Biomedical subjects

D S Veldhuijzen

Publications and source records attributed to D S Veldhuijzen.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Effect of chronic nonmalignant pain on highway driving performance.

Most pain patients are treated in an outpatient setting and are engaged in daily activities including driving. Since several studies showed that cognitive functioning may be impaired in chronic nonmalignant pain, the question arises whether or not chronic nonmalignant pain affects driving performance. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the effects of chronic nonmalignant pain on actual highway driving performance during normal traffic. Fourteen patients with chronic nonmalignant pain and 14 healthy controls, matched on age, educational level, and driving experience, participated in the study. Participants performed a standardized on-the-road driving test during normal traffic, on a primary highway. The primary parameter of the driving test is the Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP). In addition, driving-related skills (tracking, divided attention, and memory) were examined in the laboratory. Subjective assessments, such as pain intensity, and subjective driving quality, were rated on visual analogue scales. The results demonstrated that a subset of chronic nonmalignant pain patients had SDLPs that were higher than the matched healthy controls, indicating worse highway driving performance. Overall, there was a statistically significant difference in highway driving performance between the groups. Further, chronic nonmalignant pain patients rated their subjective driving quality to be normal, although their ratings were significantly lower than those of the healthy controls. No significant effects were found on the laboratory tests.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Processing capacity in chronic pain patients: a visual event-related potentials study.

Chronic pain may impair performance on attentional processing capacity tasks. In the present study, event-related potentials were recorded to examine whether pain patients show performance decrements on attentional processing capacity tasks due to shared resources by pain and attention or, alternatively, due to deficits in allocating attentional resources during pain. Fourteen chronic pain patients and thirty age and education matched healthy controls were investigated. An attentional capacity probe task was used in which the difficulty level was manipulated, resulting in an easy and a difficult condition, while task-irrelevant visual probes were presented. These probe-elicited P3 amplitudes were assumed to provide the most pure estimate of processing capacity since they are relatively free from target-related processes. Event-related potentials were recorded from the midline electrodes Fz, Cz, Pz, and Oz. For the behavioral measures, it was found that pain patients maintained a different speed-accuracy tradeoff. Pain patients showed faster reaction time responses and higher error rates compared to controls. No significant differences were found between pain patients and controls on the primary task. Pain patients differed from controls with respect to amplitudes elicited by task-irrelevant probe stimuli. For healthy controls, the expected decreased amplitude was found for probe stimuli in the difficult compared to the easy task. In contrast, the pain patients did not show decreased probe amplitudes with increasing task load. The data may imply that allocation of attentional resources is deficient in pain patients, instead of attentional capacity.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

The impact of chronic pain patients' psychotropic drug knowledge and warning labels on the decision whether to drive a car or not.

OBJECTIVE: The attitudes of patients towards driving a car while taking medication with psychotropic side effects is unclear. A growing number of patients use these psychotropic medicines on a daily basis, and this may interfere with their ability to drive a car. METHODS: By means of a survey, we examined attitudes towards driving while using psychotropic medicinal drugs and the effect of warning labels on the decision whether to drive a car or not in patients with chronic pain. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of 100 patients possessing a driver's license used psychotropic medication. Despite warning labels affixed on the packages that these drugs might impair driving ability, the majority (71%) of these patients continued driving a car. A point of concern is that 40% of these patients reported not to be more cautious in traffic after taking psychotropic drugs. CONCLUSION: The results of this survey indicate that drug warning labels applied by Dutch pharmacies do not significantly change attitudes towards driving a car in patients taking medicinal drugs with psychotropic side effects. Future road-safety campaigns should pay more attention to the impairing effects of psychotropic drugs on driving.

Accidents, Traffic↗

PubMed2005

Acute and subchronic effects of amitriptyline on processing capacity in neuropathic pain patients using visual event-related potentials: preliminary findings.

RATIONALE: Little is known about the effects of low doses of amitriptyline, prescribed in the treatment of neuropathic pain, on attentional processing capacity. OBJECTIVES: Changes due to amitriptyline treatment on attentional processing capacity were investigated on behavioral measures and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in six patients with neuropathic pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were treated for 15 consecutive days with 25 mg nocturnally administered amitriptyline or placebo in a double-blind crossover randomized design. Measurements were carried out on day 1 and day 15 of each treatment period. An attentional capacity probe task was used in which the difficulty level was manipulated, resulting in an easy and a hard condition, while task-irrelevant visual probes were presented. During task performance, ERPs were measured from the midline electrodes Fz, Cz, Pz, and Oz. RESULTS: Amitriptyline increased reaction times (RTs) after acute but not after subchronic administration. ERP analyses showed that P3 amplitudes to the task stimuli were not affected by amitriptyline in either treatment phase. Moreover, P3 amplitudes to the probes were increased in the easy compared to the hard task condition after subchronic amitriptyline treatment, indicating beneficial effects of repeated amitriptyline administration. In contrast, acute amitriptyline administration did reduce an earlier visual evoked potential, N1, preceding the P3 component. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that amitriptyline, even at low dosages of 25 mg, affects performance after acute administration in chronic neuropathic pain patients. After 2 weeks of treatment, performance appears to be unaffected. No deficits in processing capacity due to amitriptyline treatment were found.

Adult↗