PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Daniel van Steenberghe

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel van Steenberghe.

44 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

The efficacy of amine fluoride/stannous fluoride in the suppression of morning breath odour.

BACKGROUND: Breath odour is a complaint encountered worldwide, often linked to microbial overload in the oral cavity. This double blind, crossover, randomised study assessed the efficacy of several antiseptic mouthrinses or slurry vs. a control solution in the prevention of morning bad breath during an experimental period of 7 days without mechanical plaque control. METHODS: Sixteen dental students with a healthy periodontium abolished, after a thorough professional cleaning, all means of mechanical plaque control during five experimental periods of 7 days, interleaved by washout periods of at least 3 weeks. During each experimental period, as the only oral hygiene measure, the students rinsed twice a day with one of the following formulations (in a randomised order): a 0.2% chlorhexidine-alcohol mouthrinse (CHX-Alc), a 0.05% CHX + 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride + 0.14% zinc lactate mouthrinse (CHX-CPC-Zn), an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride (125 ppm F-/125 ppm F-) containing mouthrinse (AmF/SnF2Mr), a slurry of a tooth paste (AmF/SnF2Sl) containing amine fluoride (350 ppm F-) and stannous fluoride (1050 ppm F-) and a placebo solution (placebo). At days 0, 3 and 7, morning breath was scored via VSC level measurements of the mouth air, and organoleptic ratings of the mouth air and tongue coating. At the same visits both the degree of gingival inflammation and the de novo plaque formation were rated. At the end of each period a questionnaire for subjective ratings was completed and microbiological samples were taken from the tongue dorsum, the saliva and the supragingival plaque for anaerobic and aerobic culturing. RESULTS: Although oral hygiene during the experimental periods was limited to rinsing, bad breath parameters systematically improved (P < 0.001) with the three mouthrinses (CHX-Alc, CHX-CPC-Zn, AmF/SnF2Mr), with a superiority of the CHX-CPC-Zn solution when only VSC values were considered (P < 0.003). The AmF/SnF2 slurry and the placebo solution showed only minor changes with time. The three mouthrinses reduced significantly (P < 0.001) the bacterial load (aerobic & anaerobic) in the saliva (>or= 0.5 log reduction with a superiority (P < 0.005) for the CHX-Alc when compared to the two others). Changes in the bacterial load on the tongue dorsum could only be detected for the CHX-Alc solution (0.5 log). The antibacterial effect of the placebo solution and the slurry were negligible. The composition of microflora on the other hand did not reveal significant changes. The de novo supragingival plaque formation was significantly (P < 0.05) inhibited by the three mouthrinses with a slight superiority for the CHX-Alc solution. The degree of gingival inflammation at day 7 remained low (< 0.16) for all products. The CHX-Alc solution scored significantly worse for the subjective evaluation (questionnaires) concerning taste and sensitivity of tongue). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that morning breath odour can be successfully reduced by the sole twice daily use of CHX-Alc, CHX-CPC-Zn or AmF/SnF2Mr mouthrinses, which all significantly reduced the bacterial load in the saliva and retarded the de novo plaque formation.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: As the use of oral implants for the treatment of partially as well as fully edentulous patients has increased the past two decades, more specialized radiographic techniques have become available for the preoperative planning of oral implant placement. PURPOSE: The goal of this article was to enable clinicians to select the appropriate imaging techniques when planning for oral implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This artide reviews the available literature about various imaging techniques and their indication for the preoperative planning of oral implants. The advantages and drawbacks of each technique are described. A dosimetric overview is given relative to different radiologic techniques used in various clinical situations. RESULTS: For preoperative planning of implant placement, advantages and drawbacks of the available imaging techniques have been considered, which allows guidelines for image technique selection to be formulated based on the clinical situation provided, considering the diagnostic yield of each technique and the radiation doses involved. CONCLUSIONS: From the available literature, it can be stated that many clinical situations demand the use of cross-sectional imaging techniques for optimal preoperative planning of implant placement. Nevertheless, such techniques are not required in cases in which the clinical examination reveals sufficient bone width and where standard radiographic examinations, such as intraoral and panoramic radiography, reveal adequate bone height and space for implant placement.

Dental Implantation, Endosseous↗
PubMed2002

Topical review: modulation of trigeminal sensory input in humans: mechanisms and clinical implications.

In this review, the modulatory effects of tooth and implant loading, orofacial pain, and psychological factors on somatosensory and jaw-motor function in humans are assessed. Experimental studies on the control of jaw actions have revealed that patients with prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants show an impairment of fine motor control of the mandible. One possibility is that this may be related to the loss of afferent information from periodontal ligament mechanoreceptors, which results in considerably higher and more variable forces to hold and manipulate food between the teeth. However, psychophysical investigations have shown that patients still perceive mechanical stimuli exerted on osseointegrated implants in the jawbone. The use of somatosensory evoked potentials may revealed what specific receptor groups are responsible for this so-called osseoperception phenomenon. Orofacial pain is another modulator of trigeminal system functioning. Experimental jaw muscle pain has several effects on the somatosensory and motor function of the masticatory system, all of them serving to warn the individual about the ongoing damaging of tissues. Finally, the influence of mental state on the sensory and motor functions of the trigeminal system will be addressed. While some animal studies suggest that psychological stress can reduce acute pain, less speculative are the findings in human subjects that the anticipation of receiving a painful stimulus or undertaking difficult mental tasks can modulate jaw reflexes, including those evoked by mechanical stimuli applied to the teeth. Since such stimuli occur regularly during normal oral activities, the study of the resulting motor effects may yield clinically meaningful results in the context of other variables that modulate mandibular function.

Afferent Pathways↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present investigation was to examine to what extent precision data from 3-dimensional planning software for oral implants can be transferred to the operative field by means of a drilling template, containing high-precision drilling sleeves, fitted on the jawbone. It was investigated whether this procedure would allow advance preparation of a fixed definitive prosthesis that could be placed at the completion of surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This procedure was experimentally carried out in 2 cadavers and later in 8 consecutive human patients. RESULTS: The results indicated a nearly perfect match between the positions and axes of the placed implants and those planned. DISCUSSION: This procedure permitted the placement of a definitive fixed prosthesis with limited freedom of space between the abutments and the metallic cylinders incorporated into the prosthesis. CONCLUSION: These encouraging results of the Leuven information technology-based oral rehabilitation by means of implants (LITORIM) are presently being further investigated at the clinical level.

Cadaver↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome.

PURPOSE: This randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of splinted implants versus unsplinted implants in overdenture therapy over a 10-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample comprised 36 completely edentulous patients, 17 men and 19 women (mean age 63.7 years). In each patient, 2 implants (Brånemark System, Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) were placed in the interforaminal area. Three to 5 months after placement, they were connected to standard abutments. The patients were then rehabilitated with ball-retained overdentures, magnet-retained overdentures, or bar-retained overdentures (the control group). Patients were followed for 4, 12, 60, and 120 months post-abutment connection. Group means as well as linear regression models were fitted with attachment type and time as classification variables and corrected for simultaneous testing (Tukey). RESULTS: After 10 years, 9 patients had died and 1 was severely ill. Over 10 years, no implants failed. Mean Plaque Index, Bleeding Index, change in attachment level, Periotest values, and marginal bone level at the end of the follow-up period were not significantly different among the groups. DISCUSSION: The annual marginal bone loss, excluding the first months of remodeling, was comparable with that found around healthy natural teeth. CONCLUSION: The fact that no implants failed and that overall marginal bone loss after the first year of bone remodeling was limited suggested that implants in a 2-implant mandibular overdenture concept have an excellent prognosis in this patient population, irrespective of the attachment system used.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The importance of implant surface characteristics in the replacement of failed implants.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare the failure rates of implants with either a machined surface or a TiUnite surface used to replace failing implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The files of 578 patients, ie, of all patients who were treated at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospital in Leuven by means of oral implants during 3 recent consecutive years, were analyzed. The implants included in the study had an observation time ranging from 9 to 49 months. All patients had been provided with Brånemark System implants. Only 2 types of implant surfaces were used: machined and TiUnite. Data collection and analysis focused on the replacement implants, ie, implants placed at sites where the original implants had failed. Data were statistically analyzed by means of Statistica for Windows Software version 5.1; a Fisher exact P test was used. The level of significance was set at P = .05. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients experienced the nonintegration of 58 implants. Of those, 29 implants with a machined surface were replaced by implants with the same surface. Six of the replacement implants failed. Nineteen machined-surface implants were replaced by TiUnite surface implants; 1 failed. Ten TiUnite-surface implants were replaced by implants with the same surface; none failed. The difference in failure rate between machined-surface replacement implants and TiUnite replacement implants was statistically significant (P = .05). DISCUSSION: In addition to the usual patient-related compromising factors, replacement of a failing implant involves the challenge of achieving osseointegration in a nonpristine bone site. In the present study, implants with TiUnite surfaces were associated with fewer failures than machined-surface implants under the same conditions. CONCLUSION: An improved implant surface such as TiUnite may offer a better prognosis when a failed implant has to be replaced at the same site.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Facial development, continuous tooth eruption, and mesial drift as compromising factors for implant placement.

The replacement of teeth lost by children because of trauma can be an important indication for early implant therapy. Osseointegrated dental implants, like ankylosed teeth, alter position as growth-related changes occur within the jawbones (displacement, remodeling, mesial drift). Facial growth of the child and even of the adolescent, as well as the continuous eruption of the adjacent anterior teeth, create significant risk of a less favorable esthetic and/or functional outcome. For patients with a normal facial profile, the placement of an implant should be postponed until growth is complete. For patients with a short or long face type, further growth, especially the continuous eruption of adjacent teeth, creates a serious risk even after the age of 20 years, as illustrated by some recent clinical studies. This review aims to explain these phenomena and provides some recommendations for implant placement.

Adolescent↗