PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David D Pothier

Publications and source records attributed to David D Pothier.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

'Choose and Book' in ENT: the GP perspective.

OBJECTIVES: 'Choose and Book' is a UK government initiative devised to allow a greater freedom of choice for National Health Service patients. The system is designed to give patients a choice of hospitals and appointment times, as well as giving their general practitioner (GP) more responsibility for appropriate prioritization. We set out to determine the attitudes of UK GPs to the new Choose and Book project and to assess the impact that these changes are likely to have on ENT practice. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey. METHODS: Five hundred GPs were sent a questionnaire about the planned Choose and Book referral project. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty GPs (76 per cent) replied to the questionnaire after reminders were sent. Most were aware of the project and had been sent information about it. Of those who had heard of it, 61.5 per cent did not think it was a good thing. Most stated that both they and their patients were satisfied with current prioritization practices. Many GPs would be willing to delegate responsibility for prioritization to non-clinical staff. Important time and responsibility issues were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of GPs were not in favour of Choose and Book. Many cited difficulties with time constraints and an inflexible system as factors that made Choose and Book unacceptable.

Appointments and Schedules↗
PubMed2006

Should we apply suction during fine needle cytology of thyroid lesions? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a well-established investigation in thyroid disease. Fine needle sampling without aspiration (FNS) is less commonly used but often easier to perform. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages but, as yet, there is no agreement on which method produces better specimens for cytological diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a review of the literature and performed a meta-analysis of the results of four cross-over trials. RESULTS: The resulting odds ratio favoured FNS (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.88-1.11) but was not statistically significant. A fifth paper not included in the meta-analysis reported results in favour of FNS (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from the meta-analysis that one method is superior to the other; however, taking into consideration all available evidence, it seems that FNS may be easier to perform and may produce better samples.

Biopsy, Fine-Needle↗
PubMed2006

Do information sheets improve patient satisfaction in the out-patient department?

INTRODUCTION: Time spent waiting to see a doctor in the out-patient department is a significant source of dissatisfaction for patients. Out-patient staff are often repeatedly questioned about the running of the clinic and why a delay has developed. These complaints and requests often result in further delays to the clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An information sheet was written to answer these questions. We set out to determine if the distribution of these sheets increased patient satisfaction with waiting times in the outpatient setting. Twelve sequential ENT clinics at the Lister Hospital, Stevenage were randomised into two groups. Patients attending clinics in Group A (n = 103) received an information sheet while those attending clinics in Group B (n = 124) received no information sheet. At the end of their clinic visit, all patients completed a questionnaire in which they were asked to provide a rating of their levels of satisfaction with various experiences in the out-patient department on a rating score from 1 to 5. RESULTS: We found levels of satisfaction regarding waiting times to be significantly higher in the group who received information sheets (P < 0.001). No verbal complaints were received by the nursing staff at clinics where the information sheet was distributed. Four verbal complaints were received at the clinics where no sheets were distributed. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the use of information sheets is a cost-effective method of improving patient satisfaction and that this is a useful tool both in the primary care setting and in hospital out-patient departments.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed2005

Referral letters: are we prioritizing consistently?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the levels of intra- and inter-grade variability of the vetting of general practice (GP) letters as well as the intra-rater reliability of letter prioritization. DESIGN: Prospective assessment of letter vetting and questionnaire survey. SETTING: Three otolaryngology secondary referral centres in Bristol and Bath, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve consultants, nine registrars, four staff and associate specialists (SAS) and 16 senior house officers (SHOs) in otolaryngology. METHODS: Fifty GP letters (not including 'fast-track' referrals) addressed to one of the ENT departments were chosen sequentially. These were anonymized, photocopied and included in the questionnaire to all participating staff. Participants were asked to vet the letters as 'urgent', 'soon' or 'routine' according to supplied waiting time criteria. The same letters were sent out again six weeks later. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between grades for the mean number of letters vetted into each category. Intra-grade variability was high; the number of letters vetted urgent varied from one out of 50 to 15 out of 50 for the consultants. The intra-rater reliability was high. CONCLUSION: The grade of trainee seems to make little difference with regard to ability to prioritize referrals, but within grades there is little agreement on what constitutes an urgent referral. We suggest further research, looking at the final outcome of patients, needs to be done to try to establish evidence-based guidelines to assist with letter vetting.

Correspondence as Topic↗
PubMed2005

The use of drains following thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a meta-analysis.

The use of suction drains following thyroid and parathyroid surgery is controversial. Although there have been several prospective and retrospective studies carried out on this subject, no paper had sufficient power to provide a suitable answer to whether or not drains should be used routinely. We present the first formal meta-analysis of the data from eight randomized controlled trials on this subject. The result of the meta-analysis showed that there is no difference in complication rates between patients in whom drains have been used routinely and those in whom they have not.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Sphenopalatine artery ligation: technical note.

Epistaxis is a common problem. Most patients presenting to hospital will stop bleeding with simple first-aid measures or with nasal packing. Those who do not stop will usually require surgical management. For persistent posterior epistaxis, the sphenopalatine artery may be ligated as the artery leaves the sphenopalatine foramen to enter the nasal mucosa of the lateral wall of the nose. This may be performed endoscopically. We describe the anatomy of the area and the surgical technique. We also present a brief review of the literature on this technique.

Epistaxis↗