PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D van der Heijde

Publications and source records attributed to D van der Heijde.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Radiography as primary outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: acceptable sample sizes for trials with 3 months' follow up.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether plain radiographs can show changes in joint damage due to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) within 3 months. METHODS: 188 film pairs taken with a 3 month interval were evaluated. They were scored with (chronological) and without (paired) knowledge of the sequence of the films according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. Changes in joint damage were analysed on a group and an individual level for different subsets of patients. Sample sizes required to detect statistically and clinically significant differences were estimated based on the percentages of patients with progression larger than the smallest detectable change (SDC). RESULTS: Changes in joint damage were seen by both the chronological and the paired scoring method. The percentage of patients with progression of joint damage larger than the corresponding SDCs (1.7 and 2.4) varied in the subsets from 18% to 64% if based on the chronological change-scores and from 9% to 36% using paired change-scores. Acceptable sample size estimates were seen in several subsets, depending on (a) how the investigated drug would reduce the individual risk of progression of joint damage (by an absolute or a relative risk reduction model); (b) how damage was scored (chronological or paired); (c) the baseline risk; and (d) whether a two sided or one sided test would be used. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in joint damage due to RA can be detected reliably already within 3 months. This finding can be used to plan short term, randomised controlled trials with radiographic progression as primary outcome.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Sustained improvement over two years in physical function, structural damage, and signs and symptoms among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab and methotrexate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated administration of infliximab plus methotrexate (MTX) over a 2-year period in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who previously experienced an incomplete response to MTX. METHODS: Four hundred twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive MTX plus placebo or infliximab at a dose of 3 or 10 mg/kg plus MTX for 54 weeks, with an additional year of followup. The protocol was later amended to allow for continued treatment during the second year. Of 259 patients who entered the second year of treatment, 216 continued to receive infliximab plus MTX for 102 weeks. Ninety-four of these 259 patients experienced a gap in therapy of >8 weeks before continuing therapy. Infusions were administered at weeks 0, 2, and 6, followed by treatment every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (alternating with placebo infusions in the interim 4-week visits) at a dose of 3 or 10 mg/kg for a total of 102 weeks (including the gap in therapy). For safety and efficacy assessments, data on the patients who were randomized to receive treatment, irrespective of whether treatment was administered for 102 weeks, were evaluated using all actual observations available. The efficacy measures included the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (physical function), Short Form 36 health survey (SF-36) (health-related quality of life), total radiographic scores (structural damage), and the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) (signs and symptoms). RESULTS: The infliximab plus MTX regimens resulted in significantly greater improvement in HAQ scores (P < or = 0.006) and SF-36 physical component summary scores (P < or = 0.011) compared with the MTX-only group. There also was stability in the SF-36 mental component summary score among patients who received the infliximab plus MTX regimens. Median changes from baseline to week 102 in the total radiographic score were 4.25 for patients who received the MTX-only regimen and 0.50 for patients who received the infliximab plus MTX regimen. The proportion of patients achieving an ACR20 response at week 102 varied from 40% to 48% for the infliximab plus MTX groups compared with 16% for the MTX-only group. CONCLUSION: Throughout 102 weeks of therapy, infliximab plus MTX provided significant, clinically relevant improvement in physical function and quality of life, accompanied by inhibition of progressive joint damage and sustained improvement in the signs and symptoms of RA among patients who previously had an incomplete response to MTX alone.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2004

OMERACT-OARSI initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited.

BACKGROUND: The OARSI Standing Committee for Clinical Trials Response Criteria Initiative had developed two sets of responder criteria to present the results of changes after treatment in three symptomatic domains (pain, function, and patient's global assessment) as a single variable for clinical trials (1). For each domain, a response was defined by both a relative and an absolute change, with different cut-offs with regard to the drug, the route of administration and the OA localization. OBJECTIVE: To propose a simplified set of responder criteria with a similar cut-off, whatever the drug, the route or the OA localization. METHODS: Data driven approach: (1) Two databases were considered: the "elaboration" database with which the formal OARSI sets of responder criteria were elaborated, and the "revisit" database. (2) Six different scenarios were evaluated: The two formal OARSI sets of criteria; Four proposed scenarios of simplified sets of criteria. Data from clinical randomized blinded placebo controlled trials were used to evaluate the performances of the two formal scenarios with two different databases ("elaboration" versus "revisit") and those of the four proposed simplified scenarios within the "revisit" database. The placebo effect, active effect, treatment effect, and the required sample arm size to obtain the placebo effect and the active treatment effect observed were the performances evaluated for each of the six scenarios. Experts' opinion approach: Results were discussed among the participants of the OMERACT VI meeting, who voted to select the definite OMERACT-OARSI set of criteria (one of the six evaluated scenarios). RESULTS: Data driven approach: Fourteen trials totaling 1886 OA patients and fifteen studies involving 8164 OA patients were evaluated in the "elaboration"and the "revisit" databases respectively. The variability of the performances observed in the "revisit" database when using the different simplified scenarios was similar to that observed between the two databases ("elaboration" versus "revisit") when using the formal scenarios. The treatment effect and the required sample arm size were similar for each set of criteria. Experts' opinion approach: According to the experts, these two previous performances were the most important of an optimal set of responder criteria. They chose the set of criteria considering both pain and function as evaluation domain and requiring an absolute change and a relative change from baseline to define a response, with similar cut-offs whatever the drug, the route of administration or the OA localization. CONCLUSION: This data driven and experts' opinion approach is the basis for proposing an optimal simplified set of responder criteria for OA clinical trials. Other studies, using other sets of OA patients, are required in order to further validate this proposed OMERACT-OARSI set of criteria.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2004

Long term evaluation of radiographic disease progression in a subset of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with leflunomide beyond 2 years.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of long term (>2 years) leflunomide treatment on radiographic progression in patients with RA. METHODS: Patients treated with leflunomide for >2 years in one of three phase III trials and subsequent extensions, for whom paired, evaluable radiographs at baseline and study end point were available, were included. Radiographs of hands and feet were assessed according to the modified Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method, for erosion, joint space narrowing, and total score. Changes from baseline were assessed, and a predicted yearly progression rate estimated for each patient. RESULTS: 128 of the original 824 patients were included, with mean disease duration 5.1 years and mean leflunomide treatment duration 4.3 years until the final x ray examination. The mean change from baseline in total score was 8.6 with yearly adjusted rate 1.9, and the median change was 2 with yearly adjusted rate 0.5, compared with 7.9 and 4.9, respectively, before leflunomide treatment. After treatment, the rate improved in 92/128 (72%) patients and deteriorated in 21/128 (16%). In 42 (33%) patients who had a total score >0 at baseline, no radiographic progression occurred after leflunomide treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In a subset of patients who continued treatment long term, leflunomide treatment reduced the rate of radiographic damage.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2004

Which patients with ankylosing spondylitis should be treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibiting therapy? A survey among Dutch rheumatologists.

AIM: To determine the criteria considered important by Dutch rheumatologists in judging whether a patient with ankylosing spondylitis should start tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blocking therapy. METHODS: 19 Dutch rheumatologists were asked to prioritise various demographic and clinical features for their importance in judging whether a patient should be treated with TNF blocking therapy. In addition, nine Dutch physicians who had referred patients with ankylosing spondylitis for inclusion in an ongoing long term observational study (OASIS) were asked to determine on the basis of case record review for each of their patients whether or not TNF blocking therapy would be considered appropriate. RESULTS: The variables considered most important were: rate of development of functional impairment; physician's global assessment of current disease activity; physician's global assessment of cumulative disease activity; presence of hip arthritis; physician's global assessment of disease severity. Analysis of the OASIS data (79 patients) showed that patients in whom TNF blocking therapy was considered justified (n = 24; 30%) differed significantly from those in whom it was not considered justified in: patient reported disease activity; functional impairment; spinal mobility; radiographic damage score. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex, function, and radiographic damage were the only independent determinants of a decision to start TNF blocking drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians reported that disease activity, function, and severity were critically important in judging whether to start TNF blocking therapy. In practice, they based their decision more on severity than on activity. They were able to select patients with a high level of radiographic damage, which suggests that this feature captures other domains such as disease activity, spinal mobility, and function.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2004

How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early.

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (LBP), the leading symptom of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and undifferentiated axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), precedes the development of radiographic sacroiliitis, sometimes by many years. OBJECTIVE: To assign disease probabilities and to develop an algorithm to help in the early diagnosis of axial SpA. METHODS: Axial SpA comprises AS and undifferentiated SpA with predominant axial involvement. Clinical features include inflammatory back pain (IBP), alternating buttock pain, enthesitis, arthritis, dactylitis, acute anterior uveitis, a positive family history, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, and good response to NSAIDs. Associated laboratory findings include raised acute phase reactions, HLA-B27 association, and abnormalities on skeletal imaging. Sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios (LRs) of these parameters were determined from published studies. A 5% prevalence of axial SpA among patients with chronic LBP was used. The probability of the presence of axial SpA, depending on the presence or absence of the above clinical features of SpA, was determined. A probability of > or = 90% was used to make a diagnosis of axial SpA. RESULTS: The presence of inflammatory back pain features increased the probability of axial SpA from the background 5% prevalence to 14%. The presence of 2-3 SpA features was necessary to increase the probability of axial SpA to 90%. The highest LRs were obtained for HLA-B27 and MRI. Diagnostic algorithms to be used in daily practice were suggested. CONCLUSIONS: This approach can help clinicians to diagnose with a high degree of confidence axial SpA at an early stage in patients with IBP who lack radiographic sacroiliitis.

Axis, Cervical Vertebra↗
PubMed2003

Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Although disease-specific health status measures are available for ankylosing spondylitis (AS), no instrument exists for assessing quality of life (QoL) in the condition. OBJECTIVE: To produce an AS-specific QoL measure that would be relevant and acceptable to respondents, valid, and reliable. METHODS: The ASQoL employs the needs-based model of QoL and was developed in parallel in the UK and the Netherlands (NL). Content was derived from interviews with patients in each country. Face and content validity were assessed through patient field test interviews (UK and NL). A postal survey in the UK produced a more efficient version of the ASQoL, which was tested for scaling properties, reliability, internal consistency, and validity in a further postal survey in each country. RESULTS: A 41 item questionnaire was derived from interview transcripts. Field testing interviews confirmed acceptability. Rasch analysis of data from the first survey (n=121) produced a 26 item questionnaire. Rasch analysis of data from the second survey (UK: n=164; NL: n=154) showed some item misfit, but showed that items formed a hierarchical order and were stable over time. Problematic items were removed giving an 18 item scale. Both language versions had excellent internal consistency (alpha=0.89-0.91), test-retest reliability (r(s)=0.92 UK and r(s)=0.91 NL), and validity. CONCLUSIONS: The ASQoL provides a valuable tool for assessing the impact of interventions for AS and for evaluating models of service delivery. It is well accepted by patients, taking about four minutes to complete, and has excellent scaling and psychometric properties.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Assessment of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess, firstly, the validity of the enthesis index published by Mander (Mander enthesis index (MEI)) and, secondly, to investigate whether it is possible to define a new enthesis index that is less time consuming to perform with at least similar or better properties. METHODS: Data from the OASIS cohort, an international, longitudinal, observational study on outcome in ankylosing spondylitis, were used. In this study, measures of disease activity, including the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and the MEI, were assessed regularly in 217 patients. With the MEI, for each measurement period independently, a process of data reduction was performed to identify the entheses most commonly reported as painful by the patients. A more concise enthesis index was constructed with aid of the entheses found in this way. Correlations with measures of disease activity were used to test the validity of several entheses indices. RESULTS: Reduction of the number of entheses from 66 to 13 and omitting grading of the intensity of pain resulted in an index which was named the "Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score" (MASES). The MASES (range 0-13) has much greater feasibility than the MEI (range 0-90). However, up to 21% of patients with a score >0 on the MEI were not identified by a score on the MASES >0. Only 2.1% of the patients with an original enthesis score >0 had an original score on the MEI >3 (range 0-90) and it can be questioned whether a low score on the MEI index represents clinically important enthesitis. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the MASES score and the MEI was 0.90 and between the MASES and the BASDAI was 0.53 compared with a correlation of 0.59 between the MEI and the BASDAI. CONCLUSIONS: MASES seems to be a good alternative to the MEI with much better feasibility.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) whether the newly developed World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II) is a useful instrument for measuring disability, to assess its responsiveness in relation to other traditional disease specific instruments, and to identify factors that are associated with both short term and long term scores on the WHODAS II. METHODS: Patients with AS from a randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy of spa treatment (n=117) and from a five year longitudinal observational study (n=97) participated. The patients completed several questionnaires, including the WHODAS II. After a three week course of spa treatment, 31 patients again completed all questionnaires to assess responsiveness. To determine to what degree the WHODAS II reflects some AS oriented measures on disease activity, functioning, and quality of life, correlation coefficients between the WHODAS II and these other questionnaires were calculated. Responsiveness was calculated by the effect size (ES) and standardised response mean (SRM). Linear regression analysis was performed to explore which factors might be associated with short term changes on the WHODAS II and to investigate (in the observational study) which factors of WHODAS II might predict disability five years later. RESULTS: Mean score on the WHODAS II was 23.9 (SD 15.5 (range 0.0-76.1)). Scores on the WHODAS II were significantly correlated with all disease specific questionnaires measured (all p<0.001). The WHODAS II showed a comparable short term responsiveness score (SRM 0.41; ES 0.39). In regression analysis these short term changes on the WHODAS II were significantly associated with changes in functioning (beta coefficient 4.25, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.24 to 7.26, p=0.007). In the observational study, disease activity (beta coefficient 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.53, p<0.000) as well as functioning (beta coefficient 0.23, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.38, p=0.002) seemed to significantly predict disability (WHODAS II) after five years. CONCLUSION: The WHODAS II is a useful instrument for measuring disability in AS in that it accurately reflects disease specific instruments and that it shows similar responsiveness scores. In AS, a short term change on the WHODAS II is associated with a change in physical function. At the group level, disease activity and physical functioning may predict disability after five years.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of statistically derived ASAS improvement criteria for ankylosing spondylitis with clinically relevant improvement according to an expert panel.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the recently developed (statistically derived) "ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis Working Group" improvement criteria (ASAS-IC) for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) reflect clinically relevant improvement according to the opinion of an expert panel. METHODS: The ASAS-IC consist of four domains: physical function, spinal pain, patient global assessment, and inflammation. Scores on these four domains of 55 patients with AS, who had participated in a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug efficacy trial, were presented to an international expert panel (consisting of patients with AS and members of the ASAS Working Group) in a three round Delphi exercise. The number of (non-)responders according to the ASAS-IC was compared with the final consensus of the experts. The most important domains in the opinion of the experts were identified, and also selected with discriminant analysis. A number of provisional criteria sets that best represented the consensus of the experts were defined. Using other datasets, these clinically derived criteria sets as well as the statistically derived ASAS-IC were then tested for discriminative properties and for agreement with the end of trial efficacy by patient and doctor. RESULTS: Forty experts completed the three Delphi rounds. The experts considered twice as many patients to be responders than the ASAS-IC (42 v 21). Overall agreement between experts and ASAS-IC was 62%. Spinal pain was considered the most important domain by most experts and was also selected as such by discriminant analysis. Provisional criteria sets with an agreement of >or=80% compared with the consensus of the experts showed high placebo response rates (27-42%), in contrast with the ASAS-IC with a predefined placebo response rate of 25%. All criteria sets and the ASAS-IC discriminated well between active and placebo treatment (chi(2)=36-45; p<0.001). Compared with the end of trial efficacy assessment, the provisional criteria sets showed an agreement of 71-82%, sensitivity of 67-83%, and specificity of 81-88%. The ASAS-IC showed an agreement of 70%, sensitivity of 62%, and specificity of 89%. CONCLUSION: The ASAS-IC are strict in defining response, are highly specific, and consequently show lower sensitivity than the clinically derived criteria sets. However, those patients who are considered as responders by applying the ASAS-IC are acknowledged as such by the expert panel as well as by patients' and doctors' judgments, and are therefore likely to be true responders.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2003

Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: does training improve quality?

OBJECTIVE: To assess performance of radiologists and rheumatologists in detecting sacroiliitis METHODS: 100 rheumatologists and 23 radiologists participated. One set of films was used for each assessment, another for training, and the third for confidence judgment. Films of HLA-B27+ patients with AS were used to assess sensitivity. For specificity films of healthy HLA-B27- relatives were included. Plain sacroiliac (SI) films with simultaneously taken computed tomographic scans (CTs) were used for confidence judgment. Three months after reading the training set, sensitivity and specificity assessments were repeated. Next, participants attended a workshop. They also rated 26 SI radiographs and 26 CTs for their trust in each judgment. Three months later final assessments were done. RESULTS: Sensitivity (84.3%/79.8%) and specificity (70.6%/74.7%) for radiologists and rheumatologists were comparable. Rheumatologists showed 6.3% decrease in sensitivity after self education (p=0.001), but 3.0% better specificity (p=0.008). The decrease in sensitivity reversed after the workshop. Difference in sensitivity three months after the workshop and baseline was only 0.5%. Sensitivity <50% occurred in 13% of participants. Only a few participants showed changes of >5% in both sensitivity and specificity. Intraobserver agreement for sacroiliitis grade 1 or 2 ranged from 65% to 100%. Sensitivity for CT (86%) was higher than for plain films (72%) (p<0.001) with the same specificity (84%). Confidence ratings for correctly diagnosing presence (7.7) or absence (8.3) of sacroiliitis were somewhat higher than incorrectly diagnosing the presence (6.6) or absence (7.4) of sacroiliitis (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Radiologists and rheumatologists show modest sensitivity and specificity for sacroiliitis and sizeable intraobserver variation. Overall, neither individual training nor workshops improved performance.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Direct costs of ankylosing spondylitis and its determinants: an analysis among three European countries.

OBJECTIVE: To assess direct costs associated with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). To determine which variables, including country, predict costs. METHODS: 216 patients with AS from the Netherlands, France, and Belgium participated in a two year observational study and filled in bimonthly economic questionnaires. Disease related healthcare resource use was measured and direct costs were calculated from a societal perspective (true cost estimates) and from a financial perspective (country-specific tariffs). Predictors of costs were assessed using Cox's regression analysis. RESULTS: 209 patients provided sufficient data for cost analysis. Mean annual societal direct costs for each patient were euro;2640, of which 82% were direct healthcare costs. In univariate analysis costs were higher in the Netherlands than in Belgium, but this difference disappeared after adjusting for baseline differences in patients' characteristics among countries. Longer disease duration, lower education, worse physical function, and higher disease activity were predictors of costs. Mean annual direct costs from a financial perspective were euro;2122, euro;1402, and euro;941 per patient in the Netherlands, France, and Belgium, respectively. For each country, costs from a financial perspective were significantly lower than costs from a societal perspective. CONCLUSION: Direct costs for AS are substantial in three European countries but not significantly different after adjusting for baseline characteristics among countries. Worse physical function and higher disease activity are important determinants of costs, suggesting better disease control might reduce the costs of AS. The difference in costs from a societal and financial perspective emphasises the importance of an economic analysis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Costs of ankylosing spondylitis in three European countries: the patient's perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To assess a patient's out of pocket costs, income loss, time consumption, and quality of life (QoL) due to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in three European countries and to assess variables predicting these outcomes. METHODS: 216 patients with AS from the Netherlands, France, and Belgium participated in a two year study. Health resource use, days absent from work, time lost, and quality of life (EuroQol) were assessed by bimonthly questionnaires. AS related healthcare and non-healthcare expenditure and income loss were calculated taking into account country-specific regulations. Predictors of costs, time consumption, and QoL were analysed by Cox's regression. RESULTS: 209 patients provided data for cost analysis. Average annual healthcare and non-healthcare expenditure was euro;431 per patient and average annual income loss was euro;1371 per patient. Healthcare costs were highest for Belgian and lowest for French patients, while non-healthcare costs were highest for Dutch patients. A patient's total costs were associated with higher age and worse physical function. On average, patients with AS needed 75 minutes additional time a day because of AS. Worse physical function and higher disease activity predicted time consumption. After adjusting for baseline confounders, QoL was worse in Belgian and French than in Dutch patients. Peripheral arthritis, worse physical function, higher disease activity, and loss of income contributed to worse QoL. CONCLUSION: AS is time consuming and associated with substantial out of pocket costs. Belgian patients incur the highest healthcare payments. Poor physical function increases patient's costs and time consumption. Loss of income is associated with lower QoL.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Initiation of biological agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a Delphi study by the ASAS Group.

BACKGROUND: There is ample evidence of important symptomatic efficacy of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibition in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Moreover, studies suggest that anti-TNF could be considered as the first disease controlling antirheumatic treatment (DC-ART) for AS. OBJECTIVE: To determine precisely which patients with AS are most likely to benefit from anti-TNFalpha treatment because of the cost and possible long term side effects of such treatment. METHODS: Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) members were asked to use a Delphi technique to name the characteristics of patients with AS for whom they would start DC-ART, in three different clinical presentations (isolated axial involvement, peripheral arthritis, enthesitis). RESULTS: Among the 62 invited ASAS members, more than 50% actively participated in the four phases of definition according to the Delphi technique. For each of the three clinical presentations, a combination of five to six domains was proposed, with an evaluation instrument and a cut off point defining a minimum level of activity for each domain. CONCLUSION: This study provides a profile for a patient with AS for considering initiation of biological agents that reflects the opinion of the ASAS members, using a Delphi exercise. Further studies are required to assess their relevance and their consistency with clinical practice.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2003

International ASAS consensus statement for the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain an international consensus about the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF alpha) for treating patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: These recommendations were developed by a review of published reports in combination with expert opinion, including a Delphi exercise, and a consensus meeting of the ASsessments in AS (ASAS) Working Group. RESULTS: The final consensus comprises the following requirements: (1) For the initiation of anti-TNF alpha therapy: (a) a diagnosis of definitive AS; (b) presence of active disease for at least four weeks as defined by both a sustained Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) of at least 4 and an expert opinion based on clinical features, acute phase reactants, and imaging modalities; (c) presence of refractory disease defined by failure of at least two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during a single three month period, failure of intra-articular steroids if indicated, and failure of sulfasalazine in patients with peripheral arthritis; (d) application and implementation of the usual precautions and contraindications for biological therapy. (2) For the monitoring of anti-TNF alpha therapy: both the BASDAI and the ASAS core set for clinical practice should be followed regularly. (3) For the discontinuation of anti-TNF alpha therapy: in non-responders, consideration should be made after 6-12 weeks' treatment. Response is defined as improvement of (a) at least 50% or 2 units (on a 0-10 scale) of the BASDAI, (b) expert opinion that treatment should be continued. CONCLUSION: This consensus statement on anti-TNF alpha treatment in AS may be used for guidance in clinical decision making and as the basis for the development of guidelines. Evaluation of the healthcare consequences of this consensus is subject to further research by the ASAS group.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2003

Imaging: do erosions heal?

It was shown previously that reparative changes in erosions can be seen in individual joints and individual patients. Whether repair may occur at a group level, and can be induced by treatment, is not known. This manuscript describes a means of visualising data obtained in a clinical trial by the use of probability plots to better understand the results. These probability plots give a good insight into the coherence of the data. They can also be used to make the interpretation of repair at a group level easier. Probability plots also explain the hazard of using binomial cut off points to compare treatment effects. The interference of true repair with measurement error is demonstrated. Repair at a group level is suggested if the mean progression score is statistically significantly different from zero, which can be visualised by a 95% confidence interval of this mean change score below zero. Application of this technique may give us better information on the effects of new drugs on the induction of repair.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Work status and productivity costs due to ankylosing spondylitis: comparison of three European countries.

OBJECTIVE: To compare work disability, sick leave, and productivity costs due to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) of three European countries. METHODS: 216 patients with AS from the Netherlands, France, and Belgium participated in a two year observational study. Employment and work disability rates at baseline were adjusted for age and sex. Productivity costs were calculated by both the friction cost method and the human capital approach. The adjusted contributions of country to employment, work disability, and having an episode of sick leave were assessed by logistic regression and the contribution of the country to days of sick leave and costs by Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: 209 patients completed the two years' follow up with sufficient data for cost analysis. Adjusted employment was 55% in the Netherlands as compared with 72% in both other countries and only in the Netherlands was it lower than expected in the general population. Adjusted work disability was 41%, 23%, and 9% in the Netherlands, France, and Belgium and in all countries was higher than expected in the general population. In those with a paid job, the mean number of days of sick leave per patient per year because of AS was 19 (range 0-130), six (range 0-77), and nine (range 0-60 ) in the Netherlands, France, and Belgium respectively. Applying the friction cost method to those with a paid job resulted in mean costs per patient per year of 1257 euros (range 0-7356), 428 euros (range 0-5979), and 476 euros (range 0-2354) in the Netherlands, France, and Belgium. Applying the human capital approach to the whole group resulted in mean costs per patient per year of 8862 euros (range 0-46 818), 3188 euros (range 0-43 550), and 3609 euros (range 0-34 320) in the three countries, respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic and disease characteristics, living in the Netherlands, as compared with both other countries, was associated with a higher chance of being work disabled (odds ratio (OR)=3.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33 to 11.01), but not with the risk of having an episode of sick leave. Similarly, living in the Netherlands contributed independently to the number of days sick leave (OR=0.65; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.97), a higher amount of friction costs (OR=0.63; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.96), and a higher amount of human capital costs (OR=0.46; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.68). CONCLUSION: There are remarkable differences in work status and productivity costs between the three European countries. This has implications for the generalisability of health economic studies.

Adult↗