PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David E Manthey

Publications and source records attributed to David E Manthey.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Report of the Task Force on National Fourth Year Medical Student Emergency Medicine Curriculum Guide.

This manuscript reports recommendations of the National Fourth Year Medical Student Emergency Medicine Curriculum Guide Task Force. This task force was convened by 6 major emergency medicine organizations to develop a standardized curriculum for fourth year medical students. The structure of the curriculum is based on clerkship curricula from other specialties such as internal medicine and pediatrics. The report contains a historical context, global and targeted needs assessment, goals and objectives, recommended educational strategies, implementation guidelines, and suggestions on feedback and evaluation.

Advisory Committees↗
PubMed2005

Impact of the Liaison Committee on Medical Education requirements for emergency medicine education at U.S. schools of medicine.

The Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) accredits complete and independent medical education programs leading to the MD degree. The LCME standards for accreditation are described in the online document "Functions and Structure of a Medical School." There are ongoing minor and major changes to these standards. This article examines how the newest LCME requirements may affect emergency medicine (EM) rotations. The descriptions focus on 1) how the LCME requirements affect EM educational activities and 2) how the department of EM can help the school of medicine meet the LCME requirements. The recommendations focus on the general areas of the instructional setting, components of the educational program, resources for medical students, and faculty development. The department of EM can provide the students at the school of medicine with a number of key experiences and opportunities through its educational offerings and graduate medical education programs that will help satisfy the LCME standards. The new LCME standards will also have a significant impact on the way EM educators/clerkship directors develop curricula, assess students, provide feedback, and develop their own faculty/residents as teachers. The leadership of EM should recognize their increasingly important role within the school of medicine and be sensitive to additional requirements for faculty development and scholarship.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2004

Referral of emergency department patients for pneumococcal vaccination.

OBJECTIVES: To determine what proportion of eligible patients, when referred to a primary care physician for pneumococcal vaccination with a prescription, actually obtain the vaccination. To ascertain the number of eligible patients who would receive the vaccination in the emergency department (ED), if available. METHODS: The authors surveyed a convenience sample of patients presenting to an urban ED during a four-month period. Eligible patients were referred to specific sites with a prescription to be immunized. Data on those referred were collected by review of medical record and telephone follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 2,299 surveys were distributed; 338 patients declined to participate, yielding an 85% response rate. The total number of patients identified as having an indication for the pneumovax was 711 (36%). Of these, 411 were not previously vaccinated; 167 of the 411 had a contraindication to vaccination. The remaining 244 qualified for referral to receive the pneumococcal vaccine. One hundred thirty-one of these accepted referral prescription. Of the patients given prescriptions, 12 followed up and received the vaccine, 81 did not follow up, and 38 were lost to follow-up. Seventy-four percent of patients would have received the pneumovax in the ED if it had been available. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of ED patients who used prescription referral to the primary care network for pneumococcal vaccination was approximately 10%. The use of a referral by prescription method in this setting was not a reliable means of increasing the number of patients receiving the pneumococcal vaccination.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

A comparison of oral, tympanic, and rectal temperature measurement in the elderly.

This cross-sectional study enrolled 95 elderly Emergency Department patients aged 60 years or more to determine if rectal temperatures identify fevers more often than oral or tympanic temperatures when the chief complaint suggests an infection. A fever was defined as a temperature greater than 38 degrees C (100.4 degrees F). Discordance was defined as any patient with an oral or tympanic temperature of 38 degrees C or less but manifesting a rectal temperature greater than 38 degrees C and 0.5 degrees C (1 degrees F) greater than the oral or tympanic temperature. Rectal thermometry identified a fever in 14 of 95 (14.7%) patients who were afebrile orally and in 11 of 90 (12.2%) patients who were afebrile tympanically. Five of 90 (5.6%) patients were febrile rectally but were afebrile by both oral and tympanic thermometry. Thus, rectal thermometry identified fevers missed orally and tympanically in elderly patients whose presentation suggested infection. To identify these febrile patients with possible infection, clinicians must be attentive to elderly patients' vague clinical presentation.

Aged↗