Antibiotic allergy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
Biomedical subjects
Daryl D DePestel
Publications and source records attributed to Daryl D DePestel.
Dalbavancin: a new option for the treatment of gram-positive infections.
OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, microbiology, chemistry, in vitro susceptibility, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, tolerability, dosage, and administration of dalbavancin, a new semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search, restricted to the English language, was conducted from 1966 through January 2006. Supplementary sources included program abstracts from the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, American Society of Microbiology, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America from 2000 to 2005 and information available from the manufacturer's Web site. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: In vitro and preclinical studies, as well as Phase I, II, and III clinical trials, were evaluated to summarize the microbiology, pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of dalbavancin. All published trials and abstracts citing dalbavancin were selected. DATA SYNTHESIS: Dalbavancin, a novel lipoglycopeptide, has a mechanism of action similar to that of other glycopeptides. It has in vitro activity against a variety of gram-positive organisms, but no activity against gram-negative or vancomycin-resistant enterococci that possess VanA gene. Due to its prolonged half-life (6-10 days), dalbavancin can be administered intravenously once weekly. In Phase II and III clinical trials, dalbavancin was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections, catheter-related bloodstream infections, and skin and skin-structure infections. To date, adverse events are mild and limited; the most common include pyrexia, headache, nausea, oral candidiasis, diarrhea, and constipation. CONCLUSIONS: Dalbavancin appears to be a promising antimicrobial agent for the treatment of gram-positive infections. A new drug application was filed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2004. The FDA issued an approvable letter in 2005 for dalbavancin. If approved, dalbavancin is expected to be launched in the first quarter of 2006.
Animals↗
Factors influencing the magnitude and clinical significance of drug interactions between azole antifungals and select immunosuppressants.
The magnitude of drug interactions between azole antifungals and immunosuppressants is drug and patient specific and depends on the potency of the azole inhibitor involved, the resulting plasma concentrations of each drug, the drug formulation, and interpatient variability. Many factors contribute to variability in the magnitude and clinical significance of drug interactions between an immunosuppressant such as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, or sirolimus and an antifungal agent such as ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, or posaconazole. By bringing similarities and differences among these agents and their potential interactions to clinicians' attention, they can appreciate and apply these findings in a individualized patient approach rather than follow only the one-size-fits-all dosing recommendations suggested in many tertiary references. Differences in metabolism and in the inhibitory potency of cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein influence the onset, magnitude, and resolution of drug interactions and their potential effect on clinical outcomes. Important issues are the route of administration and the decision to preemptively adjust dosages versus intensive monitoring with subsequent dosage adjustments. We provide recommendations for the concomitant use of these agents, including suggestions regarding contraindicated combinations, those best avoided, and those requiring close monitoring of drug dosages and plasma concentrations.
ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
Are cephalosporins adequate for antimicrobial prophylaxis for cardiac surgery involving implants?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
Incidence of carbapenem-associated allergic-type reactions among patients with versus patients without a reported penicillin allergy.
This retrospective analysis sought to determine the comparative incidence of cross-reactivity associated with carbapenem antibiotic treatment among patients with versus those without penicillin allergy. We sought to determine whether the incidence of cross-reactivity is different between imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem. A total of 211 patients were treated with a carbapenem antibiotic. Included were 100 patients with and 111 patients without a documented or reported penicillin allergy. Within each group, subgroups of penicillin-allergic and penicillin-nonallergic patients were balanced equally between imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem. The incidence of patients with a reported or documented penicillin allergy experiencing an allergic-type reaction to a carbapenem was 11%, which is 5.2 times greater than the risk in patients who were reportedly not allergic to penicillin (P=.024). No difference in the occurrence of allergic-type reactions was observed between the 2 carbapenems.
Adolescent↗
Magnitude and duration of elevated gastric pH in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus after administration of chewable, dispersible, buffered didanosine tablets.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that gastric pH would be elevated above pH 3.0 for at least 2 hours after administration of chewable, dispersible, buffered didanosine tablets. Doses tested were 200 mg (two 100-mg tablets) and 400 mg (two 200-mg tablets). We also sought to compare these doses with regard to maximum gastric pH (pHmax), time to pHmax (TpH-max), time that gastric pH exceeds 3.0 (TpH>3), and area under the gastric pH versus time curve for pH greater than 3.0 (AUCT>pH 3). DESIGN: Prospective, parallel-group, dose-comparison, gastric pH study. SETTING: General Clinical Research Center, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan. PATIENTS: Nineteen patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus, aged 30-62 years, and receiving long-term didanosine therapy. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent continuous gastric pH monitoring, using the Heidelberg capsule radiotelemetric pH monitoring device. After documentation of a fasting baseline gastric pH below 3.0, patients were given 180 ml of water (control phase), and gastric pH was allowed to return to baseline. After administration of a single, oral dose of didanosine 200 mg or 400 mg with 180 ml of water, gastric pH was recorded until pH remained below 3.0 for 10 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A mean pHmax of 8.6 (range 6.3-9.5) was achieved with a TpH-max of 4.1 minutes (range 1-12.0 min). Mean TpH>3 was 24.9 minutes (range 15-55 min), with an AUCT>pH 3 of 2.6 pH x min(-1) (range 1.2-6.9 pH x min(-1)). The two doses of didanosine tested did not differ significantly in mean gastric pH parameters. CONCLUSIONS: After administration of chewable, dispersible, buffered didanosine tablets, 200 or 400 mg, the mean duration of elevated gastric pH (TpH>3) was less than 30 minutes, with a range of 15-55 minutes. Characterization of the magnitude and duration of elevated gastric pH may allow for earlier administration of other pH-sensitive drugs. The short duration of elevated gastric pH may help explain the wide variability in didanosine bioavailability observed clinically.
Administration, Oral↗
Peritoneal dialysis fluid concentrations of linezolid in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium peritonitis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine linezolid concentrations in peritoneal dialysis fluid after multiple oral doses of the drug in a 46-year-old man with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium peritonitis who was undergoing peritoneal dialysis. METHODS: After administration of oral linezolid 600 mg twice/day was started, peritoneal dialysis fluid was collected at the end of several 4- and 8-hour dwell times and submitted for analysis of linezolid concentration. Before linezolid therapy was begun, and immediately after several peritoneal dialysis exchanges, 30 ml of expended peritoneal dialysis fluid was collected in a sterile container and immediately frozen at -70 degrees C until analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Peritoneal dialysis concentrations of linezolid greater than 4 microg/ml were achieved after the first dose of linezolid and maintained after repeated doses. During the course of therapy, mean linezolid concentrations in peritoneal dialysis fluid tended to increase (mean 7.60 pg/ml, range 3.54-16.2 microg/ml). All assayed peritoneal dialysis samples demonstrated linezolid concentrations greater than 4 microg/ml at the end of 4- or 8-hour dwell times, except for one level after a missed dose on linezolid treatment day 3. Duration of dwell times did not appear to correlate with linezolid concentrations. CONCLUSION: In this patient, linezolid 600 mg twice/day penetrated into peritoneal dialysis fluid at or above the concentrations necessary to treat common gram-positive bacteria. Linezolid therapy is likely to have a role in peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis based on its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, ease of administration, and tolerability.
Acetamides↗
The effect of an antimicrobial restriction program on Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance to beta-lactams in a large teaching hospital.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of beta-lactams and subsequent Pseudomonas aeruginosa sensitivity patterns before and after implementation of a clinical pharmacist-facilitated antimicrobial restriction program in August 1997. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive data collection. SETTING: Large university-affiliated medical center. INTERVENTION: The study results are the accumulation of the daily intervention activities of the antimicrobial restriction program. Data on antimicrobial grams purchased/1,000 patient-days and susceptibility patterns were collected and analyzed retrospectively. MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS: Annual grams of ceftazidime, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and other antipseudomonal beta-lactams purchased/1,000 patient-days were compared during the 2 full calendar years before the antimicrobial restriction program (1995-1996) with the 4 full calendar years after the program was implemented (1998-2001). Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance trends for the antipseudomonal beta-lactams, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin also were compared for the 2 years before the program (1995-1996) with the last 2 years of the program (2000-2001). A 44% reduction in ceftazidime use was documented; ostensibly, minimal changes occurred in the overall use of piperacillin and piperacillin-tazobactam. During the same time period, ceftazidime resistance fell from 24% to 11.8% (p<0.001), whereas piperacillin resistance fell from 32.5% to 18.5% (p<0.001). Imipenem resistance declined from 20.5% to 12.3% (p<0.001) with an 18% reduction in use. Aztreonam resistance declined from 29.5% to 16.5% (p<0.001) despite a 57% increase in use. No changes in resistance to either ciprofloxacin or tobramycin were found. CONCLUSION: Through an antimicrobial restriction program, a dramatic reduction in ceftazidime use was achieved with judicious use of other antipseudomonal antimicrobials, which resulted in reduced resistance of P aeruginosa to other beta-lactams.
Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
Linezolid clearance during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration: a case report.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the linezolid clearance and serum concentrations in a critically ill man receiving continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). METHODS: Intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours was administered to a critically ill, 85-year-old man with anuria who was receiving CVVHDF at a dialysate flow rate of 2000 ml/hour and a mean ultrafiltrate production rate of 775 ml/hour. Samples of blood and spent dialysate and ultrafiltrate were obtained at the time of linezolid peaks and troughs, and linezolid concentrations were determined. RESULTS: The CVVHDF yielded a mean linezolid clearance of 36.5 ml/minute and an elimination half-life of 7.5 hours. The linezolid saturation coefficient ranged from 0.77-0.81. Administration of intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours yielded suitable serum trough concentrations. CONCLUSION: Administration of intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours maintained therapeutic serum trough concentrations in this critically ill patient receiving CVVHDF.
Acetamides↗