PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Scott LaMontagne

Publications and source records attributed to D Scott LaMontagne.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Management of genital chlamydial infections at termination of pregnancy services in England and Wales: where are we now?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the range of policies and practices related to the management of genital chlamydial infection employed at termination of pregnancy services in England and Wales. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: England and Wales. POPULATION: Termination of pregnancy providers. METHODS: Survey questionnaire administered to termination of pregnancy providers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Policies and practices for the management of genital chlamydial infection in women seeking termination of pregnancy with comparison to the national guidelines of the chief medical officer (CMO) and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight (48%) practices responded to the survey, with representation across England and Wales. Policies for screening and/or treatment of chlamydial infection existed for 70% of providers. We found three practice patterns for the management of genital chlamydial infection among termination of pregnancy attenders: 70% of providers tested their own attenders prior to termination and treated if necessary; about 25% of providers administered prophylaxis without testing; and a small number of providers (< 5%) neither tested nor treated attenders. CONCLUSION: These patterns may be the result of differences in the CMO and RCOG guidelines. Given the impact of untreated genital chlamydial infection in women attending for termination, consistent recommendations from the CMO and RCOG may encourage uniform practice for the management of chlamydial infection in this vulnerable population.

Abortion, Induced↗

Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic men.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men is not well defined, especially among those who are asymptomatic or show no signs of infection. Established C. trachomatis screening programs for women have demonstrated the benefit of routine screening in reducing prevalence over time, but the yield and benefit of screening asymptomatic men are unclear. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of C. trachomatis prevalence and associated risk factors among men tested at sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. We analyzed data from 43,094 men universally tested from 1997 to 1999 at 103 STD clinics, and assessed age-specific prevalence of infection, controlling for signs of infection (urethritis diagnosed by clinician) and report of sexual contact to a person with an STD (defined as "contact"). RESULTS: Overall prevalence of C. trachomatis was 10.3%. Age-specific prevalence was highest among men aged 18 to 19 years and lowest among those aged >29 years, regardless of signs of infection upon examination or contact to a person with an STD. If these factors and age <25 years had been used to direct C. trachomatis testing at STD clinics, 59% of men would have been tested and 91% of positives would have been detected. CONCLUSIONS: Using either the presence of clinical signs or report of a sex partner with an STD in combination with selective screening of all men aged <25 years detects the majority of infections and, in our population, would have considerably reduced the number of negative tests performed.

Adult↗