PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel C Malone

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel C Malone.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Practitioners' views on computerized drug-drug interaction alerts in the VA system.

OBJECTIVES: To assess Veterans Affairs (VA) prescribers' and pharmacists' opinions about computer-generated drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts and obtain suggestions for improving DDI alerts. DESIGN: A mail survey of 725 prescribers and 142 pharmacists from seven VA medical centers across the United States. MEASUREMENTS: A questionnaire asked respondents about their sources of drug and DDI information, satisfaction with the combined inpatient and outpatient computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE) system, attitude toward DDI alerts, and suggestions for improving DDI alerts. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 40% (prescribers: 36%; pharmacists: 59%). Both prescribers and pharmacists indicated that the CPOE system had a neutral to positive impact on their jobs. DDI alerts were not viewed as a waste of time and the majority (61%) of prescribers felt that DDI alerts had increased their potential to prescribe safely. However, only 30% of prescribers felt DDI alerts provided them with what they needed most of the time. Both prescribers and pharmacists agreed that DDI alerts should be accompanied by management alternatives (73% and 82%, respectively) and more detailed information (65% and 89%, respectively). When asked about suggestions for improving DDI alerts, prescribers most preferred including management options whereas pharmacists most preferred making it more difficult to override lethal interactions. Prescribers and pharmacists reported primarily relying on electronic references for general drug information (62% and 55%, respectively) and DDI information (51% and 79%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Respondents reported neutral to positive views regarding the effect of CPOE on their jobs. Their opinions suggest DDI alerts are useful but still require additional work to increase their clinical utility.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Performance of drug-drug interaction software for personal digital assistants.

BACKGROUND: Personal digital assistants (PDAs) allow healthcare professionals to check for potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) at the point of care, reducing the need to consult traditional references. However, PDAs can only be as effective as the software programs they use. OBJECTIVE: To examine the ability of DDI software programs manufactured for Palm OS-compatible PDAs in detecting clinically important DDIs. METHODS: Eight PDA software programs were assessed for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for 16 well-documented DDIs contained within 6 simulated patient profiles. RESULTS: Sensitivity of the software programs ranged from 0.81 to 1.0, specificity ranged from 0.52 to 1.0, positive predictive values ranged from 0.62 to 1.0, and negative predictive values ranged from 0.88 to 1.0. Five programs scored perfect sensitivity scores: DrugIx, ePocrates Rx, ePocrates Rx Pro, Lexi-Interact, and the Tarascon pocket Pharmacopoeia. Of these, the ePocrates programs scored the highest in specificity (0.9), while Lexi-Interact and the Tarascon pocket Pharmacopoeia scored considerably lower (0.52). MosbyIx was the only program to score a 1.0 in specificity; however, its sensitivity was just 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: ePocrates Rx and ePocrates Rx Pro scored greater than or equal to 90% in regard to both sensitivity and specificity, making them the most reliable in detecting the clinically relevant interactions studied without the distraction of detecting those of no clinical significance. In addition, ePocrates Rx is updated regularly and is easily accessible on the Internet at no cost.

Computers, Handheld↗

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of overactive bladder.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of various antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: A decision-analysis model was developed and included clinical outcomes (i.e., therapy continued or discontinued, treatment success or failure, OAB-induced comorbidities) and costs for drugs and treatment of OAB-induced comorbidities (i.e., urinary tract infections, fractures, depression, and skin infections). Treatment success was defined as complete continence. A systematic MEDLINE literature search from January 1990-January 2006 identified English-language articles concerning the eight antimuscarinic drugs: darifenacin, solifenacin, trospium, immediate-release oxybutynin, extended-release oxybutynin, transdermal oxybutynin, immediate-release tolterodine, and extended-release tolterodine. Probabilities and cost data for these drugs were retrieved from the literature, and drug costs were based on 2005 average wholesale prices. The analysis was constructed from a payer's perspective. The time frame for the model was 3 months. RESULTS: Expected costs for each patient with OAB ranged from $3373 when treated with solifenacin to $3769 when treated with immediate-release oxybutynin. The average cost/patient with continued and successful treatment was lowest for solifenacin ($6863). Solifenacin dominated all other antimuscarinic agents because they were associated with high costs and low effectiveness. Success rates were the key parameters driving the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Among various antimuscarinic agents, solifenacin 5 mg had the lowest costs and highest effectiveness in the treatment of OAB.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Evaluation of the performance of drug-drug interaction screening software in community and hospital pharmacies.

BACKGROUND: Computerized drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening is widely used to identify potentially harmful drug combinations in the inpatient and outpatient setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening software in identifying select clinically significant DDIs in pharmacy computer systems in community and hospital pharmacies. METHODS: Ten community pharmacies and 10 hospital pharmacies in the Tucson metropolitan area were invited to participate in the study in 2004. To test the performance of each of the systems used by the pharmacies, 25 medications were used to create 6 mock patient profiles containing 37 drug-drug pairs, 16 of which are clinically meaningful DDIs that pose a potential risk to patient safety. Each profile was entered into the computer pharmacy system, and the system response in terms of the presence or absence of a DDI alert was recorded for each drug pair. The percentage of correct responses and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each system to correctly classify each drug pair as a DDI or not was calculated. Summary statistics of these measures were calculated separately for community and hospital pharmacies. RESULTS: Eight community pharmacies and 5 hospital pharmacies in the Tucson metropolitan area agreed to participate in the study. The median sensitivity and median specificity for community pharmacies was 0.88 (range, 0.81-0.94) and 0.91 (range, 0.67-1.00), respectively. For hospital pharmacies, the median sensitivity and median specificity was 0.38 (range, 0.15-0.94) and 0.95 (range, 0.81-0.95), respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on this convenience sample of 8 community pharmacies and 5 hospital pharmacies in 1 metropolitan area, the performance of community pharmacy computer systems in screening DDIs appears to have improved over the last several years compared with research published previously in 2001. However, significant variation remains in the performance of hospital pharmacy computer systems, even among systems manufactured by the same vendor. Future research should focus on improving the performance of these systems in accurately and precisely identifying DDIs with a high probability of resulting in true potential adverse effects on clinical outcomes and creating a low .noise. ratio associated with false-positive alerts.

Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems↗

Incremental effects of concurrent pharmacotherapeutic regimens for heart failure on hospitalizations and costs.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate medication use in patients with heart failure (HF) presents challenges in providing optimal, evidence-based care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incremental differences of concurrent and persistent use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-blockers, loop diuretics, and digoxin on the one-year, all-cause risk of hospitalization and total healthcare costs associated with treatment of HF in patients enrolled in a managed care organization within the US. METHODS: A retrospective database analysis was conducted spanning from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 1999. Multivariate regression methods were used to examine the association between treatment regimens and hospitalizations or costs after controlling for patient demographics and risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 1903 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 32.3% (n = 615) received none of the 4 HF agents studied and were associated with a 2.5 times greater risk (p < or = 0.001) of hospitalization and 43.6% higher (p < or = 0.001) total costs compared with all other patients with HF. Comparatively, 13.9% (n = 264) utilized the HF medications investigated for at least 6 months. Of those with persistent use of > or =3 agents, approximate decreases in hospitalizations were noted of 80% (p < or = 0.001) and total costs of 70% (p < or = 0.001) relative to patients receiving no HF therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial portion of patients with HF may be receiving suboptimal pharmacotherapeutic care in real-world practice settings, potentially incurring large increases in hospitalizations and total costs. Quality improvement initiatives should seek to identify and manage those not being treated according to guideline recommendations.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Assessment of potential drug-drug interactions with a prescription claims database.

PURPOSE: The prevalence of 25 clinically important potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in a population represented by the drug claims database of a pharmacy benefit management company (PBM) was studied. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of pharmaceutical claims for almost 46 million participants in a PBM was conducted to determine the frequency of 25 DDIs previously identified as clinically important. A DDI was counted when drugs in potentially interacting combinations were dispensed within 30 days of each other during a 25-month period between April 2000 and June 2002. RESULTS: The number of DDIs ranged from 37 for pimozide and an azole antifungal to 127,684 for warfarin and a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID). The highest prevalence (278.56 per 100,000 persons) and highest case-exposure rate (242.7 per 1,000 warfarin recipients) occurred with the warfarin-NSAID combination. The combination with the lowest overall prevalence (cyclosporine and a rifamycin, 0.10/100,000) differed from the combination with the lowest case-exposure rate (pimozide and an azole antifungal, 0.028 per 1,000 azole antifungal recipients). Number of cases, prevalence, and case-exposure rates for both sexes generally increased with age. An estimated 374,000 plan participants were exposed to a clinically important DDI during a 25-month period. Between 20% and 46% of prescription drug claims were reversed (canceled) for a medication with a drug interaction when a warning about the interaction was sent to the pharmacy. CONCLUSION: Analysis of prescription claims data from a major PBM found that 374,000 of 46 million plan participants had been exposed to a potential DDI of clinical importance.

Adolescent↗

Accuracy of adverse-drug-event reports collected using an automated dispensing system.

PURPOSE: The accuracy of adverse-drug-event (ADE) reports collected using an automated dispensing system was evaluated. METHODS: ADE reports were collected by requiring nurses on five units in a tertiary care facility to select a reason for removing two tracer drugs (dextrose injection 50% [D50] and naloxone) from an automated dispensing system (Medstation 2000, Pyxis, San Diego, CA). The accuracy of the ADE reports during a period of 4.5 months was evaluated through retrospective chart review. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the reports were calculated. RESULTS: A review of 61 D50 transactions found that the appropriate reason for removal was selected by nursing staff 62% of the time. Twenty-seven transactions were recorded as occurring due to an ADE, and 70% of these were confirmed in the medical record. The sensitivity and specificity of the ADE reports for D50 were 55.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.2-72.6%) and 70.4% (95% CI, 53.2-87.6%), respectively. A review of 32 naloxone transactions found that nurses correctly selected the reason for removal 88% of the time. Twenty-three transactions were recorded as occurring due to an ADE, and 87% of these were confirmed in the medical record. The sensitivity and specificity of the ADE reports for naloxone were 95.2% (95% CI, 86.1-104.4%) and 72.7% (95% CI, 46.4-99.1%), respectively. CONCLUSION: A Pyxis ADE reporting mechanism using the tracer drugs D50 and naloxone increased the overall reporting of ADEs.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Adherence assessment using medication weight in a phase IIb clinical trial of difluoromethylornithine for the chemoprevention of skin cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Adherence is a common and essential measurement in clinical trials. This study evaluates the association between participant self-reported study diary records and the weight of the medication vessel at each study visit, in the setting of a phase IIb topical chemoprevention trial. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-four eligible participants were randomized to one of four arms [34 to difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) plus triamcinolone, 31 to DFMO plus placebo, 31 to placebo plus triamcinolone, and 28 to double placebo] for 6 months of treatment for actinic keratosis. Adherence was assessed at each clinic visit by weighing each tube of dispensed and returned medication and the participant's study diary. RESULTS: Self-reported adherence was consistently higher than adherence measured by returned medication weight (96.5% versus 71.3%, 94.6% versus 82.4%, 95.3% versus 69.5%, and 95.8% versus 66.8% for DFMO, DFMO placebo, triamcinolone, and triamcinolone placebo, respectively; P < 0.001). Most participants (59.2%) recorded 100% adherence on the study diary; however, using the weight adherence, only 10.2% were completely adherent to the study regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported diary measures seem to overestimate adherence when compared with weighing the returned medication vessel. It is recommended that future clinical trials involving topical applications incorporate medication weights as a primary measure of adherence because it is objective, quantitative, inexpensive, noninvasive, and easy to use.

Administration, Topical↗

An economic and outcomes assessment of first-line monotherapy in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia within managed care.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the resource consumption and outcomes associated with first-line monotherapy for community-acquired pneumonia, focusing specifically on the use of erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and levofloxacin. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective managed care database analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects included patients within a managed care setting over 18 years of age with an initial diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia from January 1995 to April 2002. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to examine associations with treatment success rates and direct medical costs between antibiotic treatments after controlling for patient demographics and pneumonia risk factors. MAIN RESULTS: Overall, treatment success rates were high (95.8%), the use of second antibiotics was un common (2.3%), and hospitalizations were infrequent (2.0%) among the 1952 subjects studied. After controlling for patient characteristics and risk factors, significantly lower total costs were associated with erythromycin (92.7% lower, p < 0.001), azithromycin (48.7% lower, p < 0.001), and clarithromycin (21.3% lower, p = 0.015) relative to levofloxacin, with no difference in treatment success between groups. Among newer agents, azithromycin (49.2% lower, p < 0.001) and clarithromycin (21.7% lower, p = 0.013) treatment groups were associated with significantly lower total costs than levofloxacin in the full sample. However, in subjects with a chronic disease score above the sample's mean, only azithromycin was associated with significantly lower total costs (47.9% lower, p < 0.001) relative to levofloxacin. CONCLUSION: Erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin were associated with significantly lower total costs than levofloxacin, although treatment success rates did not differ between groups. Following stratification based upon various subset criteria, erythromycin and azithromycin were observed to have significantly lower total costs than levofloxacin. Although these findings may augment clinical guidelines and evidence-based approaches, health plans should consider evaluating their own patient data to see if similar differences exist in their populations.

Adolescent↗

Development and validation of a diabetes mellitus severity index: a risk-adjustment tool for predicting health care resource use and costs.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a diabetes mellitus-specific risk-adjustment tool--the diabetes severity index (DSI)--to assist in predicting health care costs and resources within populations of patients with diabetes. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of clinical and resource use for patients with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Model estimation was conducted with half the sample, and validation analysis was conducted with the other half. SETTING: Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System. PATIENTS: Seven hundred thirty-four patients with diabetes (710 men, 24 women; mean age 66 yrs). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical measures of diabetes severity (known as the DSI) were used to predict three health care resource outcomes: risk of hospitalization, and total and ambulatory health care costs. Validity of the DSI was assessed by comparing the DSI with the revised chronic disease score (CDS). The DSI weights ranged from -471.5-3081.2 for total health care costs, from -304.3-1582.1 for outpatient costs, and -0.19-0.93 for risk of hospitalization. The DSI explained 6-8% of the variance in total and ambulatory costs and performed significantly (p<0.05) better than demographics alone, but was similar to the CDS. When the DSI was used with the CDS, up to 8% of variability in costs and use were explained. CONCLUSION: The DSI was developed to stratify veterans with diabetes according to diabetes severity and comorbidity. Since additional variance in medical care costs were explained by combining the DSI and CDS, the two indexes may explain different dimensions of a patient's severity of diabetes. However, the utility of such an index based on clinical measures to predict short-term use may be limited due to low yet significant variability explained in the outcomes.

Adult↗

The role of pharmacoeconomic modeling in evidence-based and value-based formulary guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To review evidence-based medicine (EBM) in the context of pharmacoeconomic (PE) decision making by health care organizations. SUMMARY: Pharmacoeconomics involves processes similar to EBM, but it deals with decisions on the population rather than the patient level. The overall goal of PE is to provide the most efficient use of resources, taking into account both the cost and the value derived from a given technology. These evaluations assist health care decision making because both cost and effectiveness are considered. New therapies are increasingly complex in terms of administration, effects, and cost. As a result, PE models are likely to become more complex as well. At present, there is no standard threshold for what constitutes cost-effective therapy, so each organization is likely to have its own criterion for acceptance. CONCLUSION: Clinical trial results define the safety and efficacy of therapy but cannot determine whether a given technology represents a good buy for a specific organization. This requires PE analysis.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Cost-efficacy analysis of peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVE: Combination therapy with pegylated interferon (Peg) and ribavirin (RBV) is the standard of care for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This analysis compares the cost efficacy of treatment with pegylated interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin (Peg-2b plus RBV) with pegylated interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin (Peg-2a plus RBV) in hypothetical cohorts of 100 chronic HCV patients comprised 75% of genotype 1. METHODS: A decision analysis model was constructed from the viewpoint of a managed care organization to compare Peg-2b plus RBV (1.5 mcg per kilogram per week plus RBV 800 mg per day) and Peg-2a plus RBV (180 mcg per week plus RBV 1,000-1,200 mg per day) pursuant to the label dosing approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The model also included the so-called weight-based dosing regimen with Peg-2b plus RBV (1.5 mcg per kilogram per week plus RBV 10.6 mg/kg per day). Patient weight was assumed to be 80 kg. For purposes of this analysis, early virologic response (EVR), defined as viral negative or 2-log drop in viral load, was assessed at 12 weeks for only genotype 1 patients, and nonresponders were assumed to discontinue therapy. The positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated for each treatment group for genotype 1 patients, which is determined from the values for EVR and sustained viral response (SVR). Genotype 2 and genotype 3 patients were assumed to be treated for 24 weeks. Treatment duration and efficacy data were obtained from the published literature. Product pricing was based on average wholesale price, October 2004, and sensitivity analysis was performed using prices from the Federal Supply Schedule. Economic outcomes were determined from hypothetical 100-patient cohorts assumed to be comprised 75% of genotype 1 HCV. RESULTS: Taking into account both EVR and SVR, the PPV for genotype 1 patients was 0.63 and 0.57 for Peg-2b plus RBV and Peg-2a plus RBV, respectively. The proportion of treated patients achieving SVR would be nearly identical, (53.6%) and (53.8%) for Peg-2a plus RBV and Peg-2b plus flat RBV, respectively. For Peg- 2b plus weight-based RBV, the proportion of patients achieving SVR was higher (61.4%). Consequently, this leads to fewer overall treatment weeks for the Peg- 2b plus RBV cohorts. Therefore, the cost per successful treatment (defined as SVR) was 19.4% less (37,638 US dollars) for Peg-2b plus flat dosing of RBV as compared with Peg-2a plus RBV (46,717 US dollars). When Peg-2b plus RBV was dosed 1.5 mcg per kilogram per week plus RBV 10.6 mg/kg/day, then the cost per SVR was 39,045 US dollars. The cost for the 100-patient cohort was 2,024,846 US dollars for Peg-2b plus RBV, 2,397,529 US dollars for Peg-2b plus weight-based RBV, and 2,505,317 US dollars for Peg-2a plus RBV. This difference is due to a lower PPV in the Peg-2a plus RBV groups and hence more patients treated in spite of a low probability of achieving SVR. CONCLUSION: The results of this cost-efficacy analysis suggest that treating HCV genotype 1 patients with Peg-2b plus RBV may result in savings to a health care system because fewer of these patients are treated beyond 12 weeks when achieving sustained viral clearance is unlikely.

Administration, Oral↗

Health services use and health care costs of obese and nonobese individuals.

BACKGROUND: Obesity has clinical and economic consequences. Few studies have compared health care resource utilization between age- and sex-matched obese and nonobese persons. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in obese and nonobese individuals matched by age, sex, medical clinic, and selected exclusionary diagnoses. Data collected included hospitalizations, outpatient visits, professional claims, and prescriptions over 1 year. Costs were assigned to medical resources based on market prices using publicly available costs. Comorbid conditions were determined using a chronic disease score (CDS) index. Groups were compared on types and costs of resources consumed. Regression models were used to examine the effect of body mass index (BMI) on costs while controlling for age and chronic diseases. RESULTS: A total of 539 obese and 1225 nonobese persons were examined. Obese patients had more hospitalizations (P<.001), prescription drugs (P<.001), professional claims (P<.001), and outpatient visits (P = .005). Obese patients used more cardiovascular, intranasal allergic rhinitis, asthma, ulcer, diabetes, thyroid, and analgesic drugs. Total costs between groups were different (median of $585.44 for obese and $333.24 for nonobese patients; P<.001). Cost differences were primarily due to medications (P<.001). Predictors of total costs were age, sex, BMI, and CDS. For each unit BMI increase, costs increased 2.3% (P<.001). For each CDS unit increase, costs increased 52.9% (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Over 1 year, health care costs for obese persons are higher than for nonobese persons, primarily because of prescription drugs.

Adult↗

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure enrolled in a managed care organization: effect on costs and probability of hospitalization.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy on risk of hospitalization and resource utilization in patients with heart failure enrolled in a managed care organization. DESIGN: Retrospective medical and pharmacy claims analysis. PATIENTS: One thousand five hundred seventy-three patients with heart failure enrolled in a managed care organization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical and pharmacy claims from January 1, 1997-December 31, 1999, from a managed care organization covering approximately 350,000 individuals were analyzed. Patients aged 35 years or older with a diagnostic code for heart failure and 18 months of continuous eligibility were selected. From this group (1573 patients), two cohorts were selected based on exposure to an ACE inhibitor. Dependent variables of interest were all-cause hospitalization and total direct medical costs during the 12-month study period. A logistic regression model and an ordinary least-squares model adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, and concomitant drug therapy were used to analyze the risk of all-cause hospitalization and total direct medical costs, respectively. Therapy with an ACE inhibitor for 180 days was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause hospitalization (odds ratio 0.65, p<0.0001) and lower total costs (mean dollars 2397, p<0.001) compared with no ACE inhibitor therapy. CONCLUSION: In patients with a diagnosis of heart failure, exposure to ACE inhibitor therapy is associated with fewer hospitalizations and lower total costs than no ACE inhibitor exposure.

Aged↗

Comparison of peptic-ulcer drug use and expenditures before and after the implementation of a government policy to separate prescribing and dispensing practices in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: The South Korean government instituted a new policy, the separation of prescribing and dispensing (SPD) of medications, on July 1, 2000, to provide greater differentiation between the roles of physicians and pharmacists than had historically existed in South Korea. It was hoped that this policy would promote the rational use of medications and reduce medication expenditures, which accounted for approximately 30% of the total health care expenditures before the implementation of SPD. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of SPD on drug market share and expenditures for branded and generic medications by comparing the use of and expenditures for peptic-ulcer medications before and after the implementation of SPD. METHODS: Data on expenditures and quantity of use in January and December 2000 (in terms of defined daily dose [DDD]) of peptic-ulcer medications were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database. These data were derived using a 3-stage probability sample of prescription data from medical clinics in South Korea. RESULTS: The number of prescription drug claims for peptic-ulcer drugs increased by 13.9% after the introduction of SPD. Medication expenditures increased by 98.4% for peptic-ulcer medications. The use of more expensive drugs and branded products, even when generic products were available, accounted for most of this increase. In particular, the use of branded ranitidine 150 mg (measured by DDD) increased from 6.3% of the market share before SPD to 27.6% of the market share after the implementation of SPD. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of SPD increased both prescription drug claims and expenditures for peptic-ulcer medications. A principal factor contributing to the increase in expenditures was the use of branded medications.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗

The impact of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on blood pressure, with an emphasis on newer agents.

BACKGROUND: Both nonselective and selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been reported to increase blood pressure (BP). OBJECTIVE: This review summarizes the most recent data regarding the BP changes that may occur with routine dosing of nonselective or selective NSAIDs, with a focus on the latter. The review includes both clinical trials and studies having more naturalistic designs. METHODS: Relevant articles were identified through a search of MEDLINE emphasizing NSAIDs and hypertension. RESULTS: It is well established that NSAIDs increase BP in certain patients. Patients with existing hypertension seem to be at greatest risk for this adverse event. There seem to be differences between nonselective NSAIDs with regard to their effect on BP; indomethacin, naproxen, and piroxicam have been associated with clinically significant changes in BP. Most of the available evidence concerning the selective NSAIDs suggests that rofecoxib is more likely than celecoxib to raise systolic BP. Based on the results of trials in the treatment of BP, increases in systolic BP produced by these NSAIDs may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The adverse effects of NSAIDs on BP may be related to the specific drug or to the dose or duration of therapy, as well as to patient-specific characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant BP changes may occur after treatment with either nonselective or selective NSAIDs. The observed BP changes are not the same for all products, however.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

A cost-benefit analysis of vision screening methods for preschoolers and school-age children.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine costs and benefits of visual acuity screening (VAS) or photoscreening (PS) in children. METHODS: A societal-perspective, decision-analytic model compared VAS and PS conducted in three age groups: children 6 to 18 months, 3 to 4 years, and 7 to 8 years old. Literature estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence were used. Cost estimates and referral rates for surgical treatment were derived from a managed care database and the United States Social Security Administration. RESULTS: All the benefit-to-cost ratios exceeded 1.0, meaning that all screening programs studied had benefits that exceeded the cost of screening. The total net benefit was highest for PS in children of 3 to 4 years of age (19,412 US dollars) and the least for VAS in children 7 to 8 years of age (15,179 US dollars). The benefit-to-cost ratio was highest for the VAS in children 3 to 4 years of age (162 US dollars) and least for PS in infants 6 to 18 month old (140 US dollars). Sensitivity of the PS instrument and VAS charts were the most influential variables in determining the most cost-beneficial program. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the best available data, the net benefit of PS in 3 to 4 year old preschool children is greater than VAS in children 7 to 8 years of age, PS in toddlers, and VAS in children 3 to 4 years of age.

Age Factors↗