PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel J Rinchuse

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel J Rinchuse.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

ABO certification in the age of evidence and enhancement.

The American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) phase III certification examination was originally constructed and recently modified to "help the Board determine the candidate's knowledge of clinical orthodontics and provide a basis to assess the quality of the candidate's clinical treatment results." For the most part, the ABO phase III examination measures the orthodontic treatment-induced changes in occlusion in a limited and biased patient sample. The process and outcome measures used in the current model-the discrepancy index and the objective grading system-are so narrowly focused that an orthodontist might lack up-to-date clinical knowledge, psychomotor and critical thinking skills, diagnostic acumen, patient management ability, and patient-centered ethics, and still pass the examination largely because of mechanically morphing the patient's teeth into the board's construct of ideal occlusion. The goal of this article is to provide provocative insight into the core concepts that drive the ABO phase III certification process and to recommend an alternative paradigm predicated on a patient-centered, evidence-based clinical practice model.

Certification↗
PubMed2006

Developmental occlusion, orthodontic interventions, and orthognathic surgery for adolescents.

This article addresses issues in orthodontics such as timing of treatment, expansion in the absence of a posterior crossbite, serial ex-tractions, treatment of Class II and III malocclusions, treatment of open bites, extraction versus nonextraction, preservation of E-space to resolve crowding, orthodontics and temporomandibular disorders, orthognathic surgery, and current trends in orthodontics. Although much information is presented on these topics, many controversies still exist. When more data from evidence-based systematic reviews become available, more predictable and standardized orthodontic treatments may develop.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of skeletal and dental changes between 2-point and 4-point rapid palatal expanders.

Rapid palatal expansion has been a clinically accepted technique used by orthodontists for over 100 years. Its primary goal is to maximize orthopedic and minimize orthodontic movements of teeth. Historically, this was best accomplished by including 4 teeth in the appliance. However, including more teeth makes construction and insertion more difficult. The appliance also is less comfortable for patients and hinders oral hygiene. The 4-point hyrax expander can be modified by removing the 2 anterior wires, creating a 2-point expander between the first molars only. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference, if any, between midpalatal suture separation and dental expansion produced between 2-point and 4-point palatal expanders. Thirty subjects between the ages of 6 and 16 years were randomly assigned to either the 2-point (n = 15) or the 4-point group (n = 15). The groups were compared on dental and radiographic landmarks. The groups showed no statistical differences in total molar cusp width, molar gingival width, canine cusp width, canine gingival width, or diastema width. There were slight differences in arch perimeter and midpalatal suture separation. The results of this study showed that the 2-point appliance produced similar effects on the midpalatal suture and the dentition as did the 4-point appliance. It might therefore be considered instead of the 4-point appliance to successfully produce adequate skeletal and dental expansion.

Adolescent↗