Biomedical subjects

Daniel Thoenissen

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Thoenissen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Differential involvement of parietal and precentral regions in movement preparation and motor intention.

Flexible goal-oriented behavior relies on spatial coordinate transformations and motor control mechanisms, but also on the capability to take advantage of contextual information for steering the sensorimotor machinery. Although accurate performance of a sensorimotor task requires parietal and frontal regions, their differential contribution and functional relationship with other associative regions remains obscure. We have used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure human cerebral activity associated with motor cognitive processes in the context of delayed performance of an associative visuomotor task. Movement instruction (specified by visual cues) and motor performance (specified by an auditory cue) were separated by a variable delay period. By manipulating the predictive value of the instruction cue, we distinguished delay-related activity influenced by response probabilities (motor preparation and motor inhibition) from delay-related activity unaffected by the likelihood of providing a motor response (motor intention). We found delay-related activity distributed across a cerebral network involving not only frontal circuitry, but also extrastriate and mediotemporal regions. Areas showing motor intentions and preparatory responses were spatially intermingled. Posterior parietal cortex deviated from this pattern, showing delay-related activity regardless of movement probability, but no specific preparatory responses. These results suggest that posterior parietal cortex and dorsal precentral cortex play different strategic roles in handling associative visuomotor problems. While parietal regions cover a range of potential responses defined by the task setting, precentral regions focus on a likely movement. Temporo-prefrontal regions might incorporate contextual information in the visuomotor process by defining potential and probable responses on the basis of the task contingencies.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Multiple movement representations in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study.

Neurovascular correlates of response preparation have been investigated in human neuroimaging studies. However, conventional neuroimaging cannot distinguish, within the same trial, between areas involved in response selection and/or response execution and areas specifically involved in response preparation. The specific contribution of parietal and frontal areas to motor preparation has been explored in electrophysiological studies in monkey. However, the associative nature of sensorimotor tasks calls for the additional contributions of other cortical regions. In this article, we have investigated the functional anatomy of movement representations in the context of an associative visuomotor task with instructed delays. Neural correlates of movement representations have been assessed by isolating preparatory activity that is independent from the performance of an actual motor act, or from the presence of a response's target. Movement instruction (specified by visual cues) and motor performance (specified by an auditory cue) were separated by a variable delay period. We have used whole-brain event-related fMRI to measure human brain activity during the performance of such a task. We have focused our analysis on specific preparatory activity, defined as a sustained response over variable delay periods between a transient visual instruction cue and a brief motor response, temporally independent from the transient events. Behavioral and electrophysiological controls ensured that preparatory activity was not contaminated by overt motor responses or working memory processes. We report suggestive evidence for multiple movement representations in the human brain. Specific sustained activity in preparation for an action was found not only in parieto-frontal regions but also in extrastriate areas and in the posterior portion of the superior temporal sulcus. We suggest that goal-directed preparatory activity relies on both visuomotor and visuoperceptual areas. These findings point to a functional-anatomical basis for the integration of perceptual and executive processes.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Movement preparation and working memory: a behavioural dissociation.

We can cross temporal sensorimotor contingencies by remembering sensory events or by anticipating motor responses. Here we tested the hypothesis that sensory and motor representations can be accessed according to different temporal dynamics. We predicted that the manipulation of movement representations would lead to a performance independent from the length of a delay interposed between sensory instructions and behavioural responses. Conversely, we expected a delay-dependent performance whenever temporary storage of sensory information was necessary to solve the task. We have measured reaction times and error rate in subjects performing a delayed non-matching to sample task. Task contingencies rather than explicit instructions ensured that either sensory or motor representations were used to cross the delay period on each trial. We tested our hypothesis by manipulating the length of the delays between stimulus presentation and behavioural response. We found that carrying sensory material over temporal gaps affects performance as a non-linear function of time, whereas movement representations remain robust over a wide range of delays. This novel behavioural paradigm might prove effective in dissociating the neural bases of preparatory and mnestic processes in normal human subjects, as well as their disorders in neurological patients.

Adult↗