PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David Antoniucci

Publications and source records attributed to David Antoniucci.

47 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Does gender affect the clinical outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention?

This study sought to determine the impact of female gender on clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) due to predominant ventricular failure undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We analyzed gender-related differences in procedural, angiographic, and clinical outcomes in 208 consecutive patients with AMI complicated by CS. Out of 208 patients with CS, 65 were women and 143 men. Women were older than men (74 +/- 10 years vs. 66 +/- 12 years; P < 0.001) and had a greater incidence of a history of hypertension (43% vs. 29%; P = 0.041). The 6-month mortality rate was 42% in women and 31% in men (P = 0.157). There were no differences between groups in reinfarction rate and target vessel revascularization rate. Multivariate analysis showed age as the only variable independently related to the 6-month mortality, while female gender was not related to the risk of death. The benefit of early PCI is similar in women and men, and any potential referral bias in the use of PCI based on gender differences should be avoided.

Aged↗

Direct stenting with the Bx VELOCITY balloon-expandable stent mounted on the Raptor rapid exchange delivery system versus predilatation in a European randomized Trial: the VELVET trial.

AIMS: This study examined the six-month angiographic results of direct coronary stenting, and compared the nine-month safety, efficacy and cost of this strategy versus stenting after balloon predilatation. METHODS: In phase I of VELVET, 122 patients (mean age = 62.3 +/- 10.1 years, 77% male, 11% with diabetes) with angina pectoris or myocardial ischemia resulting from a single de novo 51% to 95% coronary stenosis underwent direct stenting. The endpoints of phase I included angiographic findings and rates of major adverse cardiac events up to six months of follow-up. In phase II, 401 patients (mean age = 61.3 +/- 10.8 years, 79% male, 16% with diabetes) with angina pectoris or documented myocardial ischemia resulting from single or multiple, de novo or restenotic, coronary lesions were randomized between direct stenting and stenting after predilatation. The immediate angiographic results, and clinical outcomes and costs associated with the two treatment strategies up to nine months of follow-up were compared. RESULTS: In phase I the mean diameter stenosis immediately before and after the procedure, and at six months was 61.7+/-9.4%, 13.5+/-6.3%, and 33.6+/-16.2%, respectively. The six-month binary restenosis rate was 11%. The overall rate of major adverse cardiac events, including two non-cardiac deaths, was 9.8%. In phase II, the success rates of the intended delivery strategies were 87.9% and 97.9% for direct stenting and predilatation, respectively (p < 0.001), while the procedural success rates were similar (93.9% vs 96.5%). Over a follow-up period of nine months, major adverse cardiac events rates were 12.0% and 10.9% in patients randomized to direct stenting and predilatation, respectively (non-significant). Analyses of the costs incurred up to nine months in each treatment group revealed a mean saving of e362 per patient in favor of the direct stenting strategy (non-significant). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a strategy of stenting preceded by balloon dilatation, direct stenting was associated with an equivalent procedural success rate, equivalent clinical results up to nine months of follow-up, and a reduction in procedural and in-hospital costs (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively), that was no longer significant after nine months.

Angina Pectoris↗

Preliminary experience with the Tsunami coronary stent: immediate and six-month clinical and angiographic results.

The Tsunami is a new, balloon-expandable, stainless steel, tubular coronary stent whose design is based on a number of radial, diamond-shaped cells joined by double connectors. The aim of this two-centre, prospective, nonrandomized study was to examine the procedural, in-hospital, and long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients undergoing angioplasty with the Tsunami stent. Sixty-one consecutive unselected patients were treated by means of the implantation of 74 Tsunami stents in 72 coronary lesions. Most of the patients (64%) had unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction. The baseline lesion morphology was complex in 76% of cases, and the mean lesion length was 14 +/- 6 mm. The procedural success rate was 98%. Mean percentage diameter of the stenosis decreased after the intervention from 79 +/- 12% to 10 +/- 6%. The in-hospital major adverse cardiac event rate was 3.3%. During the six-month follow-up, there was one cardiac death and nine subjects (14.5%) underwent target vessel revascularization. The six-month event-free survival rate was 80%. The angiographic restenosis rate was 17%: a focal or limited pattern (class I or II) was found in 43% of cases, whereas the remaining 57% had a proliferative morphology (class III or IV). In conclusion, this study indicates the good clinical and angiographic performance of the Tsunami coronary stent system in consecutive unselected patients.

Aged↗

Left ventricular remodeling after primary coronary angioplasty: patterns of left ventricular dilation and long-term prognostic implications.

BACKGROUND: We prospectively evaluated the prevalence, pattern, and prognostic impact of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) successfully treated with primary PTCA. The prevalence, course, and prognostic value of LV remodeling after primary PTCA are still to be clarified. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 284 consecutive patients with AMI treated with primary PTCA, serial echocardiographic and angiographic studies, within 24 hours (T1), at 1 (T2) and 6 months (T3) after AMI were performed. Long-term (61+/-14 months) clinical follow-up data were collected for 98.6% patients enrolled in the study. Overall, 85 (30%) patients showed LV dilation (>20% end-diastolic volume increase) at T3 as compared with T1. Early (from T1 to T2), late (from T2 to T3), and progressive dilation patterns (from T1 to T2 to T3) were detected in 42 (15%), 41 (14%), and 36 (13%) patients, respectively. Cardiac death and combined events rate was significantly higher among patients with than among those without LV dilation (P=0.005 and P=0.025, respectively). The pattern of LV dilation during 6 months did not significantly affect survival. Cox survival analysis identified end-systolic volume at T1 and age as baseline predictors and end-systolic volume at T3 and age as 6-month predictors of cardiac death, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LV remodeling after successful PTCA occurs despite sustained patency of the infarct-related artery and preservation of regional and global LV function. LV dilation at 6 months after AMI but not the specific pattern of LV dilation is clearly associated with worse long-term clinical outcome.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Abciximab therapy improves survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by early cardiogenic shock undergoing coronary artery stent implantation.

The impact of abciximab therapy on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who are undergoing infarct-related artery (IRA) stent implantation, which is complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) due to predominant ventricular failure has not been established, whereas concluded randomized trials comparing IRA stenting plus abciximab with IRA stenting alone in patients with AMI have produced conflicting results. Moreover, these trials have excluded patients with CS from randomization. This study sought to determine whether IRA stenting plus abciximab treatment has an impact on 1-month mortality compared with IRA stenting alone in consecutive patients with AMI complicated by CS due to predominant ventricular failure. Of 77 patients with CS and IRA stenting, 44 had abciximab therapy, whereas 33 underwent primary IRA stenting alone. There were no differences between groups in major baseline characteristics except for a higher incidence of women in the stent alone group compared with the abciximab group (36% vs 14%, p = 0.020). The 1-month overall mortality rate was 18% in the abciximab group and 42% in the stent alone group (p <0.020). There were no differences between groups in reinfarction and target vessel revascularization rates. Multivariate analysis showed that abciximab therapy was the only variable that was independently related to 1-month mortality (odds ratio 0.36; 95% confidence intervals 0.15 to 0.86, p = 0.021). The results of this study support the use of abciximab in patients with AMI complicated by CS who are undergoing IRA stent implantation. The mechanism of the clinical benefit of abciximab at 1 month was not related to the patency of the IRA.

Abciximab↗

Relation of time to treatment and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty.

The benefit of thrombolysis is dependent on time to treatment, but there is lack of evidence of this relation in patients undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The hypothesis that the relation of time to treatment to mortality is dependent on patient risk was tested in a series of 1,336 patients who underwent successful primary PTCA and were stratified into "low-risk" and "not low-risk" patient groups according to the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction criteria. After stratification, 942 patients (71%) were at not low risk, and 394 (29%) were at low risk. The 6-month mortality rate was 9.3% for not low-risk patients and 1.3% for low-risk patients (p <0.001). Among not low-risk patients, longer time to treatment was associated with increased age and a greater incidence of cardiogenic shock. Unadjusted mortality of the not low-risk patients increased from 4.8% to 12.9%, with increasing time to reperfusion up to 6 hours, whereas mortality of the low-risk group was constant, with an increased time to reperfusion. For the not low-risk group, the univariate analysis revealed a relation between time to treatment and mortality (odds ratio 1.35; 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.73, p = 0.017). Time to reperfusion was not an independent predictor of mortality at multivariate analysis. Mortality for not low-risk patients who undergo successful primary PTCA is related to the delay from symptom onset to treatment. The effects of other variables associated with a longer time to reperfusion may have a stronger impact on mortality, obscuring the incremental value of time to reperfusion at multivariate analysis.

Aged↗

Relation between preintervention angiographic evidence of coronary collateral circulation and clinical and angiographic outcomes after primary angioplasty or stenting for acute myocardial infarction.

It is unknown if collateral circulation (CC) has a beneficial effect on outcomes of patients who undergo mechanical intervention in the first hours after onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study analyzes the relation between CC and outcome in patients with AMI who underwent primary angioplasty or stenting within 6 hours of symptom onset. The analysis was performed in a series of 1,164 consecutive patients. The contribution of clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables to the angiographic and clinical outcomes was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model, respectively. Of 1,164 patients, 264 (23%) had angiographic evidence of CC. Patients with CC had a lower incidence of diabetes (11% vs 16%, p = 0.033), anterior AMI (41% vs 55%, p <0.001), cardiogenic shock (9% vs 14%, p = 0.029), anterograde TIMI grade flow >1 (10% vs 21%, p <0.001), and a greater incidence of preinfarction angina (43% vs 32%, p = 0.001), multivessel disease (59% vs 47%, p = 0.001), and total chronic occlusion (20% vs 10%, p <0.001). At 6 months, the mortality rate was lower in patients with CC compared with patients without CC (4% vs 9%, p = 0.011), whereas there were no differences in the incidence of reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and angiographic restenosis. After multivariate analysis, CC did not emerge as a significant variable in relation to 6-month clinical and angiographic outcomes. CC does not exert a protective effect in patients who undergo mechanical intervention in the first 6 hours of AMI onset.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Patterns of in-stent restenosis after placement of NIR gold-coated stents in unselected patients.

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis 6 months after the implantation of NIR gold-coated stents in an unselected patient population. One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients were treated with the implantation of 149 NIR gold-coated stents. The majority of the patients (52%) had unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction. The baseline lesion morphology was complex in 78% of cases; the mean lesion length was 18 +/- 5 mm. The procedural success rate was 97%. Subacute stent thrombosis occurred in three patients (2.6%). During the 6-month follow-up, there were 2 deaths and 22 subjects (19.5%) underwent target vessel revascularization. The 6-month event-free survival was 60%. The angiographic restenosis rate was 32%. In 83% of the cases, the morphology of the restenosis was proliferative; in the remaining 17%, it presented as total occlusion. In conclusion, the restenosis rate after NIR gold-coated stent implantation in high-risk patients is similar to that reported using other stent designs. However, restenosis was always diffuse, involving the overall stent length and extending beyond the margins, thus indicating a greater proliferative neointimal response to this device.

Aged↗

Percutaneous reperfusion of left main coronary disease complicated by acute myocardial infarction.

Previous studies have shown a benefit of a strategy of direct angioplasty and stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by early cardiogenic shock. However, few data exist for the subset of patients with left main trunk disease complicated by AMI and cardiogenic shock. We performed an analysis of patients with AMI who underwent mechanical intervention between January 1995 and December 2000. Out of 1,433 patients with ST segment elevation AMI treated with primary coronary angioplasty (PTCA), 22 patients (1.5%) had left main disease (LMD) as the culprit lesion. Baseline characteristics were age, 66 +/- 11 years; female gender, 9%; diabetes, 14%; previous myocardial infarction, 14%; mean systolic blood pressure, 77 +/- 24 mm Hg; time to treatment, 4.8 +/- 2.2 hr; TIMI 0-1, 77%; collateral flow (Rentrop grade >or= 2) 9%. The primary success rate was 91%. Primary stenting was performed in 17 patients (77%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 50%. All deaths were due to refractory shock. The 6-month survival rate was 41% +/- 1%, while the event-free survival rate was 27% +/- 10%. At 6-month follow-up, the mortality rate increased to 59%; the target vessel revascularization rate was 14%. A percutaneous mechanical intervention strategy in patients with left main disease complicated by AMI is feasible and effective, and patients discharged alive have a good mid-term prognosis.

Adult↗

Abciximab therapy improves 1-month survival rate in unselected patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing routine infarct artery stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: The impact of abciximab therapy on mortality in unselected patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing routine primary infarct-related artery (IRA) stent implantation is not yet defined, and previous randomized studies have produced conflicting results. METHODS: A strategy of IRA stenting alone as opposed to IRA stenting plus abciximab was compared in a series of 561 consecutive unselected patients with AMI. Abciximab treatment was strongly encouraged for all patients. The contraindication for abciximab therapy was a high risk of major bleeding as assessed by the operator before mechanical intervention. RESULTS: Of 561 patients, 348 patients underwent abciximab therapy and 213 underwent primary IRA stenting alone. The 1-month overall mortality rate was 2.9% in the abciximab group and 10.8% in the stent alone group (P <.001). The relative reduction in mortality rate was 73% for patients overall, 77% in the subset of patients aged < or =70 years (mortality rate, 1.2% vs 5.2%, P =.020), 57% in patients aged >70 years (7.7% vs 18%, P =.043), 63% in patients with cardiogenic shock (17% vs 46%, P =.022), and 77% in patients without cardiogenic shock (1.3% vs 5.6%, P =.002). Multivariate analyses on the basis of all patients, and on the subset of patients aged < or =70 years, showed that abciximab therapy was independently related to the risk of death at 1 month. No differences were seen between groups in the procedural success rate (99.1% vs 98.1%) or in the incidence rates of nonfatal reinfarction (0.3% vs 1.9%) or repeat target vessel revascularization (1.7% vs 1.9%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study strongly support the use of abciximab therapy in nonselected patients with AMI undergoing routine IRA stent implantation. The mechanism of the clinical benefit of abciximab was not related to the patency of the IRA.

Abciximab↗

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary chest pain unit for the assessment of coronary syndromes and risk stratification in the Florence area.

BACKGROUND: In patients seen at the emergency department (ED) with chest pain (CP), noninvasive diagnostic strategies may differentiate patients at high or intermediate risk from those at low-risk for cardiovascular events and optimize the use of high-cost resources. However, in welfare healthcare systems, the feasibility, accuracy, and potential benefits of such management strategy need further investigation. METHODS: A total of 13,762 consecutive patients with CP were screened, and their conditions were defined as high, intermediate, and low risk for short-term cardiovascular events. Patients at high and intermediate risk were admitted. Patients at low risk were discharged from the ED if first line (<6 hours, including electrocardiogram, troponins, and serum cardiac markers) or second line short-term evaluation (<24 hours, including echocardiogram, rest or stress 99m-Tc myocardial scintigraphy, exercise tolerance test, or stress-echocardiography) had negative results. Patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) were admitted. Patients without evidence of cardiovascular disease underwent screening for psychiatric and gastroesophageal disorders. Inhospital mortality rate was assessed in all patients. RESULTS: Among patients at high and intermediate risk (n = 9335), 2420 patients had acute myocardial infarction (26%, 10.6% mortality rate), 3764 had unstable angina (40%, 1.1% mortality rate), 129 had aortic dissection (1.4%, 23.3% mortality rate), and 408 had pulmonary embolism (4%, 27.6% mortality rate). The remaining 2614 had chronic coronary heart disease in the context of multiple pathology (n = 2256) or pleural or pericardial diseases (n = 358). Among patients at low risk (n = 4427), 2672 were discharged at <6 hours (60%, 0.2% incidence rate of nonfatal CAD at 6 months) and 870 patients were discharged at <24 hours (20%, no CAD at follow-up). The remaining 885 patients were recognized as having CAD (20%, 1.1% inhospital mortality rate). Finally, half of the patients without CAD had active gastroesophageal or anxiety disorders. CONCLUSION: An effective screening program with an observation area inside the ED (1) could be implemented in a public healthcare environment and contribute significantly to the reduction of admissions, (2) could optimize the management of patients at high and intermediate risk and succeed in recognizing CAD in 20% of patients at low risk, and (3) could allow screening for alternative causes of CP in patients without evidence of CAD.

Aortic Dissection↗