PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

D S Greer

Publications and source records attributed to D S Greer.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Charting the winds of change: evaluating innovative medical curricula.

The increased interest, in North America and around the world, in problem-based and community-oriented medical curricula has sparked interest in the evaluation of these innovative programs. In January 1989, the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation sponsored a conference to consider designs for evaluation studies and the potential distinctive outcomes of the innovative curricula that might be foci of these studies. After defining an "innovative curriculum," the participants identified seven characteristics of "important evaluation studies," particularly endorsing studies that compare curricula as whole entities. The participants then identified 26 areas where differences between graduates of innovative and traditional curricula might be expected, and five equally important areas where differences are not expected. Distinctive outcomes of innovative curricula were anticipated in areas such as interpersonal skills, continuing learning, and professional satisfaction. Overall, these recommendations are offered to stimulate creative evaluations of the growing number of innovative programs in medical education.

Clinical Clerkship

Human neuroelectric patterns predict performance accuracy.

In seven right-handed adults, the brain electrical patterns before accurate performance differed from the patterns before inaccurate performance. Activity overlying the left frontal cortex and the motor and parietal cortices contralateral to the performing hand preceded accurate left- or right-hand performance. Additional strong activity overlying midline motor and premotor cortices preceded left-hand performance. These measurements suggest that brief, spatially distributed neural activity patterns, or "preparatory sets," in distinct cognitive, somesthetic-motor, and integrative motor areas of the human brain may be essential precursors of accurate visuomotor performance.

Adult

An alternative in terminal care: results of the National Hospice Study.

Hospice is a program of supportive services for terminally ill patients and their families, provided either at home or in designated inpatient settings, which is purported to improve patient and family quality of life at lower cost than conventional terminal care. The National Hospice Study was a multi-site, quasi-experimental study to compare the experiences of terminal cancer patients and their families in hospices with those of similar patients and families receiving conventional terminal care. The results indicate that, although care is different in hospices, e.g. lesser utilization of aggressive interventional therapy and diagnostic testing, patients' quality of life is similar in the hospice and conventional care systems with the exception of pain and symptom control, which may be better in the inpatient hospice setting. Hospice patients are more likely to die at home and their families are satisfied with that outcome. Otherwise, no consistent superiority of family outcome was associated with the hospice approach. The cost of hospice care is less than that of conventional terminal care for patients in hospices without inpatient facilities, but the cost of hospice appears to be equivalent to conventional care for patients in hospices having beds.

Adult

The effect of treatment setting and patient characteristics on pain in terminal cancer patients: a report from the National Hospice Study.

Debilitating pain is the symptom most often associated with cancer by the general public. The National Hospice Study (NHS) evaluated pain control among terminal cancer patients served in hospital based (HB) and home based (HC) hospices, and in conventional care settings (CC) such as outpatient clinics and oncology units. Pain was reported by the patient when able to respond and by the patients' primary care person (PCP) during repeated interviews until death. Patient and PCP pain reports were correlated at 0.43. PCPs reported that around 16% of patients were pain free in the last weeks of life while 18% were in persistent pain. Statistically adjusting for differences in the CC, HB, and HC samples, HB patients were less likely to report having persistent pain than either CC or HC patients, although there were no differences in the proportion of patients who were pain free. Age was negatively correlated with the level of pain. As expected, brain and bone metastases were related to pain in opposite directions, with more pain among those with bone involvement and less among those with brain involvement. Conclusions about whether HB hospices really are superior at pain control must be made cautiously in view of the relationship between age and pain and the greater age of hospice patients in our study.

Adult

Analgesic use in terminal cancer patients: report from the National Hospice Study.

Little systematic research has been reported on analgesic use in terminal cancer patients. This paper presents data from the National Hospice Study on the use of analgesics by a sample of terminal cancer patients served in home based and hospital based hospice programs as well as conventional oncological settings. Patients in hospital based hospice programs were more likely than other patients to have an analgesic prescription and to have consumed analgesics. Patients in hospice settings were more likely to consume analgesia orally and less likely to have "prn" (as needed) analgesic prescriptions. The amount of analgesic consumption was inversely related to age. The paper discusses the implications of these and other findings for the treatment of pain in terminal cancer patients.

Adult

Functional status measurement and medical rehabilitation outcomes.

An on-stream method for describing patients' functional abilities is used to develop analyses of medical rehabilitation outcomes. Outcomes are the changes in status between admission, discharge and follow-up. Standardized observation and reporting make it possible to compare one date with another, one case with another or one agency or facility with another to determine program characteristics, effectiveness and efficiency.

Activities of Daily Living