PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David B Johnston

Publications and source records attributed to David B Johnston.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Protein distribution in commercial wet- and dry-milled corn germ.

To identify high-valued coproducts from commercially processed corn germ, it was necessary to determine the effect of processing conditions on corn germ proteins. We found that significantly less protein was extracted from commercial wet-milled as compared to dry-milled corn germ using Tris, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer containing 14 mM 2-mercaptoethanol at 100 degrees C for 10 min. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) revealed a number of proteins with molecular masses ranging from approximately 10 to 66 kDa for the dry-milled corn germ as compared to only a few significant protein bands centered around 23 kDa in the wet-milled corn germ. The protein content of the wet- and dry-milled corn germ was approximately the same; however, nonprotein nitrogen values were significantly greater for the wet-milled than for the dry-milled germ. The distribution of fractionated germ protein freshly excised from the embryo of yellow dent corn kernels was more similar to that of dry-milled than wet-milled corn. SDS-PAGE of laboratory preparations of wet-milled corn germ more closely resembled commercial dry- than wet-milled corn germ, which could be attributed to limited microbial growth during steeping in the laboratory preparations.

Agriculture↗

Improvement in fermentation characteristics of degermed ground corn by lipid supplementation.

With rapid growth of fuel ethanol industry, and concomitant increase in distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), new corn fractionation technologies that reduce DDGS volume and produce higher value coproducts in dry grind ethanol process have been developed. One of the technologies, a dry degerm, defiber (3D) process (similar to conventional corn dry milling) was used to separate germ and pericarp fiber prior to the endosperm fraction fermentation. Recovery of germ and pericarp fiber in the 3D process results in removal of lipids from the fermentation medium. Biosynthesis of lipids, which is important for cell growth and viability, cannot proceed in strictly anaerobic fermentations. The effects of ten different lipid supplements on improving fermentation rates and ethanol yields were studied and compared to the conventional dry grind process. Endosperm fraction (from the 3D process) was mixed with water and liquefied by enzymatic hydrolysis and was fermented using simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. The highest ethanol concentration (13.7% v/v) was achieved with conventional dry grind process. Control treatment (endosperm fraction from 3D process without lipid supplementation) produced the lowest ethanol concentration (11.2% v/v). Three lipid treatments (fatty acid ester, alkylphenol, and ethoxylated sorbitan ester 1836) were most effective in improving final ethanol concentrations. Fatty acid ester treatment produced the highest final ethanol concentration (12.3% v/v) among all lipid supplementation treatments. Mean final ethanol concentrations of alkylphenol and ethoxylated sorbitan ester 1836 supplemented samples were 12.3 and 12.0% v/v, respectively.

Culture Media↗

Membrane separation of solids from corn processing streams.

Corn processing streams are characterized by high water content. Removal of water and recovery of solids are major economic and logistical challenges. New technologies are needed to modify processing streams and to reduce variability and improve quality of coproducts. The objective was to determine the effectiveness of microfiltration and ultrafiltration systems in altering water, solids (protein) and ash contents of corn processing streams. Corn was either steeped with SO(2) (STW) or soaked (SKW) in water; STW contained more solids than SKW. Ultrafiltration of STW and SKW had little effect on water removal or solids recovery. Corn was processed by a conventional wet milling process and a wet milling process that used enzymes to eliminate use of SO(2) steeping. Protein streams from the conventional process (CG) and the enzymatic process (EG) were processed by microfiltration. Permeate streams from EG and CG had higher total solids and ash concentrations than retentate streams; much of the ash was recovered in permeate (67% and 83%, respectively). For CG, proteins were largely recovered in retentate, whereas for EG, proteins were recovered in permeate. SDS-PAGE data indicated a decrease in size of proteins in the EG process stream. Permeate streams from microfiltration were subject to ultrafiltration; there was little effect on solids and nutrient separations.

Chemical Fractionation↗

Fermentation of "Quick Fiber" produced from a modified corn-milling process into ethanol and recovery of corn fiber.

Approximately 9% of the 9.7 billion bushels of corn harvested in the United States was used for fuel ethanol production in 2002, half of which was prepared for fermentation by dry grinding. The University of Illinois has developed a modified dry grind process that allows recovery of the fiber fractions prior to fermentation. We report here on conversion of this fiber (Quick Fiber [QF]) to ethanol. QF was analyzed and found to contain 32%wt glucans and 65%wt total carbohydrates. QF was pretreated with dilute acid and converted into ethanol using either ethanologenic Escherichia coli strain FBR5 or Saccharomyces cerevisiae. For the bacterial fermentation the liquid fraction was fermented, and for the yeast fermentation both liquid and solids were fermented. For the bacterial fermentation, the final ethanol concentration was 30 g/L, a yield of 0.44 g ethanol/g of sugar(s) initially present in the hydrolysate, which is 85% of the theoretical yield. The ethanol yield with yeast was 0.096 gal/bu of processed corn assuming a QF yield of 3.04 lb/bu. The residuals from the fermentations were also evaluated as a source of corn fiber oil, which has value as a nutraceutical. Corn fiber oil yields were 8.28%wt for solids recovered following pretreatment.

Biomass↗