Biomedical subjects

Daniel B Longley

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel B Longley.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Drug resistance, predictive markers and pharmacogenomics in colorectal cancer.

Resistance to chemotherapy limits the effectiveness of current cancer therapies, including those used to treat colorectal cancer, which is the second most common cause of cancer death in Europe and the United States. 5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimens are the standard treatment for colorectal cancer in both the adjuvant and advanced disease settings. Drug resistance is thought to cause treatment failure in over 90% of patients with metastatic cancer, while drug resistant micrometastic tumour cells may also reduce the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. The identification of panels of biomarkers that not only identify those patients most likely to benefit from chemotherapy treatment, but also which chemotherapies to use, would be a major advance. In this review, we describe molecular mechanisms of drug resistance that may be relevant to colorectal cancer. We also describe the results of predictive biomarker studies in this disease. Finally, we discuss how pharmacogenomics and other high through-put technologies may impact on the clinical management of colorectal cancer in the future.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2006

Pharmacogenomic identification of novel determinants of response to chemotherapy in colon cancer.

DNA microarray analysis was used to analyze the transcriptional profile of HCT116 colorectal cancer cells that were treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or oxaliplatin and selected for resistance to these agents. Bioinformatic analyses identified sets of genes that were constitutively dysregulated in drug-resistant cells and transiently altered following acute exposure of parental cells to drug. We propose that these genes may represent molecular signatures of sensitivity to 5-FU and oxaliplatin. Using real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), the robustness of our microarray data was shown with a strong overall concordance of expression trends for > or =82% (oxaliplatin) and > or =85% (5-FU) of a representative subset of genes. Furthermore, strong correlations between the microarray and real-time RT-PCR measurements of average fold changes in gene expression were observed for both the 5-FU (R(2) > or = 0.73) and oxaliplatin gene sets (R(2) > or = 0.63). Functional analysis of three genes identified in the microarray study [prostate-derived factor (PDF), calretinin, and spermidine/spermine N(1)-acetyl transferase (SSAT)] revealed their importance as novel regulators of cytotoxic drug response. These data show the power of this novel microarray-based approach to identify genes which may be important markers of response to treatment and/or targets for therapeutic intervention.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2006

Chemotherapy-induced epidermal growth factor receptor activation determines response to combined gefitinib/chemotherapy treatment in non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations have been linked with sensitivity to gefitinib and erlotinib; however, there are no established predictive markers for response to the combination of EGFR inhibitors with standard chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In this study, we characterized a panel of human EGFR wild-type and mutant NSCLC cells for their sensitivity to gefitinib alone and in combination with cisplatin or Taxol. Cell viability was assessed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and crystal violet cell viability assays. Cell cycle distribution was measured by flow cytometry. EGFR expression was measured by flow cytometry, real-time PCR, and Western blotting. EGFR/Her2/Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (Erk1/2) phosphorylation were measured by Western blotting. Two of nine EGFR wild type and one of two EGFR mutant NSCLC cells were sensitive to gefitinib, and this was associated with a decrease in phospho (p)-Akt and pErk1/2 following gefitinib exposure. There was no correlation between constitutive EGFR expression or activity and sensitivity to gefitinib nor was there a correlation between Her2/Akt and Erk1/2 activity and gefitinib sensitivity. However, in cells displaying a synergistic interaction between gefitinib and chemotherapy (cisplatin or Taxol), a dose-dependent increase in pEGFR was observed following chemotherapy exposure. In contrast, in cells where no change or a decrease in pEGFR following drug treatment was observed, we found an antagonistic or (at best) an additive interaction between the two compounds. Furthermore, the nature of this interaction was not dependent on the presence of a mutant EGFR. These novel findings suggest that modulation of EGFR activity following drug treatment determines response to gefitinib in combination with chemotherapy in NSCLC cells.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2005

Effect of p53 status and STAT1 on chemotherapy-induced, Fas-mediated apoptosis in colorectal cancer.

We investigated the role of p53 and the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) in regulating Fas-mediated apoptosis in response to chemotherapies used to treat colorectal cancer. We found that 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin only sensitized p53 wild-type (WT) colorectal cancer cell lines to Fas-mediated apoptosis. In contrast, irinotecan (CPT-11) and tomudex sensitized p53 WT, mutant, and null cells to Fas-mediated cell death. Furthermore, CPT-11 and tomudex, but not 5-FU or oxaliplatin, up-regulated Fas cell surface expression in a p53-independent manner. In addition, increased Fas cell surface expression in p53 mutant and null cell lines in response to CPT-11 and tomudex was accompanied by only a slight increase in total Fas mRNA and protein expression, suggesting that these agents trigger p53-independent trafficking of Fas to the plasma membrane. Treatment with CPT-11 or tomudex induced STAT1 phosphorylation (Ser727) in the p53-null HCT116 cell line but not the p53 WT cell line. Furthermore, STAT1-targeted small interfering RNA (siRNA) inhibited up-regulation of Fas cell surface expression in response to CPT-11 and tomudex in these cells. However, we found no evidence of altered Fas gene expression following siRNA-mediated down-regulation of STAT1 in drug-treated cells. This suggests that STAT1 regulates expression of gene(s) involved in cell surface trafficking of Fas in response to CPT-11 or tomudex. We conclude that CPT-11 and tomudex may be more effective than 5-FU and oxaliplatin in the treatment of p53 mutant colorectal cancer tumors by sensitizing them to Fas-mediated apoptosis in a STAT1-dependent manner.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

Chemotherapy and TRAIL-mediated colon cancer cell death: the roles of p53, TRAIL receptors, and c-FLIP.

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has recently attracted attention as a potential therapeutic agent in the treatment of cancer. We assessed the roles of p53, TRAIL receptors, and cellular Fas-associated death domain-like interleukin-1beta-converting enzyme inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) in regulating the cytotoxic effects of recombinant TRAIL (rTRAIL) alone and in combination with chemotherapy [5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan] in a panel of colon cancer cell lines. Using clonogenic survival and flow cytometric analyses, we showed that chemotherapy sensitized p53 wild-type, mutant, and null cell lines to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis. Although chemotherapy treatment did not modulate mRNA or cell surface expression of the TRAIL receptors death receptor 4, death receptor 5, decoy receptor 1, or decoy receptor 2, it was found to down-regulate expression of the caspase-8 inhibitor, c-FLIP. Stable overexpression of the long c-FLIP splice form but not the short form was found to inhibit chemotherapy/rTRAIL-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, siRNA-mediated down-regulation of c-FLIP, particularly the long form, was found to sensitize colon cancer cells to rTRAIL-induced apoptosis. In addition, treatment of a 5-FU-resistant cell line with 5-FU down-regulated c-FLIP expression and sensitized the chemotherapy-resistant cell line to rTRAIL. We conclude that TRAIL-targeted therapies may be used to enhance conventional chemotherapy regimens in colon cancer regardless of tumor p53 status. Furthermore, inhibition of c-FLIP may be a vital accessory strategy for the optimal use of TRAIL-targeted therapies.

Apoptosis↗

PubMed2004

Characterization of p53 wild-type and null isogenic colorectal cancer cell lines resistant to 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan.

To elucidate mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapies currently used in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, we have developed a panel of HCT116 p53 wild-type (p53(+/+)) and null (p53(-/-)) isogenic colorectal cancer cell lines resistant to the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (CPT-11), and DNA-damaging agent oxaliplatin. These cell lines were generated by repeated exposure to stepwise increasing concentrations of each drug over a period of several months. We have demonstrated a significant decrease in sensitivity to 5-FU, CPT-11, and oxaliplatin in each respective resistant cell line relative to the parental line as determined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide analysis, with increases in IC(50 (72 h)) concentrations ranging from 3- to 65-fold. Using flow cytometry, we have also demonstrated compromised apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in 5-FU-, oxaliplatin-, and CPT-11-resistant cell lines compared with the parental lines after exposure to each drug. In addition, we found that resistance to 5-FU and oxaliplatin was higher in parental p53(-/-) cells compared with parental p53(+/+) cells, with an approximately 5-fold increase in IC(50 (72 h)) for each drug. In contrast, the IC(50 (72 h)) doses for CPT-11 were identical in the p53 wild-type and null cell lines. Furthermore, apoptosis after treatment with 5-FU and oxaliplatin, but not CPT-11, was significantly reduced in parental p53(-/-) cells compared with parental p53(+/+) cells. These data suggest that p53 may be an important determinant of sensitivity to 5-FU and oxaliplatin but not CPT-11. Using semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR, we have demonstrated down-regulation of thymidine phosphorylase mRNA in both p53(+/+) and p53(-/-) 5-FU-resistant cells, suggesting that decreased production of 5-FU active metabolites may be an important resistance mechanism in these lines. In oxaliplatin-resistant cells, we noted increased mRNA levels of the nucleotide excision repair gene ERCC1 and ATP-binding cassette transporter breast cancer resistance protein. In CPT-11-resistant cells, we found reduced mRNA levels of carboxylesterase, the enzyme responsible for converting CPT-11 to its active metabolite SN-38, and topoisomerase I, the SN-38 target enzyme. In addition, we noted overexpression of breast cancer resistance protein in the CPT-11-resistant lines. These cell lines are ideal tools with which to identify novel determinants of drug resistance in both the presence and absence of wild-type p53.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2003

Identification of 5-fluorouracil-inducible target genes using cDNA microarray profiling.

The fluoropyrimidine 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely used in the treatment of cancer. To identify novel downstream mediators of tumor cell response to 5-FU, we used DNA microarray technology to identify genes that are transcriptionally activated by 5-FU treatment in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. Of 2400 genes analyzed, 619 were up-regulated by >3-fold. Highly up-regulated genes (>6-fold) with signal intensities of >3000 were analyzed by Northern blot. Genes that were consistently found to be up-regulated were spermine/spermidine acetyl transferase (SSAT), annexin II, thymosin-beta-10, chaperonin-10, and MAT-8. Treatment of MCF-7 cells with the antifolate tomudex and DNA-damaging agent oxaliplatin also resulted in up-regulation of each of these targets. The 5-FU-induced activation of MAT-8, thymosin-beta-10, and chaperonin-10 was abrogated by inactivation of p53 in MCF-7 cells, whereas induction of SSAT and annexin II was significantly reduced in the absence of p53. Moreover, each of these genes contained more than one potential p53-binding site, suggesting that p53 may play an important regulatory role in 5-FU-induced expression of these genes. In addition, we found that basal expression levels of SSAT, annexin II, thymosin beta-10, and chaperonin-10 were increased (by approximately 2-3-fold), and MAT-8 expression dramatically increased (by approximately 10-fold) in a 5-FU-resistant colorectal cancer cell line (H630-R10) compared with the parental H630 cell line, suggesting these genes may be useful biomarkers of resistance. These results demonstrate the potential of DNA microarrays to identify novel genes involved in mediating the response of tumor cells to chemotherapy.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed2003

The interaction of thymidylate synthase expression with p53-regulated signaling pathways in tumor cells.

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is a chemotherapeutic target for the fluoropyrimidine 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and antifolate tomudex (TDX). Using the MCF-7 breast cancer line, we have developed a cell line with inducible TS expression termed M7TS90. Inducible TS expression in this line resulted in a moderate (approximately 3-fold) increase in 5-FU 50% inhibitory concentration at 72 hours (IC-50(72 h)) dose and a dramatic (approximately 24-fold) increase in the IC-50(72 h) dose of TDX, but did not affect chemosensitivity to cisplatin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and paclitaxel. In the absence of drug treatment, inducible TS expression had no effect on expression of the p53 tumor suppressor gene. However, TS induction abrogated p53, p21, Fas, and Bak induction in response to TDX, but not 5-FU. Similarly, downregulation of Bcl-2 was reversed by inducible TS expression in TDX, but not 5-FU-treated cells. Our results indicate that inducible TS expression in M7TS90 cells modulates p53 and p53 target gene expression in response to TDX, but not 5-FU.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed2003

5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies.

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely used in the treatment of cancer. Over the past 20 years, increased understanding of the mechanism of action of 5-FU has led to the development of strategies that increase its anticancer activity. Despite these advances, drug resistance remains a significant limitation to the clinical use of 5-FU. Emerging technologies, such as DNA microarray profiling, have the potential to identify novel genes that are involved in mediating resistance to 5-FU. Such target genes might prove to be therapeutically valuable as new targets for chemotherapy, or as predictive biomarkers of response to 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Predictive markers for colorectal cancer: current status and future prospects.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Although there is clear evidence of the benefit of chemotherapy in adjuvant and metastatic settings, its use continues to be suboptimal because of intrinsic or acquired drug resistance. 5-Fluorouracil continues to be the mainstay of CRC therapy, and combinations with newer chemotherapeutic agents such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin have resulted in improved response rates and survival. The role of other agents including cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor, and farnsyl transferase inhibitors remains to be elucidated. Despite these improvements, many patients undergo chemotherapy without benefit. Increased understanding of the biology of CRC has led to the identification of prognostic markers that may help identify patients who will benefit from chemotherapy. Furthermore, studies have also begun to identify markers that predict whether a tumor will respond to a particular chemotherapy. The ultimate goal of this research is to prospectively identify patients who should receive chemotherapy and, thus, to tailor treatment to the molecular profile of the tumor and patient. Such an approach has the potential to dramatically improve response rates. This review highlights potentially important prognostic and predictive factors in CRC and discusses the potential for their use in the treatment of this disease.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2002

The role of thymidylate synthase induction in modulating p53-regulated gene expression in response to 5-fluorouracil and antifolates.

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is a critical target for chemotherapeutic agents such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and antifolates such as tomudex (TDX),multitargeted antifolate, and ZD9331. Using the MCF-7 breast cancer line, we have developed p53 wild-type (M7TS90) and null (M7TS90-E6) isogenic lines with inducible TS expression (approximately 6-fold induction compared with control after 48 h). In the M7TS90 line, inducible TS expression resulted in a moderate approximately 3-fold increase in 5-FU IC-50(72 h) dose and a dramatic >20-fold increase in the IC-50(72 h) doses of TDX, multitargeted antifolate, and ZD9331. S-phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by the antifolates were abrogated by TS induction. In contrast, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by 5-FU was unaffected by TS expression levels. Inactivation of p53 significantly increased resistance to 5-FU and the antifolates with IC-50(72 h) doses for 5-FU and TDX of >100 and >10 microM, respectively, in the M7TS90-E6 cell line. Furthermore, p53 inactivation completely abrogated the cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by 5-FU. The antifolates induced S-phase arrest in the p53 null cell line; however, the induction of apoptosis by these agents was significantly reduced compared with p53 wild-type cells. Both inducible TS expression and the addition of exogenous thymidine (10 microM) blocked p53 and p21 induction by the antifolates but not by 5-FU in the M7TS90 cell line. Similarly, inducible TS expression and exogenous thymidine abrogated antifolate but not 5-FU-mediated up-regulation of Fas/CD95 in M7TS90 cells. Our results indicate that in M7TS90 cells, inducible TS expression modulates p53 and p53 target gene expression in response to TS-targeted antifolate therapies but not to 5-FU.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMedDate not supplied

5-Fluorouracil: identification of novel downstream mediators of tumour response.

BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is routinely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal, breast and head and neck cancers. A major limitation to the use of this drug is acquired or inherent resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To examine the downstream molecular signals activated in response to 5-FU, we used DNA microarray technology to examine global transcriptional changes in 5-FU-treated MCF-7 breast cancer cells. RESULTS: We identified several novel 5-FU-inducible target genes that have not previously been linked to 5-FU response, including spermine/spermidine acetyl transferase (SSAT) and annexin II. Treatment of MCF-7 cells with the antifolate tomudex (TDX) and the DNA damaging agent oxaliplatin also caused up-regulation of each target gene. Inactivation of wild-type p53 abrogated the 5-FU-mediated induction of SSAT and annexin II. Inducible expression of thymidylate synthase completely abrogated TDX-, but not 5-FU-mediated induction of each gene. Furthermore, basal expression of SSAT and annexin II was elevated in cells resistant to 5-FU. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the potential of microarray analysis to identify novel genes associated with response or resistance to chemotherapeutic agents.

Acetyltransferases↗