Biomedical subjects

Daniel E Spratt

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel E Spratt.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Characterizing the Activity of Inflammasome-Related Genes and Their Association With Oncological Outcomes in Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation plays a critical role in cancer cell proliferation; however, the specific role of inflammasomes, multiprotein complexes that regulate inflammation-associated signaling pathways, in prostate cancer (PCa) remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to characterize the expression of inflammasome-related genes in PCa and evaluate their association with clinical outcomes. METHODS: De-identified transcriptome data from the Decipher GRID RP, a cohort of 52,266 radical prostatectomy (RP) samples tested (2016-2024) with the Decipher prostate genomic classifier (Veracyte, San Diego, CA), were retrieved from the GRID registry (NCT02609269). Expression analysis of 34 genes involved in inflammatory pathways was conducted to associate their expression with clinical and genomic variables. Outcomes analyses were conducted on a retrospective cohort of 855 patients treated with RP (META855). RESULTS: Analysis of inflammasome gene expression in the GRID RP cohort revealed that most genes exhibit low baseline expression, whereas HSP90AB1, APP, TXN, and TXNIP demonstrate strong expression signals. Additionally, higher expression of most genes was associated with Gleason Grade Group 4-5 and very high Decipher scores. On survival analysis of the META855 cohort, higher expressions of AIM2 and HSP90AB1 were significantly associated with worse metastasis-free survival. Conversely, both high and low expression levels of NLRP3 were associated with better metastasis-free survival outcomes following RP compared to average expression. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, higher expressions of AIM2 (HR 1.75) and HSP90AB1 (HR 1.60) were significantly associated with shorter time to metastasis following RP. CONCLUSIONS: There is molecular heterogeneity within pro-inflammatory genes among patients with PCa. Our findings showed there is a potential association between the expression levels of certain inflammasomes, such as AIM2, HSP90AB1, and NLRP3, and oncological outcomes following RP.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Understanding randomized controlled trial generalizability through an embedded molecular diagnostics trial.

BACKGROUND: Issues with randomized controlled trial generalizability are well described, but whether these issues result from differences in patient treatment across contexts remains unknown. We studied treatment of patients with high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy inside and outside a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a genomic classifier on post-radical prostatectomy treatment decision making (Genomics in Michigan Impacting Observation of Radiation [G-MINOR]; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02783950). METHODS: G-MINOR enrolled 338 patients; propensity score-matched eligible but unenrolled patient cohorts (pretrial and trial contemporary) from the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC), in which the trial was embedded, were compared for rates and time to secondary treatment (adjuvant or salvage therapy) after prostatectomy. RESULTS: Among 338 patients in the G-MINOR cohort, 69 (31 adjuvant, 38 salvage) received secondary treatment compared with 266 (183 adjuvant, 83 salvage) and 104 (60 adjuvant, 44 salvage) in the 1014 contemporary and 338 pretrial-matched MUSIC cohorts. Time to secondary treatment was much shorter in the MUSIC cohort across all comparisons. For example, matching G-MINOR to synchronous MUSIC patients demonstrated 84% vs 74% estimated 2-year treatment-free survival for trial and real-world patients, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Controlling for key clinicopathologic factors, patients in the G-MINOR randomized controlled trial and MUSIC cohorts were treated differently, even after stratifying by genomic risk. These findings suggest that challenges in randomized controlled trial generalizability extend beyond the representativeness of trial participants. Differences in management may also explain why divergent patient outcomes are observed in randomized controlled trials vs real-world settings.

Aged↗