[Myocardial viability].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Victoria.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
UNLABELLED: Rest-stress sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has sensitivity and specificity similar to those of thallium 201 SPECT for detection of coronary artery disease. However, sestamibi is not ideal agent to study myocardial viability. There is not published experience in Latin American using dual isotope SPECT protocol to evaluate myocardial perfusion and viability. We studied 44 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease, 37 of them with previous myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography was performed in all patients. We used a 3 mCi rest T 201 SPECT followed by stress and 25 mCi sestamibi injection. Sestamibi SPECT was performed 30 minutes after exercise or 1 hour after pharmacologic stress with dipyridamole. To validate perfusion findings patients returning next day for rest sestamibi injection and SPECT. Scintigraphic data were read by two blinded expert using 20 SPECT segment analysis and each segment was scored using 5 points scoring system (0 = normal, 4 = absent uptake). The segmental score agreement between rest thallium 201 and rest sestamibi and the comparison of defect reversibility percentage and non reversibility between both protocols was 90.7%. CONCLUSION: Separate acquisition dual isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT is accurate for coronary artery disease evaluation. It showed a good agreement with rest-stress sestamibi SPECT for assessment of rest perfusion defects and reversibility and it was a better method to evaluate myocardial viability.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of cardiac SPECT in the detection of coronary artery disease, and the relation with the site, number and severity of the angiographic lesions. METHOD: We studied 216 patients; with myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT (T1-201 and/or Tc-99 Sestamibi) and coronary angiogram. We defined the localization of myocardial perfusion defects (anterior, inferior, septal, lateral or apex), and their correlation with coronary angiogram, based on the location, number and severity of coronary angiographic lesions. We considered significative coronary stenosis obstructions of 60% or more. RESULTS: Of the 216 patients studied, 181 (83.8%) were male and 35 (16.2%) female. Age ranged between 30 and 82 years; 143 males and 23 females had a previous myocardial infarction. The SPECT sensitivity for diagnosing ischemia of one, two and three vessel disease was 94%, 96% and 100%. The sensitivity for diagnosing disease in specific vascular territories was 91.6% for LAD 100% for RCA, 92.8% for CX and 100% for left main. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT has high sensitivity for diagnosing coronary artery disease. The sensitivity and specificity were more accurate in proximal anterior descending artery disease, left main and three-vessel coronary artery disease. We found correlation in the site, number and severity of the angiographic lesions and in myocardial perfusion defects.