PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D S Cannom

Publications and source records attributed to D S Cannom.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Influence of patient characteristics in the selection of patients for defibrillator implantation (the AVID Registry). Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators.

The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) trial is a prospective, randomized study of treatment for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Patients who are eligible for the main trial but who are not enrolled for any reason are followed in a registry. The objective of the present study was to determine whether there are identifiable patient characteristics among these registry patients that may influence whether a patient is treated with an implantable defibrillator. The 914 patients in the registry were divided into 2 groups according to whether the primary treatment was an implantable defibrillator. The mean age of defibrillator patients was 60 years, compared with 65 years in the nondefibrillator group (p <0.001). Only 11.2% of defibrillator recipients were minorities, whereas the percentage of minorities in the nondefibrillator group was 18.7% (p <0.003). A history of recurrent ventricular fibrillation was more likely in the group treated with defibrillators (8.9% vs 4.4%, p <0.01), whereas a history of atrial fibrillation or diabetes mellitus were both significantly more likely in the nondefibrillator group. Among defibrillator patients, a higher proportion had ventricular fibrillation as the index arrhythmia; patients with ventricular tachycardia were significantly more likely to be treated without devices. In this prospective but nonrandomized cohort of patients treated for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, older age, minority status, and comorbidity reduced the chances that a patient would be treated with a defibrillator.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Baseline characteristics of patients in the coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) Patch Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with left ventricular dysfunction who undergo coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery frequently have late sudden cardiac death. The CABG Patch Trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial that randomized patients at high risk at the completion of CABG surgery to implantation of an epicardial implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or to no antiarrhythmic treatment. The trial was designed to determine whether prophylactic implantation of an ICD at the time of CABG surgery would result in a lower total mortality in long-term follow-up. METHODS: Patients undergoing CABG surgery were eligible for the trial if they were younger than 80 years, had a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.36, and had an abnormal signal averaged electrocardiogram. Patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were excluded from the trial. All patients were scheduled to undergo follow-up at 3-month intervals until 42 months after surgery. RESULTS: Randomization of patients in the trial ended in February 1996. During the recruitment period 71,855 patients were screened, 1,422 were eligible, 1,055 were enrolled (signed consent forms), and 900 patients (76% of eligible patients) were randomized. The mean age of the 446 patients in the ICD group was 64 years versus 63 years for the 454 patients in the control group. A total of 87% of the participants in the ICD group were men versus 82% in the control group (p = NS). Most of the patients had a history of hypertension (55%), smoking (78%), and hypercholesterolemia (54%). Half of the patients had clinical heart failure, and the mean ejection fraction for both patient groups was 0.27 +/- 0.06. No difference was seen in the history of myocardial infarction (83%), congestive heart failure (50%), or atrial (11%) or ventricular (17%) arrhythmias between the two groups. Major clinical characteristics (age, sex, number of previous infarctions, incidence of heart failure, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction) were almost identical to those found in another ICD primary prevention trial, the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT). CONCLUSIONS: A high risk sample of patients was enrolled in The CABG Patch Trial, as shown by examination of their baseline characteristics.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Unsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with previous myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction is associated with a two-year mortality rate of about 30 percent. We studied whether prophylactic therapy with an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator, as compared with conventional medical therapy, would improve survival in this high-risk group of patients. METHODS: Over the course of five years, 196 patients in New York Heart Association functional class I, II, or III with prior myocardial infarction; a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 0.35; a documented episode of asymptomatic unsustained ventricular tachycardia; and inducible, nonsuppressible ventricular tachyarrhythmia on electrophysiologic study were randomly assigned to receive an implanted defibrillator (n = 95) or conventional medical therapy (n=101). We used a two-sided sequential design with death from any cause as the end point. RESULTS: The base-line characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. During an average follow-up of 27 months, there were 15 deaths in the defibrillator group (11 from cardiac causes) and 39 deaths in the conventional-therapy group (27 from cardiac causes) (hazard ratio for overall mortality, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.26 to 0.82; P=0.009). There was no evidence that amiodarone, beta-blockers, or any other antiarrhythmic therapy had a significant influence on the observed hazard ratio. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a prior myocardial infarction who are at high risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmia, prophylactic therapy with an implanted defibrillator leads to improved survival as compared with conventional medical therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator advances.

Significant advances in the basic science of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy have led to improvements in defibrillation waveforms and in capacitor technology. Nonthoracotomy devices with biphasic waveforms can be implanted with a near 100% success rate. Although fewer patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are being treated with concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy, sotalol appears to decrease the defibrillation threshold. Controversy still exists over the optimal design for defibrillator sensing leads. Tachyarrhythmia detection enhancement increase specificity for sensing ventricular tachycardia but may risk undersensing. A variety of subsets of patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have been identified; patients presenting with ventricular fibrillation appear to have the most unfavorable prognosis. Controversy exists as to the true impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy on subsequent survival. Randomized clinical trials such as AVID (Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators) are designed to determine the true benefits of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and may lead to expanded indications.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗
PubMed1995

Dose-ranging study of intravenous amiodarone in patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The Intravenous Amiodarone Multicenter Investigators Group.

BACKGROUND: Oral amiodarone effectively suppresses ventricular arrhythmias; however, full activity may take days or weeks. In patients with frequent, life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, this delay is not acceptable. Thus, in these patients, the speed and dosing accuracy of an intravenous formulation would be beneficial. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of intravenous amiodarone in patients with refractory, recurrent hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation by determining a dose response among three regimens. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 342 patients were enrolled at 46 medical centers in the United States. Patients received one of three randomized, double-blind dose regimens delivering 125, 500, or 1000 mg during the first 24 hours. Supplemental infusions (150 mg) of intravenous amiodarone could be given to treat breakthrough ventricular arrhythmias. The key efficacy end points were the arrhythmia event rate, time to first arrhythmic event, and number of supplemental infusions administered. The event rate decreased with increasing doses: median values were 0.07, 0.04, and 0.02 events per hour for the 125-, 500-, and 1000-mg dose groups, respectively, representing a significant decrease from baseline event rates (P = .043), and approached significance in the overall test for trend (P = .067). There was a significant dose-related increase in the time to first event (trend test P = .025) and a significant dose-related decrease in the number of supplemental boluses per hour (trend test P = .043). Hypotension was the most common (26%) treatment-emergent adverse event during intravenous amiodarone therapy; there was no dose-response relationship. Seventy-eight percent of the patients survived to at least 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous amiodarone is effective for the treatment of recurrent, life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Amiodarone↗
PubMed1995

Clinical aspects of preconditioning and implications for the cardiac surgeon.

Ischemic preconditioning is one of the most powerful means to reduce myocardial ischemic cell death in the experimental laboratory. Data are now emerging suggesting that ischemic preconditioning also can occur in the human heart. Studies performed on human myocardial biopsies, angioplasty studies, clinical studies assessing acute tolerance to angina, and some studies evaluating the effect of angina prior to myocardial infarction, lend support to the concept that the human heart can be preconditioned. The ultimate objective is to develop preconditioning-mimetic agents that can be administered prophylactically prior to the time of cardiopulmonary bypass surgery or administered to hearts that have been harvested for transplant in order to better preserve the ischemically jeopardized myocyte.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed1993

Ventricular fibrillation in patients without significant structural heart disease: a multicenter experience with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to characterize the outcome of survivors of ventricular fibrillation with no or minimal structural heart disease who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. BACKGROUND: The prognosis among survivors of ventricular fibrillation with minimal or no structural cardiac abnormalities remains unclear. Since the advent of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, this question takes on added importance. METHODS: This 10-center retrospective study provided information on 28 survivors of ventricular fibrillation (mean age 42 years) with minimal or no structural abnormalities who were treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. RESULTS: Ventricular tachyarrhythmias (polymorphic in all but one patient) were induced during baseline programmed stimulation in 39% of patients. During a median 30.6-month follow-up period after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, there were no cardiac deaths and two noncardiac deaths. Sixteen patients experienced 36 shock episodes (total 88 shocks). The majority of shocks were classified as "indeterminate"; one patient received 47 "spurious" shocks during one shock episode and each of four patients received one "appropriate" shock. Ventricular arrhythmias were not inducible in any of these latter four patients. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of ventricular fibrillation with minimal or no structural cardiac abnormalities receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator have an excellent 3-year survival rate. The occurrence, albeit infrequent, of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in this group suggests that these patients have a potential risk of recurrent cardiac arrest whose fatal outcome may be avoided by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1993

Electrophysiological evaluation of moricizine in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: low efficacy and high incidence of proarrhythmia.

In patients with history of sustained ventricular tachycarrhythmias, the efficacy and safety of moricizine have not been systematically evaluated by electrophysiological studies. We performed electrophysiological testing in these patients in the drug-free state and then after moricizine loading, and evaluated the safety profile of moricizine during in-hospital loading and follow-up. The study population comprised of 31 patients with clinically sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The underlying heart disease was coronary in 25 patients, cardiomyopathy in 5 patients, and none in 1 patient. The left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ranged from 15%-69% (mean 39 +/- 15%). During the baseline drug-free electrophysiological testing, sustained ventricular tachycardia was inducible in 27 patients, ventricular fibrillation in 1 patient, and reproducible, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (15-25 sec) in 3 patients. All 31 patients received moricizine to the maximum tolerated dose (851 +/- 185 mg) over a period of 2-7 days. Six patients developed ventricular proarrhythmia within the first 4 days. Proarrhythmia required multiple cardioversions in three patients, was not associated with QT prolongation, and spontaneously resolved 6-24 hours after withdrawal of moricizine. Of the remaining 25 patients, 24 underwent electrophysiological testing on moricizine and 4 patients (16%) were rendered noninducible. The VT cycle length in the other 20 patients slowed from 243 +/- 30 msec to 299 +/- 60 msec (P < 0.09). Four noninducible patients, two patients with inducible but slowed VT and one patient who had refused further testing were discharged on moricizine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1993

Influence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the long-term prognosis of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest not associated with acute myocardial infarction are at high risk for recurrent cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death. The impact of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator on long-term prognosis in these patients is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-one survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (age, 56 +/- 13.7 years) underwent electrophysiologically guided therapy. Implantable defibrillators were placed in 150 patients (45.3%), and 181 patients (54.7%) received pharmacological and/or surgical therapy alone. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 35.2 +/- 16.6% in defibrillator recipients and 45.3 +/- 18.2% in nondefibrillator patients. Median patient follow-up was 24 months in the defibrillator group and 46 months in the nondefibrillator group. In a proportional hazards model, the independent predictors of total cardiac mortality were left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.40 (relative risk, 4.55; 95% confidence interval, 2.44 to 8.33; P = .0001), absence of an implantable defibrillator (relative risk, 2.70; confidence interval, 1.41 to 5.00; P = .017), and persistence of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (relative risk, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 3.49; P = .045). The 1- and 5-year probabilities of survival free of cardiac mortality in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.40 were 94.3% and 69.6% with a defibrillator and 82.1% and 45.3% without a defibrillator, respectively. For patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 or more, the 1- and 5-year probabilities of survival free of cardiac mortality were 97.7% and 94.6% with a defibrillator and 95.4% and 86.9% without a defibrillator, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the implantable defibrillator is associated with a reduction in cardiac mortality, particularly in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗
PubMed1992

A critical appraisal of indications for the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a remarkably effective therapy for reducing sudden cardiac death in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The indications for implantation of the ICD were approved in 1985 by the United States Food and Drug Administration; it could be implanted in patients who have experienced cardiac arrest or in those with recurrent ventricular arrhythmias which are not suppressed by anti-arrhythmic drugs in the electrophysiology laboratory. These established indications have not changed in the last seven years. In the near future, the release of third-generation ICDs (with antitachycardia pacing) will likely further expand indications for the device. Many patients with stable ventricular tachycardia who have not had syncope or cardiac arrest will receive a third-generation defibrillator. Also, three clinical trials now in progress--CABG-PATCH, Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) and Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT)--are studying "pre-event" patients with low ejection fraction and electrical instability; some of the patients in each trial are being prospectively randomized to the ICD. Within the next five years we will have a better understanding of the role of ICD therapy in such patients. Until these studies are completed, it is important that the indications for the ICD not be expanded.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1988

Predictors of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharge for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

Data from 100 patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators (AICDs) were analyzed to determine if clinical, angiographic and electrophysiologic variables are predictive of AICD discharge. During a median follow-up period of 18 months, 45% of patients experienced greater than or equal to 1 device discharge during a documented ventricular arrhythmia or in association with presyncope or syncope ("appropriate" AICD discharge). Univariate predictors of appropriate AICD discharge included depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.0007), inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmia at electrophysiologic study performed in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs (p = 0.009), fewer number of extrastimuli required for induction at this study (p = 0.001), inducible sustained arrhythmia at electrophysiologic study performed on the discharge antiarrhythmic regimen (p = 0.0005) and fewer extrastimuli required for this induction (p less than 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified the induction of a sustained ventricular arrhythmia by 1 or 2 extrastimuli during electrophysiologic study performed on the discharge regimen as the only independent predictor among the variables analyzed (p less than 0.0001). The probability of appropriate AICD discharge at 18 months was 86% for patients who had a sustained arrhythmia induced with 1 or 2 extrastimuli versus 15% for those requiring 3 extrastimuli for arrhythmia induction and 13% for patients without inducible sustained arrhythmias.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1988

The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: efficacy, complications and survival in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias.

Ninety-four patients underwent surgery for automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. Ninety patients were discharged from the hospital with the device and were followed up for a mean period of 17 +/- 10 months. Forty-six patients experienced at least one discharge of the device under circumstances consistent with a malignant ventricular arrhythmia. One sudden death occurred. Complications included perioperative death (3 patients), post-operative ventricular tachycardia (12 patients) and atrial fibrillation (8 patients), perioperative myocardial infarction (1 patient) and device discharges for sinus tachycardia and supraventricular arrhythmias (17 patients). Six and 12 month survival rates by life table analysis were 98.7 and 95.4%, respectively. Thus, the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is a highly effective and relatively low risk treatment modality for patients with refractory life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

Postoperative infection with the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator: clinical presentation and use of the gallium scan in diagnosis.

This report describes three patients with infection involving an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator. All three patients presented with fever, fluid in the pulse generator pocket, leukocytosis and an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. A gallium scan, together with aspiration and culture of the fluid from the pocket, confirmed the diagnosis in each case.

Candidiasis↗
PubMed1986

Implantation of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD): practical aspects.

Most patients who are resuscitated from an episode of sudden cardiac death or one of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) can now be treated using serial electrophysiologic testing as a guide to drug therapy. Recurrence rates are low if an antiarrhythmic regimen can be found which prevents induction of VT. Patients failing serial drug testing have a high recurrence rate (approximately 50%/year). Most clinicians now refer such patients for either experimental antiarrhythmic therapy or electrical intervention. The most promising of the electrical interventions (including tachycardia converting pacemakers and intraoperative mapping) has been the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD). Only recently has the AICD been released from investigative status by the Food and Drug Administration. It can be implanted safely and with favorable clinical outcome if the techniques of implantation are well understood and used often. The text incorporates the authors' experience in implanting nearly 200 devices and is intended as a practical guide to the use of the AICD.

Electric Countershock↗
PubMed1984

Clinical and induced ventricular tachycardia in a patient with myotonic dystrophy.

A 20 year old patient with myotonic dystrophy presented with hemodynamically significant ventricular tachycardia at a rate of 230 beats/min requiring cardioversion. Two days later, the identical tachycardia was reproducibly initiated and terminated in the electrophysiology laboratory using two extrastimuli in the right ventricle. Trials of procainamide and quinidine were not successful in controlling the induced rhythm and amiodarone was administered. On restudy with amiodarone, ventricular fibrillation was induced using a single extrastimulus. This case suggests that ventricular tachyarrhythmias may contribute to the known cardiac morbidity and mortality in myotonic dystrophy.

Adult↗