PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David A Fishbain

Publications and source records attributed to David A Fishbain.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Genetic testing for enzymes of drug metabolism: does it have clinical utility for pain medicine at the present time? A structured review.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a structured review of genomic (genetic) testing for enzymes of drug metabolism. OBJECTIVES: Recently, industry began offering genomic testing for enzymes of drug metabolism. As such, the objective of this review was to determine if genomic testing for enzymes of drug metabolism has any imminent clinical relevance for the practice of pain medicine. METHODS: Relevant references relating to pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics, and the metabolizing of drugs used in pain medicine by cytochrome P-450 enzymes were located and reviewed in detail. The P-450 enzymes that metabolize each drug and whether that drug had been identified as being subject to a clinical consequence of a genetic polymorphism of the P-450 enzyme involved in its metabolism were placed into tabular form. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: 1) For a large number of drugs, we do not yet know which cytochrome P-450 enzymes are involved in their metabolism; 2) For a large number of drugs, the consequences of a P-450 genetic polymorphism have yet to be determined; 3) Genetic polymorphism can lead to important potential clinical consequences for some opioids, anticonvulsants (phenytoin), benzodiazepines (diazepam), muscle relaxants (succinylcholine), antidepressants (imipramine, nortriptyline, venlafaxine), typical neuroleptics, alcohol, antihypertensives (propranolol, timolol), local anesthetics (procainamide), L-dopa, nicotine, and warfarin. Based on these results, factors for and against using genomic testing were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: It was concluded that genomic testing for enzymes of drug metabolism has significant potential for improving the efficacy of drug treatment and reducing adverse drug reactions. Recommendations for when such testing would be useful are outlined.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2004

Are patients with chronic low back pain or chronic neck pain fatigued?

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were the following: to determine if fatigue is present in chronic low back pain (LBP) and chronic neck pain patients to a greater extent than in controls (nonpatients); to determine which variables are associated with the presence of fatigue; and to determine which of the above chronic pain patient (CPP) groups is more fatigued. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first such study in the literature. DESIGN: Totals of 175 chronic LBP and 33 chronic neck pain patients completed the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI), Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS), and Beck Depression Inventory rating scales on admission. In addition, an information tool was completed on each CPP and contained the following information: demographics, primary and secondary pain diagnoses, DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses assigned, pain location, pain precipitating event, type of injury, years in pain, number of surgeries, types of surgery, type of pain pattern, opioids consumed per day in morphine equivalents, workers' compensation status, and whether, according to the clinical examination, the pain did or did not have a neuropathic component. Scores on the MFI were then compared with published norms for controls (nonpatients) via chi-squared tests. Bivariate analyses were conducted between the MFI subscales and the variables selected for analysis. Pearson correlations, analyses of variance, and t-tests were used to test for relationships between MFI scale scores and the appropriate variables. In the next step of the analysis, stepwise regression analyses were used to predict each of the MFI subscale scores using the variables that were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) related to fatigue by the preceding analysis. In the final analysis, the variables that were significant predictors of the fatigue subscales were controlled for as covariates in an analysis of variance in order to determine if chronic LBP patients had scores on the MFI subscales that were significantly different from those of chronic neck pain patients. SETTING: Multidisciplinary pain facility. PATIENTS: Chronic LBP and chronic neck pain patients. RESULTS: Chronic LBP and chronic neck pain patients were found to be significantly more fatigued than controls (nonpatients). Most of the MFI subscale scores could be predicted by four major variables: presence of neuropathic pain, female gender, presence of depression, and total number of DSM-IV diagnoses. Chronic LBP patients were as fatigued as chronic neck pain patients. CONCLUSIONS: The complaint of fatigue appears to be a significant problem for chronic LBP and chronic neck pain patients. This complaint may be associated with neuropathic pain, female gender, and psychiatric comorbidities.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2004

Do the second-generation "atypical neuroleptics" have analgesic properties? A structured evidence-based review.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a structured, evidence-based review of all available studies on the potential effectiveness of the atypical neuroleptics for the treatment of pain (analgesia). To determine what evidence, if any, exists for, or against, the effectiveness of the atypical neuroleptics for analgesia. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been significant controversy over whether the conventional neuroleptics (non-atypicals) have analgesic properties. A recent review (Patt et al. 1994) did conclude that the evidence for effectiveness was sparse, except for methotrimeprazine. However, that review did not include a new class of neuroleptics: the atypicals such as olazapine, risperidone, quetiapine, etc. METHODS: A computer and manual search for studies relating to the atypicals and their analgesic effectiveness produced 10 studies/reports. These were reviewed in detail, and information relating to the above problem was abstracted and placed into tabular form. Each report was also categorized by the type of study it represented according to the guidelines developed by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). The strength and consistency of the evidence represented by the 10 studies were then categorized according to the AHCPR guidelines. Conclusions of this review were based on these results. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Of the 10 studies/reports, four were characterized by AHCPR guidelines as Type II (experimental), two were Type III (quasiexperimental), two were Type IV (nonexperimental), and two were Type V (case reports). Of these studies/reports, 90% indicated that the atypicals did have an analgesic effect. The overall strength and consistency of this evidence using the AHCPR guidelines was, therefore, categorized as B (generally consistent from Type II, Type III, and Type IV studies). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the above results, it was concluded that the reviewed data were generally consistent, suggesting that some of the atypicals may have an analgesic effect. There were, however, few double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, and many of the reports/studies had less than 50 patients. As such, this question requires further research.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2004

Modafinil for the treatment of pain-associated fatigue: review and case report.

Fatigue is a symptom that is frequently found in chronic pain patients with low back pain and/or neck pain. At the present time, no specific psychopharmacological treatment for this problem has been identified. Modafinil is a wakefulness-promoting agent that the FDA has approved for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy. There have been reports on the use of modafinil for the treatment of fatigue in various neurological syndromes. This literature is reviewed. As such, modafinil treatment was initiated for a patient with severe fatigue associated with chronic low back pain and neck pain. There was dramatic improvement in fatigue and associated function. This case is described. It is the first such case report in the literature. The significance of this finding to the treatment of pain-associated fatigue is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Do the proposed cervicogenic headache diagnostic criteria demonstrate specificity in terms of separating cervicogenic headache from migraine?

Diagnostic criteria for cervicogenic headache (CH) have been proposed. These criteria are controversial in that they appear to overlap or include characteristics that usually are attributed to migraine headache (MH). Whether these criteria are specific enough to separate CH patients from MH patients remains to be controversial. The literature on this issue is reviewed. In addition, the authors report the results of a study attempting to build a model of variables typically associated with CH or MH, which would identify patients with CH. A significant model could not be built that did not include MH symptoms. As such, it has been concluded that it is unlikely that the criteria for CH will have the specificity required to separate CH patients from MH patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Are opioid-dependent/tolerant patients impaired in driving-related skills? A structured evidence-based review.

Previous reviewers have concluded that opioids cause dose-related impairment in opioid-naive volunteers on psychomotor skills related to driving. Data relating to opioid-dependent/tolerant patients have not yet been reviewed. To determine what evidence, if any, exists for or against opioid-related driving skill impairment in opioid-dependent/tolerant patients, we performed a structured evidence-based review of all available studies addressing the issue of whether opioid-dependent/tolerant patients are impaired in driving-related skills. A computer and manual literature search for studies relating to opioid-dependent/tolerant patients and driving-related skills produced 48 relevant reports. These references were reviewed in detail, sorted, and placed into tabular form according to the following subject areas: (1) psychomotor abilities studies; (2) cognitive function studies; (3) effect of opioid dosing on psychomotor abilities studies; (4) motor vehicle driving violations and motor vehicle accident studies; and (5) driving impairment as measured in driving simulators and off/on road driving studies. For each topic area, each study was categorized for the type of study it represented according to guidelines developed by the Agency for Health Care Policy Research (AHCPR). The strength and consistency of the evidence in each subject area also then was categorized according to AHCPR guidelines and a quantitative method. This evidence-based review indicated the following: (1) There was moderate, generally consistent evidence for no impairment of psychomotor abilities of opioid-maintained patients; (2) There was inconclusive evidence on multiple studies for no impairment on cognitive function of opioid- maintained patients; (3) There was strong consistent evidence on multiple studies for no impairment of psychomotor abilities immediately after being given doses of opioids; (4) There was strong, consistent evidence for no greater incidence in motor vehicle violations/motor vehicle accidents versus comparable controls of opioid-maintained patients; and (5) There was consistent evidence for no impairment as measured in driving simulators off/on road driving of opioid-maintained patients. Based on the above results, it can be concluded that the majority of the reviewed studies appeared to indicate that opioids do not impair driving-related skills in opioid-dependent/tolerant patients. This evidence was consistent in four out of five research areas investigated, but inconclusive in one. As such, additional controlled studies are required. Until more data are available, however, physicians may wish to consider the approach to this problem recommended in this review.

Automobile Driving↗
PubMed2003

Relationships between functional capacity measures and baseline psychological measures in chronic pain patients.

The extent to which baseline psychological measures, pain, and compensation status are related to admission and posttreatment functional capacity and employment outcome was investigated. Four pass/fail functional capacity tests based on the DOT (Dictionary of Occupational Titles) classification system and previously shown to be predictive of treatment outcome in chronic pain patients were analyzed in relation to baseline measures of depression, state and trait anxiety, and perceived stress. Statistical tests of all measures with employment level at admission to treatment, 1 month follow-up and at long-term follow-up were also performed. The results showed that pain level and/or compensation status were the primary predictors of functional capacity and employment status at follow-up. Admission functional capacity measures were also predictors of employment outcome. Depression scores at admission predicted some admission functional capacity results, however, psychological scores were not as significantly related to discharge functional capacity tests. One functional capacity test, the crouching test, was an independent predictor of short- and long-term employment outcome. Trait anxiety was the only psychological factor that was independently predictive of long-term employment outcome. In conclusion, these results suggest that psychological variables are related to measures of functional capacity measured at admission. However, psychological measures at admission are not good predictors of later functional capacity measures. Functional capacity measures are important predictors of follow-up employment outcome, but return to work cannot be predicted without taking pain into account.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Is pain fatiguing? A structured evidence-based review.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a structured, evidence-based review of all available studies on the coexistence of fatigue and pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine what evidence, if any, exists for or against the existence of an association between fatigue and pain and a potential etiological relationship between pain and fatigue. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pain physicians have noted fatigue as a frequent complaint in chronic pain patients (CPPs), and previous studies have reported the association of fatigue and pain. METHODS: Computer and manual literature searches for studies relating to fatigue and pain produced 23 reports. These references were reviewed in detail, and information relating to the above problems was abstracted and placed into tabular form. Each report was also categorized for the type of study it represented according to the guidelines developed by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). In addition, a list of 15 quality criteria was utilized in order to measure the quality of each study. Each study was categorized for each criterion as positive, (criterion filled), negative (criterion not filled), or not applicable independently by two of the authors. A percent quality score was obtained for each study by counting the total number of positives obtained, dividing by 15 minus the total number of not applicable, and multiplying by 100. Only studies having a quality score of 75% or greater were utilized to formulate the conclusions of this review. The strength and consistency of the evidence represented by the remaining studies was then categorized according to the AHCPR guidelines. Conclusions of this review were based on those results. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Of the 23 reports, 17 had quality scores of 75% or greater. Of these 17 reports, 94.1% indicated that there was an association between fatigue and pain. In addition, 100% of a subgroup of 13 reports (all with quality scores of 75% or greater) indicated that there may be an etiological relationship between pain and fatigue. The overall strength and consistency of this evidence according to AHCPR guidelines was therefore categorized as A (highly consistent findings from multiple studies). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the above results, it was concluded that there is an association between fatigue and pain and that there may be an etiological relationship between pain and fatigue. Pain physicians and other pain treatment professionals should be aware of the high prevalence of fatigue in pain patients. In addition, future research might investigate possible mechanisms for the relationship between pain and fatigue.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2003

A structured evidence-based review on the meaning of nonorganic physical signs: Waddell signs.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a structured, evidence-based review of all available studies addressing the concept of nonorganic findings: Waddell signs (WSs). OBJECTIVES: To determine what evidence, if any, exists for the various interpretations for the presence of WSs on physical examination. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: WSs are a group of eight physical findings divided into five categories, the presence of which has been alleged at times to have the following interpretations: Malingering/secondary gain, hysteria, psychological distress, magnified presentation, abnormal illness behavior, abnormal pain behavior, and somatic amplification. At the present time, there is, therefore, significant confusion as to what these findings mean. METHODS: A computer and manual literature search produced 61 studies and case series reports relating to WSs. These references were reviewed in detail, sorted, and placed into tabular form according to the following subject areas: 1) Reliability (test-retest); 2) Reliability (inter-rater); 3) Reliability (factor analysis); 4) Validity, psychological distress; 5) Validity, correlation Minnesota Multiphasic Pain Inventory (MMPI); 6) Validity, correlation abnormal illness behavior; 7) Validity, other behaviors; 8) Validity, as a nonorganic phenomenon; 9) Validity, correlation pain drawing; 10) Validity, functional performance; 11) Validity, treatment outcome; 12) Validity, predicting surgical treatment outcome; 13) Validity, return to work outcome; 14) Validity, secondary gain correlation; and 15) Validity, pain correlation. Each study in each topic area was classified according to the type of study it represented according to the type of evidence guidelines developed by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). In addition, a list of 14 study quality criteria was used to measure the quality of each study. Each study was categorized for each criterion as positive, (criterion filled), negative (criterion not filled), or not applicable independently by two of the authors. A percent quality score was obtained for each study by counting the total number of positives obtained, dividing by 14 minus the total number of not applicables, and multiplying by 100. Only studies having a quality score of 75% or greater were used to formulate the conclusions of this review. The strength and consistency of the evidence represented by the remaining studies in each topic area (above) was then categorized according to the strength and consistency AHCPR guidelines. Conclusions of this review for each topic area are based on these results. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Of the 61 studies, four had quality scores below 75% and were not used to generate the results of this review. According to the AHCPR guidelines for strength and consistency of the reviewed data, the following results were obtained: 1) There was consistent evidence for WSs being associated with decreased functional performance, poor nonsurgical treatment outcome, and greater levels of pain; 2) There was generally consistent evidence for WSs not being associated with psychological distress, abnormal illness behavior, or secondary gain; 3) There was also generally consistent evidence that WSs are an organic phenomenon and that they cannot be used to discriminate organic from nonorganic problems; 4) There was inconsistent evidence that WSs do demonstrate inter-rater reliability, do not correlate with the neurotic triad of the MMPI, are associated with poorer surgical treatment outcome, and are associated with nonreturn to work; 5) There was little or no evidence that WSs demonstrate test-retest reliability, or reliable factors, and are associated with self-esteem problems, catastrophizing, or the nonorganic pain drawing. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the above results, the following conclusions were made: 1) WSs do not correlate with psychological distress; 2) WSs do not discriminate organic from nonorganic problems; 3) WSs may represent an organic phenomenon; 4) WSs are associated with poorer treatment outcome; 5) WSs are associated with greater pain levels; 6) WSs are not associated with secondary gain; and 7) As a group, WS studies demonstrate some methodological problems.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Medico-legal rounds: medico-legal issues and alleged breaches of "standards of medical care" in opioid rotation to methadone: a case report.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this medico-legal case report were the following: 1) To present an example of a medico-legal problem that developed as a result of a decision to rotate a chronic pain patient (CPP) to methadone in order to taper the CPP from oxycodone; 2) To present both the plaintiff's and defendant's expert witnesses' opinions as to if and where the care of that patient fell below the "standard of medical care;" and 3) Based on these opinions, to develop some recommendations on how, in the future, pain medicine physicians and other physicians should proceed, in order to avoid allegations of breach of "standards of care" when using methadone. METHODS: This is a case report of a CPP treated at a regional hospital pain clinic. Methadone rotation was used in order to taper the CPP from oxycodone because of addictive disease. RESULTS: During the rotation process, the CPP expired. This had medico-legal consequences. Expert witnesses differed as to whether methadone caused the death. CONCLUSION: Pain physicians should proceed with caution in using methadone for opioid rotation.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Is the location of nondermatomal sensory abnormalities (NDSAs) related to pain location?

OBJECTIVES: Nondermatomal sensory abnormalities (NDSAs) are alleged to be nonorganic physical findings, where one finds diminished sensation to light touch, pinprick, and, sometimes, other modalities fitting a "nondermatomal pattern." The presence of NDSAs has historically been classified as a conversion symptom. We wished to determine if, in chronic pain patients (CPPs), NDSA location was associated with pain location. METHODS: The setting was a multidisciplinary pain facility. Patients included in the study were those CPPs who, on physical examination by two independent examiners, were found to have NDSAs. NDSA location and pain location were recorded for each CPP. Chi-square analyses (Fisher exact tests) and Kappa statistics were used to test for a relationship between NDSA location and pain location in three patient groups: Pain, upper body only; pain, lower body only; and pain, both lower and upper body. RESULTS: Of 283 consecutive CPPs, 74 were found to have NDSAs, by both examiners, and to fulfill the inclusion criteria of this study. The relationship between NDSA location and pain location was found to be significant (Fisher exact test) for all three patient subsets: Upper body P < 0.05, lower body P < 0.0001, and upper and lower body P < 0.000001. Similarly, the relationship between NDSA location and pain location was found to be statistically significant for all three patient subsets using the Kappa statistic. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that NDSA location is associated with perceived pain location. This finding has implications for whether the presence of NDSAs is considered a conversion symptom.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Concurrent validity of an electronic descriptive pain scale.

The study objective was to assess the concurrent validity of the Electronic Descriptive Pain Scale (EDPS), a pain scale built into a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device. One hundred patients in an outpatient physiotherapy (PT) clinic participated (mean age 41.30 years, SD 13.95). Before and after a PT treatment, subjects rated their current pain intensity with the EDPS, a visual analogue scale, a numerical pain rating scale, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire's Present Pain Intensity. The results showed relatively high significant correlations between the EDPS and each of the other pain scales.

Adult↗