PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Skehan

Publications and source records attributed to D Skehan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Multisite pacing as a supplemental treatment of congestive heart failure: preliminary results of the Medtronic Inc. InSync Study.

This report describes the initial results of the "InSync" study, a European and Canadian multicenter trial that examines the safety and efficacy of a multisite pacemaker (Medtronic InSync) and of left ventricular pacing leads (Medtronic 2187 and 2188) implanted via a cardiac vein as a supplemental treatment of refractory congestive heart failure. Over a 10-month period, the system was implanted successfully in 68 of the 81 (84%) patients who had been enrolled in the study. The 68 patients were, on average, 66 +/- 10 years old, had a mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) = 21% +/- 9%, and 63% were in NYHA functional Class III and 37% were in Class IV. No system implant related complication occurred. During follow-up, 7 of 10 patients who exited the study had died, 4 suddenly. There was a clinical benefit among surviving patients, which was corroborated by a significant improvement in NYHA functional class and in the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Quality of Life Questionnaire Score (MLS) and by a longer distance covered during a 6-minute walk test. This clinical improvement was associated with a significant narrowing of the paced QRS complex during biventricular pacing, a significant decrease in the interventricular mechanical delay, and a trend towards an increase in the duration of ventricular filling. These encouraging preliminary results confirm the feasibility and reliability of this new multisite pacing system in the management of dilated cardiomyopathy and support the continuation of further evaluations of this complementary treatment of refractory congestive heart failure.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Identification of a high risk subgroup of patients with silent ischaemia after myocardial infarction: a group for early therapeutic revascularisation?

Asymptomatic ("silent") ischaemia has been shown to be of prognostic significance in patients with stable and unstable angina and more recently in patients recovering after myocardial infarction. No therapeutic regimen has yet been shown to improve the prognosis of patients with silent ischaemia after infarction, which can be found in as many as a third of these patients. Attempts to achieve therapeutic revascularisation in all these patients may be undesirable, but early revascularisation could be especially beneficial in some selected high risk patients. Two hundred and fifty consecutive clinically stable survivors of myocardial infarction who had predischarge submaximal exercise tests were followed up for a year. Silent ischaemia was found in 27% of these patients; 15% had symptomatic ischaemia. Patients with a positive exercise test were prescribed a beta blocker before discharge. Mortality in patients with silent (9.4%) and symptomatic (5.4%) ischaemia in the first year after infarction was not significantly different. Patients with symptomatic ischaemia were more likely to have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting in the first year. Patients with silent ischaemia were, however, significantly more likely to die than patients with a negative exercise test (relative odds 12:1). Patients with silent ischaemia and an abnormal blood pressure response or who could not complete a submaximal exercise protocol were at particularly high risk, being 32 times more likely to die than those with a negative test (95% confidence interval from 3.3 to 307 times more likely). First year mortality in this group was 22%. The benefits of therapeutic revascularisation in this high risk group need to be studied.

Coronary Angiography↗