PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel L Leonard

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel L Leonard.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

The effect of a translucent post on resin composite depth of cure.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a light-transmitting post on the depth of cure of a resin composite. METHODS: Acetate resin molds were filled with resin composite in which a light-transmitting post was inserted into the center and photopolymerized to the manufacturer's recommendations. Identical molds without a light-transmitting post were photopolymerized in a similar matter and served as a control. Molds were sectioned on a water-cooled, diamond saw at prescribed distances and the depth of cure was determined using a Knoop Hardness bottom-to-top ratio criterion. Data within each group were analyzed using 2-way (depth-by-distance) repeated measure ANOVA. Between-group contrasts (post versus no post) were accessed by a 3-way (2 within-subjects and 1 between-subjects) ANOVA with critical p = 0.05. RESULTS: The presence of the post did increase (p < 0.001) Knoop Hardness values in simulated apical regions as compared to a control. However, there was no difference in the depth of cure between the groups (3-way analysis p = 0.2) and also when evaluated using an 80% bottom-to-top Knoop Hardness ratio. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that these posts may have a limited utility when judged against a Knoop Hardness ratio criterion.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2004

Statistical estimation of resin composite polymerization sufficiency using microhardness.

With respect to determining sub-surface resin polymerization sufficiency, this study compared a traditional method of applying linear regression to bottom- to top-surface Knoop hardness ratios to an alternative method based on nonlinear regression. Inverse linear regression on ratios was used to estimate the exposure duration required for 80% bottom-surface hardness with respect to the top, in six light-by-material groups. Alternatively, a one-phase, two-parameter, exponential association of the form Y=Y(max)(1-e(-kt)) (where Y(max) is maximum hardness, k is a rate constant, and t is exposure duration), was used to model hardness. Inverse nonlinear regression estimated, for each condition, the exposure duration required for the bottom surface to achieve 80% of corresponding condition (light and material) top-surface Y(max). Mathematically, analysis of ratios was demonstrated to yield potentially less precise and biased estimates. Nonlinear regression yielded better statistical fit and provided easily accessible tests for differences in k across light-system groups. Another recently proposed nonlinear model for polymerization, Y=Y(max)kt(n)/(1+kt(n)), was also considered. While this new model has substantially greater phenomenological and mechanistic justification, we found that the model-fitting process was more sensitive to initial parameter values and sometimes yielded untenable results when applied to our data. However, we believe that these problems would not occur if sample points are well distributed across a wide range of exposure durations, and that the model, Y=Y(max)kt(n)/(1+kt(n)), should be considered for such data sets.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2002

Polymerization efficiency of LED curing lights.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the curing efficiency of three commercially available light-emitting diode (LED)-based curing lights with that of a quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) curing light by means of hardness testing. In addition, the power density (intensity) and spectral emission of each LED light was compared with the QTH curing light in both the 380- to 520-nm and the 450- to 500-nm spectral ranges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A polytetrafluoroethylene mold 2 mm high and 8 mm in diameter was used to prepare five depth-of-cure test specimens for each combination of exposure duration, composite type (Silux Plus [microfill], Z-100 [hybrid]), and curing light (ZAP Dual Curing Light, LumaCure, VersaLux, Optilux 401). After 24 hours, Knoop hardness measurements were made for each side of the specimen, means were calculated, and a bottom/top Knoop hardness (B/T KH) percentage was determined. A value of at least 80% was used to indicate satisfactory polymerization. A linear regression of B/T KH percentage versus exposure duration was performed, and the resulting equation was used to predict the exposure duration required to produce a B/T KH percentage of 80% for the test conditions. The power densities (power/unit area) of the LED curing lights and the QTH curing light (Optilux 401) were measured 1 mm from the target using a laboratory-grade, laser power meter in both the full visible light spectrum range (380-780 nm) and the spectral range (between 450 and 500 nm), using a combination of long- and short-wave edge filters. RESULTS: The emission spectra of the LED lights more closely mirrored the absorption spectrum of the commonly used photoinitiator camphorquinone. Specifically, 95% of the emission spectrum of the VersaLux, 87% of the LumaCure, 84% of the ZAP LED, and 78% of the ZAP combination LED and QTH fell between 450 and 500 nm. In contrast, only 56% of the emission spectrum of the Optilux 401 halogen lamp fell within this range. However, the power density between 450 and 500 nm was at least four times greater for the halogen lamp than for the purely LED lights. As a result, the LED-based curing lights required from 39 to 61 seconds to cure a 2-mm thick hybrid resin composite and between 83 and 131 seconds to adequately cure a microfill resin composite. By comparison, the QTH light required only 21 and 42 seconds to cure the hybrid and microfill resin composites, respectively. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The first-generation LED-based curing lights in this study required considerably longer exposure durations than the QTH curing light to adequately polymerize a hybrid and a microfill resin composite.

Composite Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of handpiece maintenance method on bond strength.

This study evaluated the effect of dental handpiece lubricant on the shear bond strength of three bonding agents to dentin. A lubrication-free handpiece (one that does not require the user to lubricate it) and a handpiece requiring routine lubrication were used in the study. In addition, two different handpiece lubrication methods (automated versus manual application) were also investigated. One hundred and eighty extracted human teeth were ground to expose flat dentin surfaces that were then finished with wet silicon carbide paper. The teeth were randomly divided into 18 groups (n=10). The dentin surface of each specimen was exposed for 30 seconds to water spray from either a lubrication-free handpiece or a lubricated handpiece. Prior to exposure, various lubrication regimens were used on the handpieces that required lubrication. The dentin surfaces were then treated with total-etch, two-step; a self-etch, two-step or a self-etch, one-step bonding agent. Resin composite cylinders were bonded to dentin, the specimens were then thermocycled and tested to failure in shear at seven days. Mean bond strength data were analyzed using Dunnett's multiple comparison test at an 0.05 level of significance. Results indicated that within each of the bonding agents, there were no significant differences in bond strength between the control group and the treatment groups regardless of the type of handpiece or use of routine lubrication.

Acid Etching, Dental↗