Biomedical subjects
D S Crossland
Publications and source records attributed to D S Crossland.
Patient attitudes to sternotomy and thoracotomy scars.
BACKGROUND: There are no data comparing patient attitudes to sternotomy and thoracotomy scars following surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Two hundred and one patients with a scar from CHD surgery (105 sternotomy, 36 thoracotomy, and 60 both scars) had a structured interview to explore attitudes to their scar. RESULTS: Comparable proportions of each group reported that they did not like or hated their scar (23/105 [22 %] sternotomy, 9/36 [25 %] thoracotomy, 17/60 [28 %] both scars). Significantly more patients stated that they where embarrassed by and/or their choice of clothing was affected by a thoracotomy scar (20/36, 56 %) than those with a sternotomy scar (36/105, 34 %), p = 0.04. This was also seen when comparing sternotomy alone with both scars (36/105 [34 %] vs. 34/60 [57 %], p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Adults who have undergone surgery for CHD are more likely to have a negative attitude to a thoracotomy than a sternotomy scar. Before a change in surgical approach is considered based on patient preferences, the acceptability and psychological impact of the different scars following surgery needs formal study.
Life insurance and mortgage application in adults with congenital heart disease.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of life insurance and mortgage applications of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) with controls and at different severities of CHD. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-nine adult CHD patients underwent a questionnaire-based interview by a trained nurse. They were asked to give an identical questionnaire to a friend to act as a control. One hundred and seventy-seven controls replied. CHD patients were classified into three categories based on severity. Comparisons were made between matched controls and between different severities of CHD. RESULTS: Similar proportions of the CHD group (59%) had applied for life insurance as matched controls (56%). Compared to controls, significantly more of the adults with CHD who had applied for life insurance have been refused (34 vs 4%, P < 0.0001) or asked to pay extra (37 vs 6%, P = 0.0002). Mortgage application rate was also similar in both groups with more of the CHD patients refused than matched controls (20 vs 3%, P = 0.0004). These differences in both life insurance and mortgage remain significant when the cases and controls are matched by employment status and NYHA functional class. There was no significant difference in life insurance and mortgage application outcome between the groups of mild, significant and complex CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with CHD are significantly more likely to have difficulty obtaining life insurance or a mortgage than controls. Refusal rates appear to be independent of the severity of CHD. This suggests that the label of CHD may have a negative impact despite the lesion being minor and that the outcome of an individual application is difficult to predict based on the severity of the CHD. The increasing numbers of adults with CHD suggest that this problem is likely to increase and needs to be addressed as it can have a major impact on the patient's quality of life.
Variability of four limb blood pressure in normal neonates.
AIMS: To assess the variation in blood pressure (BP) between limbs in normal neonates. To assess whether comparison of arm and leg BP in neonates is reproducible enough to allow the difference to raise suspicion of coarctation of the aorta. METHODS: Infants recruited from the postnatal wards and the postnatal murmur clinic underwent echocardiography and BP measurement in each limb using a Dinamap Compact T 482210. The method of BP measurement was guided by a telephone survey of 40 UK neonatal units. RESULTS: Forty healthy neonates underwent echocardiography and all had a normal aortic arch. BP was measured in 39. In three, BP in the arms was 20 mm Hg higher than in the legs. This gave a specificity of comparison of the upper and lower limb BPs of 92 (36/39) or a false positive rate of 8% (3/39). The standard deviation in BPs was 15.7 mm Hg between arms, 14.5 mm Hg between legs, and 11 mm Hg when the nearest arm and leg were compared. CONCLUSIONS: With current measurement techniques, normal neonates may have a wide variation in BP between limbs. A difference of 20 mm Hg in isolation is more likely to be due to random variability in measurement than to coarctation of the aorta. If coarctation of the aorta is suspected, it can only be excluded or confirmed by echocardiography.
Prevalence and distribution of petechiae in well babies.
AIMS: To determine the prevalence of petechial spots in well babies. METHODS: A total of 116 babies under the age of 12 months were fully examined at child health surveillance clinics. The number and site of petechiae were recorded together with details of possible causes. RESULTS: A total of 27.6% of babies had one or more petechiae, 8.6% had two or more petechiae, and 2.6% had more than two. None of these babies subsequently developed sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Many well infants examined in the community are likely to have petechial spots. In this setting one or two petechiae are common and their presence should not be taken as pathological without other clinical signs. Recognition of this fact may also be helpful when examining otherwise well infants with petechiae in a secondary care setting.