PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Stubbing

Publications and source records attributed to D Stubbing.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Sustained bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and symptom control during regular formoterol use in asthma of moderate or greater severity. The Canadian FO/OD1 Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have raised concern that regular inhalation of beta2 -agonists may cause a worsening of asthma control compared with on-demand dosing regimens. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of twice daily formoterol (Foradil), 4 times daily albuterol, and on-demand albuterol on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), lung function measurements, symptoms, and other indicators of disease control over 6 months inpatients with asthma of moderate or greater severity receiving concomitant inhaled corticosteroids. We also looked for occurrence of rebound BHR on discontinuation of treatment. METHODS: This was a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, clinical trial. Methacholine PC20 was the primary outcome variable. Other outcome variables included symptom scores, use of rescue medication, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), serial FEV1 measurements, and asthma exacerbations. RESULTS: Of the 271 randomized patients, 217 completed the study. Formoterol was significantly superior to on-demand albuterol with regard to methacholine PC20, FEV1, PEF, symptom scores, and use of rescue medication at each measured time point/interval. Regular albuterol was superior to on-demand albuterol with regard to PC20 and FEV1, but not PEF or various clinical scores. After a small drop in the magnitude of bronchoprotection and bronchodilatation occurring shortly after randomization, there was no evidence of progressive tolerance to either regular treatment for any of the measured variables or of rebound increase in BHR 2 days after the end of treatment. The formoterol group had the lowest number of exacerbation days, as defined by high intake of rescue bronchodilator and/or symptom scores, whereas the number of exacerbations requiring increased corticosteroid coverage was similar in the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with asthma of moderate or greater severity receiving inhaled corticosteroids, formoterol taken twice daily resulted in superior bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and clinical control compared with on-demand albuterol over 6 months. Four times daily albuterol was superior to on-demand albuterol for only some of the end points. Progressive tolerance and a rebound increase in BHR on discontinuation of beta-agonists were not found

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Generic and specific measurement of health-related quality of life in a clinical trial of respiratory rehabilitation.

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of measures of health-related quality of life in a randomized controlled trial of respiratory rehabilitation versus conventional community care for patients with chronic airflow limitation. The study included 89 stable patients with moderate to severe chronic airflow limitation with measurement of health status at 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Outcomes included two disease-specific (the Oxygen Cost Diagram and the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire [CRQ]) measures, a generic health profile (the Sickness Impact Profile [SIP]), and two utility measures (the Standard Gamble and the Quality of Well-Being index [QWB]). Of the measures, only the four domains of the CRQ (dyspnea, fatigue, mastery, and emotional function) showed statistically significant differences (P < or = 0.05) between treatment and control groups. Correlation between change in the CRQ and change in other relevant measures, including the 6-minute walk test and global ratings of change in dyspnea, fatigue, and emotional function were generally weak to moderate (from 0.19 to 0.51). All correlations between change in the QWB, SIP, and Standard Gamble and other measures were very weak or weak (up to 0.30). Correlation between change in the three generic measures were all very weak (<0.15). The results suggest that unless investigators include responsive and valid disease-specific measures of health-related quality of life in controlled trials in chronic diseases, they risk misleading conclusions about the effect of treatments on health status.

Health Care Surveys↗
PubMed1994

Randomised controlled trial of respiratory rehabilitation.

Disability associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has led to the development of rehabilitation programmes that aim to increase exercise tolerance and improve quality of life. Many reports of the benefits of rehabilitation have been from uncontrolled trials and unsupervised programmes. In view of the commitment asked of patients, their families, and health-care professionals, rehabilitation should be justified by a demonstration of sustained improvement over conventional treatment. We undertook a prospective randomised controlled trial of respiratory rehabilitation in 89 subjects (44 men, 45 women) aged 66 (SD 7) years with severe but stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who received rehabilitation or conventional community care. The treatment group were rehabilitated as inpatients for 8 weeks and supervised as outpatients for 16 weeks. Primary outcome measures of exercise tolerance and quality of life were made at baseline and repeated at 12, 18, and 24 weeks. The difference between baseline and last follow-up was significant for 6 min walk distance (37.9 m [95% CI 10.8-65.0], p = 0.0067) and submaximal cycle time (4.7 min [2.1-7.3]). There were also significant differences in questionnaire assessment of dyspnoea (p = 0.0061), emotional function (p = 0.0150), mastery (p = 0.0002), and dyspnoea index (p = 0.0053). Improvements in exercise tolerance and quality of life can be achieved and sustained for 6 months in patients undergoing respiratory rehabilitation compared with those receiving conventional care.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Lung volume reduction for emphysema and the Canadian Lung Volume Reduction Surgery (CLVR) Project.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the surgical treatment of emphysema and to present preliminary results from a pilot study of lung volume reduction (LVR) surgery. DESIGN: Case series of consecutive patients referred for LVR surgery. Outcomes were quality of life, pulmonary function and exercise capacity. SETTING: Two university-affiliated hospitals in Ontario. POPULATION STUDIED: Patients between the ages of 40 and 75 years with emphysema who had severe airflow limitation, hyperinflation of the lungs and impaired quality of life. INTERVENTION: Bilateral reductions with multiple wedge resections of the lung using a linear stapling device with bovine pericardial buttressing were completed via a median sternotomy. MAIN RESULTS: Of 50 patients referred, 24 underwent LVR surgery. Mean age of the cohort was 63 years. Operative 30-day or in hospital mortality was 8%. Two other patients (8%) died from respiratory failure after LVR within the first year. Postoperative complications included prolonged air leaks (six of 24), tracheobronchitis (five of 24), mechanical ventilation (four of 24) and pneumonia (three of 24). Mean length of stay was 18 days (median 12 days). At one year, there was a sustained decrease in total lung capacity from 133% to 123% predicted. There were improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s, from 22% of predicted preoperatively to 32% postoperatively, and in 6 min walk performance, from 345 to 381 m. Improvements were also noted in the quality of life assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest that LVR surgery is feasible and may improve the patient's quality of life, pulmonary function and exercise capacity. A randomized clinical trial comparing LVR plus the best medical management with the best medical management alone is currently underway to determine the effectiveness of LVR.

Adult↗