PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David Coons

Publications and source records attributed to David Coons.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Risks to the superior gluteal neurovascular bundle during percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion: an anatomical cadaver study.

BACKGROUND: Iliosacral screws are a popular technique used to treat complicated injuries of the pelvis. It is well recognized that this technique entails some potentially disabling complications, including damage to vessels and lumbosacral nerves. The recommended insertion site for iliosacral screws into the S1 body lies along the posterior ilium between the greater sciatic notch and the iliac crest. The anatomy and course of the superior gluteal nerve and vessels have been described along the outer aspect of the posterior ilium. Injury to the superior gluteal nerve and vessels has been reported during pelvic surgery, including the insertion of iliosacral screws. The purpose of this study is to assess the risks of injury and proximity of percutaneously inserted iliosacral screws to the superior gluteal nerve and vessels using a cadaver model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine cadaver pelvises for a total of 58 sides (58 screws) were studied. Percutaneous iliosacral screws were placed into the first sacral bodies using multiplanar fluoroscopic guidance. The superior gluteal neurovascular bundle was then studied via a posterior dissection. Injury to the neurovascular bundle was noted if it occurred, and the distance between the screw head and the neurovascular bundle was measured. Distances from the screw head to the crista glutea, greater sciatic notch, and iliac crest were also measured. RESULTS: The branching pattern of the superior gluteal nerve and vessels after they exit the greater sciatic notch demonstrated considerable variation, but was generally consistent with prior descriptions in most cases. Ten of 58 (18%) iliosacral screws caused injury to the superior branch of the superior gluteal nerve and vessels; 8 neurovascular bundles were impaled and 2 others were partly entrapped between the screw head and the ilium. The mean distance from the head of the iliosacral screws to the deep superior branches of the superior gluteal nerve and vessels was 9.1 mm (+/- 6.8 mm). The mean distances from the screw head to the crista glutea, sciatic notch, and iliac crest were 19.5 mm (+/- 4.9 mm), 33.0 mm (+/- 6.4 mm) and 50.3 mm (+/- 4.6 mm). Of the screws that caused superior gluteal nerve and vessels injury, all were within the "desired" area of insertion. CONCLUSIONS: The deep superior branch of the superior gluteal nerve and vessels, which provides major blood and nerve supply to the G. medius and G. minimus, is at significant risk during the percutaneous placement of iliosacral screws even when "well placed" and soft tissue protecting cannulas are used. The clinical effects of these injuries remain poorly understood.

Bone Screws↗

Standard multiplanar fluoroscopy versus a fluoroscopically based navigation system for the percutaneous insertion of iliosacral screws: a cadaver model.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficiency of standard multiplanar fluoroscopy (StdFluoro) and virtual fluoroscopy (VirtualFluoro) for use in the percutaneous insertion of iliosacral screws. DESIGN: : Human cadaver study comparing 2 imaging modalities during iliosacral screw insertion; imaging randomized from side to side. SETTING: Bioskills laboratory in a medical school. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine embalmed whole human cadavers without prior hip or pelvic surgery. INTERVENTION: Iliosacral screws were inserted into the S1 bodies using a percutaneous insertion technique. Screws were inserted on one side using StdFluoro, and on the other side, screws were placed using VirtualFluoro. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Time necessary for imaging preparation, screw insertion, and actual fluoroscopy were recorded. Accuracy and safety of screw placement was assessed using computed tomography and an anatomic dissection of the pelvis. RESULTS: : Fifty-six of 58 iliosacral screws were placed within the desired bony corridor of the posterior pelvis. One screw placed using each method was inserted erroneously, but both were relatively minor deviations. There were no obvious injuries to major vessels or nerve roots. The total surgical time required for preparation of imaging and screw insertion averaged 7.3 minutes using StdFluoro and 6.7 minutes using VirtualFluoro (P = 0.4). Although the time necessary for screw insertion using VirtualFluoro averaged only 3.5 minutes, compared to 7.0 minutes for StdFluoro (P < 0.05), this time savings was offset by that required for application and calibration of tracking devices when using VirtualFluoro. The average fluoroscopy time using StdFluoro method was 26 seconds, whereas that for the VirtualFluoro was only 6 seconds (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the percutaneous iliosacral screws were safely inserted using StdFluoro and VirtualFluoro, and total surgical times were similar using both methods. As VirtualFluoro continues to evolve, improved efficiency in operative times may be expected. Currently, the most beneficial aspect of using VirtualFluoro during the insertion of percutaneous iliosacral screws appears to be significantly decreased use of fluoroscopy when compared to StdFluoro.

Aged↗