PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Dan Ericson

Publications and source records attributed to Dan Ericson.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Protein profile of pepsin-digested carious and sound human dentine.

The purpose of this study was to describe the protein profile of pepsin-digested carious and sound dentine using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Carious and sound dentine powder was decalcified using 10% EDTA at pH 7.4 for 48 h. The decalcified pellet was digested using pepsin at pH 2 under sequenced conditions: at 4 degrees C for 24 h, a further 24 h at 23 degrees C, and finally for 24 h at 37 degrees C. After every step, the soluble fraction was separated by centrifugation and analyzed in 15% SDS-PAGE. Two bands at 56 and 62 kDa could be observed in carious dentine digests and were considered specific carious bands. Similar bands could be observed in sound dentine samples, but only after pepsin digestion at higher temperatures (23 degrees C and 37 degrees C). Pepsin digests non-helical collagen and the triple helix structure of collagen is lost when the temperature rises. The bands at 56 and 62 kDa in sound dentine specimens thus represent pepsin-cleaved collagen. There is a possibility that the specific carious bands in carious dentine represent collagen decomposed in a manner similar to the way pepsin digests native dentine collagen at 23 degrees C and 37 degrees C.

Collagen↗

Chlorhexidine-containing glass ionomer cement. A clinical investigation on the fissure caries inhibiting effect in first permanent molars.

UNLABELLED: Glass ionomer cement with addition of chlorhexidine used as a varnish on tooth surfaces has been shown to reduce the number of interproximal mutans streptococci (ms). The effect of a single application of such a varnish containing 2.5% chlorhexidine on occlusal caries development of the first permanent molars on 6-year-old children in a high caries incidence area was investigated. The children were examined according to WHO criteria and 262 children with 2 caries free contra-lateral molars were selected for treatment. Salivary ms samples were collected using the Strip-mutans (SM) method. After brushing the occlusal surfaces with a toothbrush and pumice in water slurry, rinsing and drying with a cotton roll, glass ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine (GI-CHX) and glass ionomer (GI) were applied randomly with a micro brush and the varnish was covered with occlusal wax. At baseline, the mean defs was 18.18 and DMFS was 0.25 and after one year 18.24 and 0.83 respectively. The salivary ms scores were high or very high (SM 2 and 3) in 85.6% at baseline. At the one-year follow up, the GI-CHX and GI materials could not be detected in the fissures. Also, a large number of fissure sealants had been placed in the molars outside the study protocol; thus 4% of the GI-CHX and GI, and 70% of the untreated were sealed at year one. Overall, there was no significant difference between the caries-reducing effect of GI-CHX and GI, but a trend towards a higher effect was seen for GI-CHX. Excluding the sealed molars the reduction was 74% in the GI-CHX-group, and 71% in the GI-group. CONCLUSION: Addition of 2.5% chlorhexidine to glass ionomer did not seem to increase the caries-reducing effect of the varnish in this high caries incidence population.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗

What is minimally invasive dentistry?

Minimally Invasive Dentistry is the application of "a systematic respect for the original tissue." This implies that the dental profession recognizes that an artifact is of less biological value than the original healthy tissue. Minimally invasive dentistry is a concept that can embrace all aspects of the profession. The common delineator is tissue preservation, preferably by preventing disease from occurring and intercepting its progress, but also removing and replacing with as little tissue loss as possible. It does not suggest that we make small fillings to restore incipient lesions or surgically remove impacted third molars without symptoms as routine procedures. The introduction of predictable adhesive technologies has led to a giant leap in interest in minimally invasive dentistry. The concept bridges the traditional gap between prevention and surgical procedures, which is just what dentistry needs today. The evidence-base for survival of restorations clearly indicates that restoring teeth is a temporary palliative measure that is doomed to fail if the disease that caused the condition is not addressed properly. Today, the means, motives and opportunities for minimally invasive dentistry are at hand, but incentives are definitely lacking. Patients and third parties seem to be convinced that the only things that count are replacements. Namely, they are prepared to pay for a filling but not for a procedure that can help avoid having one.

Attitude to Health↗

Minimally Invasive Dentistry--concepts and techniques in cariology.

The concept 'Minimally Invasive Dentistry' can be defined as maximal preservation of healthy dental structures. Within cariology, this concept includes the use of all available information and techniques ranging from accurate diagnosis of caries, caries risk assessment and prevention, to technical procedures in repairing restorations. Dentists are currently spending more than half their time replacing old restorations. The main reasons for restoration failures are secondary caries and fractures, factors that are generally not addressed in the technical process of replacing a restoration. Prevailing concepts on minimally invasive dentistry seem to be 'product or technique-motivated', challenging one technique or product with another, rather than focusing on a general concept. New knowledge of caries progression rates has also led to substantial modification of restorative intervention thresholds and further handling of the disease. New diagnostic tools for caries lesion detection, caries risk assessment and focused preventive treatments have decreased the need for early restorative interventions. In parallel to this, new techniques for cutting teeth and removing decay have evolved. This paper focuses on describing minimally invasive dentistry in cariology from a conceptual perspective, relating to clinical caries diagnosis, restorative intervention thresholds and operative procedures, with special reference to survival of tunnel and slot restorations and to repair vs. replacement of defective restorations.

Dental Caries↗

Cultivatable bacteria in dentine after caries excavation using rose-bur or carisolv.

To measure the amount of viable bacteria after excavation using conventional rose-bur or the chemo-mechanical Carisolv method, a total of 22 lesions were analyzed (one vital tooth per patient) in this open, controlled and randomized study. Two samples per lesion were taken under aseptic conditions using a rose-bur, one superficially in the caries lesion and one after completed excavation. In in vitro tests more material was collected from the hard caries free dentine as compared to the carious dentine. The samples were incubated on blood agar (aerobically and anaerobically), Rogosa (SL) agar and mitis salivarius (MS) agar. For blood agar (aerobic) both methods resulted in a significant decrease in CFU, for blood agar (anaerobic) and MS agar only the Carisolv method resulted in a significant decrease in CFU and for SL agar neither method resulted in a significant decrease in CFU. Comparing CFU before and after excavation, a considerable reduction of CFU was seen ranging from 10(1) to 10(4). Comparing the excavation methods, there were no significant differences, except in the case of blood agar (aerobic), which showed that Carisolv excavation was more effective in reducing CFU. This study indicated that bacterial sampling collected more material from hard dentine as compared from soft. Remaining bacteria after excavation were low in both groups. The Carisolv method seemed to remove bacteria at least up to and possibly beyond the extent of conventional drilling.

Adult↗