Biomedical subjects

D Sievering

Publications and source records attributed to D Sievering.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1995

Self-rotation estimate about the vertical axis.

The aim of this paper was to examine the accuracy of passive whole-body self-rotation estimate around the earth-vertical (yaw) axis. Subjects were required to reach an imposed angle of +/- 90 degrees, 180 degrees or 360 degrees (outward way), and then to rotate back to the initial position (return way), through passive rotation controlled by the subject, in darkness. During these rotations, only the semi-circular canals were stimulated. On the outward way, subjects were required to elaborate the correct imposed angle, without any external reference. In average, subjects undershot the expected angles on outward way, which suggests an overestimate of self-rotation, and the error increased with increasing expected angle. On the return way, subjects had to rotate back to the starting point, through a path integration process. There was no effect of the imposed angle on the error, and the variability was lower than on the outward way. The data suggests that the subjects could construct the internal representation of a virtual starting point: the initial body position, which became a goal to reach clearer than the outward rotation angle, which the subjects also have defined, in an environment deprived of any external spatial reference.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

The interactive contribution of neck muscle proprioception and vestibular stimulation to subjective "straight ahead" orientation in man.

Seventeen normal subjects were asked to direct a laser point to the position they felt to lie exactly straight ahead of their body. Subjects were seated in complete darkness in an approximately spherical cabin in an upright position with the orientation of the trunk and head aligned. For both the horizontal and vertical plane, "straight ahead" judgements were closely scattered around the objective straight ahead body position. Posterior neck muscle vibration as well as caloric vestibular stimulation with ice water led to (1) an apparent motion and horizontal displacement of a stationary visual target to the side opposite to stimulation and (2) a horizontal deviation of subjective "straight ahead" perception toward the side of stimulation. Only those subjects who experienced an illusion of target motion also showed a deviation of their subjective body orientation. No systematic effect of a displacement of subjective body orientation in the vertical plane was detected. When vestibular stimulation and neck muscle vibration were combined their effects were additive, i.e. the horizontal deviation of subjective body orientation observed when either type of stimulation was applied in isolation, was linearly combined either by summation or by cancellation. The present results clearly support the assumption that afferent visual, vestibular and proprioceptive input converge to the neural generation of an egocentric, body-centred coordinate system that allows us to determine our body position with respect to visual space.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Rotational kinematics of the human vestibuloocular reflex. I. Gain matrices.

1. This series of three papers aims to describe the three-dimensional, kinematic input-output relations of the rotational vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) in humans, and to identify the functional advantages of these relations. In this first paper the response to sinusoidal rotation in darkness at 0.3 Hz, maximum speed 37.5%/s, was quantified by the use of the three-dimensional analogue of VOR gain: a 3 x 3 matrix where each element describes the dependence of one component (torsional, vertical, or horizontal) of eye velocity on one component of head velocity. 2. The three matrix elements indicating collinear gains (i.e., dependence of torsional eye velocity on torsional head velocity, vertical on vertical, and horizontal on horizontal) were smaller than the -1's required for optimal retinal image stabilization. Of these three the torsional gain was weakest: -0.37 for rotation about an earth-vertical axis, versus -0.73 and -0.64 for vertical and horizontal gains. Matrix elements indicating cross talk were mostly negligible. There was a tendency to leftward eye rotation in response to clockwise head motion, but this was not statistically significant. 3. VOR responses were compared for rotation about earth-vertical and earth-horizontal axes. The varying otolith input due to the rotation of the gravity vector relative to the head during earth-horizontal axis rotation made no difference to the collinear gains. 4. There were no consistent phase leads or lags except for a torsional phase lead of up to 10 degrees, usually more marked for clock-wise head rotation versus counterclockwise, and for oblique axis rotations versus purely torsional. 5. Torsional gain was magnified, averaging -0.52, when the torsional component of head rotation was only a small part of a predominantly vertical or horizontal rotation, i.e., when the axis of head rotation was near the frontal plane. Because most natural head rotations occur about such axes, the torsional VOR is probably somewhat stronger than the response to pure torsion would suggest. 6. The speed of eye rotation in response to a given stimulus varied widely among subjects, but the direction of rotation was much more uniform. For head rotations about oblique axes out of the frontal plane, there was a systematic misalignment of eye and head axes, with eye axes tilted toward the frontal plane. These findings can be explained on the basis of a strategy where the VOR balances the muscular effort of rotating the eyes against the cost of retinal slip.

Acceleration↗

PubMed1994

Rotational kinematics of the human vestibuloocular reflex. II. Velocity steps.

1. Gain matrices were used to quantify the three-dimensional vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) in five human subjects who were accelerated over 1 s and then spun at a constant 150 degrees/s for 29 s in darkness. Rotations were torsional, vertical and horizontal, about earth-vertical and earth-horizontal axes. 2. Elements on the main diagonal of the gain matrices were much smaller than the optimal value of -1, and torsional gain was weaker than vertical or horizontal. Off-diagonal elements, indicating cross talk, were minimal except for a small but consistent horizontal response to torsional head rotation. 3. Downward slow phases were more than twice as fast as upward at the start of rotation about both earth-vertical and earth-horizontal axes, but the asymmetry vanished later in the rotation. 4. During earth-vertical-axis rotation, all matrix elements decayed to zero. The main-diagonal torsional and vertical gains waned with time constants close to that of the cupula (6.7 and 7.3 s). Velocity storage prolonged the horizontal response to horizontal head rotation (time constant 14.2 s) but not the horizontal response to torsion (7.7 s). A simple explanation is that velocity storage acts on a central estimate of head motion that accurately distinguishes horizontal from torsional and that the inappropriate horizontal eye velocity response to torsion occurs because of cross talk downstream from velocity storage. 5. During earth-horizontal-axis rotation, the torsional, vertical, and horizontal main-diagonal elements declined, with time constants of 7.6, 8.2, and 7.9 s, to maintained nonzero values, all equal to about -0.1. Off-diagonal elements, including the horizontal response to torsion, decayed to zero, so that the otolith-driven reflex, late in the rotation, was equally strong in all dimensions and almost free of detectable cross talk. 6. The difference between gain curves over the course of earth-vertical- and earth-horizontal-axis rotations was not constant but increased with time, suggesting that the VOR response to earth-horizontal-axis rotation is not a simple sum of canal and otolith reflexes.

Acceleration↗

PubMed1994

Rotational kinematics of the human vestibuloocular reflex. III. Listing's law.

1. Do slow phase eye velocities generated by the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) depend on eye position? If the purpose of the VOR is simply to stabilize the retinal image, there can be no such dependence, because eye velocity must always be equal and opposite to head velocity. But if the VOR tolerates some retinal slip to achieve other goals, such as reducing eye velocity or following Listing's law, then one should see specific patterns of dependence. We examined VOR responses of human subjects to yaw, pitch, and roll rotation looking in various directions to quantify how the input-output properties of the VOR vary with eye position. 2. Eye rotation axes during yaw and pitch tilted in the same direction as the gaze line but only one-quarter as far on average. Thus, during yaw head rotation, the axis of eye rotation was roughly aligned with the head axis when the subject looked straight ahead, but tilted up when the gaze direction was up, and down when gaze was down. The amount of tilt varied between subjects, but on average a 30 degrees change in eye position caused a 7.5 degrees tilt in the eye rotation axis. During pitch, the eye axis tilted right when gaze was right and left when gaze was left, also moving 7.5 degrees on average for a 30 degrees change in the gaze direction. 3. During roll stimulation, the axis of eye rotation tilted in the opposite direction to the gaze line, and about one-half as far. On average, when the gaze line moved 30 degrees down, the eye rotation axis tilted 12.0 degrees up; when the gaze moved 30 degrees left, the eye axis tilted 15.3 degrees right. 4. It is often argued that the torsional VOR is weak because head rotation about the line of sight causes little image displacement on the fovea. But the line of sight is collinear with the torsional axis only when the subject looks straight ahead. Does the "weak axis" of the VOR stay collinear with the gaze line when the subject looks eccentrically? We calculated the axis of head rotation for which the VOR response is weakest and found that it does vary with eye position, but does not stay parallel with the gaze direction. When subjects looked straight ahead, the weak axis was roughly collinear with the gaze line; when gaze shifted eccentrically, the weak axis shifted in the same direction but only about one-half as far.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acceleration↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of full-field visual input on the three-dimensional properties of the human vestibuloocular reflex.

The three-dimensional (3-D) properties if the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) were studied in six normal human subjects during passive whole-body rotations in darkness and with full-field visual input in light. Subjects were asked to fixate a point target stationary in space straight ahead or to imagine such a target in darkness. Using a 3-D rotating chair, subjects were rotated sinusoidally (frequency .3 Hz, maximum speed 37.5 degrees/s) about an earth-vertical axis for horizontal stimulation and about an earth-horizontal axis for vertical and torsional stimulation. The subject faced forward for vertical stimulation, 90 degrees to the side for torsional stimulation, or 15 degrees to the right or left side for combined vertical and torsional stimulation. Left eye position was measured using 3-D search coils. The VOR response was quantified using the 3-D analogue of gain, a 3 x 3 matrix where each element describes the dependence of one component--torsional, vertical, or horizontal--of eye velocity on one component of head velocity. Average gain matrices were calculated for three cycles of rotation (10 s). Major findings were: (1) Gain values for the VOR were higher in light than in darkness for all directions. In light, vertical and horizontal responses were fully compensatory in both magnitude and direction, whereas the torsional responses were still weak. (2) Intersubject variability, large in the dark, was very small in the light for the vertical and horizontal responses but still considerable for the torsional.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗