of this period (1973 to 1983) and accounted for 5,359 (64%) of the 8,434 eligible patients. The median number of patients treated per arm of the trials rose from 77 (1973 to 1983) to 121 (1984 to 1994) (P <.001). Five trials (15%) showed a statistically significant difference in survival between treatment arms, with a median prolongation of the median survival of 2 months (range, 0.7 to 2.7 months). CONCLUSION: Analysis of past trials in North America shows that the prolongation in median survival between two arms of a randomized study was rarely in excess of 2 months. Techniques for improved use of patient resources and appropriate trial design for phase III randomized therapeutic trials with patients with advanced NSCLC need to be developed.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Activity of high-dose toremifene plus cisplatin in platinum-treated non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II California Cancer Consortium Trial.

PURPOSE: Although cisplatin is an important agent in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), de novo resistance is common and acquired resistance emerges rapidly during therapy. Proposed mediators of platinum resistance include the protein kinase C (PKC) signal transduction pathway and associated c-FOS overexpression. While estrogen administration has been reported to upregulate PKC and c-FOS expression, the triphenylethylenes tamoxifen and toremifene potentiate platinum cytotoxicity by inhibition of PKC. Downregulation of c-FOS expression has been reported to result from PKC inhibition. In view of these findings, we hypothesized that toremifene would reverse platinum resistance and that this interaction would be influenced by tumor estrogen receptor (ER) status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phase II trial of high-dose toremifene (600 mg orally daily on days 1-7) plus cisplatin (50 mg/m2 intravenously on days 4 and 11) every 28 days in NSCLC patients was conducted. A group of 30 patients with metastatic NSCLC who had been previously treated with platinum-based therapy were enrolled. RESULTS: All of the 30 patients were assessable for toxicity and 28 for tumor response. Therapy was well tolerated with minimal hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity. Common toxicity criteria grade 3 hematologic toxicity was seen in only three patients. Five patients achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 18% (95% CI 6-37). Median overall survival was 8.1 months (95% CI 5.4-17). To assess PKC, ER, and c-Fos expression by immunohistochemistry, 12 informative pretreatment patient tumor specimens were obtained. Four patient tumor specimens were positive for one or both PKC isoforms (alpha and epsilon) while c-Fos was overexpressed in three. None of the responding patient tumors exhibited c-FOS or PKC-epsilon overexpression. ER expression was found to be infrequent (8%), contrasting with previous reports in this tumor type. CONCLUSION: While this phase II study indicates that high-dose toremifene plus cisplatin is feasible, active, and well tolerated in NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum compounds, the mechanism of action remains unclear. Further study of this regimen is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Dolastatin-10 in metastatic melanoma: a phase II and pharmokinetic trial of the California Cancer Consortium.

Dolastatin-10 is a novel pentapeptide agent originally isolated from the marine mollusk Dolabella auricularia with a mechanism of antitumor activity that involves the inhibition of microtubule assembly. We performed a Phase II trial of Dolastatin-10, 400 microg/m2 in patients with advanced melanoma who had received no prior chemotherapy. Dolastatin-10 pharmokinetics were evaluated in a subset of patients following courses 1 and 2. Twelve patients were treated with a median of 2 cycles of Dolastatin-10, and no patient experienced an objective response. The only grade >2 toxicities were grade 3 neutropenia uncomplicated by infection, occurring in 4 patients following the first treatment cycle. The total systemic clearance and volume of distribution at steady-state were 2.61 +/- 1.9 L/h/m2 and 28.4 +/- 13 L/m2, respectively. Due to prolonged terminal elimination. Dolastatin-10 plasma concentrations of greater than 1 nM were sustained for 24 h in all patients studied. Dolastatin-10 is unlikely to have substantial activity in the treatment of melanoma.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Gemcitabine in combination with new platinum compounds: an update.

Combinations of gemcitabine (Gemzar) with cisplatin (Platinol) are among the most active new chemotherapy regimens developed for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Carboplatin (Paraplatin) is a platinum analog devoid of many of the nonhematologic toxicities associated with cisplatin. Although few direct comparisons have been made, when administered by area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) dosing, carboplatin is probably equivalent to cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and provides an improved therapeutic index. Based on its favorable toxicity profile, carboplatin has supplanted cisplatin for use in combination with paclitaxel in several different tumor types. Initial trials combining gemcitabine and carboplatin using standard days 1, 8, and 15 dosing of gemcitabine suggested that thrombocytopenia was problematic. More recently, 21-day schedules in which gemcitabine is administered only on days 1 and 8 have demonstrated both efficacy and improved toxicity profiles. Here we review recent studies investigating gemcitabine plus carboplatin and preliminary data regarding combinations of gemcitabine with the new platinum analog oxaliplatin.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed2001

Neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant or preoperative therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have demonstrated the feasibility, tolerability and activity of this approach. Three randomized trials have reported improved survival in patients with stage III NSCLC treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgical resection compared to surgery alone. Combinations of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus thoracic radiotherapy have also been investigated, generally resulting in higher rates of pathologic response, but higher toxicity rates as well. The best approach to neoadjuvant therapy remains to be determined and may well be substage dependent. In bulky stage III NSCLC, the role of surgery itself remains unclear and is the subject of an ongoing intergroup trial in the US. Regardless, neoadjuvant therapy has emerged as an important paradigm for clinical research since it serves as an in vivo test of chemosensitivity in patients, and represents a 'window of opportunity' for testing new chemotherapeutic agents and novel strategies. Among the new chemotherapeutic agents being investigated in this setting is docetaxel, one of the most active agents in first- and second-line chemotherapy of NSCLC, and a potent radiosensitizer. Preliminary studies have confirmed the feasibility of integrating docetaxel into neoadjuvant treatment strategies and encouraging results have been reported.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2001

Integration of new chemotherapeutic agents into chemoradiotherapy for stage III non--small cell lung cancer: focus on docetaxel.

Randomized clinical trials have shown that combinations of chemotherapy plus thoracic radiation improve survival compared with radiotherapy alone in stage III non--small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Furthermore, two recent studies have concluded that concurrent chemoradiotherapy produces superior results to sequential administration. Dependent on the dose and schedule used, chemotherapy may contribute by eradicating distant micrometastases by improving local control as a radiosensitizer, or through both mechanisms. In general, sequential approaches in which full-dose platinum-based chemotherapy precedes thoracic radiation or surgery have improved outcome by impacting distant metastases. In contrast, concurrent chemoradiotherapy using low-dose cisplatin is reported to improve survival by reducing local recurrence without an impact on distant failure rates. In view of these observations, chemoradiotherapy strategies integrating both radiosensitizing agents and dose levels of chemotherapy effective against micrometastases may prove to be most efficacious. Because distant metastases remain the major site of failure, it also is likely that more effective chemotherapy will be required to further improve the current level of response and survival. Fortunately, several newly available chemotherapeutic agents are both highly active against NSCLC and are potent radiosensitizers. In this report we review recent data regarding integration of new chemotherapeutic agents into chemoradiotherapy programs in stage III NSCLC, focusing on trials investigating docetaxel. Encouraging results, including those of the Southwest Oncology Group trial 9504, suggest that docetaxel will play a major role in the future of combined-modality therapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 9):26-32.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed2001

Cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in untreated patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of the Southwest Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel (PET) in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Chemo-naive adult patients with a performance status (PS) of 0-2 and adequate organ function were eligible. Patients received cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v., etoposide 80 mg/m-2 i.v., and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) i.v. over a 3-h period on day 1 followed by etoposide 160 mg/m(2) p.o. on days 2 and 3 every 21 days for six cycles. G-CSF 5 microg/kg was injected s.c. on days 4-14. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were assessable. The median age was 60 years; 50% were male, 78% had PS of 0-1, 28% had PS of 2, 53% had multiple sites, and 13% had brain involvement. The overall response rate was 57% with 10 (12%) of 84 patients achieving a complete response. Median progression-free survival was 6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5-7 months] with a median survival of 11 months (95% CI, 8-13 months) and a 1-year survival rate of 43% (95% CI, 33-54%). Six patients (7%) died from toxicity. Grade 5 toxicity occurred in 3 (14%) of 22 patients (with a PS of 2) versus 3 (5%) of 61 patients (with a PS of 0-1; P, not significant). Grade 4 neutropenia developed in 40% of patients. Grade 3 nonhematological toxicities were primarily nausea (20%), vomiting (16%), and fatigue (14%). CONCLUSION: The survival result achieved was superior to prior SWOG experiences; however, the toxic death rate was unacceptably high in PS-2 patients. These results provide the largest database for the ongoing randomized Intergroup trial comparing PET to cisplatin+etoposide in PS-0-1 patients with ES-SCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Control of high-dose-cisplatin-induced emesis with an all-oral three-drug antiemetic regimen.

In this pilot trial, the antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of an all-oral antiemetic combination in the prevention of both acute and delayed nausea and vomiting following high-dose cisplatin was evaluated. Fifty-two patients receiving cisplatin (median dose 100 mg/m2) were entered. Patients received (1) 60 min prior to cisplatin: prochlorperazine spansule 15 mg, dexamethasone 20 mg, granisetron 2 mg; (2) 12 h after cisplatin: prochlorperazine spansule 15 mg, dexamethasone 10 mg; (3) on days 2 and 3: prochlorperazine spansule 15 mg b.i.d., dexamethasone 8 mg b.i.d.; (4) on days 4 and 5: dexamethasone 4 mg b.i.d. All antiemetics were administered orally. The study period was the 120 h after cisplatin administration. The primary efficacy end-point was complete control (no vomiting, retching or antiemetic rescue) of delayed emesis (24-120 h after cisplatin). Complete control of delayed emesis was achieved in 26 patients (53%). Nineteen patients (39%) noted no delayed nausea. Complete control of acute emesis (24 h after cisplatin) was attained in 44 patients (86%). The no nausea rate during the first 24 h was 74%. Overall, 39 patients (80%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their outcome. Treatment was well tolerated with infrequent and minor adverse events. In conclusion, an all-oral combination of granisetron, dexamethasone and prochlorperazine is a highly effective and well-tolerated regimen for preventing acute cisplatin-induced emesis. Control of delayed emesis was not better than with current standard treatment, and more effective approaches are needed.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

A phase II trial of etoposide, leucovorin, 5-FU, and interferon alpha 2b (ELFI) + G-CSF for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study (SWOG 9413).

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapeutic treatments using combinations of etoposide, leucovorin and 5-FU (ELF) have shown activity in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. Interferon alpha 2b is known to have antiproliferative effects on several cell lines and has well documented in vitro evidence of synergism with 5-FU. It was postulated that the combination of ELF and interferon alpha 2b would improve response rates and survival in patients with pancreas cancer. METHODS: Fifty-five eligible patients with locally-advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received a regimen consisting of: i.v. leucovorin at 300 mg/m2/day on Days 1-3 (of 28-day cycle), i.v. etoposide at 80 mg/m2/day on Days 1-3, i.v. 5-FU at 500 mg/m2/day on Days 1-3, subcutaneous interferon alpha 2b at 3 million units TIW, and subcutaneous G-CSF at 5 microg/kg/day on Days 4-14 (or until WBC exceeds 10,000/microl). Patients with no evidence of disease progression continued on treatment for a total of 6 cycles. RESULTS: Complete response was demonstrated in 1 patient, partial response in 5 patients (11% confirmed response rate). The median survival was 5 months, and the six-month survival rate was 40%. Ten patients completed all 6 cycles of treatment. Toxicity-related dose delays and reductions were necessary for most patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although the combination of ELF and interferon alpha 2b (ELFI) has modest activity in pancreatic cancer, it is a toxic and complex regimen that is not superior to other currently available approaches for the chemotherapeutic management of pancreatic cancer. ELFI cannot be recommended as a standard therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Activity of docetaxel in platinum-treated non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a phase II multicenter trial.

PURPOSE: Although several new chemotherapeutic agents are promising as primary therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), few have demonstrated activity in platinum-refractory disease. Based on encouraging results reported in two single-institution studies of docetaxel in this setting, we performed a multicenter phase II trial evaluating this novel taxane in previously treated NSCLC patients prospectively categorized by platinum response status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy received docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) intravenously over 1 hour, repeated every 21 days, accompanied by dexamethasone 8 mg orally twice daily for 5 days. Forty-seven patients (59%) were defined as platinum-refractory based on response status to prior therapy. RESULTS: The median number of cycles delivered per patient was four (range, one to 21 cycles). Partial response was observed in 13 (16%) of 80 of patients, with similar response rates in platinum-sensitive and platinum-refractory patients. The median survival time was 7 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 25%. Docetaxel was relatively well tolerated in this previously treated population. Grade IV neutropenia was common in patients (77%) but typically of brief duration. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 11 patients (14%), with no fatal infections. Severe fluid retention was rare (4% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter phase II trial confirms antitumor activity and encouraging survival with docetaxel therapy in platinum-treated and platinum-refractory NSCLC. To validate these results, a phase III trial randomizing platinum-treated patients to docetaxel or best supportive care is underway.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Gemcitabine/carboplatin combination regimens: importance of dose schedule.

Platinum compounds, either cisplatin (Platinol) or carboplatin (Paraplatin), in combination with a number of new chemotherapeutic agents, have demonstrated improved response or survival compared to cisplatin alone or older platinum-based regimens. Gemcitabine (Gemzar)-platinum combinations are of particular interest because of their interactive mechanisms of action, demonstrated preclinical synergism, and the single-agent activity of gemcitabine. Indeed, gemcitabine and cisplatin regimens have proven to be among the most efficacious in the palliative treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In view of the reduced nonhematologic toxicities associated with the platinum analogue, carboplatin, several combinations of new agents and carboplatin have been developed and incorporated into clinical practice. This article describes recent clinical trials evaluating gemcitabine plus carboplatin, and the impact of the dosing schedule on the feasibility and tolerability of this combination.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗