PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D R THOMAS

Publications and source records attributed to D R THOMAS.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1963

Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer.

Stimulus generalization has been observed for discriminative, eliciting, and emotional functions of stimuli. In our study, in order to investigate the generalization of the reinforcing function of stimuli, pigeons were trained in a Skinner box to peck at an unlighted key to obtain aperiodic, brief exposures of light at a wavelength of 550 mmicro, the positive conditioned reinforcer, which was immediately followed by food reward. Testing in extinction, we obtained generalization gradients for the number of responses and the time the pigeons expended to produce exposures on the unlighted key of 550 mmicro, 530 mmicro) 510 mmicro, or no light. This finding suggests that stimulus generalization occurs with all functions of stimuli.

Animals↗
PubMed1963

A further study of stimulus generalization following three-stimulus discrimination training.

A group of pigeons was trained in a Skinner box to peck for VI reinforcement when the key was illuminated by a monochromatic light of 540 or 580 mmu but were non-reinforced for responding to 560 mmu. Two control groups, differing in amount of training, received only the two positive stimuli. At the completion of training all Ss received generalization tests under extinction. Both control groups produced bi-modal generalization gradients with the peaks of responding at the S+ values. The post-discrimination gradient revealed peaks displaced from the S+ values in the direction away from the S-, low responding and increased steepness in the region of S- and a general elevation of the gradient.

Animals↗
PubMed1962

Instructions and stimulus categorizing in a measure of stimulus generalization.

In Experiment I, three groups of 20 Ss each were exposed to a light of 550 mmu (yellowish-green) for 60 sec and then viewed a random sequence of wavelengths with instructions to respond only to the original color. The instructions given the three groups were worded differently in an attempt to vary the strength of a set-to-discriminate assumed to be created by this procedure. The three groups produced similar gradients, each with a peak of responding at 540 mmu, in agreement with Kalish's (1958) published gradient for the 550 mmu standard stimulus value. It was suggested that the nature of the task is such that a strong discriminatory set is produced regardless of the wording of the instructions.A temporal analysis of the gradient as it develops during the testing revealed that initially the peak of responding occurs at 550 mmu; but as testing progresses, it shifts gradually in the direction of the shorter wavelengths (purer greens). Experiment II was performed to test the generality of the phenomenon of regression to the primary color. Two groups of 20 Ss each were tested for generalization following exposure to 510 mmu (bluish-green) and 525 mmu (pure green), respectively. We predicted that the 510 mmu gradient would reveal a progressive shift toward the longer wavelengths (purer greens), whereas the 525 mmu gradient would show no tendency to shift. The results were strikingly in accord with these predictions. We concluded that although a physiological process could not be ruled out, the verbal labeling of the standard stimulus value may well be responsible for the regression of the gradient toward the primary color.

Color↗