PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D S Blough

Publications and source records attributed to D S Blough.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Effects of priming, discriminability, and reinforcement on reaction-time components of pigeon visual search.

Pigeons searched computer screens for 1 of 4 letter targets among 55 alphanumeric distractors. In Experiment 1, valid-cue trials used distinctive patterns to signal the subsequent appearance of specific targets, whereas ambiguous-cue trials used a signal common to all targets. Search reaction times (RTs) after valid cues were shorter than after the ambiguous cue; increased target discriminability also reduced RT. In Experiment 2, when reinforcement for 2 targets shifted from 10% to 20%, RTs to those targets dropped, whereas RTs to the other 2 targets rose. RT distributions suggested that precues and discriminability both affect the momentary probability of finding a target, as embodied in the decay constant of an underlying exponentially distributed RT component. Reinforcement changes appeared to affect different components of the response process, embodied in changes in the mean of an underlying lognormal distribution.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Context reinforcement degrades discriminative control: a memory approach.

This study measured effects of context reinforcement on a visual discrimination. Five pigeons responded to 1 key in the presence of 6 shorter wavelengths and to another key for 6 longer wavelengths. Psychometric functions provided measures of discriminative sensitivity (d') and overall stimulus control. Sensitivity and control were slightly but significantly better when 20% of correct choices yielded reinforcement than when 5% did. Reinforcement of pecks to the sample stimulus reduced control substantially and sensitivity slightly; noncontingent reinforcement during intertrial intervals also reduced control, whether such reinforcement was signaled or not. Accuracy was excellent during an extinction session, but it fell substantially when reinforcement for sample pecks was added during choice extinction. Simulations based on a memory model of the discrimination process reproduced most of the experimental findings.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Reaction time drifts identify objects of attention in pigeon visual search.

Three pigeons searched for a unique target form among 31 identical distractors, and search reaction time (RT) was measured. Within experiments, target and distractor on each trial were drawn from the same small set of forms that differed from each other by simple features. Correlations across sessions among RTs to the various form pairs were analyzed. Experiment 1 indicated drifts of attention between the top of the forms, where a gap might appear, and the bottom, where a line might appear, and also suggested drifts of attention to the line as a target feature. Experiment 2 indicated similar drifts between the top and bottom of the forms and between small differences and large differences in target features. Attention to intraform location appeared relatively independent of attention to target features. The method provides a new way to identify functionally separable aspects of stimulus processing and to describe their temporal properties.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Effects of stimulus frequency and reinforcement variables on reaction time.

Pigeons pecked at one of two black forms, "+" or "O," either of which could appear alone on a white computer monitor screen. In baseline series of sessions, each form appeared equally often, and two pecks at it produced food reinforcement on 10% of trials. Test series varied the relative probability or duration of reinforcement or frequency of appearance of the targets. Peck reaction times, measured from target onset to the first peck, were found to vary as a function of reinforcement probability but not as a function of relative target frequency or of reinforcement duration. Reaction times to the two targets remained approximately equal as long as the probability of reinforcement, per trial, was equal for the targets, even if the relative frequency of the targets differed by as much as 19 to 1. The results address issues raised in visual search experiments and indicate that attentional priming is unimportant when targets are easy to detect. The results also suggest that equalizing reinforcement probability per trial for all targets removes differential reinforcement as an important variable. That reaction time was sensitive to the probability but not the duration of reinforcement raises interesting questions about the processes reflected in reaction time compared with rate as a response measure.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1989

Visual effects of opiates in pigeons: I. Target location in visual search.

Pigeons pecked at target forms, located in arrays of distractors. In experiment 1 the number of distractors and their similarity to the target varied. In experiment 2, similarity was varied over a more extended range. Drug tests used morphine in doses ranging from 1 to 6 mg/kg, naloxone (0.3-3 mg/kg) alone and combined with morphine. Morphine had relatively small effects on accuracy; however, it produced pronounced elevations in reaction time. Significant interactions with display variables indicated a visual component to the morphine effect. Naloxone alone had no effect; naloxone combined with morphine blocked the morphine effect.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Visual effects of opiates in pigeons: II. Contrast sensitivity to sinewave gratings.

In a simultaneous forced-choice procedure, three pigeons learned to discriminate between a blank field and sinewave gratings of equal space-averaged luminance. Conditions included two spatial frequencies and, for each, a series of contrasts, which were varied over a range sufficient to generate psychometric functions. Drug tests used two doses of morphine and a condition that combined naloxone with the higher dose. Morphine decreased contrast sensitivity, although this outcome was reliable only at the higher dose and the higher spatial frequency. This effect was reduced and usually blocked by naloxone. Morphine-induced changes in pupil size were too small to account for the opiate effect.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Contrast as seen in visual search reaction times.

Three pigeons searched arrays of alphabetic letters displayed on computer monitors. On each trial, either an A or an E appeared, and the reaction time and accuracy with which the bird pecked at this target were measured. In each block of trials, each target (A or E) was displayed alone, or together with a number of distractor letters (2 or 18) that varied in their similarity to the target. During a baseline series of sessions, responses to the A and to the E each yielded food reinforcement on 10% of the trials. In the next series of sessions, reinforcement continued at 10% for A, but rose to 30% for E. In a final series, these reinforcement conditions were reversed. As expected, reaction times increased with target-distractor similarity and (for similar distractors) with the number of distractors. Increased reinforcement of E had no effect on reaction times to E, but produced a very consistent increase in reaction times to A; the average increase was constant across the various display conditions. Reversal of the differential reinforcement conditions reversed this contrast effect. Analysis of the reaction time distributions indicated that increased reinforcement to E decreased the momentary probability of response to A by a constant amount, regardless of display conditions. These results are discussed in relation to theories of contrast, memory, and of the search image.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Feature-based search asymmetries in pigeons and humans.

Pigeon and human subjects searched for one target item amidst a number of identical distractors. Simple line forms were used. The target differed from the distractors only in terms of the presence or absence of a feature (a line or a gap); in some experimental series, the feature was present in the target; in others, the feature was in the distractors. The pigeons pecked at the target; the human subjects either reported the presence of the target or pointed to it with a light pen. The time between display onset and this response was recorded. Varied across experimental conditions were the number of distractors in the display, the nature of the stimulus forms, and certain procedural parameters; five conditions were run with pigeons and three with humans. Under all test conditions, the results from the human subjects replicated the previously reported search-asymmetry effect. That is, search speed was greater and decreased less with display size when the target bore the feature (line or gap) than when the distractors bore the feature; both yes/no and localization-response conditions yielded this effect. However, pigeons failed to show search asymmetry; neither line nor gap in a target facilitated search. The results suggest that early visual processing differs for pigeons and humans, that pigeon features differ from human features, or that search asymmetry was eliminated by the long practice given the pigeons.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Odd-item search in pigeons: display size and transfer effects.

Pigeons searched arrays of small forms displayed on computer monitors. On each trial, a single target form appeared together with two or more identical distractor forms. A set of six different forms was used in each of three experiments. All possible combinations of these forms, paired as target and distractor, appeared in each experimental session. Both the accuracy and speed of search increased with the number of distractors displayed. When both targets and distractors were new, accuracy was above chance only for the large (24 item) display, where transfer was highly significant. The experiments do not support the attribution to pigeons of a general "oddity concept." Rather, the results suggest that odd-item performance depends in part on a perceptual isolation of the target and in part on familiarity with target-distractor combinations.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Counterpoint.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1985

Discrimination of letters and random dot patterns by pigeons and humans.

In a three-choice discrimination task, pigeons learned to distinguish each letter of the alphabet from all the other letters and each of 16 random dot patterns from all the others. Discrimination errors were used to generate a matrix of interletter and interpattern similarities. Human estimates of letter similarity were obtained from the literature, and human subjects rated the similarity of the dot patterns. Pigeon and human performances were described and compared through correlation, multidimensional scaling, and cluster analysis. Fits of the data by simple-feature and template models were computed and compared. The correlation between pigeon and human similarity matrices was .68 for letters and .72 for dot patterns. The other analyses revealed broadly similar patterns of results from the two species but suggested also that, relative to human data, the best fits to the pigeon data required fewer dimensions, fewer features, and fuzzier templates. There was some indication that pigeon discriminations depended on relatively simple features, and several of these were tentatively identified. The different methods employed might have influenced these apparent differences between pigeons and humans, but, overall, the results suggest considerable cross-task and cross species generality in the processing of these simple forms.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Sequential effects in dimensional contrast.

Two experiments examined pigeons' response rates during short trials signaled by stimuli closely spaced along a wavelength continuum. In Experiment 1 separate halves of the continuum were correlated with different reinforcement schedules. In Experiment 2, the middle stimulus was accompanied by a lower probability of reinforcement than were the remaining wavelengths. Both procedures resulted in dimensional contrast "shoulders," seen as relatively enhanced or depressed response rates in the presence of stimuli between the extreme of the continuum and the border separating the positive and negative stimuli. Sequential analyses addressed possible contributions of the following interactions: (a) local contrast, seen when rate during a given schedule depends on the schedule in the just-preceding trial; (b) modification of local contrast by the similarity of the signaling stimuli (P. Blough, 1983); and (c) schedule-independent rate contrast, seen when rate in a given trial depends on the rate controlled by the stimulus that accompanied the just-preceding trial (Malone & Rowe, 1981). Dimensional contrast functions were similar when isolated according to the schedule, to the similarity of the signaling stimulus, and to the response rate of the just-preceding trial. The interactions noted above do not appear to make important contributions to this effect.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1982

Pigeon perception of letters of the alphabet.

In a three-choice discrimination task three pigeons learned to distinguish each letter of the alphabet from all other letters. Errors during learning were based on 54 presentations of each target letter with every other letter. The errors were used to scale letters in a multidimensional similarity space and to associate them in hierarchical clusters. The results resembled those generated from similarity judgments by humans, suggesting cross-task and cross-species generality in processes of letter discrimination.

Animals↗
PubMed1982

The pigeon's distant visual acuity as a function of viewing angle.

Distant visual acuity was determined for several viewing angles in two restrained White Carneaux pigeons. The behavioral technique was a classical conditioning procedure that paired presentation of sinusoidal gratings with shock. A conditioned heart rate acceleration during the grating presentation indicated resolution of the grating. The bird's acuity was fairly uniform across a large range of their lateral visual field; performance decreased slightly for posterior stimulus placement and sharply for frontal placements. The data suggest that foveal viewing is relatively less advantageous for acuity in pigeons than in humans. The data are also consistent with the current view that pigeons are myopic in frontal vision.

Animals↗
PubMed1979

Effects of the number and form of stimuli on visual search in the pigeon.

Pigeons' pecks at small luminous forms on a large display field were photoelectrically recorded. Pecks to target (S+) forms were reinforced with food; pecks to distractor (S-) forms produced a short time-out. The speed and accuracy of search for a target declined as the number of distractors increased to a maximum of 15. Search was further impaired when the distractors were quite similar to the target. However, search was unaffected by a change in the number of potential targets (memory set size) from one to two, nor was it clearly affected by the use of several different distractor forms instead of a single repeated form. Search was swift over a large (50 degrees) visual field, in the apparent absence of substantial head and eye movements.

Animals↗