Biomedical subjects

Daniel Tremblay

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Tremblay.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Measurements of intrafraction motion and interfraction and intrafraction rotation of prostate by three-dimensional analysis of daily portal imaging with radiopaque markers.

PURPOSE: To measure the interfraction and intrafraction motion of the prostate during the course of external beam radiotherapy using a video electronic portal imaging device and three-dimensional analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen patients underwent implantation with two or three gold markers in the prostate before five-angle/11-field conformal radiotherapy. Using CT data as the positional reference, multiple daily sets of portal images, and a three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm, intrafraction translations, as well as interfraction and intrafraction rotations, were analyzed along the three principal axes (left-right [LR], superoinferior [SI], and AP). The overall mean values and standard deviations (SDs), along with random and systematic SDs, were computed for these translations and rotations. RESULTS: For 282 intrafraction translational displacements, the random SD was 0.8 mm (systematic SD, 0.2) in the LR, 1.0 mm (systematic SD, 0.4) in the SI, and 1.4 mm (systematic SD, 0.7) in the AP axes. The analysis of 348 interfraction rotations revealed random SDs of 6.1 degrees (systematic SD, 5.6 degrees ) around the LR axis, 2.8 degrees (systematic SD, 2.4 degrees ) around the SI axis, and 2.0 degrees (systematic SD, 2.2 degrees ) around the AP axis. The intrafraction rotational motion observed during 44 fractions had a random SD of 1.8 degrees (systematic SD, 1.0 degrees ) around the LR, 1.1 degrees (systematic SD, 0.8 degrees ) around the SI, and 0.6 degrees (systematic SD, 0.3 degrees ) around the AP axis. CONCLUSION: The interfraction rotations observed were more important than those reported in previous studies. Intrafraction motion was generally smaller in magnitude than interfraction motion. However, the intrafraction rotations and translations of the prostate should be taken into account when designing planning target volume margins because their magnitudes are not negligible.

Humans↗

PubMed2004

Performing daily prostate targeting with a standard V-EPID and an automated radio-opaque marker detection algorithm.

Online prostate positioning using gold markers and a standard video-based electronic portal imaging device is reported. The average systematic (random) errors have been reduced from 2.1 mm (2.7 mm) to 0.5 mm (1.5 mm) in AP direction, 1.1 mm (1.7 mm) to 0.7 mm (1.2 mm) SI and 1.2 mm (1.7 mm) to 0.6 mm (1.3 mm) LR.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

Automatic generation of anatomy-based MLC fields in aperture-based IMRT.

We have developed an algorithm to automatically generate anatomy-based MLC fields. For each beam, a first field is adjusted to the projection of the target in a beam's eye view, allowing subsequent fields to be derived from this conformal field by removing the overlapping surface of each organ at risk, respectively. The projections are based on a surface sampling of the anatomical structures. On top of the MLC mechanical constraints, verification constraints are imposed on the MLC segments, in order to get reliable dosimetry using a commercial dose calculation engine. Thus, in each direction, the aperture's cross-section must be greater than a specified threshold, in our case 2 cm. Furthermore, junctions are not tolerated in order to avoid underdosage, for instance from the tongue-and-groove effect. The use of such MLC fields simplifies the verification process. The performance of the algorithm is illustrated for head and neck, thorax and prostate cases. Only a fraction of a second of CPU time is required to perform the segmentation for each beam.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

Simultaneous optimization of beam orientations, wedge filters and field weights for inverse planning with anatomy-based MLC fields.

As an alternative between manual planning and beamlet-based IMRT, we have developed an optimization system for inverse planning with anatomy-based MLC fields. In this system, named Ballista, the orientation (table and gantry), the wedge filter and the field weights are simultaneously optimized for every beam. An interesting feature is that the system is coupled to Pinnacle3 by means of the PinnComm interface, and uses its convolution dose calculation engine. A fully automatic MLC segmentation algorithm is also included. The plan evaluation is based on a quasi-random sampling and on a quadratic objective function with penalty-like constraints. For efficiency, optimal wedge angles and wedge orientations are determined using the concept of the super-omni wedge. A bound-constrained quasi-Newton algorithm performs field weight optimization, while a fast simulated annealing algorithm selects the optimal beam orientations. Moreover, in order to generate directly deliverable plans, the following practical considerations have been incorporated in the system: collision between the gantry and the table as well as avoidance of the radio-opaque elements of a table top. We illustrate the performance of the new system on two patients. In a rhabdomyosarcoma case, the system generated plans improving both the target coverage and the sparing of the parotide, as compared to a manually designed plan. In the second case presented, the system successfully produced an adequate plan for the treatment of the prostate while avoiding both hip prostheses. For the many cases where full IMRT may not be necessary, the system efficiently generates satisfactory plans meeting the clinical objectives, while keeping the treatment verification much simpler.

Algorithms↗