PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel G Haller

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel G Haller.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer.

PURPOSE: To address whether all medically fit patients with curatively resected stage II colon cancer should be offered adjuvant chemotherapy as part of routine clinical practice, to identify patients with poor prognosis characteristics, and to describe strategies for oncologists to use to discuss adjuvant chemotherapy in practice. METHODS: An American Society of Clinical Oncology Panel, in collaboration with the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guideline Initiative, reviewed pertinent information from the literature through May 2003. RESULTS: A literature-based meta-analysis found no evidence of a statistically significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II patients. Recommendations The routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for medically fit patients with stage II colon cancer is not recommended. However, there are populations of patients with stage II disease that could be considered for adjuvant therapy, including patients with inadequately sampled nodes, T4 lesions, perforation, or poorly differentiated histology. CONCLUSION: Direct evidence from randomized controlled trials does not support the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II colon cancer. Patients and oncologists who accept the relative benefit in stage III disease as adequate indirect evidence of benefit for stage II disease are justified in considering the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, particularly for those patients with high-risk stage II disease. The ultimate clinical decision should be based on discussions with the patient about the nature of the evidence supporting treatment, the anticipated morbidity of treatment, the presence of high-risk prognostic features on individual prognosis, and patient preferences. Patients with stage II disease should be encouraged to participate in randomized trials.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant↗
PubMed2004

Impact of T and N stage and treatment on survival and relapse in adjuvant rectal cancer: a pooled analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine survival and relapse rates by T and N stage and treatment method in five randomized phase III North American rectal adjuvant studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were pooled from 3,791 eligible patients enrolled onto North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) 79-47-51, NCCTG 86-47-51, US Gastrointestinal Intergroup 0114, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) R01, and NSABP R02. Surgery alone (S) was the treatment arm in 179 patients. The remaining patients received adjuvant treatment as follows: irradiation (RT) alone (n = 281), RT + fluorouracil (FU) +/- semustine bolus chemotherapy (CT; n = 779), RT + protracted venous infusion CT (n = 325), RT + FU +/- leucovorin or levamisole bolus CT (n = 1,695), or CT alone (n = 532). Five-year follow-up was available in 94% of surviving patients, and 8-year follow-up, in 62%. RESULTS: Overall (OS) and disease-free survival were dependent on TN stage, NT stage, and treatment method. Even among N2 patients, T substage influenced 5-year OS (T1-2, 67%; T3, 44%; T4, 37%; P <.001). Three risk groups of patients were defined: (1) intermediate (T1-2/N1, T3/N0), (2) moderately high (T1-2/N2, T3/N1, T4/N0), and (3) high (T3/N2, T4/N1, T4/N2). For intermediate-risk patients, those receiving S plus CT had 5-year OS rates of 85% (T1-2/N1) and 84% (T3/N0), which was similar to results with S plus RT plus CT (T1-2/N1, 78% to 83%; T3/N0, 74% to 80%). For moderately high-risk lesions, 5-year OS ranged from 43% to 70% with S plus CT, and 44% to 80% with S plus RT plus CT. For high-risk lesions, 5-year OS ranged from 25% to 45% with S plus CT, and 29% to 57% with S plus RT plus CT. CONCLUSION: Different treatment strategies may be indicated for intermediate-risk versus moderately high- or high-risk patients based on differential survival rates and rates of relapse. Use of trimodality treatment for all patients with intermediate-risk lesions may be excessive, since S plus CT resulted in 5-year OS of approximately 85%; however, 5-year disease-free survival rates with S plus CT were 78% (T1-2/N1) and 69%(T3/N0), indicating room for improvement.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much?

PURPOSE: Although it is well-established that fluorouracil- (FU-) based adjuvant therapy improves survival for patients with resected high-risk colon cancer, the magnitude of adjuvant therapy benefit across specific subgroups and for individual patients has been uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a pooled data set of 3,302 patients with stage II and III colon cancer from seven randomized trials comparing FU + leucovorin or FU + levamisole to surgery alone, we performed an analysis based on a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Treatment, age, sex, tumor location, T stage, nodal status, and grade were tested for both prognostic and predictive significance. Model derived estimates of 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) for surgery alone and surgery plus FU-based therapy were calculated for a range of patient subsets. RESULTS: Nodal status, T stage, and grade were the only prognostic factors independently significant for both disease-free survival and OS. Age was significant only for OS. In a multivariate analysis, adjuvant therapy showed a beneficial treatment effect across all subsets. Treatment benefits were consistent across sex, location, age, T-stage, and grade. A significant stage by treatment interaction was present, with treatment benefiting stage III patients to a greater degree than stage II patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with high-risk resected colon cancer obtain benefit from FU-based therapy across subsets of age, sex, location, T stage, nodal status, and grade. Model estimates of survival stratified by T stage, nodal status, grade, and age are available at http://www.mayoclinic.com/calcs. This information may improve patients' and physicians' understanding of the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2004

Phase I trial of the antifolate ZD9331 in combination with cisplatin in patients with refractory solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of ZD9331 in combination with cisplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors and to describe any preliminary antitumor activity associated with this regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received combination therapy with ZD9331 as a 30-min infusion on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle at doses of 100 or 130 mg/m(2), followed by cisplatin at 50 or 75 mg/m(2) as a 30- to 60-min infusion on day 1 only. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients received 59 cycles of ZD9331 and cisplatin. Patients were enrolled at three dose levels: ZD9331/cisplatin 100/50 ( n=3), 130/50 ( n=9), 130/75 ( n=4). DLTs at 130/75 included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting and stomatitis. Among 15 evaluable patients, 2 showed a partial response (patients with mesothelioma and head and neck cancer) and 6 showed stable disease (for a median of 5.5 cycles). CONCLUSIONS: ZD9331 in combination with cisplatin was well tolerated at a dose of 130/50 mg/m(2) after establishing the principal DLTs of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The combination shows evidence of antitumor activity in a pretreated population.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Recent updates in the clinical use of platinum compounds for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.

Since the late 1970s, clinical researchers have investigated the use of platinum compounds administered as single agents or in combination with other drugs for the treatment of a variety of cancers, including gastrointestinal cancers. After extensive clinical development, oxaliplatin has become an important option in the treatment of colorectal cancer, and its role in the treatment of other gastrointestinal cancers (and other cancers) remains a focus of intense investigation. Historically, platinum compounds have shown limited single-agent activity in pancreatic cancer, although more recent studies have explored potential synergies using platinum-based combinations. In addition, platinum agents have long been used in the treatment of advanced gastroesophageal tumors (typically 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin combinations), although poor outcomes in this disease clearly indicate a need for the development of more active agents. This review will examine recent clinical data on the use of platinum-based chemotherapies for the treatment of these gastrointestinal cancers.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2004

Phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) and mitomycin C, vincristine, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (MVPF) in patients with metastatic large bowel cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (EST 1285).

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and the toxicity of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) and mitomycin C, vincristine, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (MVPF) in patients with metastatic large bowel cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 94 patients with no prior chemotherapy and measurable metastatic large bowel cancer were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment regimens. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) criteria were used to evaluate response and toxicity. RESULTS: Fifty patients were randomized to PF and 44 to MVPF. Toxicity was evaluable in all patients except one; response was evaluable in 40 and 31, with response rate of 13 and 42%, respectively. Intent-to-treat analysis showed a response rate of 12 and 32%, respectively (p = 0.076), where it was assumed that none of the ineligible or unevaluable patients responded. Median survival for all patients was 9 months, with no difference between PF and MVPF. ECOG Performance Status (0 vs. 1), weight loss (< or =10 vs. >10%) and site of metastatic lesion had statistically significant impact on survival. MVPF was definitely more toxic than PF (p < 0.000005). CONCLUSION: Both treatment regimens showed clinical activity. The MVPF regimen resulted in more responses than PF, no improvement in survival, and more toxicity.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2004

Future directions with angiogenesis inhibitors in colorectal cancer.

The recent US Food and Drug Administration's approval of bevacizumab has reinvigorated antiangiogenic research and has moved colorectal cancer to the forefront of study for the most promising drug candidates in this class. Predicting future directions in this field requires a return to the challenges of the past. Antiangiogenic drugs have necessitated new study design paradigms and imaging techniques in the assessment of drug activity and in dose selection. The success of bevacizumab and the promise of vatalanib (PTK787/ZK222584) and the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors also illustrate the importance of these adaptations. A better understanding of the determinants of response to antiangiogenic agents and their mechanisms of action, especially in combination with cytotoxic drugs, is crucial to future drug development.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗
PubMed2003

Phase I trial of the antivascular agent combretastatin A4 phosphate on a 5-day schedule to patients with cancer: magnetic resonance imaging evidence for altered tumor blood flow.

PURPOSE: Combretastatin A4 (CA4) phosphate (CA4P) inhibits microtubule polymerization and is toxic to proliferating endothelial cells in vitro. It causes reversible vascular shutdown in established tumors in vivo, consistent with an antivascular mechanism of action. The present study investigated escalating doses of CA4P administered intravenously to patients with advanced cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid malignancies and good performance status received CA4P as a 10-minute infusion daily for 5 days repeated every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed during cycle 1. Patients receiving >/= 52 mg/m2/d had serial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) studies to measure changes in tumor perfusion with CA4P treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received 133 treatment cycles. CA4P dose levels ranged from 6 mg/m2 to 75 mg/m2 daily. Severe pain at sites of known tumor was dose limiting at 75 mg/m2. Dose-limiting cardiopulmonary toxicity (syncope and dyspnea or hypoxia) was noted as well in two patients treated at 75 mg/m2. Other toxicities included hypotension, ataxia, dyspnea, nausea or vomiting, headache, and transient sensory neuropathy. Plasma CA4P and CA4 area under the concentration-time curve and maximal concentration values increased linearly with dose. Tumor perfusion, as measured by the first-order rate constant of gadolinium plasma to tissue transfer during DCE-MRI studies, was found to decrease in eight of 10 patients. Relationships were also demonstrated between perfusion changes and pharmacokinetic indices. A partial response was observed in a patient with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, and 14 patients exhibited disease stability for a minimum of two cycles. CONCLUSION: Doses of CA4P on a daily times five schedule of 52 to 65 mg/m2 were reasonably well-tolerated. The 52 mg/m2 dose is recommended for further study based on cumulative phase I experience with CA4P. Antitumor efficacy was observed, and the use of DCE-MRI provided a valuable noninvasive measure of the vascular effects of CA4P treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of the novel taxane BMS-184476 administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion in combination with cisplatin every 21 days.

BMS-184476 is a 7-methylthiomethyl ether derivative of paclitaxel that displays potency superior to paclitaxel against tumor cells in culture and human tumor xenografts. It also inhibits the growth of paclitaxel-resistant human tumor cell lines with multidrug resistance mediated by either P-glycoprotein or mutated tubulin. Given the known synergy between taxanes and cisplatin in vitro and their clinical activity in combination, we performed a Phase I trial of BMS-184476 as a 1-h i.v. infusion followed by cisplatin every 21 days. Twenty-seven patients with a variety of solid tumors and good performance status received 116 cycles of therapy at BMS-184476 doses of 40-60 mg/m(2) together with cisplatin at 75 mg/m(2). The early observation of hypersensitivity reactions required prophylactic premedication in all patients. At the planned highest dose of BMS-184476 (60 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)), we observed dose-limiting toxicity in the form of neutropenia and diarrhea. Also at this level, five patients experienced grade 3 or worse nausea and vomiting. Aggressive prophylactic treatment eliminated the gastrointestinal toxicity. Mild to moderate peripheral neuropathy was infrequent, as was alopecia. Patient benefits included three partial responses in patients with mesothelioma, esophageal cancer, and head and neck cancer, and two additional minor responses. Plasma pharmacokinetic data are available for 23 patients treated at 40-60 mg/m(2). The mean maximum plasma concentrations and areas under the curves increased in a dose-related manner. The pharmacokinetics of BMS-184476 appeared independent of dose. The mean (+/- SE) values for clearance, volume of distribution at steady state, and the apparent terminal half-lives of the three dose groups during cycle 1 were 243 +/- 5 ml/min/m(2), 423 +/- 58 l/m(2), and 32.2 +/- 4.5 h, respectively. BMS-184476 60 at mg/m(2) with cisplatin at 75 mg/m(2) with appropriate supportive therapy is the dose recommended for further evaluation.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Association of hospital procedure volume and outcomes in patients with colon cancer at high risk for recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Studies that use registry data have demonstrated superior long-term overall survival after curative surgical resection of colon cancer at hospitals where the volume of such surgeries is high. However, because such administrative data lack information on cancer recurrence, the true nature of this relation remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospital procedure volume predicts long-term outcomes of colon cancer surgery. DESIGN: Nested cohort study within a randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Intergroup 0089 national adjuvant colon cancer study conducted between 1988 and 1992. PATIENTS: 3161 patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer. MEASUREMENTS: Overall survival and recurrence-free survival, by hospital procedure volume as defined by Medicare claims data. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 9.4 years, 5-year overall survival significantly differed across tertiles of hospital procedure volume (63.8% for patients who had resection at low-volume hospitals compared with 67.3% at high-volume hospitals; P = 0.04). After adjustment for other predictors of colon cancer outcome, the hazard ratio for overall mortality in patients treated at low-volume centers was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.03 to 1.32). However, the risk for cancer recurrence was not associated with hospital procedure volume. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 63.9% for patients who had resection at low-volume hospitals compared with 63.0% at high-volume hospitals (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03 [CI, 0.89 to 1.18]). These findings did not materially change after stratification by other potential demographic and clinical predictors of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: According to prospectively recorded data from a large clinical trial, patients whose colon cancer was resected at low-volume hospitals experienced a higher risk for long-term mortality; however, this increased mortality was not attributable to differences in colon cancer recurrences.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Influence of body mass index on outcomes and treatment-related toxicity in patients with colon carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for the development of colon carcinoma. The influence of body mass index (BMI) on long-term outcomes and treatment-related toxicity in patients with colon carcinoma has not been well characterized. METHODS: This cohort study was conducted within a large, randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial of 3759 men and women with high-risk, Stage II and Stage III colon carcinoma who were treated between 1988 and 1992 throughout the United States. With a median follow-up of 9.4 years, the authors examined the influence of BMI on disease recurrence, overall survival, and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Compared with women of normal weight (BMI, 21.0-24.9 kg/m(2)), obese women with colon carcinoma (BMI > or = 30.0 kg/m(2)) experienced significantly worse overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.07-1.67) and a nonsignificant increase in the risk of disease recurrence (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.98-1.59). The influence of BMI among women was not related to any differences in chemotherapy dose-intensity across categories of BMI. In contrast, BMI was not related significantly to long-term outcomes among male patients in this cohort. Among all study participants, obese patients had significantly lower rates of Grade 3-4 leukopenia and lower rates of any Grade > or = 3 toxicity compared with patients of normal weight. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with Stage II-III colon carcinoma, obesity was associated with a significant increase in overall mortality as well as a borderline significant increase in disease recurrence. Nonetheless, obesity was not associated with any increase in chemotherapy-related toxicity.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2003

Safety and toxicity analysis of oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil or as a single agent in patients with previously treated advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Two consecutive compassionate use studies of oxaliplatin were conducted in the United States and Canada in more than 5000 patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma who had experienced treatment failure after at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The main focus was safety. Patients were assigned to treatment with either single-agent oxaliplatin or oxaliplatin in combination with fluorouracil (FU) and with or without leucovorin (LV) in various regimens. Response data collection was not a trial objective, but time to treatment failure (TTF) was recorded in the first cohort (1370 patients). RESULTS: All treatment regimens were well tolerated, with an overall incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity of 23.2%, grade 3 or 4 treatment-related gastrointestinal toxicity of 26.4% (including diarrhea, vomiting, and mucositis), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity 3.9%. Similar results were reported in the second cohort (3806 patients), in which the eligibility criteria were much less restrictive. In the first cohort (in which 83% received prior irinotecan), median TTF was 14 weeks, and was similar for the five regimens combining oxaliplatin and FU with or without LV, but significantly shorter for the single-agent oxaliplatin arm. The overall dose-intensity of oxaliplatin was maintained at 85.5% (range, 80.6% to 94.3%) of that prescribed by protocol (average 36.7 mg/m2/wk). CONCLUSION: These data in a heavily pretreated patient population confirm that oxaliplatin is safe when used as a single agent or with a variety of FU-based regimens as salvage therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

The national practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: results of the 1996-1999 Patterns of Care Study.

PURPOSE: A Patterns of Care Study (PCS) was conducted to evaluate the standards of practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for esophageal cancer from 1996 to 1999. This study examined the evaluation and treatment schemes used during this time and compared these results to the PCS data obtained between 1992 and 1994 to identify any fundamental changes in national practice. METHODS: A national survey was conducted using a two-stage cluster sampling technique. Specific information was collected on 414 patients with esophageal cancer who received radiotherapy (RT) as part of definitive or adjuvant management at 59 institutions. Patients were staged according to the 1983 AJCC. Eligibility criteria for case review included RT between 1996 and 1999, no evidence of distant metastasis (including CT evidence of either supraclavicular or celiac nodes >1 cm), squamous cell or adenocarcinoma histology, Karnofsky performance status >60, tumors in the thoracic esophagus with <2 cm extension into the stomach, and no prior malignancies within the last 5 years. Statistical analysis was performed on the database using SUDAAN software to accurately reflect the type of sampling technique used by PCS. For the purpose of this analysis, institutions were stratified as either large or small based on the number of new cases seen each year. For the purposes of comparison, the 1992-1994 PCS esophageal survey results were subjected to the same statistical procedures and tests. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 64 years. Seventy-seven percent were male, and 23% were female. Karnofsky performance status was >or=80% in 85% of patients. The racial profile mirrors the previous survey with 75% Caucasian, 21% African-American, 3% Asian, and <1% Hispanic. A review of the histology revealed a nearly 50:50 split between squamous cell and adenocarcinoma. Sixteen percent were clinical Stage I, 39% clinical Stage II, and 33% clinical Stage III according to the 1983 AJCC system. Workup included endoscopy (96%), CT of the chest (87%), CT of the abdomen (75%), and esophagram (64%). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was used in 18% of cases as compared to <2% in the original survey (p < 0.0001). Patients treated at large centers were more likely to undergo EUS than those treated at small centers (23% vs. 12%, p = 0.047). Fifty-six percent of patients received concurrent chemoradiation as definitive treatment. There was a significant increase in the use of concurrent chemoradiation before planned surgical resection as compared to the original survey (27% vs. 10%, p = 0.007). Other schemes included RT alone (10%), postoperative RT (1%), and postoperative chemoradiation (5%). Forty-six percent of patients with adenocarcinoma underwent trimodality therapy as compared to 19% with squamous cell carcinomas (p = 0.0002). Patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation were more likely to have had an EUS. The median total dose of external RT was 50.4 Gy, and the median dose per fraction was 1.8 Gy. Brachytherapy was used in 6% of cases. The chemotherapy agents most commonly used included 5-fluorouracil (82%), cisplatin (67%), and paclitaxel (22%). Paclitaxel was more commonly employed as part of a preoperative chemoradiation regimen than in the setting of definitive chemoradiation (46% vs. 12%, p = 0.03). Compared to the original survey, paclitaxel use significantly increased between 1996 and 1999 (0.2% vs. 22%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Patterns of Care Survey confirms the use of concurrent chemoradiation as part of the national standards of practice for the management of esophageal cancer patients. A comparison with the previous study documents the significant rise in the use of EUS, preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery, and the increasing use of paclitaxel as part of a combined modality regimen.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil-leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil-leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial.

PURPOSE: In North America, no effective therapy has been available for patients with progressive metastatic colorectal cancer after front-line treatment with irinotecan, bolus fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (IFL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after IFL therapy were randomly assigned to bolus and infusional FU and leucovorin (LV5FU2), single-agent oxaliplatin, or the combination (FOLFOX4). This planned interim analysis evaluated objective response rate (RR), time to tumor progression (TTP), and alleviation of tumor-related symptoms (TRS) in an initial cohort of patients. RESULTS: Between November 2000 and September 2001, 463 patients from 120 sites in North America were randomly assigned to treatment. FOLFOX4 proved superior to LV5FU2 in all measures of clinical efficacy. Objective RRs determined by an independent radiology panel were 9.9% for FOLFOX4 versus 0% for LV5FU2 (Fisher's exact test, P <.0001). Median TTP was 4.6 months for FOLFOX4 versus 2.7 months for LV5FU2 (two-sided, stratified log-rank test, P <.0001). Relief of TRS occurred in 33% of patients treated with FOLFOX4 versus 12% of patients treated with LVFU2 (chi2 test, P <.001). Single-agent oxaliplatin was not superior to LV5FU2 in any measure of efficacy. Patients treated with FOLFOX4 experienced a higher incidence of clinically significant toxicities than patients treated with LV5FU2, but these toxicities were predictable and did not result in a higher rate of treatment discontinuation or 60-day mortality rate. CONCLUSION: For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, second-line treatment with FOLFOX4 is superior to treatment with LVFU2 in terms of RR, TTP, and relief of TRS.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Dose escalation study of tezacitabine in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: The authors performed a dose escalation study of cisplatin and the novel deoxycytidine analog, tezacitabine, to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with advanced cancer and good performance status were accrued to 3 dose levels of tezacitabine (150-270 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)). Using a 28-day treatment cycle, both drugs were administered on Days 1 and 15. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity was the most frequently observed side effect and was dose limiting. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia complicated 75% and 31% of all cycles, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Among 18 evaluable patients, 2 with upper gastrointestinal tract tumors achieved partial responses and 4 had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Based on dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia at the highest dose level, the recommended Phase II doses are 200 mg/m(2) of tezacitabine and 50 mg/m(2) of cisplatin.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes in patients with colon cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcomes and treatment-related toxicity among patients with curatively resected colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a cohort study within a large, randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial of 3,759 patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer treated between 1988 and 1992 throughout the United States. In the cohort, 287 patients were identified as having diabetes mellitus. With a median follow-up of 9.4 years, we analyzed differences in overall survival (OS) and colon cancer recurrence as well as treatment-related toxicity between patients with diabetes and those without diabetes. RESULTS: At 5 years, patients with diabetes mellitus, compared with patients without diabetes, experienced a significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS; 48% diabetics v 59% nondiabetics; P <.0001), OS (57% v 66%; P <.0001), and recurrence-free survival (RFS; 56% v 64%, P =.012). Median survival was 6.0 years and 11.3 years for diabetics and nondiabetics, respectively. Compared with patients without a history of diabetes, those with diabetes had a 42% increased risk of death from any cause (P <.0001) and 21% increased risk for recurrence (P =.05) after adjustment for other predictors of colon cancer outcome. Treatment-related toxicities were similar between the two groups, although patients with diabetes experienced an increase in treatment-related diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Patients with diabetes mellitus and high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer experienced a significantly higher rate of overall mortality and cancer recurrence, even after adjustment for other predictors of colon cancer outcome. These results underscore the need for further research to understand the mechanism that underlies this relation.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

New perspectives in the management of pancreas cancer.

Improvements in the management of locally advanced or metastatic pancreas cancer have proven to be both difficult and frequently marked by nihilism. Gemcitabine has replaced 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy as the standard of care. Gemcitabine first generated improvements in symptom control and survival in advanced disease, spurring further research. Subsequent trials have suggested that combinations of other agents with gemcitabine may extend clinical benefits to larger populations of patients. Newer combined chemoradiotherapy approaches may benefit the small population of patients with resectable disease, as well as the larger number of patients with locally advanced disease. In addition to identifying new cytotoxic agents and biologics, a greater challenge to clinical researchers is the development of innovative tools to diagnose and stage patients with pancreas cancer, and to monitor and assess their response to therapy. This applies not only to individual patients but also to large-scale clinical trials.

Adenocarcinoma↗