PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daisuke Kihara

Publications and source records attributed to Daisuke Kihara.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge.

BACKGROUND: The Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA) is a community effort held to understand the field of computational protein function prediction. Every three years, since 2010, the organizers initiate an experiment to collect function predictions on a large set of proteins and then evaluate the performance of predicting methods on a subset of proteins that have accumulated experimental annotations between the submission deadline and the evaluation time. CAFA provides an independent and rigorous assessment of the current state of the art, thus leveling the playing field, highlighting successes, revealing bottlenecks, and offering a forum for the exchange of ideas in protein science. Here, we report the results of the fourth CAFA experiment (CAFA4). RESULTS: CAFA4 featured the participation of 148 methods from 70 research groups on a total of 46,205 unique proteins over a 5-year annotation accumulation phase, the longest in any CAFA. In a comparison across CAFA2-CAFA4 methods, the prediction of Gene Ontology (GO) terms has clearly improved across all three GO aspects and traditional evaluation settings. While not achieving the first rank, several CAFA2 and CAFA3 methods featured in the top ten methods in many evaluations, suggesting that earlier methods still hold relevance. The performance is weaker in the newly introduced "partial knowledge" evaluation category (proteins with experimental annotations before submission deadline that gained additional annotations in the same GO aspect during the annotation accumulation phase), highlighting the need for a new class of methods. The rankings of the methods were stable over the years in traditional evaluation settings, but less so in the new partial knowledge evaluation. Overall, the field continues to progress with some influx of new participants. Sustained efforts will be necessary to substantially advance it.

Journal Article↗

Limitations and potentials of current motif discovery algorithms.

Computational methods for de novo identification of gene regulation elements, such as transcription factor binding sites, have proved to be useful for deciphering genetic regulatory networks. However, despite the availability of a large number of algorithms, their strengths and weaknesses are not sufficiently understood. Here, we designed a comprehensive set of performance measures and benchmarked five modern sequence-based motif discovery algorithms using large datasets generated from Escherichia coli RegulonDB. Factors that affect the prediction accuracy, scalability and reliability are characterized. It is revealed that the nucleotide and the binding site level accuracy are very low, while the motif level accuracy is relatively high, which indicates that the algorithms can usually capture at least one correct motif in an input sequence. To exploit diverse predictions from multiple runs of one or more algorithms, a consensus ensemble algorithm has been developed, which achieved 6-45% improvement over the base algorithms by increasing both the sensitivity and specificity. Our study illustrates limitations and potentials of existing sequence-based motif discovery algorithms. Taking advantage of the revealed potentials, several promising directions for further improvements are discussed. Since the sequence-based algorithms are the baseline of most of the modern motif discovery algorithms, this paper suggests substantial improvements would be possible for them.

Algorithms↗

The effect of long-range interactions on the secondary structure formation of proteins.

The influence of long-range residue interactions on defining secondary structure in a protein has long been discussed and is often cited as the current limitation to accurate secondary structure prediction. There are several experimental examples where a local sequence alone is not sufficient to determine its secondary structure, but a comprehensive survey on a large data set has not yet been done. Interestingly, some earlier studies denied the negative effect of long-range interactions on secondary structure prediction accuracy. Here, we have introduced the residue contact order (RCO), which directly indicates the separation of contacting residues in terms of the position in the sequence, and examined the relationship between the RCO and the prediction accuracy. A large data set of 2777 nonhomologous proteins was used in our analysis. Unlike previous studies, we do find that prediction accuracy drops as residues have contacts with more distant residues. Moreover, this negative correlation between the RCO and the prediction accuracy was found not only for beta-strands, but also for alpha-helices. The prediction accuracy of beta-strands is lower if residues have a high RCO or a low RCO, which corresponds to the situation that a beta-sheet is formed by beta-strands from different chains in a protein complex. The reason why the current study draws the opposite conclusion from the previous studies is examined. The implication for protein folding is also discussed.

Amino Acids↗

Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR_3 threading algorithm.

This article describes the PROSPECTOR_3 threading algorithm, which combines various scoring functions designed to match structurally related target/template pairs. Each variant described was found to have a Z-score above which most identified templates have good structural (threading) alignments, Z(struct) (Z(good)). 'Easy' targets with accurate threading alignments are identified as single templates with Z > Z(good) or two templates, each with Z > Z(struct), having a good consensus structure in mutually aligned regions. 'Medium' targets have a pair of templates lacking a consensus structure, or a single template for which Z(struct) < Z < Z(good). PROSPECTOR_3 was applied to a comprehensive Protein Data Bank (PDB) benchmark composed of 1491 single domain proteins, 41-200 residues long and no more than 30% identical to any threading template. Of the proteins, 878 were found to be easy targets, with 761 having a root mean square deviation (RMSD) from native of less than 6.5 A. The average contact prediction accuracy was 46%, and on average 17.6 residue continuous fragments were predicted with RMSD values of 2.0 A. There were 606 medium targets identified, 87% (31%) of which had good structural (threading) alignments. On average, 9.1 residue, continuous fragments with RMSD of 2.5 A were predicted. Combining easy and medium sets, 63% (91%) of the targets had good threading (structural) alignments compared to native; the average target/template sequence identity was 22%. Only nine targets lacked matched templates. Moreover, PROSPECTOR_3 consistently outperforms PSIBLAST. Similar results were predicted for open reading frames (ORFS) < or =200 residues in the M. genitalium, E. coli and S. cerevisiae genomes. Thus, progress has been made in identification of weakly homologous/analogous proteins, with very high alignment coverage, both in a comprehensive PDB benchmark as well as in genomes.

Algorithms↗

Microbial genomes have over 72% structure assignment by the threading algorithm PROSPECTOR_Q.

The genome scale threading of five complete microbial genomes is revisited using our state-of-the-art threading algorithm, PROSPECTOR_Q. Considering that structure assignment to an ORF could be useful for predicting biochemical function as well as for analyzing pathways, it is important to assess the current status of genome scale threading. The fraction of ORFs to which we could assign protein structures with a reasonably good confidence level to each genome sequences is over 72%, which is significantly higher than earlier studies. Using the assigned structures, we have predicted the function of several ORFs through "single-function" template structures, obtained from an analysis of the relationship between protein fold and function. The fold distribution of the genomes and the effect of the number of homologous sequences on structure assignment are also discussed.

Algorithms↗

The PDB is a covering set of small protein structures.

Structure comparisons of all representative proteins have been done. Employing the relative root mean square deviation (RMSD) from native enables the assessment of the statistical significance of structure alignments of different lengths in terms of a Z-score. Two conclusions emerge: first, proteins with their native fold can be distinguished by their Z-score. Second and somewhat surprising, all small proteins up to 100 residues in length have significant structure alignments to other proteins in a different secondary structure and fold class; i.e. 24.0% of them have 60% coverage by a template protein with a RMSD below 3.5A and 6.0% have 70% coverage. If the restriction that we align proteins only having different secondary structure types is removed, then in a representative benchmark set of proteins of 200 residues or smaller, 93% can be aligned to a single template structure (with average sequence identity of 9.8%), with a RMSD less than 4A, and 79% average coverage. In this sense, the current Protein Data Bank (PDB) is almost a covering set of small protein structures. The length of the aligned region (relative to the whole protein length) does not differ among the top hit proteins, indicating that protein structure space is highly dense. For larger proteins, non-related proteins can cover a significant portion of the structure. Moreover, these top hit proteins are aligned to different parts of the target protein, so that almost the entire molecule can be covered when combined. The number of proteins required to cover a target protein is very small, e.g. the top ten hit proteins can give 90% coverage below a RMSD of 3.5A for proteins up to 320 residues long. These results give a new view of the nature of protein structure space, and its implications for protein structure prediction are discussed.

Algorithms↗

TOUCHSTONEX: protein structure prediction with sparse NMR data.

TOUCHSTONEX, a new method for folding proteins that uses a small number of long-range contact restraints derived from NMR experimental NOE (nuclear Overhauser enhancement) data, is described. The method employs a new lattice-based, reduced model of proteins that explicitly represents C(alpha), C(beta), and the sidechain centers of mass. The force field consists of knowledge-based terms to produce protein-like behavior, including various short-range interactions, hydrogen bonding, and one-body, pairwise, and multibody long-range interactions. Contact restraints were incorporated into the force field as an NOE-specific pairwise potential. We evaluated the algorithm using a set of 125 proteins of various secondary structure types and lengths up to 174 residues. Using N/8 simulated, long-range sidechain contact restraints, where N is the number of residues, 108 proteins were folded to a C(alpha)-root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) from native below 6.5 A. The average RMSD of the lowest RMSD structures for all 125 proteins (folded and unfolded) was 4.4 A. The algorithm was also applied to limited experimental NOE data generated for three proteins. Using very few experimental sidechain contact restraints, and a small number of sidechain-main chain and main chain-main chain contact restraints, we folded all three proteins to low-to-medium resolution structures. The algorithm can be applied to the NMR structure determination process or other experimental methods that can provide tertiary restraint information, especially in the early stage of structure determination, when only limited data are available.

Algorithms↗

TOUCHSTONE: a unified approach to protein structure prediction.

We have applied the TOUCHSTONE structure prediction algorithm that spans the range from homology modeling to ab initio folding to all protein targets in CASP5. Using our threading algorithm PROSPECTOR that does not utilize input from metaservers, one threads against a representative set of PDB templates. If a template is significantly hit, Generalized Comparative Modeling designed to span the range from closely to distantly related proteins from the template is done. This involves freezing the aligned regions and relaxing the remaining structure to accommodate insertions or deletions with respect to the template. For all targets, consensus predicted side chain contacts from at least weakly threading templates are pooled and incorporated into ab initio folding. Often, TOUCHSTONE performs well in the CM to FR categories, with PROSPECTOR showing significant ability to identify analogous templates. When ab initio folding is done, frequently the best models are closer to the native state than the initial template. Among the particularly good predictions are T0130 in the CM/FR category, T0138 in the FR(H) category, T0135 in the FR(A) category, T0170 in the FR/NF category and T0181 in the NF category. Improvements in the approach are needed in the FR/NF and NF categories. Nevertheless, TOUCHSTONE was one of the best performing algorithms over all categories in CASP5.

Algorithms↗

Local energy landscape flattening: parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo sampling of protein folding.

Among the major difficulties in protein structure prediction is the roughness of the energy landscape that must be searched for the global energy minimum. To address this issue, we have developed a novel Monte Carlo algorithm called parallel hyperbolic sampling (PHS) that logarithmically flattens local high-energy barriers and, therefore, allows the simulation to tunnel more efficiently through energetically inaccessible regions to low-energy valleys. Here, we show the utility of this approach by applying it to the SICHO (SIde-CHain-Only) protein model. For the same CPU time, the parallel hyperbolic sampling method can identify much lower energy states and explore a larger region phase space than the commonly used replica sampling (RS) Monte Carlo method. By clustering the simulated structures obtained in the PHS implementation of the SICHO model, we can successfully predict, among a representative benchmark 65 proteins set, 50 cases in which one of the top 5 clusters have a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) from the native structure below 6.5 A. Compared with our previous calculations that used RS as the conformational search procedure, the number of successful predictions increased by four and the CPU cost is reduced. By comparing the structure clusters produced by both PHS and RS, we find a strong correlation between the quality of predicted structures and the minimum relative RMSD (mrRMSD) of structures clusters identified by using different search engines. This mrRMSD correlation may be useful in blind prediction as an indicator of the likelihood of successful folds.

Models, Molecular↗

Ab initio protein structure prediction on a genomic scale: application to the Mycoplasma genitalium genome.

An ab initio protein structure prediction procedure, TOUCHSTONE, was applied to all 85 small proteins of the Mycoplasma genitalium genome. TOUCHSTONE is based on a Monte Carlo refinement of a lattice model of proteins, which uses threading-based tertiary restraints. Such restraints are derived by extracting consensus contacts and local secondary structure from at least weakly scoring structures that, in some cases, can lack any global similarity to the sequence of interest. Selection of the native fold was done by using the convergence of the simulation from two different conformational search schemes and the lowest energy structure by a knowledge-based atomic-detailed potential. Among the 85 proteins, for 34 proteins with significant threading hits, the template structures were reasonably well reproduced. Of the remaining 51 proteins, 29 proteins converged to five or fewer clusters. In the test set, 84.8% of the proteins that converged to five or fewer clusters had a correct fold among the clusters. If this statistic is simply applied, 24 proteins (84.8% of the 29 proteins) may have correct folds. Thus, the topology of a total of 58 proteins probably has been correctly predicted. Based on these results, ab initio protein structure prediction is becoming a practical approach.

Algorithms↗