PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David E Taylor

Publications and source records attributed to David E Taylor.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect of pre-transplantation prednisone on survival after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: It is routine practice to discontinue corticosteroids or at least reduce the dose to or=0.42 mg/kg/m(2) per day). The LD Group also included 75 patients never prescribed steroids before lung transplantation (n = 139). RESULTS: A comparison of survival rates between LD and HD Cohorts showed better survival in the LD group, p value by log rank for LD vs HD <0.01. Other than having more emphysema patients (53/139, 40%) and fewer idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients (21/139, 16%) in the LD group (p < 0.01), pre-transplantation characteristics between the 2 cohorts were similar. In addition, the LD Group had more bilateral lung recipients (p < 0.01). During the first 100 days after transplantation, 20 HD (20/62) patients and 16 LD (16/139) died (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Survival in the LD Cohort was strikingly better than for patients receiving >or=0.42 mg/kg/m(2) per day. Deaths in the early post-operative period for the HD Group may be related to steroid-induced complications such as poor wound healing and serious infections. A pre-lung transplantation steroid dose adjusted for body mass index of >or=0.42 mg/kg/m(2) per day may be associated with increased complications and worse survival after lung transplantation. Further studies are warranted to confirm these results.

Adolescent↗

Coagulation in sepsis.

Activation of the coagulation cascade during invasive infection can result in purpura fulminans, with rapid progression of tissue ischemia, or may manifest as abnormal clotting indices alone. Although severe derangements in coagulation are associated with organ dysfunction and increased mortality, the contribution of coagulopathy to the pathophysiology of sepsis remains incompletely understood. Over the past decade, investigators have evaluated several therapeutic anticoagulant strategies in sepsis, and manipulation of the coagulation system has emerged as a key concept in the current management of this disease. Clinical observations during treatment of septic patients with the endogenous anticoagulant activated protein C have stimulated additional study of interactions between endothelial injury, coagulation, and inflammation. This review describes clotting abnormalities during sepsis and discusses the clinical experience with therapeutic strategies intended to oppose excessive coagulation.

Animals↗

Hemodynamic monitoring in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Hemodynamic monitoring of critically ill patients, especially those who have ALI or ARDS, is a widely practiced compilation of techniques that largely have not been demonstrated to improve patient outcomes. Indeed, some techniques, such as use of the PAC, may actually be harmful. It seems unlikely that monitoring devices themselves are unreasonably risky to use. Rather it seems more likely that operator errors in gathering and interpreting hemodynamic data and in selecting the appropriate treatment strategies are the culprits. There is promise that ongoing clinical trials and better provider education will soon result in evidence-based recommendations for monitoring the circulation in this patient population.

Blood Pressure Determination↗

Success of lung transplantation without surveillance bronchoscopy.

BACKGROUND: No current evidence demonstrates improved survival or decreased rate of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) despite regularly scheduled fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) with transbronchial biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage (TBB/BAL) after lung transplantation. Reduced lung function detected with spirometry or oximetry in symptomatic and asymptomatic lung allograft recipients (LARs) may be a more appropriate indication for bronchoscopic sampling. HYPOTHESIS: Clinically indicated TBB/BAL without routine invasive surveillance sampling of the transplanted lung does not decrease survival or increase the rate of BOS in LARs. METHODS: We reviewed 91 consecutive LARs transplanted at Ochsner Clinic between January 1995 and December 1999. Clinical indications for FOB with TBB/BAL include 10% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second below baseline; 20% decrease in forced expiratory flow rate between 25% and 75% of the forced vital capacity; or unexplained respiratory symptoms, signs, or fever. Along with demographic and clinical data, 1-year and 3-year survival rates for these 91 LARs were compared with 5,430 LARs from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Registry transplanted during the same 60-month period. Ten of the 91 patients did not survive to hospital discharge after transplantation. We divided the remaining 81 LARs into 2 subsets: Group A patients (n = 43) underwent zero to 1 TBB/BAL and Group B patients (n = 38) required more than 1 procedure. Demographic data, rejection, infection, and incidence of BOS were compared between groups. RESULTS: The 1-year and 3-year survival rates in the Ochsner LAR cohort were 85% and 73%, respectively, vs 72% and 57% in the ISHLT cohort p < 0.01. The relative risks of death in the Ochsner group at 1- and 3-years were 0.56 (0.35-0.91) and 0.66 (0.48-0.92), respectively, p < 0.05. The median (range) follow-up was 910 days (60-1,886) for Group A and 961 days (105-1,883) for Group B, p = not significant. We observed twice as many patients with cystic fibrosis and twice as many pneumonia episodes in Group B. The rate of acute rejection in each group was not statistically different. The cumulative incidence of BOS was increased in Group B at 1 year and at 3 years (5% and 56%) when compared with Group A (3% and 13%), p < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings from this observational, single-institution study, clinically indicated TBB/BAL without routine surveillance sampling of the lung allograft is unlikely to pose greater risk than does regularly scheduled bronchoscopy after lung transplantation.

Adult↗