Biomedical subjects

Dani Tomlin

Publications and source records attributed to Dani Tomlin.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects.

Evoked potential thresholds using the 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) were recorded at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz test frequencies in 36 subjects with normal acuity, and 30 subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. ASSR threshold sensation levels (SLs) were lower in ears with greater degrees of hearing loss, and for the 500 Hz stimulus. Mean SLs (maximum duration of a single recording: 89 seconds) were as follows at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz respectively: normal hearing group, 16.9+/-10.3 dB and 42.4+/-14.4 dB; mild-moderate group, 10.6+/-8.8 dB and 23.8+/-8.1 dB; severe-profound group, 10.0+/-13.2 dB and 21.5+/-18.9 dB. CAEP SLs showed no change with hearing level and CAEP/behavioural differences were similar at each test frequency. Mean SLs for CAEP threshold (single recording duration: 84 seconds) at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz respectively were: normal hearing group, 10.3+/-6.4 dB and 11.5+/-3.8 dB; mild-moderate group, 8.4+/-7.4 dB and 13.2+/-12.4 dB; severe-profound group, 11.0+/-6.6 dB and 15.9+/-16.4 dB. The results of this study suggest that while both 40 Hz ASSR and CAEP can reflect the behavioural audiogram, CAEPs may provide a more reliable estimate of hearing in awake adults.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2006

Maturation of auditory steady-state responses in normal babies.

OBJECTIVE: To track the development of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) through the neonatal and early infant periods in a group of normal-hearing babies. DESIGN: This longitudinal study involved assessment at four data collection points. ASSR thresholds to modulated 500 Hz and 4 kHz tones were established in 20 full-term subjects at 0, 2, 4, and 6 wks of age. RESULTS: Significant developmental changes were observed for both test frequencies. Mean ASSR threshold levels decreased by approximately 10 dB between the week 0 and week 6 data collection points. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that ASSR threshold levels in normal-hearing neonates and young infants are different from those observed in older subjects. Clinical application of the ASSR procedure in this population will need to take into account developmental changes occurring in the first weeks of life. Furthermore, the findings indicate that ASSR thresholds in normal-hearing babies at 6 wks of age are not yet mature.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2006

Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and tone-burst auditory brainstem responses in normal babies.

OBJECTIVE: To follow the development of tone-burst auditory brainstem response (TB-ABR) and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds in a group of normal babies through the first 6 wk of life. DESIGN: This longitudinal study involved assessment at four data-collection points. TB-ABR and ASSR thresholds to 500-Hz and 4-kHz stimuli were established in 17 full-term subjects at 0, 2, 4, and 6 wk of age. Stimulus-modulation rates for ASSR assessment were 74 Hz (for 500-Hz tones) and 95 Hz (for 4-kHz tones). TB-ABR responses were recorded to stimuli presented at 39.1 Hz. RESULTS: Mean ASSR thresholds (calibrated in dBHL) at 500 Hz ranged from 44.4 to 39.7 dB HL across the recording period, and at 4 kHz they ranged from 37.9 to 32.1 dB HL. TB-ABR thresholds (calibrated in dBnHL) were significantly lower, ranging from 36.8 to 36.2 dB nHL at 500 Hz and from 16.5 to 15.9 dB nHL at 4 kHz. However, when the stimuli used for each test were calibrated in the same units (peak equivalent dB SPL), the results were similar. That is, the differences between the two techniques were only an artifact of the calibration. ASSR thresholds were more variable than TB-ABR, particularly at the neonatal measurement point. Within-subject changes across the test period were observed for ASSR thresholds but not for TB-ABR. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal findings presented in this study suggest that for normal neonates, the TB-ABR technique may offer a more reliable basis for prediction of hearing levels than ASSR assessment. This is not because TB-ABR thresholds (calibrated in dBnHL) are lower, but because the response is less affected by maturational development in the first weeks of life and is less variable across subjects.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

The auditory steady-state response: comparisons with the auditory brainstem response.

Two studies are reported in which the threshold estimates from auditory steady-state response (ASSR) tests are compared to those of click- or toneburst-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). The first, a retrospective review of 51 cases, demonstrated that both the click-evoked ABR and the ASSR threshold estimates in infants and children could be used to predict the pure-tone threshold. The second, a prospective study of normal-hearing adults, provided evidence that the toneburst-evoked ABR and the modulated tone-evoked ASSR thresholds were similar when both were detected with an automatic detection algorithm and that threshold estimates varied with frequency, stimulus rate, and detection method. The lowest thresholds were obtained with visual detection of the ABR. The studies illustrate that ASSRs can be used to estimate pure-tone threshold in infants and children at risk for hearing loss and also in normal-hearing adults.

Adult↗