PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D W Amory

Publications and source records attributed to D W Amory.

39 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Oral testosterone-triglyceride conjugate in rabbits: single-dose pharmacokinetics and comparison with oral testosterone undecanoate.

Development of a safe and effective oral form of testosterone has been inhibited by the rapid hepatic metabolism of nonalkylated androgens. Since triglycerides are absorbed via lymphatics and bypass the liver, we hypothesized that a testosterone-triglyceride conjugate (TTC) might allow for safe and effective oral testosterone therapy. Therefore, we studied the single-dose pharmacokinetics of oral administration of TTC in rabbits. Female New Zealand rabbits were administered 2, 4, or 8 mg/kg of TTC in sesame oil by gastric lavage. Testosterone undecanoate (TU) by gastric lavage was used as a positive control. Blood was sampled from a catheter in the auricular artery at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, and 600 minutes after drug administration. Samples were assayed for testosterone by a fluoroimmunoassay. Mean serum testosterone, area under the curve (AUC), and terminal half-life were calculated. Oral TTC administration resulted in rapid and marked increases in serum testosterone. Oral TTC resulted in higher maximum serum testosterone concentrations than oral TU at 8 mg/kg (TTC: 28.6 +/- 7.9 nmol/L vs TU: 11.9 +/- 2.1 nmol/L; P <.001) and 4 mg/kg (TTC: 11.5 +/- 4.2 nmol/L vs TU: 3.6 +/- 1.0 nmol/L; P <.001). In addition, the AUC was 1.8 to 2.6 times greater for TTC than TU at both doses (P <.05). The terminal half-life for both TU and TTC was between 3 and 5 hours and was not significantly different. We conclude that oral TTC is rapidly absorbed from the rabbit intestine and results in elevated concentrations of serum testosterone. The absorption of TTC appears to be superior to that of TU; however, the in vivo persistence of the 2 compounds is similar. TTC may offer an alternative to the use of TU for oral testosterone therapy. Further testing of this compound is warranted.

Administration, Oral↗

Hemodynamic effects of intravenous famotidine in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the hemodynamic effects of famotidine in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: A large university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-one patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: The patients received a rapid intravenous bolus injection of famotidine 20 mg or saline placebo after anesthesia induction. A second dose was given 12 hours after surgery in the intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serial hemodynamic measurements (heart rate, arterial blood pressure, cardiac index, pulmonary arterial pressure, central venous pressure, systemic vascular resistance) were obtained after each famotidine or placebo dose and analyzed by ANOVA: The values were not altered (p > 0.05) after intraoperative or postoperative famotidine or placebo administration. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid intravenous bolus administration of famotidine does not alter patient hemodynamics after anesthesia induction or in the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery.

Aged↗

The effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane on recovery from outpatient surgery.

This randomized, open-label study compared the investigational inhalational anesthetic sevoflurane with isoflurane in 47 healthy women undergoing elective ambulatory surgery. The women were randomized to receive either sevoflurane or isoflurane in 60% nitrous oxide-oxygen. Induction with thiopental 3-6 mg/kg was followed by vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg and fentanyl 0-200 micrograms. Duration of anesthesia, time to emergence, orientation, length of stay in the surgical unit, and hospital discharge were recorded. The emergence, length of stay, and discharge times after discontinuation of sevoflurane were 9.7 +/- 0.7, 120.6 +/- 8.0, and 244 +/- 15 minutes, respectively, and for isoflurane were 11.9 +/- 1.4, 106.8 +/- 7.1, and 282 +/- 24 minutes, respectively (NS). The isoflurane group had a higher frequency of postoperative cough. At the end of surgery, the sevoflurane group received a deeper level of anesthesia (minimum alveolar concentration 1.5 vs 1.3), however, these patients were oriented earlier (13.6 +/- 1.1 min vs 17.0 +/- 1.5 min isoflurane; p = 0.02) after discontinuation of anesthesia, although this difference is of little clinical significance.

Adult↗