PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D W Cockcroft

Publications and source records attributed to D W Cockcroft.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

The links between allergen skin test sensitivity, airway responsiveness and airway response to allergen.

BACKGROUND: The allergen-induced early asthmatic response [provocation concentration (PC)20, the concentration causing a 20% forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV)1 fall] depends on the level of IgE sensitivity and the degree of nonallergic airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and can be predicted from histamine PC20 and allergen skin test endpoint. OBJECTIVES: We examined the relationships between allergen PC20, methacholine PC20, and allergen skin test endpoint and assessed the accuracy of both the histamine PC20-based prediction of allergen PC20 (using methacholine) and a new methacholine PC20-based prediction equation. METHODS: From 158 allergen challenges, the allergen PC20, the methacholine PC20, and the skin test endpoint were recorded and relationships between these three were sought. We compared the measured allergen PC20 to that predicted from the previous histamine PC20-based and the new methacholine-based formulae. RESULTS: In single regressions, allergen PC20 correlated with both methacholine PC20 (r=0.25, P=0.0015) and skin test endpoint (r=0.52, P <0.00005). The relationship was improved by multiple regression of log-allergen PC20vs. log-methacholine PC20 and log-endpoint (r=0.61, P <0.00005). The histamine-based formula predicted allergen PC20 to within 2 doubling concentrations in 80% and within 3 in 92%. The new methacholine-based formula to within 2 and 3 concentrations in 81% and 94%, respectively; only nine of 158 subjects were outside the 3 concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: We have confirmed the dependence of the allergen-induced early asthmatic response upon the level of allergic sensitivity and the degree of AHR, the latter as assessed by methacholine challenge. The allergen PC20 can be predicted to within 3 doubling concentrations in 94% of cases.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Mycobacterium saskatchewanense sp. nov., a novel slowly growing scotochromogenic species from human clinical isolates related to Mycobacterium interjectum and Accuprobe-positive for Mycobacterium avium complex.

A pigmented, slowly growing Mycobacterium avium complex AccuProbe-positive organism was isolated from the sputum and pleural fluid of a 72-year-old female with bronchiectasis. The unusual morphology of the organism prompted further identification by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, revealing a perfect identity with previously uncharacterized strain Mycobacterium sp. MCRO 8 (GenBank accession no. X93034), with the closest established species by 16S rDNA analysis being Mycobacterium interjectum. HPLC of the organism corresponded to previously obtained patterns identified as M. interjectum-like and, upon sequence evaluation of a selection of strains with a similar profile, more were subsequently identified as MCRO 8. A total of 16 strains isolated from human respiratory samples were evaluated in the characterization of this novel species, for which the name Mycobacterium saskatchewanense sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is strain 00-250(T) (=ATCC BAA-544(T)=DSM 44616(T)=CIP 108114(T)).

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2003

Indirect airway challenges.

Indirect challenges act by causing the release of endogenous mediators that cause the airway smooth muscle to contract. This is in contrast to the direct challenges where agonists such as methacholine or histamine cause airflow limitation predominantly via a direct effect on airway smooth muscle. Direct airway challenges have been used widely and are well standardised. They are highly sensitive, but not specific to asthma and can be used to exclude current asthma in a clinic population. Indirect bronchial stimuli, in particular exercise, hyperventilation, hypertonic aerosols, as well as adenosine, may reflect more directly the ongoing airway inflammation and are therefore more specific to identify active asthma. They are increasingly used to evaluate the prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and to assess specific problems in patients with known asthma, e.g. exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, evaluation before scuba diving. Direct bronchial responsiveness is only slowly and to a modest extent, influenced by repeated administration of inhaled steroids. Indirect challenges may reflect more closely acute changes in airway inflammation and a change in responsiveness to an indirect stimulus may be a clinically relevant marker to assess the clinical course of asthma. Moreover, some of the indirect challenges, e.g. hypertonic saline and mannitol, can be combined with the assessment of inflammatory cells by induction of sputum.

Asthma↗
PubMed2003

Regular salbutamol use increases CXCL8 responses in asthma: relationship to the eosinophil response.

Regular salbutamol use can exacerbate allergen-induced airway eosinophilia in asthmatics, but its effect on airway eosinophil chemokine responses is unknown. Asthmatic subjects (n=14) were treated for 10 days with placebo or salbutamol in a double-blind, cross-over study, then given same-dose allergen challenges. Their sputa were then analysed 1 and 7 h later for a panel of eosinophil-related cytokines. Eosinophils from five test and three control subjects were tested for expression of CXCL8/interleukin (IL)-8, and its receptors and responsiveness to CCL11/eotaxin and CXCL8/IL-8. Sputum CXCL8/IL-8, but not IL-5, CCL5/regulated on activation, T-cell expressed and secreted, CCL7/monocyte chemotactic protein-3, CCL11/eotaxin, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or tumour necrosis factor levels, were increased (42%) by the salbutamol treatments. The CXCL8/IL-8 levels correlated with the proportions of sputum eosinophils and these cells, but not other sputum cells, stained strongly for CXCL8/IL-8. The circulating eosinophils of the tested subjects (n=5) expressed CXCL8/IL-8 receptors and secreted high levels of this chemokine. Neutralisation of sputum CXCL8/IL-8 reduced eosinophil chemotactic responses to these samples by 19 +/- 5%. These data suggest that regular use of salbutamol can augment airway CXCL8/interleukin-8 responses to allergen challenge and that this CXCL8/interleukin-8 could contribute to the airway inflammatory response.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Regular inhaled salbutamol : effect on airway responsiveness to methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate and tolerance to bronchoprotection.

OBJECTIVE: Regular treatment with inhaled beta(2)-agonists increases airway responsiveness consistently to indirect bronchoconstrictors (allergen, exercise, hypertonic saline solution, etc) and inconsistently to direct bronchoconstrictors (histamine, methacholine). Studies demonstrating tolerance to beta(2)-agonist bronchoprotection against the indirect bronchoconstrictor adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) have not examined changes in baseline AMP responsiveness. This study assessed the effect of regular salbutamol on AMP and methacholine responsiveness and on tolerance to bronchoprotection. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, crossover study. SETTING: University hospital bronchoprovocation laboratory. PATIENTS: Fourteen atopic asthmatic subjects with FEV(1) > 65% predicted, and methacholine provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) < 8 mg/mL. INTERVENTIONS: Salbutamol, 100 microg, and placebo inhalers, two puffs qid, each for 10 days. MEASUREMENTS: Methacholine PC(20) and AMP PC(20) measured 12 h after blinded inhaler after each treatment period. Methacholine PC(20) and AMP PC(20) repeated 10 min after salbutamol, 200 microg (eight subjects). RESULTS: There was no difference between placebo and salbutamol treatment in geometric mean methacholine PC(20) (0.85 mg/mL vs 0.82 mg/mL, p = 0.86) or AMP PC(20) (22 mg/mL vs 17.4 mg/mL, p = 0.21; n = 14). The acute bronchoprotective effect of salbutamol was greater vs. AMP than vs methacholine (5.1 doubling concentrations vs. 3.5 doubling concentrations, p = 0.06) and loss of protective effect of salbutamol (mean +/- SD) was greater vs AMP than vs. methacholine (2.4 +/- 0.33 doubling concentration loss vs 0.8 +/- 0.21 doubling concentration loss, p = 0.008; n = 8). CONCLUSION: Regular salbutamol (mean +/- SD) treatment did not enhance airway responsiveness to either the indirect bronchoconstrictor AMP or the direct bronchoconstrictor methacholine. Compared to its effect on methacholine, salbutamol had a greater acute protective effect vs AMP and produced greater loss of protection vs AMP when used regularly.

Adenosine Monophosphate↗
PubMed2001

Methacholine challenge: test-shortening procedures.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Validation of test-shortening procedures for the 2-min tidal breathing methacholine challenge method. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary-care university clinical pulmonary function laboratory. PATIENTS: One thousand subjects aged 10 to 85 years (mean +/- SD, 44.5 +/- 16.0 years), 44.5% male, referred for methacholine challenge. INTERVENTION: Two-minute tidal breathing methacholine challenge was performed, with both physician and technician access to published test-shortening procedures. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: There were 315 positive test results (provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) [PC(20)] < or = 8 mg/mL) and 685 negative test results. The subjects with positive test results were less likely to be male (39.1 vs 47.5%; p < 0.02) and had lower FEV(1) (91.8 +/- 14.9% predicted vs 97.2 +/- 13.9% predicted; p < 0.001). The average starting PC(20) was between 0.5 mg/mL and 1.0 mg/mL; the most common PC(20) was 1 mg/mL (67%). There were 431 skipped concentrations in 380 subjects. The mean number of methacholine inhalations was 3.7 +/- 1.1 (3.9 +/- 0.1 for negative test results vs 3.3 +/- 1.2 for positive test results; p < 0.001). Eighteen subjects had a > or = 20% FEV(1) fall on the first inhalation, and 11 subjects had a > or = 20% FEV(1) fall after a skipped concentration. In only one case (0.1%) an FEV(1) fall > or = 40% on the first concentration was reported, compared with no cases after a skipped concentration and seven cases with a > or = 40% FEV(1) fall after a routine doubling dose step-up. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-min tidal breathing methacholine test in clinical practice can be safely shortened to an average of less than four inhalations using starting concentrations based on FEV(1), asthma medication, and clinical features, and by occasionally omitting concentrations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Mast cell tryptase release and asthmatic responses to allergen increase with regular use of salbutamol.

BACKGROUND: Increased asthmatic responses to allergen, both early and late, have been demonstrated after regular use of beta(2)-agonists in as few as 7 days. Desensitization of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors on airway mast cells may contribute to this effect by allowing greater release of mast cell mediator on allergen-induced degranulation. Tryptase released from lung mast cells can be measured in serum 1 hour after allergen challenge and serves as a marker of mast cell degranulation. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of regular treatment with salbutamol, a beta(2)-agonist, on mast cell mediator release after allergen challenge and its influence on the early asthmatic response (EAR) and the late allergic response, we measured the EAR, serum tryptase levels, the 7-hour FEV(1), and sputum tryptase levels and cell profiles. METHODS: We conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized cross-over comparison of treatments for 10 days with either a salbutamol metered-dose inhaler (100 microgram, 2 puffs 4 times daily) or a matched placebo inhaler with at least a 7-day washout between treatments. Atopic subjects (n = 14) with mild-to-moderate asthma performed same-dose allergen inhalation tests after both treatments 12 to 15 hours after the last dose of study inhaler. Baseline and 7-hour FEV(1) and the EAR to allergen were measured by using spirometry; venous blood was drawn at 1 hour for analysis of serum tryptase; and sputum was induced and collected at 1 and 7 hours. RESULTS: Salbutamol treatment resulted in a significantly greater EAR (20% +/- 1.6% [SEM] vs 15% +/- 2.1%; P =.047); increased 1-hour serum tryptase levels (9.09 +/- 1.57 vs 7.52 +/- 1.12 microgram/L; P =. 011); increased proportions of eosinophils in the 7-hour sputum sample (39.1% +/- 5.1% vs 28.4% +/- 4.4%; P <.05); increased proportion of metachromatic cells in the 7-hour sputum sample (4.4% +/- 1.1% vs 2.2% +/- 0.6%; P =.032); and lower 7-hour FEV(1) (2.77 +/- 0.18 vs 2.97 +/- 0.20 L; P =.014). Baseline FEV(1) was not significantly different after salbutamol treatment compared with values after placebo treatment (2.90 +/- 0.20 vs 3.00 +/- 0.19 L; P =.11). CONCLUSION: Regular 10-day treatment with salbutamol increases the allergen-induced release of mediator from airway mast cells, and this is reflected in an increased EAR to allergen. Late-phase responses to allergen were also enhanced, as demonstrated by decreased 7-hour FEV(1) and increased eosinophilia and percentage of metachromatic cells in the 7-hour sputum sample. Increased allergen-induced mast cell degranulation could, in part, explain the increased asthmatic responses to allergen after beta(2)-agonist treatment and could contribute to the deterioration of asthma control that is associated with regular use of beta(2)-agonist by potentiating allergic inflammation.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Calculation of provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1): comparison of lowest vs highest post-challenge FEV(1).

BACKGROUND: Considerable, unexamined controversy exists surrounding the use of the highest vs the lowest FEV(1) for calculating the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) during direct bronchoprovocation challenges. OBJECTIVE: To compare the PC(20) calculated using the lowest FEV(1) post-diluent and post-histamine/methacholine vs the PC(20) calculated using the highest FEV(1) post-diluent and post-histamine/methacholine. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of 225 challenges: 75 research methacholine challenges, 75 research histamine challenges, and 75 clinical methacholine challenges. For each test, the PC(20) was calculated twice, first using the lowest post-diluent FEV(1) to the lowest post-histamine/methacholine FEV(1), and then using the highest to the highest. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients for methacholine research, histamine research, and methacholine clinic challenges were 0.99, 0.98, and 0.95, respectively. The PC(20) calculated using the lowest to lowest FEV(1) was slightly and significantly lower in all three groups (paired t test p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The PC(20) values calculated using the highest FEV(1) are almost identical to the PC(20) values calculated using the lowest FEV(1). The difference, although clinically irrelevant, holds statistical significance.

Bronchial Hyperreactivity↗
PubMed2000

Routine pulse oximetry during methacholine challenges is unnecessary for safety.

BACKGROUND: Methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction is associated with significant hypoxemia, which can be assessed noninvasively by transcutaneous oxygen tension and pulse oximetry. OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of the monitoring of finger pulse oximetry during routine methacholine challenges in a clinical pulmonary function laboratory with regard to both safety and the possibility that a significant fall in oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO(2)) might be a useful surrogate for determining the response to methacholine. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic methacholine challenges in the pulmonary function laboratory of a tertiary-care, university-based referral hospital were studied. Methacholine challenges were performed by the standardized 2-min tidal breathing technique, and the DeltaFEV(1) was calculated from the lowest postsaline solution inhalation to the lowest postmethacholine inhalation value. SpO(2) was measured immediately prior to each spirogram, and the DeltaSpO(2) was measured from the lowest postsaline solution inhalation value to the lowest postmethacholine inhalation value. We examined the data for safety (ie, any SpO(2) value < 90). Based on previous reports, we used a DeltaSpO(2) of > or = 3 as significant and looked at the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for DeltaSpO(2) > or = 3 vis-à-vis a fall in FEV(1) of > or = 15%. RESULTS: There were 119 nonresponders (DeltaFEV(1), < 15%) and 81 responders. The baseline FEV(1) percent predicted was slightly but significantly lower in the responders (responders [+/- SD], 91.6 +/- 15%; nonresponders, 96.4 +/- 14%; p < 0.05). DeltaSpO(2) was 3.1 +/- 1.6 in the responders and 1.6 +/- 1.8 in the nonresponders (p < 0. 001). There was a single recording in one patient of SpO(2) < 90 (88). A DeltaSpO(2) > or = 3 had a sensitivity of 68%, a specificity of 73%, a positive predictive value of 63%, and negative predictive value of 77% for a fall in FEV(1) > or = 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse oximetry is not routinely useful for safety monitoring during methacholine challenge. DeltaSpO(2) is not helpful in predicting a positive spirometric response to methacholine. However, the negative predictive value is adequate to allow the DeltaSpO(2) to be used as an adjunct in assessing a negative result of a methacholine test in patients who have difficulty performing spirometry.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of beta2-agonists: comparison of the enantiomers of salbutamol with racemic salbutamol and placebo.

BACKGROUND: Regular use of racemic salbutamol results in the partial loss of its bronchoprotective effect. The 2 enantiomers of salbutamol, the bronchodilator R-salbutamol and nonbronchodilator S-salbutamol, are now available. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the effect of regular use of S-salbutamol, R-salbutamol, racemic salbutamol, and placebo on the bronchoprotective effect of a single dose of racemic salbutamol against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. METHODS: Eleven of 13 well-controlled beta2 -agonist-free asthmatic subjects completed a double-blind, randomized study comparing racemic salbutamol 2.5 mg, S-salbutamol 1. 25 mg, R-salbutamol 1.25 mg, and diluent placebo nebulized and inhaled 3 times daily for 6 days (>/=6-day washout period). Ten to 12 hours after the last dose, the subjects performed measurement of FEV1, methacholine PC20, and a repeat methacholine PC20 done 1 hour after the first methacholine test and 10 minutes after 2 puffs (200 microgram) of racemic salbutamol administered from a metered-dose inhaler. The primary endpoint was the methacholine PC20 dose shift (Deltalog PC20/log 2) from before to after administration of 200 microgram of racemic salbutamol. RESULTS: The methacholine dose shift was 3.2 doubling doses (9-fold increase in methacholine PC20 after 200 microgram of racemic salbutamol) during the placebo treatment and was unaltered (3.2) after administration of S-salbutamol. The dose shift was significantly lower after both the R-salbutamol and racemic salbutamol treatments (2.2 and 2.6 doubling doses, respectively); there was no significant difference between R-salbutamol and racemic salbutamol. There was no treatment effect on baseline FEV1, baseline methacholine PC20, or bronchodilation. CONCLUSION: Regular treatment with racemic salbutamol or R-salbutamol, but not S-salbutamol, results in a partial loss of bronchoprotection, without loss of bronchodilation, compared with placebo.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1999

Dose versus concentration of methacholine.

BACKGROUND: The methacholine challenge test is a common investigation used to identify airway hyperresponsiveness. There has been recent debate as to whether the airway effect is due to the concentration or the dose of methacholine. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the airway response during a methacholine challenge test is due to the concentration or the dose of methacholine. METHODS: Ten subjects with stable, mild asthma were enrolled in this study. Two methacholine challenge tests, one with 30-second inhalations of methacholine and the other with two minute inhalations of methacholine, were performed on each subject in a random order on 2 days within a 1-week period at approximately the same time each day. RESULTS: The geometric mean 2-minute PC20 was 1.1 mg/mL and the geometric mean 30-second PC20 was 5.7 mg/mL, 5.2-fold greater than the mean 2-minute PC20. The paired t-test comparison of the 2-minute PC20 multiplied by 4 and the 30-second PC20 revealed no significant difference (P > .2). CONCLUSIONS: The dose of methacholine is primarily responsible for the degree of bronchial response rather than the concentration.

Asthma↗