PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Uehlinger

Publications and source records attributed to D Uehlinger.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

[Renal biopsy: standard procedure of modern nephrology].

For more than 50 years, renal biopsy has been an important diagnostic procedure in modern nephrology. Increasing perfection of the biopsy technique has made the procedure very safe, with rare complications and few contraindications. Improved histological diagnostics and broader therapeutic possibilities have significantly expanded the indications. The most important indications are acute renal failure, proteinuria > 1 g/d (or 3 g/d) and nephritic urinary sediment. Complications with renal grafts provide additional indications for a renal biopsy. In addition, diabetes and monosymptomatic urinfindings (isolated haematuria) as well as pregnancy induced nephropathy are indications for a renal biopsy. The procedure is performed ambulatory or during a short hospital stay and the patient can usually be discharged after a monitoring period of eight hours.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed2001

Prophylactic hemodialysis after radiocontrast media in patients with renal insufficiency is potentially harmful.

PURPOSE: Acute renal failure induced by contrast media is an important cause of hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Preexisting renal failure and the dose of contrast media are known risk factors for the development of radiocontrast nephropathy. We performed a randomized trial to test whether radiocontrast nephropathy can be avoided by prophylactic hemodialysis immediately after the administration of contrast media in patients with impaired renal function. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Renal function and other parameters, hemodialysis requirement, and relevant clinical events were recorded before and during the 6 days after administration of contrast media in 113 patients with a baseline serum creatinine level >200 microm/L (>2.3 mg/dL). Patients were randomly assigned to either hemodialysis (n = 55) or nonhemodialysis (n = 58) treatment after parenteral low-osmolality contrast media. RESULTS: The characteristics of the patients in the two groups were similar. Compared with baseline levels, the mean [+/- SD] serum creatinine level decreased at day 1 (277 +/- 95 microm/L), peaked at day 4 (353 +/- 126 microm/L), and returned to baseline at day 6 (327 +/- 119 microm/L, P <0.05 by analysis of variance) after administration of contrast media in the hemodialysis group, whereas in the nonhemodialysis group, no significant changes in mean serum creatinine level were observed. Eleven patients required 1 or more hemodialyses (8 in the hemodialysis group and 3 in the nonhemodialysis group, P = 0.12), 6 of whom (4 vs. 2, P = 0.44) required 3 or more hemodialyses. Clinically relevant events included pulmonary edema (1 vs. 4 patients, P = 0.36), myocardial infarction (2 vs. 2), stroke (2 vs. 0, P = 0.24), and death (1 vs. 1). CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of performing hemodialysis immediately after the administration of low-osmolality contrast media in all patients with a reduced renal function did not diminish the rate of complications, including radiocontrast nephropathy.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cardiovascular and metabolic profile during intervention with urapidil in humans.

Increased sympathetic activity or vascular reactivity to norepinephrine or both may play a complementary role in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension. Therefore, blood pressure regulation and metabolic correlates of cardiovascular risk were evaluated in 19 normal subjects and in 13 subjects with essential hypertension receiving placebo and after 4 weeks of intervention with urapidil, an agent that was found experimentally to exert a combined central sympathetic and peripheral alpha-adrenergic receptor inhibition. In hypertensive patients, urapidil normalized the initially low norepinephrine pressor dose (+ 106%), mildly increased basal plasma norepinephrine levels (+36%), and markedly shifted the plasma norepinephrine concentration-blood pressure response curve (p less than 0.01). Blood pressure was decreased (p less than 0.001). In normal subjects, urapidil produced only mild increases in norepinephrine plasma levels (+22%) and norepinephrine pressor dose (+38%) and no change in blood pressure. Body weight, exchangeable sodium, and blood volume were unaltered or increased slightly. Heart rate; plasma epinephrine, renin, angiotensin II, basal aldosterone, and electrolyte levels; plasma clearances of norepinephrine and angiotensin II; pressor effects of angiotensin II; chronotropic responses to isoproterenol or a norepinephrine-induced rise in blood pressure; and urinary prostaglandin F2 alpha excretion, as well as serum lipoprotein fractions and glucose, insulin, and uric acid levels, were not significantly modified by urapidil. Prostaglandin E2 excretion tended to be increased. Aldosterone responsiveness to angiotensin II was increased by urapidil in normal (p less than 0.05) but not in hypertensive subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗