PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Vordos

Publications and source records attributed to D Vordos.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Long-term functional and oncological results after retroperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy according to a prospective evaluation of 550 patients.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). From 2001 to 2005, 550 consecutive patients underwent a laparoscopic extraperitoneal prostatectomy in our department. Continence and erectile function were analysed prospectively by a self-administrated questionnaire. Mean operating time was 188 min, mean bladder catheterisation time 5.9 days, mean hospital stay 4.6 days Pathological stage was pT2 in 55.8%, pT3a in 29.6%, pT3b in 9.1% and pT4a in 5.4% tumours. Positive surgical margins were 17.9% for pT2, 44.8% for pT3 tumours and 71.4% for pT4a tumours. Five years survival without biochemical progression was 78.8%. After 24 months of follow-up, diurnal continence rate was 91%, and potency rate was 64% when both neurovascular bundles were preserved, 78.6% when the patients were younger than 60 years. LRP is now a standardised procedure. An extraperitoneal approach combines the advantages of a laparoscopic procedure with those of an extraperitoneal approach.

Erectile Dysfunction↗
PubMed2004

Laparoscopic promontory sacral colpopexy: is the posterior, recto-vaginal, mesh mandatory?

OBJECTIVE(S): The aim of our retrospective study was to determine if systematic placement of a posterior mesh, in addition to an anterior vesico-vaginal mesh, is necessary for laparoscopic treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: A laparoscopic promontory sacral colpopexy was performed in 108 patients, including 55 patients with a concurrent laparoscopic Burch procedure (50.9%). We compared 33 patients treated with a single anterior mesh (SAM) and 71 treated with a double, anterior and posterior, mesh (DM). RESULTS: The difference between the SAM and DM groups was statistically significant in terms of posterior compartment failure (rectocele and/or enterocele): 31.3% and 5.9%, respectively (p=0.0006). This significant difference persisted in the Burch (B) group (p=0.001), but not in the non-Burch (NB) group (p=0.98). Among the SAM group, this difference between the B and NB groups, was significant (57.1% versus 0%; p=0.0015) and above all not a single posterior failure was observed in the NB group. CONCLUSION(S): The placement of a posterior mesh, if highly effective, appeared unnecessary in the absence of an associated Burch procedure or a patent posterior prolapse. The posterior mesh also increased risk of postoperative complications and side effects.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 renal cancer: the gold standard? A comparison of laparoscopic vs open nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the complication rate and clinical follow-up of patients treated for T1 renal cancer by open or laparoscopic nephrectomy at the same institution, as this approach appears to be attractive for treating small renal cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1995 and 2002, 39 patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic and 26 transperitoneal open radical nephrectomy for T1 renal cancer (TNM 1997). Variables before during and after surgery, e.g. cancer recurrence, were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were no differences between the laparoscopic and open groups in age, sex ratio, weight, height, fitness score, operative duration (134 vs 133 min), minor or major complications, tumour diameter, Fuhrman grade or length of follow-up. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had less blood loss (133 vs 357 mL, P < 0.001), less need for transfusion (none vs 150 mL, P = 0.04), a lower consumption of analgesia drugs, and shorter hospitalization (5.5 vs 8.8 days, P < 0.001). With a mean follow-up of 20.4 months there was no recurrence or tumour progression. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with T1 renal cancer is a safe, reliable procedure that decreases hospitalization time and bleeding, and ensures the same cancer control as open nephrectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Complete solo laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the feasibility of "complete solo" (CS) laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) performed solely with robotic manipulation of the laparoscope and without any human assistant at all. A comparison was made between CS LRP and the standard technique to identify the advantages and drawbacks. METHODS: Sixteen consecutive patients undergoing CS LRP were compared with the last 16 patients undergoing standard LRP. The standard procedure was performed with five trocars and one human assistant. Therefore, the surgeon had three instruments immediately available and could switch quickly from one to another, while the assistant held the laparoscope and a retractor. The CS method used a voice-controlled robotic arm to manipulate the laparoscope and a mechanical arm for the assisting instrument. RESULTS: The mean operative time in the CS and standard groups was 324 and 347 minutes, respectively (P >0.5). An additional human assistant was required, for 1 hour, in 3 patients of each group. No significant difference was noted between the two groups in terms of catheterization time, hospital stay, positive margin rate, complications, short-term cancer control, or functional results. The CS method has been demonstrated to be highly cost-effective compared with the standard technique. CONCLUSIONS: The CS LRP is feasible and compares favorably with the standard technique. It offers unique advantages in terms of direct control of the operative view, standardization of the assistance, and higher stability of the laparoscope, thus greatly enhancing the surgeon's comfort. The diminished need for human operative assistance provides significant economic and organizational benefits.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.

The objective of this work was to evaluate the oncological outcomes and complications of prostate cancer patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA)<10 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy by retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach. From 1988 to 2001, 306 patients with PSA<10 ng/ml underwent radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal or laparoscopic approach. Mean operative time, complication rates, length of hospital stay, catheterization time and pathological results were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the likelihood of biochemical PSA recurrence. There were no statistical differences between the three groups in terms of preoperative characteristics except for PSA levels (5.5, 6.5 and 6.6 ng/ml for the retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic approach, respectively, P<0.05) and for the T1c stage prevalence (50%, 43.1% and 68.4%, P<0.05). Operating time was significatively longer in the laparoscopic approach (266 min), whereas transfusion rate (22.1%), bladder catetherization (12.1 days), and length of hospital stay (12.1 days) were higher in the retropubic group (P<0.05). The percentage of medical and surgical complications were 6.9%, 3.1% and 3.4% (P<0.05) and 18.6%, 16.9% and 11.6% (P<0.05) for the retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic approach, respectively. Pathological staging revealed pT2 in 76.7%, 78.4% and 81.3% for retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach, respectively (P<0.05). Positive surgical positive margins were noted in 20.9%, 18.4% and 20.6% (P>0.05). The actuarial 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 89.3%, 89.2% and 86.2% (P>0.05) for retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach, respectively. It can be concluded that in patients with preoperative PSA<10 ng/ml, clinical outcome and complication rates were similar, regardless of the choice of surgical approach.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

[Can a precise vesiculectomy be performed during radical prostatectomy?].

OBJECTIVE: To define the anatomical landmarks allowing precise vesiculectomy to be performed during radical prostatectomy for cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 12 non-formalin-preserved anatomical subjects were dissected as during retropubic and perineal prostatectomy, with and without coloured latex vascular injection. RESULTS: Three anatomical landmarks were defined: 1) Denonvilliers' fascia; 2) vas deferens; 3) arteries supplying the seminal vesicles. CONCLUSIONS: These three anatomical landmarks ensure: complete resection, preservation of adjacent anatomical structures and elective haemostasis.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions.

PURPOSE: We compare the incidence of positive surgical margins in patients who underwent perineal or retropubic radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T1, T2) prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, nonrandomized study we reexamined the specimens of 94 consecutive patients who underwent radical perineal (48) or retropubic (46) prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer (stage T1, T2) and with pathological stage pT2 (intracapsular), pT3A (established extracapsular extension without positive margins) or pT3B (extracapsular extension with positive margins) without lymph node involvement (N0). We assessed the presence or absence of extracapsular cancer with or without positive margins, incisions of the prostatic capsule exposing cancer (surgically induced positive margins) or benign glandular tissue. Patients were followed for 3 to 66 months (mean 25) using an ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen assay with a lower detection limit of less than 0.05 ng./ml. RESULTS: The overall incidence of positive margins in cancer tissue was 56% in the perineal and 61% in the retropubic group, and biochemical failure-free survival was 67% each. However, surgically induced positive margins in patients with organ confined disease were more frequent in the perineal than retropubic group (43 versus 29%, p < 0.05) and associated with a 37% risk of biochemical failure (prostate specific antigen greater than 0.1 ng./ml.) at mean followup. In addition, capsular incisions exposing benign tissue were more frequent in the perineal than retropubic group (90 versus 37%, p < 0.05) irrespective of pathological stage. CONCLUSIONS: Although overall positive margins and biochemical failure rates are similar or identical for the perineal and retropubic approaches for organ confined prostate cancer, the perineal approach is associated with a significantly higher risk of capsular incisions and surgically induced positive margins and, thus, a higher risk of biochemical failure.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

[Complete perineal prostatectomy carries an increased risk of capsular incision in healthy and cancerous tissue].

OBJECTIVES: To compare positive resection margin rates in tumour tissue and healthy tissue according to whether total prostatectomy for cancer is performed via a retropubic or transperineal approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, non-randomized study was based on 94 patients suffering from clinically localized cancer (T1-T2) of the prostate operated either via a retropubic (46: group 1) or perineal (48: group II) approach. All slides were reviewed by two pathologists not informed about the clinical course. The frequency of tumour margins associated with extracapsular invasion, capsular incision, without extracapsular extension of the tumour, and finally the incidence of capsular incisions exposing tumour tissue, were determined. RESULTS: While the number of positive resection margins was equivalent in the two groups (61% for group I versus 56% for group II), it was higher in the perineal group (43% versus 29%, p < 0.05) when the tumour was confined to the gland (pT2). A higher incidence of resection margins in healthy tissue was also observed in group II (90% versus 37%). CONCLUSION: Transperitoneal prostatectomy is associated with a higher incidence of resection margins in tumour tissue in patients with prostate-confined cancer. Analysis of the resection margins in healthy tissue suggests that the surgical incision is a predisposing factor to their creation.

Aged↗