PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Schoonbaert

Publications and source records attributed to D Schoonbaert.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Tropical medicine, the Internet and current trends in biomedical communication.

Largely unknown only a decade ago, the Internet has now become totally indispensable to biomedical practice and research, as a means of disseminating and retrieving information. Electronic mail, list servers and newsgroups make rapid, personal, targeted and broadcast communication around the globe possible. Hundreds of millions of World Wide Web pages, organized by hierarchically structured web directories, and dissected by general web indexes, give access to an unprecedented amount of information. More and more scientists find their way to factual and bibliographical databases using the Internet. In addition to outlining some of the more relevant resources for the tropical-medicine and international-health communities, this review pays special attention to recent and future changes in the transfer of formal biomedical information. An interesting issue is the future role and position of the published article--either in electronic editions of traditional, peer-reviewed journals, or in even more revolutionary formats, such as electronic preprint servers--and the implications for authors, reviewers, editors, publishers and, ultimately, the readers.

Communication↗

Citation analysis for measuring the value of scientific publications: quality assessment tool or comedy of errors?

The basic concepts of citation analysis and journal impact factors are discussed in the light of quality assessment of scientific publications, individual scientists and research units. The major controversies concerning this topic are addressed: technical limitations, database selectivity, time and discipline-related biases, language and publication type biases, multiple authorship merits and citing motivations. Both positive and negative aspects are put into perspective. The authors conclude that citation analysis, even when based on journal impact factors, can be a worthwhile criterion for evaluating publication records of individual scientists or research units, as long as some of the problems discussed are sufficiently taken into account. However, this conclusion in no way implies that citation analysis may be considered as the one and only evaluation criterion.

Bibliometrics↗

SPIRS, WinSPIRS, and OVID: a comparison of three MEDLINE-on-CD-ROM interfaces.

Three MEDLINE-on-CD-ROM interfaces are compared: SPIRS (version 3.11) and WinSPIRS (version 1.0) from SilverPlatter and OVID (version 3.0, DOS and Windows interfaces) from CD Plus Technologies. Though the database is the same, there are substantial differences among the interfaces in the way these data are presented and can be searched. These different approaches are discussed, and a detailed comparative table is included. It is obvious that all three interfaces are quite good yet none of them is perfect; each has desirable and unfortunate features. Together, they offer an enormous range of possibilities. Users would benefit if most of the better features (e.g., easy menu, free-text retrieval, pre-exploded thesaurus terms) were implemented in future versions of these interfaces and if system operators were given greater latitude to determine the system defaults appropriate to their specific situations and customers.

CD-ROM↗