Biomedical subjects

Daniel Guitton

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Guitton.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Responses of collicular fixation neurons to gaze shift perturbations in head-unrestrained monkey reveal gaze feedback control.

A prominent hypothesis in motor control is that endpoint errors are minimized because motor commands are updated in real time via internal feedback loops. We investigated in monkey whether orienting saccadic gaze shifts made in the dark with coordinated eye-head movements are controlled by feedback. We recorded from superior colliculus fixation neurons (SCFNs) that fired tonically during fixation and were silent during gaze shifts. When we briefly (<or=700 ms) interrupted gaze shifts by transiently braking head movements, SCFNs fired steadily during brake-induced gaze immobility, and their mean frequency was inversely related to the remaining distance between current gaze position and the target. After head release, a corrective gaze saccade brought gaze on the unseen goal, and SCFN firing frequency peaked. The results support gaze feedback control and show that the SC is part of a network that encodes, during orientation, the distance between eye and target, irrespective of gaze trajectory characteristics.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2004

Accurate bidirectional saccade control by a single hemicortex.

Anatomical, electrophysiological and lesion studies indicate that each cortical hemisphere normally generates saccades directed to the contralateral side. In contrast, in patients who had an entire cortical hemisphere removed surgically (hemidecortication), the remaining hemicortex can generate both contraversive and ipsiversive saccades. However, current evidence indicates that ipsiversive saccades are grossly inaccurate. The obvious reason for this is that hemidecorticate patients are blind in the hemifield ipsilateral to the remaining hemicortex, and therefore normal visual signals are not available to drive ipsiversive saccades. However, absent vision also implies that visual error signals are not available to calibrate ipsiversive movements. Furthermore, the innate anatomical substrate needed to support accurate ipsiversive saccade control, in addition to the normal contraversive control, appears sparse. We show here that, in spite of these obstacles, hemidecorticate patients could generate accurate ipsiversive saccades in a task that dissociated hemianopia from saccade direction. In this task, while the patients fixated a central fixation target (FT), saccade targets (STs) were briefly presented to the intact visual hemifield contralateral to the intact hemicortex. The FT was then moved towards and beyond the former location of the ST which evoked tracking eye movements that moved the eyes towards and then beyond the ST, thereby moving the goal, ST, into the blind visual hemifield ipsilateral to the intact hemicortex. When the FT was extinguished, the patients generated, in the dark, ipsiversive saccades that moved their eyes to the remembered location of the ST with the same accuracy as normal control subjects. This indicates that a single hemicortex can mediate accurate bidirectional saccade control via fully functional bilateral connections from cortex to brainstem oculomotor structures. The mechanisms whereby visual signals can calibrate ipsiversive saccades remain elusive.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Evidence for gaze feedback to the cat superior colliculus: discharges reflect gaze trajectory perturbations.

Rapid coordinated eye-head movements, called saccadic gaze shifts, displace the line of sight from one location to another. A critical structure in the gaze control circuitry is the superior colliculus (SC) of the midbrain, which drives gaze saccades by relaying cortical commands to brainstem eye and head motor circuits. We proposed that the SC lies within a gaze feedback loop and generates an error signal specifying gaze position error (GPE), the distance between target and current gaze positions. We investigated this feedback hypothesis in cats by briefly stopping head motion during large ( approximately 50 degrees ) gaze saccades made in the dark. This maneuver interrupted intended gaze saccades and briefly immobilized gaze (a plateau). After brake release, a corrective gaze saccade brought the gaze on goal. In the caudal SC, the firing frequency of a cell gradually increased to a maximum that just preceded the optimal gaze saccade encoded by the position of the cell and then declined back to zero near gaze saccade end. In brake trials, the activity level just preceding a brake-induced plateau continued steadily during the plateau and waned to zero only near the end of the corrective saccade. The duration of neural activity was stretched to reflect the increased time to target acquisition, and firing frequency during a plateau was proportional to the GPE of the plateau. In comparison, in the rostral SC, the duration of saccade-related pauses in fixation cell activity increased as plateau duration increased. The data show that the cat's SC lies in a gaze feedback loop and that it encodes GPE.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2003

On the feedback control of orienting gaze shifts made with eye and head movements.

Combined eye-head movements are routinely used to orient the visual axis (gaze) rapidly in space. The gaze control system can be modeled using a feedback system in which an internally created instantaneous gaze position error signal equivalent to the distance between the target and the current gaze position is used to drive brainstem eye and head motor circuits. The visual axis is driven until this gaze position error (GPE) is zero. The neural structure of the feedback system is discussed here. The midbrain's superior colliculus (SC) is implicated in gaze control but its 'location' in the feedback circuitry is debated. Our moving hill hypothesis proposed that the SC is within the feedback loop and that GPE is encoded topographically by a moving locus of activity on the motor map. In cat, fixation neurons of the superior colliculus encode GPE, which supports this model. Our preliminary evidence in both monkey and cat shows that neurons on the motor map respond to and encode, at very short latency, gaze shift perturbations. This further supports the hypothesis that the SC is within the gaze feedback loop.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Superior colliculus encodes distance to target, not saccade amplitude, in multi-step gaze shifts.

The superior colliculus (SC) is important for generating coordinated eye-head gaze saccades. Its deeper layers contain a retinotopically organized motor map in which each site is thought to encode a specific gaze saccade vector. Here we show that this fundamental assumption in current models of collicular function does not hold true during horizontal multi-step gaze shifts in darkness that are directed to a goal and composed of a sequence of gaze saccades separated by periods of steady fixation. At the start of a multi-step gaze shift in cats, neural activity on the SC's map was located caudally to encode the overall amplitude of the gaze displacement, not the first saccade in the sequence. As the gaze shift progressed, the locus of activity moved to encode the error between the goal and the current gaze position. Contrary to common belief, the locus of activity never encoded gaze saccade amplitude, except for the last saccade in the sequence.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2002

In multiple-step gaze shifts: omnipause (OPNs) and collicular fixation neurons encode gaze position error; OPNs gate saccades.

The superior colliculus (SC), via its projections to the pons, is a critical structure for driving rapid orienting movements of the visual axis, called gaze saccades, composed of coordinated eye-head movements. The SC contains a motor map that encodes small saccade vectors rostrally and large ones caudally. A zone in the rostral pole may have a different function. It contains superior colliculus fixation neurons (SCFNs) with probable projections to omnipause neurons (OPNs) of the pons. SCFNs and OPNs discharge tonically during visual fixation and pause during single-step gaze saccades. The OPN tonic discharge inhibits saccades and its cessation (pause) permits saccade generation. We have proposed that SCFNs control the OPN discharge. We compared the discharges of SCFNs and OPNs recorded while cats oriented horizontally, to the left and right, in the dark to a remembered target. Cats used multiple-step gaze shifts composed of a series of small gaze saccades, of variable amplitude and number, separated by periods of variable duration (plateaus) in which gaze was immobile or moving at low velocity (<25 degrees /s). Just after contralaterally (ipsilaterally) presented targets, the firing frequency of SCFNs decreased to almost zero (remained constant at background). As multiple-step gaze shifts progressed in either direction in the dark, these activity levels prevailed until the distance between gaze and target [gaze position error (GPE)] reached approximately 16 degrees. At this point, firing frequency gradually increased, without saccade-related pauses, until a maximum was reached when gaze arrived on target location (GPE = 0 degrees). SCFN firing frequency encoded GPE; activity was not correlated to characteristics or occurrence of gaze saccades. By comparison, after target presentation to left or right, OPN activity remained steady at pretarget background until first gaze saccade onset, during which activity paused. During the first plateau, activity resumed at a level lower than background and continued at this level during subsequent plateaus until GPE approximately 8 degrees was reached. As GPE decreased further, tonic activity during plateaus gradually increased until a maximum (greater than background) was reached when gaze was on goal (GPE = 0 degrees). OPNs, like SCFNs, encoded GPE, but they paused during every gaze saccade, thereby revealing, unlike for SCFNs, strong coupling to motor events. The firing frequency increase in SCFNs as GPE decreased, irrespective of trajectory characteristics, implies these cells get feedback on GPE, which they may communicate to OPNs. We hypothesize that at the end of a gaze-step sequence, impulses from SCFNs onto OPNs may suppress further movements away from the target.

Action Potentials↗