PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David Ehrenberg

Publications and source records attributed to David Ehrenberg.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Long-term effects of storage and thermal cycling on the marginal adaptation of provisional resin crowns: a pilot study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Provisional resin crowns may be used for an extended period while complex treatments are completed. The crowns function intraorally; therefore, moisture absorption and thermal cycling may affect the physical properties of acrylic resin, causing a change in marginal gap size. PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the effect of long-term water absorption and thermal cycling on marginal gap size of polymethyl methacrylate copolymer and bis-acrylic composite resin crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specimens (n = 10) were fabricated from 2 acrylic resins: a polymethyl methacrylate (Alike) and a bis-acrylic composite resin (Provitec). Specimens were first fabricated on a metal master die. Custom die stems were fabricated for each specimen from a low-fusing alloy (Cerroblend) to eliminate the factor of polymerization shrinkage. Specimens were then fitted to assure a standardized, pre-experimental marginal gap range of < or = 25 microm. Specimens were stored in a humidor at 37 degrees C and 97% relative humidity for 1 year and subsequently thermal cycled (5 degrees C to 60 degrees C, 6-second dwell time, for 8000 cycles). Measurements in micrometers of the marginal gap were recorded using a microscope equipped with a digital video camera and image analysis software before and after treatment. A 2-way analysis of variance with a split design was performed for factors of materials and treatment (alpha = .05). RESULTS: For the factor of material, there was no significant difference; however, there was a significant difference between treatments, with a significantly greater increase in marginal gap size after thermal cycling (P < .002). CONCLUSION: Provisional crowns made from either a bis-acrylic resin composite or a polymethyl methacrylate copolymer demonstrated loss of marginal adaptation during a simulated long-term period of service.

Acrylic Resins↗

Sensory responses from loading of implants: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Osseointegrated implants lack a periodontal ligament. Nevertheless, masticatory function in subjects with implant-supported restorations appears similar to function in those with natural dentition. It is not clear how the neurophysiologic mechanisms that modulate jaw movement are associated with osseointegrated implants. This study examined the output from the inferior alveolar nerve during implant loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 3 dogs, 3 premolars were extracted in the mandible and 2 endosseous titanium implants were placed, allowed to osseointegrate for 3 months, and loaded with vibration force at the threshold response for tooth vibration, at 2x threshold, and at 3x threshold. Neurophysiologic recordings were made from the inferior alveolar nerve during loading of both implants and the adjacent molar and canine. The response magnitude in action potentials in the 50- ms poststimulus period and latency of inferior alveolar afferents in milliseconds were compared following implant loading. RESULTS: Detectable inferior alveolar nerve responses were recorded following loading from both the implants and the teeth at 2x and 3x threshold. However, the response magnitude of teeth (canine, 2.38 +/- 0.18 at 2x, 2.78 +/- 0.2 at 3x; molar, 2.2 +/- 0.16 at 2x, 2.5 +/- 0.21 at 3x) was twice that of the implants (anterior, 1.3 +/- 0.12 at 2x, 1.68 +/- 0.13 at 3x; posterior, 0.8 +/- 0.1 at 2x, 1.53 +/- 0.15 at 3x). The differences in response magnitude between the teeth and implants were significant (P < .05). The latency of response was similar. DISCUSSION: Management of the occlusion for implant-supported restorations has been empirically developed. An underlying assumption has been that implant-guided jaw function lacks significant proprioception to modulate mastication and related jaw movements. This animal study provides preliminary evidence that force application to implants does elicit a proprioceptive response. CONCLUSION: Loading of implants does elicit a sensory response that can be observed in the inferior alveolar nerve. The implications are that during occlusal function, information from regions associated with the implant can provide knowledge that could potentially modulate jaw activity in a manner similar to natural teeth.

Action Potentials↗