PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David Britt

Publications and source records attributed to David Britt.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Langmuir monolayer approaches to protein recognition through molecular imprinting.

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM) have been employed to investigate ferritin adsorption to binary surfactant monolayers of cationic dioctadecyldimethylammonium bromide (DOMA) and non-ionic methyl stearate (SME). Surfactant molar ratios, miscibility, and lateral mobility were controlled to define the number, size, and distribution of "binding sites" for ferritin, which under the low ionic strength conditions investigated, adsorbed to the monolayers predominantly through electrostatic interactions. Successive adsorption/desorption cycles revealed that fluid monolayers, capable of laterally restructuring during the initial protein adsorption event, bound up to 60% more ferritin (dependent on SME:DOMA ratios) as compared to monolayers that were immobilized on a hydrophobic support during this first adsorption step. The enhanced binding of ferritin to fluid monolayers was accentuated in films having non-ionic SME as the principal component. These findings support the premise that the surfactants reorganize to form favorable interactions with an adsorbing protein, leading to protein specific charge patterns, or templates, in the films. Template assessment, however, was complicated by the presence of an irreversibly bound protein fraction, which AFM revealed to be locally ordered protein clusters.

Adsorption↗

Electrostatic force microscopy analysis of lipid miscibility in two-component monolayers.

Electrostatic force microscopy (EFM) was used to assess lipid miscibility and phase behavior in two-component Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) monolayers composed of cationic dioctadecyldimethylammonium bromide (DOMA) and nonionic methyl stearate (SME) lipids. The surface potential measurements were calibrated by applying known bias voltages to the sample during several line scans, thus creating surface potential "scale bars" on the images from which it was determined that circular domains were 50 mV more positive than the surrounding phase. As the spatially averaged surface potential of DOMA was over 400 mV more positive than that of SME, this 50-mV surface potential difference is too low to correspond to lipid phase separation (immiscibility) in the two-component film. Rather, the surface potential contrast was attributed to an increased packing density and a more orthogonal orientation of lipids in the domains resulting in a greater contribution of dipoles to the measured (normal) surface potential. Monolayers prepared by sequentially spreading the two lipids resulted in irregular domains that were 50-450 mV more positive than the surrounding phase, representing varying degrees of lipid mixing, restricted by two-dimensional diffusion at the interface. Fluorescent images of monolayers stained with negatively charged dye supported the EFM miscibility prediction and assignment of surface potential. These results demonstrate a new approach using EFM to quantitatively measure surface potential in order to assess the lateral distribution of components in thin films as well as predict adsorption patterns to heterogeneous interfaces.

Adsorption↗