PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel Rowan

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Rowan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Learning to discriminate interaural time differences: an exploratory study with amplitude-modulated stimuli.

The advent of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) has increased interest in learning on binaural tasks, and studies in normal-hearing listeners provide important background information. However, few studies have considered learning with discrimination of interaural time difference (ITD). Here, learning with ITD was explored using stimuli that are more relevant to bilateral CIs than used previously. Inexperienced listeners were trained with envelope-based ITD using high-frequency amplitude-modulated tones with or without an interaural carrier frequency difference (IFD), the former to simulate asymmetrical bilateral CI insertions. All were tested with and without IFD before and after training. In most listeners, ITD thresholds improved substantially with training, not necessarily reaching asymptote after 3,000 trials. In these, the magnitude and time-course of learning was larger than anticipated from a previous study with low-frequency ITD. Learning generalized across IFD and the effect of IFD on ITD thresholds at post-test was smaller than reported previously. These results have implications for studies of bilateral CIs, such as the need to provide extensive training to avoid over-estimating any apparent 'impairment'.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Comparison of Levitt- and Zwislocki-type adaptive procedures for stimulus placement in human listeners.

The "3-down, 1-up" adaptive stimulus placement rules attributed to Levitt and Zwislocki were compared in the context of human interaural time difference discrimination, employing otherwise commonly used procedures (e.g., averaging reversals to estimate threshold). The Zwislocki rule typically accumulated over three more reversals than the Levitt rule but the rules were approximately equally efficient. This may be because the additional reversals did not provide additional information or that any additional information was countered by other factors, such as the lower theoretical asymptotic response probability (0.75 vs 0.794). Relative bias between rules was also explored with the aid of a simulation.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Does static ear canal pressure influence pure tone pitch perception?

OBJECTIVE: That static ear canal air pressure (ECP) influences the frequency of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) suggests that it may influence intracochlear, in addition to middle ear, processes. A previous study suggested that ECP influences pure tone pitch perception at 1,000 Hz, which was interpreted as indicating an effect on the cochlear place-frequency map. The present study extended investigations of this effect to 500 and 4,000 Hz. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine normal-hearing listeners performed interaural pitch matching with monaural ECPs of 0 and -300 daPa. RESULTS: Some indications of a small downward pitch shift (mean 0.2%) at 500 Hz were observed, which were marginally statistically significant at the 5% level. No pitch shifts were observed at 4,000 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: ECP does not influence pitch to the extent suggested previously or by SOAE frequency shifts. No evidence was found to support the notion that ECP influences the place-frequency map.

Acoustic Stimulation↗