PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel Sifrim

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Sifrim.

18 recordsLinked to original sources

Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Combined esophageal pH-impedance monitoring allows detection of nearly all gastroesophageal reflux episodes, acid as well as nonacid. However, the role of nonacid reflux in the pathogenesis of symptoms is poorly known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of this technique in patients with suspected reflux symptoms while on or off PPI therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The recordings of 150 patients recruited at seven academic centers with symptoms possibly related to gastroesophageal reflux were analyzed. Reflux events were detected visually using impedance (Sandhill, CO) and then characterized by pHmetry as acid or nonacid reflux. The temporal relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes was analyzed: a symptom association probability (SAP) > or =95% was considered indicative of a positive association. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were included, 102 women (mean age 52 +/- 14 yr, range 16-84). Among the 79 patients off PPI, five did not report any symptom during the recording period. A positive SAP was found in 41 of the 74 symptomatic patients (55.4%), including acid reflux in 23 (31.1%), nonacid reflux in three (4.1%), and acid and nonacid in 15 (20.3%). In the group of patients on PPI (N = 71, 46 women, mean age 51 +/- 15 yr), 11 were asymptomatic during the study, SAP was positive in 22 of the 60 symptomatic patients (36.7%), including acid reflux in three (5.0%), nonacid reflux in 10 (16.7%), and acid and nonacid in nine (15.0%). The symptoms most frequently associated with nonacid reflux were regurgitation and cough. CONCLUSION: Adding impedance to pH monitoring improves the diagnostic yield and allows better symptom analysis than pHmetry alone, mainly in patients on PPI therapy. The impact of this improved diagnostic value on gastroesophageal reflux disease management remains to be investigated by outcome studies.

Adolescent↗

Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.

OBJECTIVE: Gastroesophageal reflux is a physiologic process and is considered pathologic (gastroesophageal reflux disease) when it causes symptoms or results in complications. It is common in preterm infants and occurs in healthy neonates. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring commonly is used in children for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and abnormal reflux is considered with detection of increased esophageal acid exposure. However, in neonates, relatively few gastroesophageal reflux episodes cause esophageal acidification to pH < 4. Premature infants receive frequent feeds, which can induce a weaker acid secretory response than that observed in older infants and adults. As a consequence, gastric pH may be > 4 for prolonged periods, and reflux of gastric contents might be less acidic or even alkaline. Esophageal impedance monitoring can detect weakly acidic and even alkaline gastroesophageal reflux. The role of weakly acidic reflux in the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in preterm infants is not clear. To date, studies that have used impedance-pH in neonates assessed the association between nonacid reflux and cardiorespiratory symptoms, but no impedance data from healthy preterm neonates have been available to determine whether those symptomatic neonates had an increased number of weakly acidic reflux episodes or increased reactivity to a physiologic number of reflux events. Our aim with this study was to provide impedance-pH values for acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline reflux from healthy preterm neonates. METHODS: Esophageal impedance was recorded for 24 hours in 21 asymptomatic preterm neonates by replacing the conventional feeding tube with a specially designed feeding tube that included 9 impedance electrodes (8 French). All neonates were asymptomatic, with spontaneous breathing. Reflux monitoring was performed after comprehensive explanation and on receipt of written parental consent. Esophageal and gastric pH were monitored using a separate parallel pediatric catheter (6 French). According to the corresponding pH change, impedance-detected reflux was classified as acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline. For each infant, the total number of reflux events, the acid exposure and bolus exposure times at 2 cm above the respiratory inversion point, and average proximal extent of reflux were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-six preterm neonates were recruited into this study. A preliminary analysis was performed, and tracings were classified according to their quality and the presence of technical artifacts (spontaneous pH and impedance drifts, esophageal probe migration, and dysfunction of 1 or more impedance channels). Five studies were excluded because of 1 or more technical artifacts; a total of 21 neonates represent the final cohort included. At birth, the infants had a median postmenstrual age of 32 weeks, and the measurements were performed at a median age of 12 days. The total recording time was 23.7 +/- 2 hours. Gastric pH was higher than 4 during 69.3 +/- 20.4% of the recording time. The median number of reflux events in 24 hours was 71, 25.4% (range: 0%-53.1%) of which were acid, 72.9% (range: 45.3%-98.0%) were weakly acidic, and 0% (range: 0%-8.1%) were weakly alkaline. Compared with fasting periods, feeding periods tended to be associated with a higher number of total reflux events per hour. The acidity of reflux, however, was significantly different: during fasting, the number of acid reflux episodes per hour was higher, whereas during feeding, the number of weakly acidic reflux episodes was increased. Most reflux events were only liquid, whereas gas was present either mixed with liquid or pure only in 7.7% of all reflux episodes detected. The proximal esophageal segments were reached in 90% of reflux episodes. Reflux-related acid exposure (pH drops associated with impedance-detected reflux) was 1.66% (range: 0%-6.43%), whereas total acid exposure (associated and not associated with reflux detected by impedance) was 5.59% (range: 0.04%-20.69%). There was no relationship between the number or acidity of reflux events and anthropometric parameters such as weight and gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first study using 24-hour impedance-pH recordings in asymptomatic premature neonates. Previous studies that used pH-metry suggested that neonatal cardiorespiratory symptoms could be related to acid gastroesophageal reflux. However, pH-metry could not detect accurately weakly acidic or nonacid reflux. Our healthy premature neonates had approximately 70 reflux events in 24 hours, 25% of which were acid, 73% were weakly acidic, and 2% were weakly alkaline. The number of reflux events per hour (2-3 per hour) was slightly lower than that described in premature neonates with cardiorespiratory events (4 per hour). We confirmed that weakly acidic reflux is more prevalent than acid reflux, particularly so during the feeding periods. In contrast, similar to healthy adults, weakly alkaline reflux was very rare. We confirmed findings from previous studies in which most reflux events were pure liquid during both fasting and during postprandial periods and gas reflux was very rare. As in neonates with cardiorespiratory symptoms, the majority of reflux events in asymptomatic preterms reached the proximal esophagus or pharynx, and there were no differences between acid and weakly acidic reflux. The lack of differences between asymptomatic and diseased infants contravenes the hypothesis for macro- or microaspiration but does not exclude hypersensitivity to reflux as a cause for respiratory symptoms. The acid exposure that was related to reflux events and detected by impedance was significantly lower than the total acid exposure during 24 hours. Increased acid exposure could be attributable to pH-only reflux events or, less frequently, to slow drifts of pH from baselines at approximately 5 to values < 4. These changes were not accompanied by a typical impedance pattern of reflux but by slow drifts in impedance in 1 or 2 channels. Our findings confirm the need for the use of impedance together with pH-metry for diagnosis of all gastroesophageal reflux events. The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and cardiorespiratory events in neonates and older infants has been studied extensively. The current evidence for such a relationship is controversial. This study provides values of impedance-pH monitoring for acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline reflux from healthy preterm neonates that can be used for comparison when evaluating gastroesophageal reflux in preterm infants with a cardiorespiratory disease.

Buffers↗

Technology insight: The role of impedance testing for esophageal disorders.

Classic techniques like videofluoroscopy, stationary manometry, and ambulatory 24 h pH-metry are routinely used in the clinic to study patients with dysphagia, chest pain and reflux-related symptoms. Although these techniques have been very useful over the years, both for diagnosis and for therapeutic guidance, there are still many patients with dysphagia or chest pain who remain undiagnosed even after testing, and patients with typical and atypical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, with normal pH-metry findings, who do not respond adequately to antisecretory therapy. Esophageal impedance monitoring is a new technique that can be used alone and in combination with pH-metry and manometry to evaluate bolus transport and all types of gastroesophageal reflux (acid and nonacid). This review describes the esophageal impedance monitoring technique and summarizes the published validation studies that compare impedance monitoring with other methods, as well as normal values and reproducibility of impedance patterns and their association with symptoms.

Electric Impedance↗

New techniques to evaluate esophageal function.

Classical techniques like videofluoroscopy, stationary manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pH-metry are routinely used in the clinic to study patients with dysphagia, chest pain and reflux-related symptoms. Although many patients can be accurately diagnosed and their therapy successfully guided with these techniques, in many other patients, non-obstructive dysphagia or chest pain cannot be attributed to clear fluoroscopic or manometric abnormalities. Furthermore, ambulatory 24-hour pH-metry often shows a poor association between spontaneous acid reflux events and esophageal or extraesophageal symptoms, particularly in patients 'on' treatment. Non-obstructive dysphagia can be assessed with high-resolution manometry to detect segmental disturbances of peristalsis, increase in pressure gradient across the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) or abnormal axial movement of the LES during esophageal spasm. Impedance evaluation of bolus transit is a non-radiological method that can evaluate the functional relevance of manometric abnormalities. Patients with non-cardiac chest pain that do not respond to proton pump inhibitor therapy can be further assessed with intraluminal high-frequency ultrasound to detect sustained esophageal contractions of the longitudinal muscle layer. Impedance planimetry, with multimodal esophageal stimulation, may contribute to evaluate the sensitivity to mechanical, thermal and chemical stimuli. Finally, patients with persistent symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in spite of adequate treatment with proton pump inhibitors may still have weakly acidic reflux and/or bile reflux associated with their symptoms. These types of refluxates can now be detected with combinations of pH-impedance or pH-Bilitec monitoring. This review will describe the available new techniques to evaluate patients with non-obstructive dysphagia, non-cardiac chest pain and persistent gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

Electric Impedance↗

Gastroesophageal reflux and gastric emptying, revisited.

Total gastric emptying is delayed in 10% to 33% of adult patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but a strong correlation between duration of gastric emptying and severity of acid reflux or esophagitis has never been proved. Previous studies reported that patients with GERD might have exaggerated postprandial fundus relaxation with retention of food and triggering of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs). There is a positive correlation between postprandial fundus relaxation and number of TLESRs and also between proximal gastric emptying and esophageal acid exposure. However, new studies suggest that a high number of TLESRs and reflux events may occur even with accelerated gastric emptying, and prolonged gastric retention might be associated with less rather than more esophageal acid exposure. Using simultaneous gastric emptying and esophageal pH impedance we found that the rate of gastric emptying might determine the acidity and proximal extent of reflux: The slower the emptying, the higher the pH and proximal extent of the refluxate.

Gastric Emptying↗

Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux is a major problem in mechanically ventilated patients and may lead to pulmonary aspiration and erosive esophagitis. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations are the most common mechanism underlying reflux in nonventilated patients. The mechanisms that underlie reflux in critically ill ventilated patients have not been studied. The aim of this study was to determine the mechanisms underlying gastroesophageal reflux in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. METHODS: In 15 mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients, esophageal motility, pH, and intraluminal impedance (11/15 patients) were recorded for 1 hour before and 5 hours during continuous nasogastric feeding. RESULTS: Basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure was uniformly low (2.2 +/- 0.4 mmHg). The median (interquartile range) acid exposure (pH <4) was 39.4% (0%-100%) fasting and 32% (7.5%-94.2%) fed. Acid reflux occurred in 10 patients, but slow drifts in esophageal pH were also an important contributor to acid exposure. If esophageal pH decreased to pH <4, it tended to remain so for prolonged periods. A total of 46 acid reflux events were identified. Most (55%) occurred because of absent lower esophageal sphincter pressure alone; 45% occurred during straining or coughing. CONCLUSIONS: Gastroesophageal reflux in mechanically ventilated patients is predominantly due to very low or absent lower esophageal sphincter pressure, often with a superimposed cough or strain. These data suggest that measures that increase basal LES pressure may be useful to prevent reflux in ventilated patients.

Adult↗

Oesophageal intraluminal impedance can identify subtle bolus transit abnormalities in patients with mild oesophagitis.

In a subgroup of patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) or mild oesophagitis, acid clearance is prolonged in spite of favourable gravity and normal or minimally impaired oesophageal peristalsis. Dysphagia is rare in this group but might also be present or develop after anti-reflux surgery. The causal relationship between prolonged clearance or dysphagia and oesophageal body dysmotility in these patients is not completely clear. New techniques are now available to assess oesophageal motility and transit and might help to detect more subtle defects underlying functional impairment in patients with GORD. Combined video-fluoroscopy and intraluminal impedance indicate an excellent correlation between both methods in detecting oesophageal bolus transit. Combined intraluminal impedance and manometry has the capability to evaluate oesophageal contractions and bolus transit without the use of radiation. Subtle bolus transit abnormalities were identified in a small proportion of patients with mild oesophagits and normal oesophageal peristalsis. Outcome data are needed to evaluate the prognostic value of combined manometry-impedance in patients with GORD undergoing anti-reflux surgery.

Electric Impedance↗

Gastric fullness, physical activity, and proximal extent of gastroesophageal reflux.

OBJECTIVES: Proximal extent of gastroesophageal reflux (PER) is relevant for symptoms in GERD patients. It has been suggested that PER is determined by the volume of the refluxate that, in turn, might depend on the degree of gastric fullness. Abdominal straining, during ambulation, increases the likelihood of gastroesophageal reflux. We assessed the influence of gastric fullness and ambulation on proximal extent of reflux. METHODS: PER was assessed in 37 patients with GERD undergoing ambulatory pH impedance monitoring. In 14 controls and 19 GERD patients, esophageal pH impedance and gastric emptying were also studied simultaneously in stationary conditions. We compared PER during fasting, early postprandial (before half emptying), and late postprandial periods in ambulatory and stationary conditions. RESULTS: More reflux episodes reached the proximal esophagus in the postprandial period compared to fasting (60%+/-4 vs 29%+/-3, p<0.05). In stationary conditions, early postprandial reflux reached higher proximal extent than late postprandial reflux (15+/-3% vs 8+/-4%, p<0.05). The proportion of reflux events reaching the proximal esophagus was significantly higher in ambulatory than in stationary conditions (29+/-5% vs 15+/-3%, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared to fasting, reflux episodes occurring after the meals are more likely to reach higher proximal extent, particularly so during the early postprandial period. The highest proportion of postprandial proximal reflux occurred in ambulatory condition. These findings suggest that reducing meal volumes and early postprandial physical activity might contribute to decrease proximal extent of reflux and postprandial GERD symptoms.

Adult↗

New developments in detection of gastroesophageal reflux.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Esophageal pH monitoring has been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In many patients, however, there is a poor correlation between acid reflux episodes and symptoms. The high prevalence of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional heartburn associated with normal esophageal ph-metry and the nonnegligible proportion of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease refractory to adequate proton pump inhibitor therapy are now recognised. Efforts have been made to detect all types of gastroesophageal reflux and to increase the likelihood of documenting the relation between symptoms and reflux events by prolonging the recording periods. This review summarises the recent developments in detection of gastroesophageal reflux. RECENT FINDINGS: The focus for acid monitoring has been expanded from the conventional site at 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter to the entire esophageal body: from the squamocolumnar junction to the upper esophageal sphincter. A wireless pH monitoring system has been validated as an alternative to catheter pH monitoring and shows better tolerability. Finally, esophageal impedance monitoring, combined with ph-metry, allows detection not only of acid reflux but also of weakly acidic and alkaline reflux and promises to become an important clinical tool, particularly to assess gastroesophageal reflux in the postprandial period and in patients on proton pump inhibitor therapy with persistent symptoms. SUMMARY: Key developments in the recognition and diagnosis of all types of gastroesophageal reflux will have significant implication for understanding the pathophysiology of reflux disease and will influence clinical practice in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Electric Impedance↗

Influence of 5-HT1 receptor agonists on feline stomach relaxation.

Sumatriptan is known for its stomach relaxing properties in both humans and cats, but the receptor involved has not been characterized. In a barostat study the intragastric volume was monitored in sedated cats at constant pressure. The maximum intragastric volume increase after subcutaneous or intravenous administration of saline or agonists was registered [mean (n=4-5)]. Sumatriptan (0.01-1 mg kg(-1)) induced a dose-dependent intragastric volume increase vs. saline (4-15 vs. 5 ml, respectively) that was sometimes accompanied by retching after 8-10 min. Pre-treatment with nitric oxide-synthase inhibitors and different 5-HT(1) receptor antagonists N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinyl-cyclohexanecarboxamide(WAY-100635), 2-methyl-4-(5-methyl-[1,2,4]oxadiazol-3-yl)-biphenyl-4-carboxylic-acid[4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)-phenyl]amide(GR-127935), N-acetyl-5-hydroxytryptophyl-5-hydroxytryptophan-amide(5-HTP-DP) and 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-[4-(2-phthalimido)butyl]piperazine-HCl(NAN-190) did not affect the sumatriptan-induced effect. Alniditan (5-HT(1A/1D) receptor agonist) and flesinoxan (5-HT(1A) receptor agonist) did not induce significant intragastric volume changes. The 5-HT(1F) receptor agonists 5-hydroxy-3-(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)-1H-indole(BRL-54443) and (R)-(+)-N-(3-dimethylamino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-6-yl)-4-fluorobenzamide(LY-344864; 0.003-3 mg kg(-1)) however induced a dose-dependent intragastric volume increase (6-36 and 5-26 ml, respectively), no retching was seen. Our results suggest that stimulation of 5-HT(1F) receptors induces feline stomach relaxation. Whether the sumatriptan-induced gastric relaxation in cats is due to interaction with 5-HT(1F) receptors could not be proven absolutely in view of the lack of selective 5-HT(1F) receptor antagonists.

Animals↗

Acid, weakly acidic and non-acid gastro-oesophageal reflux: differences, prevalence and clinical relevance.

In patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), oesophageal symptoms and mucosal damage traditionally are related to acid-reflux episodes with pH lower than 4. Oesophageal or extra-oesophageal symptoms of GORD may also be associated with less acidic reflux (pH 4-7). New methodologies have evolved to complement pH monitoring for characterisation of less acidic gastro-oesophageal reflux. This review will focus on definition, detection, pathophysiology and symptom association of weakly acidic and non-acid reflux, in both adult and paediatric populations.

Adult↗

Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: Impedance monitoring is a new diagnostic method for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) where multiple impedance electrode pairs are placed on a standard pH catheter. It detects reflux of a liquid and/or gas bolus into the esophagus, as well as its distribution, composition, and clearing. The aim of this collaborative study is to define normal values for 24-h ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring (24-h Imp-pH), and compare bolus parameters by impedance monitoring to changes in [H(+)] measured by pH monitoring. METHODS: Sixty normal volunteers without GER symptoms underwent 24-h Imp-pH with impedance measured at six sites (centered at 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, and 17 cm above lower esophageal sphincter) and pH 5 cm above the LES. Reflux detected by impedance was characterized by the pH probe as either acid, weakly acidic, nonacid, or superimposed acid reflux. Proximal reflux was defined as reflux that reached the impedance site 15 cm above the LES. RESULTS: Reflux frequency was common upright (median-27, 25th and 75th quartile-16, 42), but rare recumbent (median-1; 0, 4). A median of 34% (14%, 49%) of upright reflux reached the proximal esophagus. There was a similar number of mixed composition (liquid + gas; 49%) and liquid-only reflux (51%). Acid reflux was two-fold more common than weakly acidic reflux (p < 0.001). Superimposed acid reflux and nonacid reflux were rare. Acid neutralization to pH 4 took twice as long as volume clearance measured by impedance. CONCLUSIONS: Combining impedance and pH monitoring improves the detection and characterization of GER. This study characterizes the frequency, duration, and extent of reflux in health and provides normal values for 24-h Imp-pH for future comparison with GERD patients.

Adult↗

A pilot study on duodenal acid exposure and its relationship to symptoms in functional dyspepsia with prominent nausea.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal hypersensitivity to acid and decreased duodenal clearance of exogenous acid have been reported in functional dyspepsia (FD). However, the relevance of these abnormalities to spontaneous duodenal acid exposure and dyspeptic symptoms in FD is unknown. AIMS: To determine spontaneous duodenal acid exposure and its relationship with symptoms, duodenal sensitivity to acid, and the effects of a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist on duodenal responses to acid in FD. METHODS: Eleven FD patients with prominent nausea and 11 healthy controls underwent 24-h ambulatory duodenal pH monitoring with assessment of dyspeptic symptoms. On the next day, duodenal bolus infusions of 5 ml of acid and normal saline were given in a randomized double-blind manner and repeated after ondansetron or a placebo. RESULTS: Nighttime duodenal acid exposure was similar, but FD patients had lower duodenal pH and higher duodenal % time (pH < 4) than controls during the daytime and in the second postprandial 2 h (p < 0.05). Seven patients (64%) with duodenal acid exposure above the normal range had higher severity scores for several dyspeptic symptoms including nausea. However, the symptom severity was poorly or weakly correlated to duodenal pH, and brief duodenal acid infusion did not affect any symptoms. Duodenal responses to exogenous acid were unaffected by 5-HT(3) receptor antagonism. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous duodenal acid exposure is increased in a subset of FD patients with prominent nausea, and this is associated with more severe dyspeptic symptoms. However, a direct relationship between duodenal acid exposure and symptom severity is lacking.

Adult↗

Pathophysiology of GERD in China: the same factors at a lower scale.

Most of the factors involved in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), previously described in European, Australian, and American studies, are present in Chinese patients with GERD, but at a lower scale. The acidity of gastric contents is reduced either spontaneously or by Helicobater pylori infection. A low-fat diet probably contributes to a more favorable gastric distribution of the meals, reduced obesity, and lowers the number of TLESRs. The prevalence of hiatal hernia is low and esophageal motility disorders are moderate. Like in Western countries, the pathophysiology of GERD in China is multifactorial, with variable combination of moderate abnormalities in individual patients, leading to milder forms of GERD.

Asian People↗

Influence of sildenafil on gastric sensorimotor function in humans.

After a meal, the proximal stomach relaxes probably through the activation of nitrergic neurons in the gastric wall. Nitric oxide-induced smooth muscle relaxation involves activation of soluble guanylate cyclase, with cGMP production, which is then degradated by phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sildenafil, a selective PDE-5 inhibitor, on fasting and postprandial proximal gastric volume and on gastric emptying rates in humans. A gastric barostat was used to study gastric compliance and perception to isobaric distension in healthy subjects before and after placebo (n = 13) or sildenafil, 50 mg (n = 15). In 10 healthy subjects, two gastric barostat studies were performed in randomized order to study the effect of placebo or sildenafil on postprandial gastric relaxation. Similarly, solid and liquid gastric emptying rates were studied in 12 healthy subjects. Sildenafil significantly increased fasting intragastric volume (141 +/- 15 vs. 163 +/- 15 ml, P < 0.05) and volumes of first perception. Sildenafil induced a higher and prolonged gastric relaxation either at 30 min (357 +/- 38 vs. 253 +/- 42 ml, P < 0.05) or 60 min (348 +/- 49 vs. 247 +/- 38 ml, P < 0.05) after the meal. Sildenafil did not alter solid half-emptying time but significantly delayed liquid emptying (43 +/- 4 vs. 56 +/- 4 min, P < 0.01). In conclusion, sildenafil significantly increases postprandial gastric volume and slows liquid emptying rate, confirming that meal-induced accommodation in humans involves the activation of a nitrergic pathway. The effect of sildenafil on gastric fundus suggests a therapeutic potential for phosphodiesterase inhibitors in patients with impaired gastric accommodation.

Adult↗

Dietary restrictions during ambulatory monitoring of duodenogastroesophageal reflux.

To avoid food impaction artifacts during ambulatory bile reflux monitoring (Bilitec), some groups have allowed only a liquid diet, while others omitted the meal and postprandial periods from the analysis. Our aim was to study whether Bilitec monitoring requires the use of a liquid diet. In 40 healthy subjects and 211 consecutive patients evaluated for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease, we performed ambulatory 24-hr esophageal pH and Bilitec monitoring. The subjects were randomized to either solid or liquid meals during the procedure. All patients underwent an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In healthy subjects, liquid and solid diets were followed by similar acid exposure of the distal esophagus. During bile reflux monitoring, major meal artifacts occurred in 19% of the patients using solid meals, but in none of the patients using liquid meals. With liquid meals, but not with solid meals, a progressive increase in duodenoesophageal reflux occurred with increasing severity of endoscopic lesions. With liquid meals, but not with solid meals, the prevalence of pathological exposure to duodenoesophageal reflux increased with increasing severity of endoscopic lesions. With liquid meals, the results of pH monitoring and bile reflux monitoring correlated better than with solid meals. Thus, ambulatory Bilitec monitoring requires the use of liquid meals, as the use of solid meals is associated with too many meal artifacts and a poorer correlation with acid reflux and severity of endoscopic lesions.

Adolescent↗

Gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects many patients and has a negative effect on quality of life. Along with the increasing prevalence of GERD is an increase in GERD-related complications, including Barrett esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. The past year has yielded new insights into the pathophysiology of GERD that can help us to better understand the relationship between reflux episodes and symptoms of mucosal damage and to provide a tailored treatment targeting individual pathophysiologic defects. The issues addressed in this report include gastric secretory and motor dysfunction; failure of the antireflux barrier caused by hiatal hernia and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations; characterization of the refluxate, particularly of nonacid reflux; prevalence and prognostic value of esophageal dysmotility in GERD; presence and eradication of Helicobacter pylori; Barrett esophagus and extraesophageal manifestations of GERD; and, finally, advances in medical, endoscopic, and surgical treatments of GERD.

Journal Article↗