Inhibitory GABAergic control of visual signals at the lateral geniculate nucleus.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D W Godwin.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The lateral geniculate nucleus conveys the center-surround organized retinal receptive fields to the cortex in a way that does not significantly alter their spatial structure. However, non-retinal influences may change the 'strength' (detectability) of the signal under conditions of anesthesia, arousal and attention. A previous analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves in cat suggests that a reduction in signal detectability occurs in lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) relay cells in anesthetized animals in comparison to the retinal afferents. In the present study, it was found that antagonism of GABAA receptors with bicuculline (BIC) increased signal detectability in LGN relay cells in the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri). This change is consistent with the hypothesis that feedforward and/or feedback GABAergic circuits in the LGN differentially affect the retinogeniculate transfer ratio for visually driven activity versus maintained (spontaneous) activity. Under conditions of arousal or attention, signal detectability may be increased by brainstem activation, thus increasing the flow of information in the visual system.
The lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) receives input from the retina that is spatially organized into a receptive-field center and surround. It maintains this organization in the signal that it sends to the visual cortex. Previous studies have focused on changes in the receptive-field 'surround' that are generated at the LGN, possibly as a local contrast enhancement mechanism. The present study suggests a role for the LGN in regulating the receptive-field center sensitivity under the control of GABAergic circuitry. Local microiontophoresis of the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline increased the contrast sensitivity of LGN relay cells to many spatial frequencies. Difference of Gaussians analysis showed that the increased was due to an increased sensitivity of the receptive-field center. Similar increases in receptive-field center sensitivity may be produced during behavioral arousal by the action of pontine and mesencephalic pathways upon the activity of the LGN GABAergic circuitry.
Relay cells of the lateral geniculate nucleus respond to visual stimuli in one of two modes: burst and tonic. The burst mode depends on the activation of a voltage-dependent, Ca2+ conductance underlying the low threshold spike. This conductance is inactivated at depolarized membrane potentials, but when activated from hyperpolarized levels, it leads to a large, triangular, nearly all-or-none depolarization. Typically, riding its crest is a high-frequency barrage of action potentials. Low threshold spikes thus provide a nonlinear amplification allowing hyperpolarized relay neurons to respond to depolarizing inputs, including retinal EPSPs. In contrast, the tonic mode is characterized by a steady stream of unitary action potentials that more linearly reflects the visual stimulus. In this study, we tested possible differences in detection between response modes of 103 geniculate neurons by constructing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for responses to visual stimuli (drifting sine-wave gratings and flashing spots). Detectability was determined from the ROC curves by computing the area under each curve, known as the ROC area. Most cells switched between modes during recording, evidently due to small shifts in membrane potential that affected the activation state of the low threshold spike. We found that the more often a cell responded in burst mode, the larger its ROC area. This was true for responses to optimal and nonoptimal visual stimuli, the latter including nonoptimal spatial frequencies and low stimulus contrasts. The larger ROC areas associated with burst mode were due to a reduced spontaneous activity and roughly equivalent level of visually evoked response when compared to tonic mode. We performed a within-cell analysis on a subset of 22 cells that switched modes during recording. Every cell, whether tested with a low contrast or high contrast visual stimulus exhibited a larger ROC area during its burst response mode than during its tonic mode. We conclude that burst responses better support signal detection than do tonic responses. Thus, burst responses, while less linear and perhaps less useful in providing a detailed analysis of visual stimuli, improve target detection. The tonic mode, with its more linear response, seems better suited for signal analysis rather than signal detection.
Pseudorabies virus (PRV) has been shown to be an effective transneuronal tracer within both the peripheral and the central nervous system. The only investigations of this virus in the visual system have examined anterograde transport of PRV from injection sites in the retina. In the present study, we injected attenuated forms of PRV into the primary visual cortex of both rats and cats to determine whether transneuronal retrograde infection would occur back to the retina. In rats, we made small injections into visual cortex of a strain of PRV (Bartha Blu) that contained a beta-galactosidase promoter insert. In cats, we injected PRV-M201 into area V1 of visual cortex. After a 2- to 4-day incubation period, we examined tissue from these animals for the presence of the beta-galactosidase marker (rats) or the virus itself (cats). Cortical PRV injections resulted in transneuronal retrograde infection of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN), and retina. PRV was retinotopically distributed in the pathway. In addition, double-labeling experiments in cats using an antibody against gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) were conducted to reveal PRV-labeled interneurons within the LGN and TRN. All TRN neurons were GABA+, as was a subset of LGN neurons. Only the subset of TRN neurons adjacent to the PRV-labeled sector of LGN was labeled with PRV. In addition, a subset of GABA+ interneurons in LGN was also labeled with PRV. We processed some tissue for electron microscopy to examine the morphology of the virus at various replication stages. No mature virions were detected in terminals from efferent pathways, although forms consistent with retrograde infection were encountered. We conclude that the PRV strains we have used produce a local infection that progresses primarily in the retrograde direction in the central visual pathways. The infection is transneuronal and viral replication maintains the intensity of the label throughout the chain of connected neurons, providing a means of examining detailed circuitry within the visual pathway.