PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel P Fishbein

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel P Fishbein.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Utility of impedance cardiography for the identification of short-term risk of clinical decompensation in stable patients with chronic heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the potential utility of impedance cardiography (ICG) in predicting clinical deterioration in ambulatory patients with heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Impedance cardiography uses changes in thoracic electrical impedance to estimate hemodynamic variables, but its ability to predict clinical events has not been evaluated. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 212 stable patients with HF and a recent episode of clinical decompensation who underwent serial clinical evaluation and blinded ICG testing every 2 weeks for 26 weeks and were followed up for the occurrence of death or worsening HF requiring hospitalization or emergent care. RESULTS: During the study, 59 patients experienced 104 episodes of decompensated HF (16 deaths, 78 hospitalizations, and 10 emergency visits). Multivariate analysis identified 6 clinical and ICG variables that independently predicted an event within 14 days of assessment. These included three clinical variables (visual analog score, New York Heart Association functional class, and systolic blood pressure) and three ICG parameters (velocity index, thoracic fluid content index, and left ventricular ejection time). The three ICG parameters combined into a composite score was a powerful predictor of an event during the next 14 days (p = 0.0002). Visits with a high-risk composite score had 2.5 times greater likelihood and those with a low-risk score had a 70% lower likelihood of a near-term event compared with visits at intermediate risk. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that when performed at regular intervals in stable patients with HF with a recent episode of clinical decompensation, ICG can identify patients at increased near-term risk of recurrent decompensation.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Expectant management is safe for cholelithiasis after heart transplant.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of cholelithiasis after heart transplant remains unclear. We use expectant management based on symptoms, without screening studies or prophylactic treatment. We hypothesized that expectant management for cholelithiasis after heart transplant does not result in significant mortality or morbidity from gallstone-associated disease. METHODS: Between November 1985 and August 2004, 409 heart transplants were performed in 402 recipients at the University of Washington. This is a non-concurrent cohort study of these recipients. RESULTS: Among recipients, 24 underwent cholecystectomy before heart transplant. After transplant, in the remaining 378 patients, 34 were found to have gallstones during the observation period. There was no mortality from gallstone-associated disease. Thirty patients developed morbidity from gallstones, including 25 cases of biliary colic, 3 of acute cholecystitis and 2 of pancreatitis, and there was 1 abnormal liver function test. Acute cholecystitis and pancreatitis were treated with conservative management followed by cholecystectomy. Cholecystectomy was performed in 32 patients after transplant. Indications included symptomatic cholelithiasis in 31, and prophylactic cholecystectomy prior to kidney transplant in 1. The laparoscopic approach was performed in 25 of these 32 patients. There was no mortality from cholecystectomy, but there were 4 complications: surgical site infections (n = 2); wound dehiscence (n = 1); and bile duct injury (n = 1). Median hospital stay was 1 day. CONCLUSIONS: Our expectant management for cholelithiasis after heart transplant resulted in no mortality or significant morbidity related to delay in treatment. Symptomatic cholelithiasis was successfully treated with cholecystectomy, mostly with the laparoscopic approach. We believe expectant management is safe for patients after heart transplant.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Open-chest management after heart transplantation.

Postcardiotomy open-chest management has been widely used in cardiac surgery. Although this strategy can be applied to heart transplantation, the use of immunosuppressants in transplant recipients raises particular concerns about sternal wound infection and impaired healing. We performed a retrospective review of 403 patients who had undergone 410 heart transplantations at our institution from 1985 through 2004. Among them, 9 patients (2.2%) had open-chest management postoperatively. There were 8 men and 1 woman, with a mean age of 58 +/- 7 years. The graft ischemic time ranged from 130 to 374 minutes (mean, 218 +/- 99 min), and the cardiopulmonary bypass time ranged from 98 to 360 minutes (mean, 210 +/- 69 min). In all cases, the reason for open-chest management was hemodynamic lability that precluded chest closure after transplantation. One patient also experienced postoperative bleeding. All patients underwent delayed sternal closure between postoperative days 1 and 11 (median, 4 days). Delayed sternal closure did not cause any significant hemodynamic changes. One patient died of stroke on postoperative day 22. No patient had sternal wound infection or impaired wound healing during the follow-up period. We conclude that, when required, open-chest management is an effective and safe measure for hemodynamically unstable heart transplant patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Usefulness of relative lymphocyte count as an independent predictor of death/urgent transplant in heart failure.

The usefulness of low relative lymphocyte count as an independent predictor of death/urgent transplant in patients with heart failure (HF) and the association between low relative lymphocyte count and neurohormone and cytokine activation were investigated. Relative lymphocyte count, clinical variables, neurohormones, and cytokines were measured in 129 outpatients with HF. Follow-up extended to a mean of 3.0 +/- 1.2 years for death/urgent transplant. Low relative lymphocyte count was independently associated with a 3.4-fold increased risk of death/urgent transplant. Relative lymphocyte count was positively associated with hemoglobin and inversely associated with age, jugular venous pressure, creatinine, leukocyte count, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1. There was only a borderline inverse association with cortisol levels during evening hours.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed2005

Statin use and risks of death or fatal rejection in the Heart Transplant Lipid Registry.

Although small, randomized trials have shown that statin use is associated with decreased risks of mortality and severe rejection, no study has examined statin therapy as used in actual practice in large numbers of heart transplant recipients. We analyzed data from the Heart Transplant Lipid Registry (n = 12 centers). Patients were included if they underwent transplantation between 1995 and 1999, survived >/=30 days after transplantation, and had >/=30 days of Registry follow-up. Multivariable Cox regression models, with propensity scoring performed to adjust for nonrandom allocation of statin therapy, were performed to determine the association of statin therapy with death and fatal rejection. The study included 1,186 patients, with a mean follow-up of 580 +/- 469 days; 937 patients (79%) received statin therapy. Overall, 71 patients (6%) died and 40 (3.4%) had fatal rejection. The statin group had a lower frequency of death (4% vs 13.7%, p <0.0001) and fatal rejection (2.4% vs 7.2%, p = 0.0001). Using multivariable Cox regression, with propensity scoring included to adjust for likelihood of receiving statin therapy, statin use was the only factor associated with lower risk of death (hazard ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.67) and fatal rejection (hazard ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.78). This study represents the largest population of heart transplant recipients analyzed for the relation between statin therapy and clinical outcomes in actual practice. Statin therapy was significantly associated with lower risk of death and fatal rejection, benefits that were independent of lipid values.

Chi-Square Distribution↗
PubMed2005

Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Sudden death from cardiac causes remains a leading cause of death among patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Treatment with amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been proposed to improve the prognosis in such patients. METHODS: We randomly assigned 2521 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III CHF and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35 percent or less to conventional therapy for CHF plus placebo (847 patients), conventional therapy plus amiodarone (845 patients), or conventional therapy plus a conservatively programmed, shock-only, single-lead ICD (829 patients). Placebo and amiodarone were administered in a double-blind fashion. The primary end point was death from any cause. RESULTS: The median LVEF in patients was 25 percent; 70 percent were in NYHA class II, and 30 percent were in class III CHF. The cause of CHF was ischemic in 52 percent and nonischemic in 48 percent. The median follow-up was 45.5 months. There were 244 deaths (29 percent) in the placebo group, 240 (28 percent) in the amiodarone group, and 182 (22 percent) in the ICD group. As compared with placebo, amiodarone was associated with a similar risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.06; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.30; P=0.53) and ICD therapy was associated with a decreased risk of death of 23 percent (0.77; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.96; P=0.007) and an absolute decrease in mortality of 7.2 percentage points after five years in the overall population. Results did not vary according to either ischemic or nonischemic causes of CHF, but they did vary according to the NYHA class. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NYHA class II or III CHF and LVEF of 35 percent or less, amiodarone has no favorable effect on survival, whereas single-lead, shock-only ICD therapy reduces overall mortality by 23 percent.

Aged↗