PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel Aletaha

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Aletaha.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

The public neglect of rheumatic diseases: insights from analyses of attendees in a musculoskeletal disease awareness activity.

OBJECTIVES: To obtain data on the care received by individuals counselled during a public health awareness campaign on painful musculoskeletal conditions (MSC). METHODS: Easy non-formal access to rheumatologists/pain specialists was offered using a mobile unit (Rheuma-Bus) at widely accessible sites. Clients were asked to assess their severity of pain using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Age, gender, disease duration, diagnosis if known, current and previous treatment as well as tentative diagnoses assigned and recommendations given to each individual by the counselling physicians were recorded. RESULTS: Average (SD) VAS pain rating was 59 (20.6) mm. Approximately 40% of clients had never consulted a physician for their condition before, but had lower pain scores than those who had seen a physician. Patients with inflammatory MSC had higher pain scores than those with non-inflammatory conditions. More than 2% of the clients had a newly detected inflammatory rheumatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Many individuals having painful MSC seek medical help only when a very high threshold of pain is reached. Even while under treatment, the high mean pain scores suggest neglect of MSC that are not adequately recognised as important contributors to disability and decreased quality of life.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis is frequently effective, even if re-employed after a previous failure.

Effectiveness of therapy with individual disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is limited, and the number of available DMARDs is finite. Therefore, at some stage during the lengthy course of RA, institution of traditional DMARDs that have previously been applied may have to be reconsidered. In the present study we investigated the effectiveness of re-employed methotrexate in patients with a history of previous methotrexate failure (original course). A total of 1,490 RA patients (80% female, 59% rheumatoid factor positive) were followed from their first presentation, yielding a total of 6,470 patient-years of observation. We identified patients in whom methotrexate was re-employed after at least one intermittent course of a different DMARD. We compared reasons for discontinuation, improvement in acute phase reactants, and cumulative retention rates of methotrexate therapy between the original course of methotrexate and its re-employment. Similar analyses were peformed for other DMARDs. Methotrexate was re-employed in 86 patients. Compared with the original courses, re-employment was associated with a reduced risk for treatment termination because of ineffectiveness (P = 0.02, by McNemar test), especially if the maximum methotrexate dose of the original course had been low (<12.5 mg/week; P = 0.02, by logistic regression). In a Cox regression model, re-employed MTX was associated with a significantly reduced hazard of treatment termination compared with the original course of methotrexate, adjusting for dose and year of employment (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.97; P = 0.04). These findings were not recapitulated in analyses of re-employment of other DMARDs. Re-employment of MTX despite prior inefficacy, but not re-employment of other DMARDs, is an effective therapeutic option, especially in those patients in whom the methotrexate dose of the original course was low.

Acute-Phase Reaction↗
PubMed2006

Measuring function in rheumatoid arthritis: Identifying reversible and irreversible components.

OBJECTIVE: Measurement of physical function at one point in time cannot distinguish impairment caused by the active disease process from chronic irreversible impairment. We aimed to dissect these two components of functional limitation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by using the disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) as the measure of function. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from 6 contemporary clinical trials of RA (2,763 patients). Patients in whom remission was achieved in the trials, based on a simplified disease activity index, were identified. In an individual patient, HAQ scores at trial entry represented both reversible and irreversible impairments, while HAQ scores at the time of RA remission represented the mostly irreversible component, and the difference between these corresponded to the component related to disease activity. We tested the concept that the HAQ has a reversible and an irreversible component by associating the HAQ score during remission with 2 measures associated with the degree of accrued damage: duration of RA and radiographic severity. RESULTS: Among patients in whom clinical remission was achieved (n = 295), average HAQ scores despite clinical remission increased progressively with the duration of RA, from 0.19 (<2 years of RA) to 0.36 (2-<5 years) to 0.38 (5-<10 years) to 0.55 (>/=10 years) (P < 0.001). The reversibility of HAQ scores decreased with the duration of RA (median 100%, 83.3%, 81.9%, and 66.7%, respectively; P < 0.001). Findings were similar in patients subgrouped by quartile of radiographic scores. CONCLUSION: Differences in the sources of functional limitations should be considered in the interpretation of functional measures, and in their use for prediction and in cost analyses.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The definition and measurement of disease modification in inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

This article focuses on measures that are used to evaluate disease activity, damage, and function in three major inflammatory musculoskeletal disorders. The instruments used in rheumatoid arthritis, where most of the methodologic work has been done, are extensively discussed and instruments for the respective domains in psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis are likewise presented.

Arthritis, Psoriatic↗
PubMed2006

Early rheumatoid arthritis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides novel and updated information on pathogenesis, referral, and clinical characteristics as well as therapeutic approaches in early rheumatoid arthritis. RECENT FINDINGS: Early referral is important, but new classification criteria for early rheumatoid arthritis need to be elaborated. Predictive markers for rheumatoid arthritis are still confined to autoantibodies; respective algorithms have been presented. Other biomarkers will still have to prove their usefulness. Magnetic resonance imaging and sonography do not appear to sufficiently distinguish between early rheumatoid and nonrheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatoid arthritis has become milder at presentation in recent years. In its very early stages, the cytokine profile reflects T-cell activation and switches to abundant proinflammatory cytokines thereafter. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs plus glucocorticoids are highly effective, as is early use of tumor necrosis factor blockers plus methotrexate. Tight control of disease activity and subsequent therapeutic adjustments are highly effective. Disease activity indices that are simple to calculate have been presented and validated. Early intensive therapy may lead to decrease in disability and cost reduction in rheumatoid arthritis. SUMMARY: Understanding of early arthritis is increasing, especially in prognostic and therapeutic respects, and new treatment strategies appear to improve the outcome in patients with early arthritis. Nevertheless, much remains to be studied to better address the issue of early rheumatoid arthritis.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Pooled indices to measure rheumatoid arthritis activity: a good reflection of the physician's mind?

Several pooled indices for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity are available to rheumatologists. Face and criterion validity of these instruments can be assessed by determining the association of their measurements with opinions of physicians. Several confounding aspects must be considered in such analyses, especially blinding of the person(s) making the decisions to the instruments being studied and to the objective of the study in general. From several studies in the literature, there is currently no evidence that any one of the available composite indices is better or worse than any other. The choice of index in clinical practice should ideally be based on practical considerations related to the needs of the rheumatologist in the respective health care setting.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2005

Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score.

INTRODUCTION: Frequent assessments of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity allow timely adaptation of therapy, which is essential in preventing disease progression. However, values of acute phase reactants (APRs) are needed to calculate current composite activity indices, such as the Disease Activity Score (DAS)28, the DAS28-CRP (i.e. the DAS28 using C-reactive protein instead of erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI). We hypothesized that APRs make limited contribution to the SDAI, and that an SDAI-modification eliminating APRs - termed the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI; i.e. the sum of tender and swollen joint counts [28 joints] and patient and physician global assessments [in cm]) - would have comparable validity in clinical cohorts. METHOD: Data sources comprised an observational cohort of 767 RA patients (average disease duration 8.1 +/- 10.6 years), and an independent inception cohort of 106 patients (disease duration 11.5 +/- 12.5 weeks) who were followed prospectively. RESULTS: Our clinically based hypothesis was statistically supported: APRs accounted only for 15% of the DAS28, and for 5% of the SDAI and the DAS28-CRP. In both cohorts the CDAI correlated strongly with DAS28 (R = 0.89-0.90) and comparably to the correlation of SDAI with DAS28 (R = 0.90-0.91). In additional analyses, the CDAI when compared to the SDAI and the DAS28 agreed with a weighted kappa of 0.70 and 0.79, respectively, and comparably to the agreement between DAS28 and DAS28-CRP. All three scores correlated similarly with Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores (R = 0.45-0.47). The average changes in all scores were greater in patients with better American College of Rheumatology response (P < 0.0001, analysis of variance; discriminant validity). All scores exhibited similar correlations with radiological progression (construct validity) over 3 years (R = 0.54-0.58; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: APRs add little information on top (and independent) of the combination of clinical variables included in the SDAI. A purely clinical score is a valid measure of disease activity and will have its greatest merits in clinical practice rather than research, where APRs are usually always available. The CDAI may facilitate immediate and consistent treatment decisions and help to improve patient outcomes in the longer term.

Acute-Phase Proteins↗
PubMed2005

Depletion of endothelial progenitor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality that cannot be explained solely by traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Cardiovascular morbidity is related to disease activity and can be normalized by effective therapy. Because the quantity of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in the peripheral blood is correlated inversely with cardiovascular risk, we studied whether such abnormalities could also be observed in patients with RA. METHODS AND RESULTS: EPCs were determined in 52 RA patients and in 16 healthy referents (HRs) by fluorescence-activated cell-sorting (FACS) analysis. Patients were divided into groups characterized by active disease (n=36) and low disease activity (n=16). Cells that were positive by flow cytometry for CD34/KDR/AC133 within the lymphocyte population were characterized as EPCs. Furthermore, in subgroups of patients, circulating EPCs were also quantified by a colony-forming unit (CFU) and a circulating angiogenic cell (CAC) assay. EPCs were significantly decreased in RA patients suffering from active disease compared with those from HRs, as measured by FACS analysis (0.026+/-0.002% versus 0.045+/-0.008%, respectively, P<0.05), CFU assay (mean of 5+/-2 versus 18+/-5 CFU/well in HRs, P<0.05), and CAC assay (mean of 7+/-2 versus 52+/-16 positive cells/high-power field, P<0.005). In contrast, the frequency of circulating EPCs from patients with low disease activity was comparable to that of healthy individuals (0.052+/-0.006% by FACS analysis), CFU assay (10+/-5 CFU/well), and CAC assay (mean of 25+/-5 positive cells). Moreover, EPC quantities in peripheral blood were correlated inversely with disease activity as assessed by the disease activity score (r=-0.38, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our observations indicate that active RA is associated with a depletion of circulating EPCs. This might be one of several factors contributing to the increased cardiovascular risk in RA.

AC133 Antigen↗
PubMed2005

Remission and active disease in rheumatoid arthritis: defining criteria for disease activity states.

OBJECTIVE: Several composite scores are available to assess the activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Criteria for remission and active RA based on these continuous scores are important for use in clinical practice and clinical trials. We aimed to reevaluate or to define such criteria for the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) and the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI). METHODS: We sampled patient profiles from an observational RA database that included clinical and laboratory variables. Thirty-five rheumatology experts classified these profiles into 1 of 4 categories: remission, low, moderate, or high disease activity. Cutoff values were estimated by mapping scores on the DAS28 and SDAI to these ratings, and analyses of agreement (kappa statistics) and a diagnostic testing approach (receiver operating characteristic curves) were used to validate the estimates. The final criteria were validated using 2 observational cohorts (a routine cohort of 767 patients and an inception cohort of 91 patients). RESULTS: Results from the 3 analyses were very similar and were integrated. The criteria for separating remission, low, moderate, and high disease activity based on the SDAI were scores of 3.3, 11, and 26, respectively; those based on the DAS28 were scores of 2.4, 3.6, 5.5, respectively. In the routine cohort, these cutoff values showed substantial agreement (weighed kappa = 0.70) and discriminated between groups of patients with clearly different functional capacities (P < 0.001). In the inception cohort, these cutoff scores differentiated responders (those with a 20% response on the American College of Rheumatology improvement criteria) from nonresponders (P < 0.01), as well as patients with and without radiologic progression (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: New criteria for levels of RA disease activity were determined and internally validated. These criteria, which are based on current and explicit expert judgment, are valuable in this era of rapidly advancing therapeutic approaches.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2005

Therapeutic strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy rests primarily on the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). It has been unequivocally shown that DMARD therapy early in the course of RA retards progression of damage and disability to a larger degree compared with delayed institution; the most effective DMARD is methotrexate (MTX). Moreover, combination therapy including intermediate to high doses of glucocorticoids and combinations of MTX with tumour necrosis factor blockers are more effective than monotherapies. However, early DMARD treatment requires early referral of patients and early diagnosis. This is hampered by the current lack of classification criteria for early RA, since the aim is to prevent destruction from occurring, while RA is typically characterized by the presence of erosions. Novel treatment strategies and therapeutic agents allow us to aim for remission rather than improvement of disease activity. Whether a 'window of opportunity' exists during which effective therapy might lead to cure is still an open issue and will be the focus of clinical trials in the near future.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

Pro-inflammatory cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis: pathogenetic and therapeutic aspects.

Therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aims at interfering with the disease process, namely inflammation and destruction of the joints, and thus at preventing long-term disability. Proinflammatory cytokines play a decisive role in the generation of the inflammatory and destructive response. Aside from traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and tumor necrosis factor-blocking agents, a number of targeted therapies are currently in evaluation, such as abatacept (interfering with co-stimulation), rituximab (an anti-B-cell agent) and tocilizumab (an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody). In phase II trials, all these agents have resulted in significant clinical improvement, and phase III trials have been partly completed with similar results and are partly on the way. Because none of these agents lead to good clinical responses in all patients and many patients have only relatively low degrees of response, it will still be a challenge to find the best therapeutic paths to combat the "inflammatory house of cards" of RA.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Minimal disease activity for rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary definition.

Agreement on response criteria in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has allowed better standardization and interpretation of clinical trial reports. With recent advances in therapy, the proportion of patients achieving a satisfactory state of minimal disease activity (MDA) is becoming a more important measure with which to compare different treatment strategies. The threshold for MDA is between high disease activity and remission and, by definition, anyone in remission will also be in MDA. True remission is still rare in RA; in addition, the American College of Rheumatology definition is difficult to apply in the context of trials. Participants at OMERACT 6 in 2002 agreed on a conceptual definition of minimal disease activity (MDA): "that state of disease activity deemed a useful target of treatment by both the patient and the physician, given current treatment possibilities and limitations." To prepare for a preliminary operational definition of MDA for use in clinical trials, we asked rheumatologists to assess 60 patient profiles describing real RA patients seen in routine clinical practice. Based on their responses, several candidate definitions for MDA were designed and discussed at the OMERACT 7 in 2004. Feedback from participants and additional on-site analyses in a cross-sectional database allowed the formulation of 2 preliminary, equivalent definitions of MDA: one based on the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) index, and one based on meeting cutpoints in 5 out the 7 WHO/ILAR core set measures. Researchers applying these definitions first need to choose whether to use the DAS28 or the core set definition, because although each selects a similar proportion in a population, these are not always the same patients. In both MDA definitions, an initial decision node places all patients in MDA who have a tender joint count of 0 and a swollen joint count of 0, and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) no greater than 10 mm. If this condition is not met: * The DAS28 definition places patients in MDA when DAS28 < or = 2.85; * The core set definition places patients in MDA when they meet 5 of 7 criteria: (1) Pain (0-10) < or = 2; (2) Swollen joint count (0-28) < or = 1; (3) Tender joint count (0-28) < or = 1; (4) Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ, 0-3) < or = 0.5; (5) Physician global assessment of disease activity (0-10) < or = 1.5; (6) Patient global assessment of disease activity (0-10) < or = 2; (7) ESR < or = 20. This set of 2 definitions gained approval of 73% of the attendees. These (and other) definitions will now be subject to further validation in other databases.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗